INSPIRE Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe
D2.8.III.5 Data Specification on Human Health and Safety – Technical Guidelines
Title |
D2.8.III.5 Data Specification on Human Health and Safety – Technical Guidelines |
Creator |
Temporary MIWP 2021-2024 sub-group 2.3.1 |
Date of publication |
2024-01-31 |
Subject |
INSPIRE Data Specification for the spatial data theme Human Health and Safety |
Publisher |
INSPIRE Maintenance and Implementation Group (MIG) |
Type |
Text |
Description |
This document describes the INSPIRE Data Specification for the spatial data theme Human Health and Safety |
Format |
AsciiDoc |
Licence |
|
Rights |
Public |
Identifier |
|
Changelog |
https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/technical-guidelines/releases/tag/v2024.1 |
Language |
en |
Relation |
Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) |
Foreword
How to read the document?
This document describes the "INSPIRE data specification on Human Health and Safety – Technical Guidelines" version 3.0 as developed by the Thematic Working Group (TWG) HH using both natural and a conceptual schema language.
The data specification is based on a common template[1] used for all data specifications, which has been harmonised using the experience from the development of the Annex I, II and III data specifications.
This document provides guidelines for the implementation of the provisions laid down in the draft Implementing Rule for spatial data sets and services of the INSPIRE Directive. It also includes additional requirements and recommendations that, although not included in the Implementing Rule, are relevant to guarantee or to increase data interoperability.
Two executive summaries provide a quick overview of the INSPIRE data specification process in general, and the content of the data specification on Human Health and Safety in particular. We highly recommend that managers, decision makers, and all those new to the INSPIRE process and/or information modelling should read these executive summaries first.
The UML diagrams (in Chapter 5) offer a rapid way to see the main elements of the specifications and their relationships. The definition of the spatial object types, attributes, and relationships are included in the Feature Catalogue (also in Chapter 5). People having thematic expertise but not familiar with UML can fully understand the content of the data model focusing on the Feature Catalogue. Users might also find the Feature Catalogue especially useful to check if it contains the data necessary for the applications that they run. The technical details are expected to be of prime interest to those organisations that are responsible for implementing INSPIRE within the field of Human Health and Safety, but also to other stakeholders and users of the spatial data infrastructure.
The technical provisions and the underlying concepts are often illustrated by examples. Smaller examples are within the text of the specification, while longer explanatory examples and descriptions of selected use cases are attached in the annexes.
In order to distinguish the INSPIRE spatial data themes from the spatial object types, the INSPIRE spatial data themes are written in italics.
The document will be publicly available as a 'non-paper'. It does not represent an official position of the European Commission, and as such cannot be invoked in the context of legal procedures. |
Legal Notice
Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication.
Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services – General Executive Summary
The challenges regarding the lack of availability, quality, organisation, accessibility, and sharing of spatial information are common to a large number of policies and activities and are experienced across the various levels of public authority in Europe. In order to solve these problems it is necessary to take measures of coordination between the users and providers of spatial information. The Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council adopted on 14 March 2007 aims at establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) for environmental policies, or policies and activities that have an impact on the environment.
INSPIRE is based on the infrastructures for spatial information that are created and maintained by the Member States. To support the establishment of a European infrastructure, Implementing Rules addressing the following components of the infrastructure have been specified: metadata, interoperability of spatial data sets (as described in Annexes I, II, III of the Directive) and spatial data services, network services, data and service sharing, and monitoring and reporting procedures.
INSPIRE does not require collection of new data. However, after the period specified in the Directive[2] Member States have to make their data available according to the Implementing Rules.
Interoperability in INSPIRE means the possibility to combine spatial data and services from different sources across the European Community in a consistent way without involving specific efforts of humans or machines. It is important to note that "interoperability" is understood as providing access to spatial data sets through network services, typically via Internet. Interoperability may be achieved by either changing (harmonising) and storing existing data sets or transforming them via services for publication in the INSPIRE infrastructure. It is expected that users will spend less time and efforts on understanding and integrating data when they build their applications based on data delivered in accordance with INSPIRE.
In order to benefit from the endeavours of international standardisation bodies and organisations established under international law their standards and technical means have been utilised and referenced, whenever possible.
To facilitate the implementation of INSPIRE, it is important that all stakeholders have the opportunity to participate in specification and development. For this reason, the Commission has put in place a consensus building process involving data users, and providers together with representatives of industry, research and government. These stakeholders, organised through Spatial Data Interest Communities (SDIC) and Legally Mandated Organisations (LMO)[3], have provided reference materials, participated in the user requirement and technical[4] surveys, proposed experts for the Data Specification Drafting Team[5], the Thematic Working Groups[6] and other ad-hoc cross-thematic technical groups and participated in the public stakeholder consultations on draft versions of the data specifications. These consultations covered expert reviews as well as feasibility and fitness-for-purpose testing of the data specifications[7].
This open and participatory approach was successfully used during the development of the data specifications on Annex I, II and III data themes as well as during the preparation of the Implementing Rule on Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services[8] for Annex I spatial data themes and of its amendment regarding the themes of Annex II and III.
The development framework elaborated by the Data Specification Drafting Team aims at keeping the data specifications of the different themes coherent. It summarises the methodology to be used for the development of the data specifications, providing a coherent set of requirements and recommendations to achieve interoperability. The pillars of the framework are the following technical documents[9]:
-
The Definition of Annex Themes and Scope describes in greater detail the spatial data themes defined in the Directive, and thus provides a sound starting point for the thematic aspects of the data specification development.
-
The Generic Conceptual Model defines the elements necessary for interoperability and data harmonisation including cross-theme issues. It specifies requirements and recommendations with regard to data specification elements of common use, like the spatial and temporal schema, unique identifier management, object referencing, some common code lists, etc. Those requirements of the Generic Conceptual Model that are directly implementable are included in the Implementing Rule on Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services.
-
The Methodology for the Development of Data Specifications defines a repeatable methodology. It describes how to arrive from user requirements to a data specification through a number of steps including use-case development, initial specification development and analysis of analogies and gaps for further specification refinement.
-
The Guidelines for the Encoding of Spatial Data defines how geographic information can be encoded to enable transfer processes between the systems of the data providers in the Member States. Even though it does not specify a mandatory encoding rule it sets GML (ISO 19136) as the default encoding for INSPIRE.
-
The Guidelines for the use of Observations & Measurements and Sensor Web Enablement-related standards in INSPIRE Annex II and III data specification development provides guidelines on how the "Observations and Measurements" standard (ISO 19156) is to be used within INSPIRE.
-
The Common data models are a set of documents that specify data models that are referenced by a number of different data specifications. These documents include generic data models for networks, coverages and activity complexes.
The structure of the data specifications is based on the "ISO 19131 Geographic information - Data product specifications" standard. They include the technical documentation of the application schema, the spatial object types with their properties, and other specifics of the spatial data themes using natural language as well as a formal conceptual schema language[10].
A consolidated model repository, feature concept dictionary, and glossary are being maintained to support the consistent specification development and potential further reuse of specification elements. The consolidated model consists of the harmonised models of the relevant standards from the ISO 19100 series, the INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model, and the application schemas[11] developed for each spatial data theme. The multilingual INSPIRE Feature Concept Dictionary contains the definition and description of the INSPIRE themes together with the definition of the spatial object types present in the specification. The INSPIRE Glossary defines all the terms (beyond the spatial object types) necessary for understanding the INSPIRE documentation including the terminology of other components (metadata, network services, data sharing, and monitoring).
By listing a number of requirements and making the necessary recommendations, the data specifications enable full system interoperability across the Member States, within the scope of the application areas targeted by the Directive. The data specifications (in their version 3.0) are published as technical guidelines and provide the basis for the content of the Implementing Rule on Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services[12]. The content of the Implementing Rule is extracted from the data specifications, considering short- and medium-term feasibility as well as cost-benefit considerations. The requirements included in the Implementing Rule are legally binding for the Member States according to the timeline specified in the INSPIRE Directive.
In addition to providing a basis for the interoperability of spatial data in INSPIRE, the data specification development framework and the thematic data specifications can be reused in other environments at local, regional, national and global level contributing to improvements in the coherence and interoperability of data in spatial data infrastructures.
Human Health and Safety – Executive Summary
The INSPIRE Human Health and Safety (HH) theme describes "the geographical distribution of dominance of pathologies (allergies, cancers, respiratory diseases, etc.), information indicating the effect on health (biomarkers, decline of fertility, epidemics) or well-being of humans (fatigue, stress, etc.) linked directly (air pollution, chemicals, depletion of the ozone layer, noise, etc.) or indirectly (food, genetically modified organisms, etc.) to the quality of the environment". Its components are: human health data (on diseases, poisoning, injuries, etc.), biomarkers, health care/health services data, health determinant measurement data and events related to safety. While the definition in the Inspire Directive refers to direct or indirect links between pathologies and the quality of the environment, the HH data model is able to accommodate all health data, while linkage of specific health issues and the environment is a matter of a user decision.
The statistical data in the scope of HH theme are primarily statistical data/indices expressed at different statistical unit levels. A generic model for environmental data relevant as health determinant is also provided. It concern raw measurement data, aggregations of these raw data, and coverages resulting from the interpolation of the raw data. Safety aspects are addressed with the descriptions of events that harm people, property and the environment.
This theme provides a generic data model applicable across statistical units (as presented in SU theme) available in the Member States. The human health theme contains mainly data attached to statistical units. Health data and biomarkers have no direct spatial features, and need to be linked to these features by the use of statistical units, for example NUTS-codes or grid coordinates.
The following themes are particularly important in their relationships to Human Health and Safety:
-
Statistical Units (SU): spatial objects defined in SU data specification are re-used.
-
Utility and Government Services (US): The use of spatial objects defined in US data specification is recommended to represent information about health care/health services.
Other themes relevant for HH include:
-
Population Distribution – Demography (PD), as the theme HH addresses mainly aspects of health conditions of individuals and populations.
-
Production and industrial facilities (PF)
-
Agricultural and aquaculture facilities (AF)
-
Natural risk zones (NR)
-
Soil (SO)
-
Atmospheric conditions/Meteorological geographical features (AC), for analysing potential links with the quality of the environment.
Some examples (use cases) are provided for environmental data in the context of human health; a case study (use case) focusing on human health, and possible linkages to other themes is considered for the next steps of DS development.
Acknowledgements
Many individuals and organisations have contributed to the development of these Guidelines.
The Thematic Working Group Human Health and Safety (TWG-HH) included:
Dorota Jarosinska (TWG Facilitator until 09/2011), Luciano Massetti (TWG Editor), Elisabeth Lipcsey, Arvid Lillethun, Georgios Giannopoulos, Julien Caudeville, Roel Smolders, Ute Dauert, Julien Gaffuri (European Commission contact point, TWG Facilitator from 09/2011).
Other contributors to the INSPIRE data specifications are the Drafting Team Data Specifications, the JRC Data Specifications Team and the INSPIRE stakeholders - Spatial Data Interested Communities (SDICs) and Legally Mandated Organisations (LMOs).
Contact information
Maria Vanda Nunes de Lima
European Commission Joint Research Centre
Institute for Environment and Sustainability
Unit H06: Digital Earth and Reference Data
TP262, Via Fermi 2749
I-21027 Ispra (VA)
ITALY
E-mail: vanda.lima@jrc.ec.europa.eu
Tel.: 39-0332-7865052
Fax: 39-0332-7866325
http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/jrc/
http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
Table of Contents
- 1. Scope
- 2. Overview
- 3. Specification scopes
- 4. Identification information
- 5. Data content and structure
- 5.1. Application schemas – Overview
- 5.2. Basic notions
- 5.3. Application schema HumanHealth
- 5.3.1. Description
- 5.3.2. Feature catalogue
- 5.3.2.1. Spatial object types
- 5.3.2.1.1. Disease
- 5.3.2.1.2. EnvHealthDeterminantConcentrationMeasure
- 5.3.2.1.3. EnvHealthDeterminantMeasure
- 5.3.2.1.4. EnvHealthDeterminantNoiseMeasure
- 5.3.2.1.5. EnvHealthDeterminantStatisticalData
- 5.3.2.1.6. HealthStatisticalData
- 5.3.2.1.7. Biomarker
- 5.3.2.1.8. HealthServicesStatistic
- 5.3.2.1.9. GeneralHealthStatistics
- 5.3.2.2. Data types
- 5.3.2.3. Code lists
- 5.3.2.3.1. AirQualityComponentTypeValue
- 5.3.2.3.2. BathingWaterQualityComponentTypeValue
- 5.3.2.3.3. ChemicalValue
- 5.3.2.3.4. ComponentTypeValue
- 5.3.2.3.5. DiseaseMeasureTypeValue
- 5.3.2.3.6. EnvHealthDeterminantTypeValue
- 5.3.2.3.7. GroundWaterQualityComponentTypeValue
- 5.3.2.3.8. HealthServicesTypeValue
- 5.3.2.3.9. LakeWaterQuality
- 5.3.2.3.10. MatrixValue
- 5.3.2.3.11. MeasureCategoryTypeValue
- 5.3.2.3.12. MediaTypeValue
- 5.3.2.3.13. NoiseSourceTypeValue
- 5.3.2.3.14. RiverWaterQualityComponentTypeValue
- 5.3.2.3.15. StatisticalAggregationMethodValue
- 5.3.2.3.16. ICDValue
- 5.3.2.3.17. CODValue
- 5.3.2.3.18. GeneralHealthTypeValue
- 5.3.2.4. Imported types (informative)
- 5.3.2.1. Spatial object types
- 5.3.3. Externally governed code lists
- 5.4. Application schema Safety
- 5.4.1. Description
- 5.4.2. Feature catalogue
- 5.4.2.1. Event
- 5.4.2.2. FireOrExplosionRelatedEvent
- 5.4.2.3. HazardousMaterialRelatedEvent
- 5.4.2.4. TrafficRelatedEvent
- 5.4.2.5. Data types
- 5.4.2.6. LocationUnitType
- 5.4.2.7. EventConsequence
- 5.4.2.8. EventInformation
- 5.4.2.9. FireOrExplosionLocalityType
- 5.4.2.10. Code lists
- 5.4.2.11. ConsequenceTypeValue
- 5.4.2.12. BuildingUseValue
- 5.4.2.13. FireOrExplosionTypeValue
- 5.4.2.14. HazardousMaterialTypeValue
- 5.4.2.15. TrafficTypeValue
- 5.4.2.16. Imported types (informative)
- 5.4.2.17. NaturalHazardCategoryValue
- 5.4.2.18. PT_FreeText
- 5.4.2.19. Real
- 6. Reference systems, units of measure and grids
- 7. Data quality
- 8. Dataset-level metadata
- 9. Delivery
- 10. Data Capture
- 11. Portrayal
- Bibliography
- Annex A: Abstract Test Suite - (normative)
- A.1. Application Schema Conformance Class
- A.2. Reference Systems Conformance Class
- A.3. Data Consistency Conformance Class
- A.4. Metadata IR Conformance Class
- A.5. Information Accessibility Conformance Class
- A.6. Data Delivery Conformance Class
- A.7. Portrayal Conformance Class
- A.8. Technical Guideline Conformance Class
- Annex B: Use cases - (informative)
- Annex C: Code list values - (normative)
1. Scope
This document specifies a harmonised data specification for the spatial data theme Human Health and Safety as defined in Annex III of the INSPIRE Directive.
This data specification provides the basis for the drafting of Implementing Rules according to Article 7 (1) of the INSPIRE Directive [Directive 2007/2/EC]. The entire data specification is published as implementation guidelines accompanying these Implementing Rules.
2. Overview
2.1. Name
INSPIRE data specification for the theme Human Health and Safety.
2.2. Informal description
Definition:
Geographical distribution of dominance of pathologies (allergies, cancers, respiratory diseases, etc.), information indicating the effect on health (biomarkers, decline of fertility, epidemics) or well-being of humans (fatigue, stress, etc.) linked directly (air pollution, chemicals, depletion of the ozone layer, noise, etc.) or indirectly (food, genetically modified organisms, etc.) to the quality of the environment [Directive 2007/2/EC].
Description:
The theme "Human health and safety" (HH), as described in the INSPIRE Directive, covers a wide range of data on diseases and related health problems, as well as other indications of health effects that might be linked – directly or indirectly – with the quality of the environment. Given that definition, several components of the scope of the theme "Human health and safety" have been identified, including:
-
Health statistical data on diseases, poisoning, injuries, etc., and data on general health status in a population, such as self-perceived health, people with health problems, smokers, etc.
-
Biomarkers
-
Determinants of health
-
Health care / services data – for example on services provided by hospitals, health care workforce, etc
-
Safety
The theme HH addresses mainly various aspects of health conditions of individuals and populations; in this sense it shares many features with the theme PD (Population Distribution – Demography), defined in the INSPIRE Directive as: geographical distribution of people, including population characteristics and activity levels, aggregated by grid, region, administrative unit or other analytical unit). From a user perspective, characteristics of population at relevant spatial units might be of key relevance for human health analyses.
Some data in the scope of the theme are statistical data/indices, expressed at different spatial units. Most of these data are defined in EUROSTAT datasets. The adoption of EUROSTAT code lists to facilitate harmonization is recommended. Meanwhile, some code lists recommended in this document (e.g. GeneralHealthTypeValue, HealthServicesTypeValue, see chapter 5) include only some EUROSTAT codes and data providers are allowed to extend these code lists with any other code, such as some already in use by EUROSTAT.
Depending on particular case, health data might be needed at different spatial and temporal scales (different frequency of reporting for different diseases), as well as specific health data with reference to population distribution and characteristics at different analytical units, such as urban/rural, in agglomeration, within a city; with respect to location of particular facilities (e.g. industry, technical installations); in coastal areas or flood-prone areas, etc.
With respect to health statistical data, an externally managed code list is used, so called International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10). The ICD is the international standard to report and categorize diseases, health-related conditions and external causes of disease and injury, used to compile health information (mortality and morbidity) on deaths, illness and injury. It is the standard diagnostic classification, applied for epidemiological, health management purposes and clinical use.
Some quantitative data on diseases, injuries and accidents are available from different sources. The users of health data statistics have access to data on regional levels in the Eurostat databases. Eurostat is collecting mortality data, based on "Causes of Death" (COD), by gender, age and NUTS 2 regions. Causes of death are classified by the 65 causes of the "European shortlist" of causes of death based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD). COD data are derived from death certificates. The medical certification of death is an obligation in all Member States. COD data refer to the underlying cause, which is "the disease or injury which initiated the train of morbid events leading directly to death, or the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury" (WHO). Incidence and prevalence data are available at European level only for cancer. National and sub-national sources of health data statistics may offer more morbidity data (e.g. incidence, prevalence data; numbers of emergency visits, etc.), though availability of data may differ from country to country. Diseases, injuries, and accidents data can be expressed as raw numbers, incidence, prevalence and mortality rates, stratified by gender, and age; for specific (study) purposes, health data might be stratified also by other factors (social, economic, ethnic, etc).
General health data, such as self-perceived health, people with health problems, smokers, etc., can be expressed as raw numbers, rates, percentage, stratified by gender, age, as well as by other socio-economic factors (such as education, employment, income, living in urban or rural; setting, etc.). Some data related to general health status may require (non-invasive or invasive) measurements, such a weight, height, concentration of some parameters in blood, urine, or in other biological material. Examples of such parameters include body mass index (BMI), concentration of cholesterol in blood, concentration of haemoglobin in blood, or concentration of various exogenous chemical substances in human body (biomarkers of exposure). These data can be expressed as average concentrations (arithmetic mean, median, geometric mean and 95% CI), percentiles (5th, 25th, 90th, 95th, etc.), proportion of persons with concentrations above or below „normal/acceptable/permissible‟ values, proportion of individuals with undetectable levels of tested parameter (below limit of detection, LOD), etc. For biomarkers, information is needed on the measured chemical (for example, cadmium, mercury, cotinine) or its metabolite, on biological matrix used to determine/quantify a biomarker (for example, urine, blood, hair); information is also needed on a population studied, sampling area, type of a study, analytical methods, etc. Effort to harmonise Human Biomonitoring protocols to increase the comparability of biomarker measurements in Europe are on-going within the COPHES (FP 7) and DEMOCOPHES (Life ) projects. Similar harmonisation efforts are currently on-going for health surveys (the European Health Examination Survey project, EHES) and food surveys (EFSA’s EUMenu); however, it is now difficult to indicate availability of those data. This theme provides a generic data model applicable not only on the regional levels provided by Eurostat databases but across statistical units (as presented in the theme Statistical units) available in the member states. The human health theme contains attributes mainly to statistical units. Health data and biomarkers have no direct spatial features, and need to be linked to these features by the use of statistical units, for example NUTS-codes or grid coordinates.
Some statistical data on health services are available from different sources. Eurostat provides data on regional (NUTS2) levels, for example on the hospital profile, hospital beds, and other health care related facilities, some data on hospital discharges, diagnosis, length of stay in hospital, cancer screening, etc, as well as data on health care workforce – physicians, dentists, and nurses. Health care/health services are not included in HH data model; to represent them, TWG US data model can be used, and particularly the feature "Governmental Service" that is classified in type of services ('serviceType' attribute). ServiceType must be set to values among those provided for Health care/health services (e.g. health) and 'occupancyType' and 'resourceType' can be used to store information describing the service (e.g. number of beds, number of physicians).
HH data model contains a module to address environmental health determinants (envhealth). It offers a possibility to refer to:
-
raw environmental health determinant measurement data. This model is based on ISO 19103 on measurements data. This model is extended for localised noise and concentration data, and may be extended in a similar way to other health determinants. EIONET code lists are recommended to describe these measurement data.
-
aggregated environmental health determinant measurement data through linking with SU data model
-
coverage data resulting from the interpolation of raw measurement data
In the context of links between human health and the quality of the environment, most widely discussed environmental conditions include: ambient air quality, indoor air quality, water (drinking, bathing) quality, chemicals (from different sources), pollens, radon, noise, and other physical factors. The INSPIRE Directive refers also to GMOs. Some quantitative data on the quality of environmental components are available, e.g. ambient air quality, noise, bathing water quality, drinking water quality, via thematic environmental legislations and reporting obligations. Ambient air quality (Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe); INSPIRE Reference: D2.8.II/III.5_v1.9 TWG-HH Data Specification on Human Health and Safety 2011-04-29 Page 4. Noise data (Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise). Water quality (drinking water, bathing water, surface water, groundwater) (Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption; Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy; Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy). For other environmental data of interest, such as pollens, soil contamination, genetically modified organisms, indoor air quality, and radiation (ultraviolet, electromagnetic, radon), available data is limited and more heterogeneous. Indoor air quality data (following WHO guidelines; voluntary reporting). Pollens (Voluntary reporting). Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are specified in the 'Human Health and Safety' theme in the INSPIRE Directive. Detailed information is available on deliberate field trials involving GMO (see the JRC managed website: http://gmoinfo.jrc.ec.europa.eu/, where 2352 such trials are described). Also, when GMOs authorised for cultivation are grown in the EU, geographical data are available, for instance in order to ensure provisions related to the co-existence between GMO cultivation, conventional and/or organic agriculture. In contrast, hardly any data are available with respect to exposure to GMOs in food. Although monitoring plans for GM food and feed exist, they do not provide any suitable dataset. Such information is of key importance for assessing potential impacts on human health. In conclusion, while information flows exist for environmental exposure, there are hardly any spatial data sets available for quantifying or qualifying exposure to GM food (information provided by Mr Guy Van den Eede, DG JRC). Anyway, the health determinant model may be extended in the future when such data will start being available.
The term "Safety" is ambiguous: partly because it is directly related to human health and in a broader context it means how the environment is affected. The latter sense affects human health indirectly. The increased availability of spatial data is of great importance both for emergency prevention and for preparatory work, and to enable a response to large-scale incidents to safeguard human health and safety.
Spatial statistical data for accidents and incidents is referred to in this document as "event". This ensures that the description of "safety" points both to societal safety and safety of the environment. Feedback of experience improves both the preventive work and preparedness for dealing with unplanned incidents that harm people, property and the environment.
An "Event" may be caused by several factors, but is always related to a specific geographic point or area or point along a linear spatial object. The description of the geographical item occurs with the aid of the models already described in AU, the SU and GN data-specifications, or by the generic geometry. The data model for "safety" distinguishes four types of events: "traffic related event", "fire or explosion related event", "natural hazard related event" and "hazardous materials related event".
Definition: |
2.3. Normative References
[Directive 2007/2/EC] Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE)
[ISO 19107] EN ISO 19107:2005, Geographic Information – Spatial Schema
[ISO 19108] EN ISO 19108:2005, Geographic Information – Temporal Schema
[ISO 19108-c] ISO 19108:2002/Cor 1:2006, Geographic Information – Temporal Schema, Technical Corrigendum 1
[ISO 19111] EN ISO 19111:2007 Geographic information - Spatial referencing by coordinates (ISO 19111:2007)
[ISO 19113] EN ISO 19113:2005, Geographic Information – Quality principles
[ISO 19115] EN ISO 19115:2005, Geographic information – Metadata (ISO 19115:2003)
[ISO 19118] EN ISO 19118:2006, Geographic information – Encoding (ISO 19118:2005)
[ISO 19123] EN ISO 19123:2007, Geographic Information – Schema for coverage geometry and functions
[ISO 19135] EN ISO 19135:2007 Geographic information – Procedures for item registration (ISO 19135:2005)
[ISO 19138] ISO/TS 19138:2006, Geographic Information – Data quality measures
[ISO 19139] ISO/TS 19139:2007, Geographic information – Metadata – XML schema implementation
[OGC 06-103r3] Implementation Specification for Geographic Information - Simple feature access – Part 1: Common Architecture v1.2.0
NOTE This is an updated version of "EN ISO 19125-1:2006, Geographic information – Simple feature access – Part 1: Common architecture". A revision of the EN ISO standard has been proposed.
[Regulation 1205/2008/EC] Regulation 1205/2008/EC implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards metadata
[ICD10 WHO] International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision: http://apps.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/
2.4. Terms and definitions
General terms and definitions helpful for understanding the INSPIRE data specification documents are defined in the INSPIRE Glossary[13].
2.5. Symbols and abbreviations
AU |
Administrative Units |
COD |
European shortlist of causes of death |
EIONET |
European Environment Information and Observation Network |
Eurostat |
Statistical Office of the European Communities |
GMO |
Genetically Modified Organisms |
GN |
Geographical Names |
HH |
Human Health and Safety |
ICD |
International Classification of Diseases |
MS |
Member State |
NUTS |
Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics |
PD |
Population and Demography |
SU |
Statistical Units |
TN |
Transport Network |
UML |
Unified Modelling Language |
US |
Utility and Governmental Services |
WHO |
World Health Organization |
2.6. How the Technical Guidelines map to the Implementing Rules
The schematic diagram in Figure 1 gives an overview of the relationships between the INSPIRE legal acts (the INSPIRE Directive and Implementing Rules) and the INSPIRE Technical Guidelines. The INSPIRE Directive and Implementing Rules include legally binding requirements that describe, usually on an abstract level, what Member States must implement.
In contrast, the Technical Guidelines define how Member States might implement the requirements included in the INSPIRE Implementing Rules. As such, they may include non-binding technical requirements that must be satisfied if a Member State data provider chooses to conform to the Technical Guidelines. Implementing these Technical Guidelines will maximise the interoperability of INSPIRE spatial data sets.
Figure 1 - Relationship between INSPIRE Implementing Rules and Technical Guidelines
2.6.1. Requirements
The purpose of these Technical Guidelines (Data specifications on Human Health and Safety) is to provide practical guidance for implementation that is guided by, and satisfies, the (legally binding) requirements included for the spatial data theme Human Health and Safety in the Regulation (Implementing Rules) on interoperability of spatial data sets and services. These requirements are highlighted in this document as follows:
📕
|
IR Requirement This style is used for requirements contained in the Implementing Rules on interoperability of spatial data sets and services (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010). |
For each of these IR requirements, these Technical Guidelines contain additional explanations and examples.
NOTE The Abstract Test Suite (ATS) in Annex A contains conformance tests that directly check conformance with these IR requirements.
Furthermore, these Technical Guidelines may propose a specific technical implementation for satisfying an IR requirement. In such cases, these Technical Guidelines may contain additional technical requirements that need to be met in order to be conformant with the corresponding IR requirement when using this proposed implementation. These technical requirements are highlighted as follows:
📒
|
TG Requirement X This style is used for requirements for a specific technical solution proposed in these Technical Guidelines for an IR requirement. |
NOTE 1 Conformance of a data set with the TG requirement(s) included in the ATS implies conformance with the corresponding IR requirement(s).
NOTE 2 In addition to the requirements included in the Implementing Rules on interoperability of spatial data sets and services, the INSPIRE Directive includes further legally binding obligations that put additional requirements on data providers. For example, Art. 10(2) requires that Member States shall, where appropriate, decide by mutual consent on the depiction and position of geographical features whose location spans the frontier between two or more Member States. General guidance for how to meet these obligations is provided in the INSPIRE framework documents.
2.6.2. Recommendations
In addition to IR and TG requirements, these Technical Guidelines may also include a number of recommendations for facilitating implementation or for further and coherent development of an interoperable infrastructure.
📘
|
Recommendation X Recommendations are shown using this style. |
NOTE The implementation of recommendations is not mandatory. Compliance with these Technical Guidelines or the legal obligation does not depend on the fulfilment of the recommendations.
2.6.3. Conformance
Annex A includes the abstract test suite for checking conformance with the requirements included in these Technical Guidelines and the corresponding parts of the Implementing Rules (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010).
3. Specification scopes
This data specification does not distinguish different specification scopes, but just considers one general scope.
NOTE For more information on specification scopes, see [ISO 19131:2007], clause 8 and Annex D.
4. Identification information
These Technical Guidelines are identified by the following URI:
NOTE ISO 19131 suggests further identification information to be included in this section, e.g. the title, abstract or spatial representation type. The proposed items are already described in the document metadata, executive summary, overview description (section 2) and descriptions of the application schemas (section 5). In order to avoid redundancy, they are not repeated here.
5. Data content and structure
5.1. Application schemas – Overview
5.1.1. Application schemas included in the IRs
Articles 3, 4 and 5 of the Implementing Rules lay down the requirements for the content and structure of the data sets related to the INSPIRE Annex themes.
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
The types to be used for the exchange and classification of spatial objects from data sets related to the spatial data theme Human Health and Safety are defined in the application schema HumanHealth.
The application schemas specify requirements on the properties of each spatial object including its multiplicity, domain of valid values, constraints, etc.
NOTE The application schemas presented in this section contain some additional information that is not included in the Implementing Rules, in particular multiplicities of attributes and association roles.
📒
|
TG Requirement 1 Spatial object types and data types shall comply with the multiplicities defined for the attributes and association roles in this section. |
An application schema may include references (e.g. in attributes or inheritance relationships) to common types or types defined in other spatial data themes. These types can be found in a sub-section called "Imported Types" at the end of each application schema section. The common types referred to from application schemas included in the IRs are addressed in Article 3.
📕
|
IR Requirement Types that are common to several of the themes listed in Annexes I, II and III to Directive 2007/2/EC shall conform to the definitions and constraints and include the attributes and association roles set out in Annex I. |
NOTE Since the IRs contain the types for all INSPIRE spatial data themes in one document, Article 3 does not explicitly refer to types defined in other spatial data themes, but only to types defined in external data models.
Common types are described in detail in the Generic Conceptual Model [DS-D2.7], in the relevant international standards (e.g. of the ISO 19100 series) or in the documents on the common INSPIRE models [DS-D2.10.x]. For detailed descriptions of types defined in other spatial data themes, see the corresponding Data Specification TG document [DS-D2.8.x].
5.1.2. Additional recommended application schemas
In addition to the application schemas listed above, the following additional application schemas have been defined for the theme Human Health and Safety (see sections 5.4):
-
Safety application schema …
These additional application schemas are not included in the IRs. They typically address requirements from specific (groups of) use cases and/or may be used to provide additional information. They are included in this specification in order to improve interoperability also for these additional aspects and to illustrate the extensibility of the application schemas included in the IRs.
📘
|
Recomendation 1 Additional and/or use case-specific information related to the theme Human Health and Safety should be made available using the spatial object types and data types specified in the following application schema(s): HumanHealth, Safety. These spatial object types and data types should comply with the definitions and constraints and include the attributes and association roles defined in this section. The code lists used in attributes or association roles of spatial object types or data types should comply with the definitions and include the values defined in this section. |
5.2. Basic notions
This section explains some of the basic notions used in the INSPIRE application schemas. These explanations are based on the GCM [DS-D2.5].
5.2.1. Notation
5.2.1.1. Unified Modeling Language (UML)
The application schemas included in this section are specified in UML, version 2.1. The spatial object types, their properties and associated types are shown in UML class diagrams.
NOTE For an overview of the UML notation, see Annex D in [ISO 19103].
The use of a common conceptual schema language (i.e. UML) allows for an automated processing of application schemas and the encoding, querying and updating of data based on the application schema – across different themes and different levels of detail.
The following important rules related to class inheritance and abstract classes are included in the IRs.
📕
|
IR Requirement (…)
|
The use of UML conforms to ISO 19109 8.3 and ISO/TS 19103 with the exception that UML 2.1 instead of ISO/IEC 19501 is being used. The use of UML also conforms to ISO 19136 E.2.1.1.1-E.2.1.1.4.
NOTE ISO/TS 19103 and ISO 19109 specify a profile of UML to be used in conjunction with the ISO 19100 series. This includes in particular a list of stereotypes and basic types to be used in application schemas. ISO 19136 specifies a more restricted UML profile that allows for a direct encoding in XML Schema for data transfer purposes.
To model constraints on the spatial object types and their properties, in particular to express data/data set consistency rules, OCL (Object Constraint Language) is used as described in ISO/TS 19103, whenever possible. In addition, all constraints are described in the feature catalogue in English, too.
NOTE Since "void" is not a concept supported by OCL, OCL constraints cannot include expressions to test whether a value is a void value. Such constraints may only be expressed in natural language.
5.2.1.2. Stereotypes
In the application schemas in this section several stereotypes are used that have been defined as part of a UML profile for use in INSPIRE [DS-D2.5]. These are explained in Table 1 below.
Table 1 – Stereotypes (adapted from [DS-D2.5])
Stereotype |
Model element |
Description |
applicationSchema |
Package |
An INSPIRE application schema according to ISO 19109 and the Generic Conceptual Model. |
leaf |
Package |
A package that is not an application schema and contains no packages. |
featureType |
Class |
A spatial object type. |
type |
Class |
A type that is not directly instantiable, but is used as an abstract collection of operation, attribute and relation signatures. This stereotype should usually not be used in INSPIRE application schemas as these are on a different conceptual level than classifiers with this stereotype. |
dataType |
Class |
A structured data type without identity. |
union |
Class |
A structured data type without identity where exactly one of the properties of the type is present in any instance. |
codeList |
Class |
A code list. |
import |
Dependency |
The model elements of the supplier package are imported. |
voidable |
Attribute, association role |
A voidable attribute or association role (see section 5.2.2). |
lifeCycleInfo |
Attribute, association role |
If in an application schema a property is considered to be part of the life-cycle information of a spatial object type, the property shall receive this stereotype. |
version |
Association role |
If in an application schema an association role ends at a spatial object type, this stereotype denotes that the value of the property is meant to be a specific version of the spatial object, not the spatial object in general. |
5.2.2. Voidable characteristics
The «voidable» stereotype is used to characterise those properties of a spatial object that may not be present in some spatial data sets, even though they may be present or applicable in the real world. This does not mean that it is optional to provide a value for those properties.
For all properties defined for a spatial object, a value has to be provided – either the corresponding value (if available in the data set maintained by the data provider) or the value of void. A void value shall imply that no corresponding value is contained in the source spatial data set maintained by the data provider or no corresponding value can be derived from existing values at reasonable costs.
📘
|
Recomendation 2 The reason for a void value should be provided where possible using a listed value from the VoidReasonValue code list to indicate the reason for the missing value. |
The VoidReasonValue type is a code list, which includes the following pre-defined values:
-
Unpopulated: The property is not part of the dataset maintained by the data provider. However, the characteristic may exist in the real world. For example when the "elevation of the water body above the sea level" has not been included in a dataset containing lake spatial objects, then the reason for a void value of this property would be 'Unpopulated'. The property receives this value for all spatial objects in the spatial data set.
-
Unknown: The correct value for the specific spatial object is not known to, and not computable by the data provider. However, a correct value may exist. For example when the "elevation of the water body above the sea level" of a certain lake has not been measured, then the reason for a void value of this property would be 'Unknown'. This value is applied only to those spatial objects where the property in question is not known.
-
Withheld: The characteristic may exist, but is confidential and not divulged by the data provider.
NOTE It is possible that additional reasons will be identified in the future, in particular to support reasons / special values in coverage ranges.
The «voidable» stereotype does not give any information on whether or not a characteristic exists in the real world. This is expressed using the multiplicity:
-
If a characteristic may or may not exist in the real world, its minimum cardinality shall be defined as 0. For example, if an Address may or may not have a house number, the multiplicity of the corresponding property shall be 0..1.
-
If at least one value for a certain characteristic exists in the real world, the minimum cardinality shall be defined as 1. For example, if an Administrative Unit always has at least one name, the multiplicity of the corresponding property shall be 1..*.
In both cases, the «voidable» stereotype can be applied. In cases where the minimum multiplicity is 0, the absence of a value indicates that it is known that no value exists, whereas a value of void indicates that it is not known whether a value exists or not.
EXAMPLE If an address does not have a house number, the corresponding Address object should not have any value for the «voidable» attribute house number. If the house number is simply not known or not populated in the data set, the Address object should receive a value of void (with the corresponding void reason) for the house number attribute.
5.2.3. Code lists
Code lists are modelled as classes in the application schemas. Their values, however, are managed outside of the application schema.
5.2.3.1. Code list types
The IRs distinguish the following types of code lists.
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
The type of code list is represented in the UML model through the tagged value extensibility, which can take the following values:
-
none, representing code lists whose allowed values comprise only the values specified in the IRs (type a);
-
narrower, representing code lists whose allowed values comprise the values specified in the IRs and narrower values defined by data providers (type b);
-
open, representing code lists whose allowed values comprise the values specified in the IRs and additional values at any level defined by data providers (type c); and
-
any, representing code lists, for which the IRs do not specify any allowed values, i.e. whose allowed values comprise any values defined by data providers (type d).
📘
|
Recomendation 3 Additional values defined by data providers should not replace or redefine any value already specified in the IRs. |
NOTE This data specification may specify recommended values for some of the code lists of type (b), (c) and (d) (see section 5.2.4.3). These recommended values are specified in a dedicated Annex.
In addition, code lists can be hierarchical, as explained in Article 6(5) of the IRs.
📕
|
IR Requirement (…)
|
The type of code list and whether it is hierarchical or not is also indicated in the feature catalogues.
5.2.3.2. Obligations on data providers
📕
|
IR Requirement (….)
|
Article 6(6) obliges data providers to use only values that are allowed according to the specification of the code list. The "allowed values according to the specification of the code list" are the values explicitly defined in the IRs plus (in the case of code lists of type (b), (c) and (d)) additional values defined by data providers.
For attributes whose type is a code list of type (b), (c) or (d) data providers may use additional values that are not defined in the IRs. Article 6(6) requires that such additional values and their definition be made available in a register. This enables users of the data to look up the meaning of the additional values used in a data set, and also facilitates the re-use of additional values by other data providers (potentially across Member States).
NOTE Guidelines for setting up registers for additional values and how to register additional values in these registers is still an open discussion point between Member States and the Commission.
5.2.3.3. Recommended code list values
For code lists of type (b), (c) and (d), this data specification may propose additional values as a recommendation (in a dedicated Annex). These values will be included in the INSPIRE code list register. This will facilitate and encourage the usage of the recommended values by data providers since the obligation to make additional values defined by data providers available in a register (see section 5.2.4.2) is already met.
📘
|
Recomendation 4 Where these Technical Guidelines recommend values for a code list in addition to those specified in the IRs, these values should be used. |
NOTE For some code lists of type (d), no values may be specified in these Technical Guidelines. In these cases, any additional value defined by data providers may be used.
5.2.3.4. Governance
The following two types of code lists are distinguished in INSPIRE:
-
Code lists that are governed by INSPIRE (INSPIRE-governed code lists). These code lists will be managed centrally in the INSPIRE code list register. Change requests to these code lists (e.g. to add, deprecate or supersede values) are processed and decided upon using the INSPIRE code list register’s maintenance workflows.
INSPIRE-governed code lists will be made available in the INSPIRE code list register at http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/<CodeListName>. They will be available in SKOS/RDF, XML and HTML. The maintenance will follow the procedures defined in ISO 19135. This means that the only allowed changes to a code list are the addition, deprecation or supersession of values, i.e. no value will ever be deleted, but only receive different statuses (valid, deprecated, superseded). Identifiers for values of INSPIRE-governed code lists are constructed using the pattern http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/<CodeListName>/<value>.
-
Code lists that are governed by an organisation outside of INSPIRE (externally governed code lists). These code lists are managed by an organisation outside of INSPIRE, e.g. the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) or the World Health Organization (WHO). Change requests to these code lists follow the maintenance workflows defined by the maintaining organisations. Note that in some cases, no such workflows may be formally defined.
Since the updates of externally governed code lists is outside the control of INSPIRE, the IRs and these Technical Guidelines reference a specific version for such code lists.
The tables describing externally governed code lists in this section contain the following columns:
-
The Governance column describes the external organisation that is responsible for maintaining the code list.
-
The Source column specifies a citation for the authoritative source for the values of the code list. For code lists, whose values are mandated in the IRs, this citation should include the version of the code list used in INSPIRE. The version can be specified using a version number or the publication date. For code list values recommended in these Technical Guidelines, the citation may refer to the "latest available version".
-
In some cases, for INSPIRE only a subset of an externally governed code list is relevant. The subset is specified using the Subset column.
-
The Availability column specifies from where (e.g. URL) the values of the externally governed code list are available, and in which formats. Formats can include machine-readable (e.g. SKOS/RDF, XML) or human-readable (e.g. HTML, PDF) ones.
Code list values are encoded using http URIs and labels. Rules for generating these URIs and labels are specified in a separate table.
-
📘
|
Recomendation 5 The http URIs and labels used for encoding code list values should be taken from the INSPIRE code list registry for INSPIRE-governed code lists and generated according to the relevant rules specified for externally governed code lists. |
NOTE Where practicable, the INSPIRE code list register could also provide http URIs and labels for externally governed code lists.
5.2.3.5. Vocabulary
For each code list, a tagged value called "vocabulary" is specified to define a URI identifying the values of the code list. For INSPIRE-governed code lists and externally governed code lists that do not have a persistent identifier, the URI is constructed following the pattern http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/<UpperCamelCaseName>.
If the value is missing or empty, this indicates an empty code list. If no sub-classes are defined for this empty code list, this means that any code list may be used that meets the given definition.
An empty code list may also be used as a super-class for a number of specific code lists whose values may be used to specify the attribute value. If the sub-classes specified in the model represent all valid extensions to the empty code list, the subtyping relationship is qualified with the standard UML constraint "\{complete,disjoint}".
5.2.4. Identifier management
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
NOTE 1 An external object identifier is a unique object identifier which is published by the responsible body, which may be used by external applications to reference the spatial object. [DS-D2.5]
NOTE 2 Article 9(1) is implemented in each application schema by including the attribute inspireId of type Identifier.
NOTE 3 Article 9(2) is ensured if the namespace and localId attributes of the Identifier remains the same for different versions of a spatial object; the version attribute can of course change.
5.2.5. Geometry representation
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
NOTE 1 The specification restricts the spatial schema to 0-, 1-, 2-, and 2.5-dimensional geometries where all curve interpolations are linear and surface interpolations are performed by triangles.
NOTE 2 The topological relations of two spatial objects based on their specific geometry and topology properties can in principle be investigated by invoking the operations of the types defined in ISO 19107 (or the methods specified in EN ISO 19125-1).
5.2.6. Temporality representation
The application schema(s) use(s) the derived attributes "beginLifespanVersion" and "endLifespanVersion" to record the lifespan of a spatial object.
The attributes "beginLifespanVersion" specifies the date and time at which this version of the spatial object was inserted or changed in the spatial data set. The attribute "endLifespanVersion" specifies the date and time at which this version of the spatial object was superseded or retired in the spatial data set.
NOTE 1 The attributes specify the beginning of the lifespan of the version in the spatial data set itself, which is different from the temporal characteristics of the real-world phenomenon described by the spatial object. This lifespan information, if available, supports mainly two requirements: First, knowledge about the spatial data set content at a specific time; second, knowledge about changes to a data set in a specific time frame. The lifespan information should be as detailed as in the data set (i.e., if the lifespan information in the data set includes seconds, the seconds should be represented in data published in INSPIRE) and include time zone information.
NOTE 2 Changes to the attribute "endLifespanVersion" does not trigger a change in the attribute "beginLifespanVersion".
📕
|
IR Requirement (…)
|
NOTE The requirement expressed in the IR Requirement above will be included as constraints in the UML data models of all themes.
📘
|
Recomendation 6 If life-cycle information is not maintained as part of the spatial data set, all spatial objects belonging to this data set should provide a void value with a reason of "unpopulated". |
5.2.6.1. Validity of the real-world phenomena
The application schema(s) use(s) the attributes "validFrom" and "validTo" to record the validity of the real-world phenomenon represented by a spatial object.
The attributes "validFrom" specifies the date and time at which the real-world phenomenon became valid in the real world. The attribute "validTo" specifies the date and time at which the real-world phenomenon is no longer valid in the real world.
Specific application schemas may give examples what "being valid" means for a specific real-world phenomenon represented by a spatial object.
📕
|
IR Requirement (…)
|
NOTE The requirement expressed in the IR Requirement above will be included as constraints in the UML data models of all themes.
5.3. Application schema HumanHealth
5.3.1. Description
5.3.1.1. Narrative description
The four components about "Human Health" (see section 2.2) are described in an application schema logically divided two subthemes. The first subtheme is modelled by three diagrams: "HealthStatisticalData - Core" and "HealthStatisticalData - Full" that respectively include an abstract definition of a HealthStatisticalData datatype and all subtypes describing statistical data on diseases and related health problems, and on biomarkers (health statistical data and biomarkers) and "HealthStatisticalData - CodelistEnumeration" including all the corresponding code lists.
The second subtheme is the "EnvHealthDeterminant" diagram that covers elements related to environmental data, relevant for human health. No model was provided for data describing specific health care/health services since they are covered by GovernmentalService featureType defined by US.
📘
|
Recomendation 7 To represent information about Health care/health services is recommended to use GovernmentalService feature as it is defined in the US Data Specification (see chapter 5.4 - Administrative and social governmental services"). |
As already stated in section 2.2, no specific HH spatial objects were identified since HH data are mainly statistical values/indices that are attached to spatial objects defined by other themes. Actually, all classes included in "HealthStatisticalData - Full" diagram, represent data attached to a statistical unit (in the scope of Statistical Unit theme - SU. In the EnvHealthDeterminant diagram, aggregated data are linked to StatisticalUnits and primary data/point measurement are derived by OM Observation class. Object referencing to the spatial objects defined by SU theme is used, according to the INSPIRE Directive that promotes the reuse of information.
Therefore, all kind of health statistical data are linked, through an association, to a StatisticalUnit as it is defined in SU data specification as well as aggregated data on health determinants, while access to primary data is defined subtyping the "OM Observation" featureType, in accordance with the O&M iso standard.
The following figure shows the structure of the Human Health application schema and the imported application schema: "Core" by SU application schema, ISO DIS 19156:2010 Observations and Measurements and Basic Types package from ISO 19103:2005 Schema Language.
Figure 2 – UML class diagram: Overview of the Human Health package
5.3.1.2. UML Overview
5.3.1.2.1. HealthStatisticalData - Core Diagram
All data that are included in this diagram are statistical data on diseases, injuries, etc., data on general health status of a population, on some features of health services, as well as data resulting from studies on biomarkers, which are reported as aggregated data according to thematic, spatial and temporal attributes.
In the following figure all data of this kind are represented by an abstract featureType HealthStatisticalData that has an association to the abstract class StatisticalUnit of the application schema "Core", and so to one of its specializations (grid, urban audit, NUTs, region, etc.) that are defined in the SU data specification.
📕
|
IR Requirement Statistical information on the spatial data theme Human Health and Safety must refer to spatial objects as defined in the spatial data theme Statistical Units. |
Reference material and user requirements analysis shows that this approach has already been applied, for example by Eurostat, to provide aggregated data at NUTS 2 level (e.g absolute number of death due to a certain cause). Detailed information on how to model any spatial object to be used to represent human health statistical data can be found in the SU data specification.
Figure 3: UML class: HealthStatisticalData - Core diagram
5.3.1.2.2. HealthStatisticalData - Full Diagram
This Diagram in Figure 4 describes four subtypes of the abstract HealthStatisticalData featuretype, each one representing a group defined in sec 2.2: Disease (health statistical data on disease and injuries), GeneralHealthStatistics (general health status in a population), HealthServiceStatistic (information on health services, like e.g. number of beds) and Biomarker (biomarker data collected and analysed in various types of studies). Figure 4 also includes other datatypes used in this application schema, while Figure 4 illustrates all code lists used in this schema.
Disease is characterized by two mandatory attributes:
-
"diseaseMeasure" that is a datatype composed by two mandatory attributes: "diseaseMeasureType" containing one of the indices of the "DiseaseMeasureTypeValue" codelist (incidence, prevalence, mortality and outbreak) that are used to measure disease or health related problem impacts on population and "value" containing the value itself."
-
"referencePeriod" defined as the period between the startDate and endDate (ReferencePeriodType) the statistical information refers to.
The name of the disease is represented using the externally managed code list that is used by the HH user community (see section 2.2): "ICDValue" code list pointing to ICD10 "the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems Revision Version for 2007" managed by WHO. This attribute is mandatory except the case of mortality data for which the CODValue code list, European Shortlist of Causes of Death used by Eurostat (externally managed code list) and available at http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/ for collection and reporting of this kind of information (see Figure 5) should be used.
📕
|
IR Requirement Where possible, the ICDValue code list shall be used to identify the disease name. |
This class includes also two voidable attributes that are commonly used to aggregate data: the ageRange (datatype that is composed by a startAge, and a range, both of type Age (expressed in one of the following format: years, months or weeks) and gender (enumeration) in a population.
Figure 4: UML class: HealthStatisticalData - Full diagram
Biomarker class is characterized by a similar structure apart from the "biomarkerName" that is defined by two pieces of information, chemical and matrix (both defined as empty codelists extensible by MS), and some common statistical parameters (BiomarkerstatisticalParameterType) that are used to describe the biomarker value and are necessary to compare results from different studies.
Also GeneralHealthStatistics class has a similar structure, characterized by a value that refers to a parameter (generalHealthName), listed in GeneralHealthTypeValue codelist, that is extensible by MS.
Finally, HealthServiceStatistics is characterized by a referencePeriod and a healthServiceValue that is referred to a specific parameter among those listed in HealthServicesTypeValue codelist.
This codelist includes some items and definitions taken from "Health care: resources and patients" used by Eurostat (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_SDDS/EN/hlth_care_esms.htm). This codelist is not exhaustive and can be extensible by MS.
Figure 5: UML class Codelist diagram
5.3.1.2.3. EnvHealthDeterminant Diagram
Health determinant data are represented as:
-
Raw measurement data located somewhere.
-
Statistical aggregation of these raw measurement data reported on some statistical units.
-
Coverages resulting from an interpolation of these raw measurement data.
Raw measurement
EXAMPLES Nitrate concentration in lake water, pollen concentration in ambient air, noise from road traffic.
The data structure proposed is based on ISO 19103 standard presented the Figure 6. A measure is characterized by a numerical value expressed in a unit of measure. Examples of measures and associated units are given for length, areas, velocity, etc. Of course, a measure has to be expressed in the corresponding unit of measure (For example, Length measures have to be expressed with UomLength).
Figure 6: Measure and units, as defined in ISO 19103
Health determinant raw measurement data are described based on this standard following the diagram shown on the Figure 7. An environmental health determinant measure is characterized by a location, a type, and a measurement time. The measurement data are represented based on ISO 19103 measure class, which types are used by the measure attribute.
Figure 7: Environmental health determinant measure, based on ISO 19103
📕
|
IR Requirement Raw measurement data shall be based on ISO/TS 19103:2005. |
The following diagrams provide a specialisation of the EnvHealthDeterminantMeasure feature type for two specific cases of interest for human health: Noise and Concentration. Other similar specialization may be performed for other health determinants.
-
Noise: A noise measure is characterized by a source described in the EIONET code list.
Figure 8: Noise measure
📘
|
Recomendation 8 Noise measurements should be characterized by a source following the EIONET code list. |
-
Concentration: A concentration measurement is characterised by the component whose concentration in a media is measured. List of components are available in EIONET code lists.
Figure 9: Concentration measure
📘
|
Recomendation 9 Concentration measurements should be characterized by a component and a media where the component concentration is measured. List of component should be described following the EIONET codelist. |
The previous model is suitable raw data. The two following paragraphs describe other coarser representations of these data as aggregated statistical layers and interpolated coverages.
Statistical aggregation
Health determinant measurement data can be represented as aggregated values reported on statistical units (see figure below).
Figure 10: Statistical aggregation of measurements located within a statistical unit
How envhealth statistical data could be presented is shown in the example taken from Eurostat Atlas about health statistics data at NUTS 2 level (Figure 11).
Figure 11: Health Statistics – Atlas on mortality in the European Union. Eurostat, 2009 edition
The following UML diagram presents how such data are represented. An environmental health determinant statistical data is a health statistical data (it means it is reported on a specified statistical unit) with a measurement value. This value is obtained by the aggregation of some measurement raw data located within the statistical unit, and following a statistical aggregation method specified in the provided extensible code list (usually, the mean).
Figure 12: Health determinant data aggregated as statistical data
📕
|
IR Requirement Health determinant statistical data shall be modelled as health statistical data characterized by a measurement value based on ISO/TS 19103:2005 and a statistical aggregation method. |
Coverage interpolation
Health determinant measurement data can be represented as a coverage resulting from the interpolation of raw measurement data.
EXAMPLE 1 Particulate matter distribution coverage produced from raw measurement data.
Figure 13: Particulate matter distribution coverage
EXAMPLE 2 Pollen distribution coverage produced from raw measurement data on pollen concentration in ambient air (http://www.polleninfo.org).
Figure 14: Oak pollen distribution coverage
📕
|
IR Requirement Health determinant coverages shall be represented using the spatial object types defined in Section 6 of Annex I. For continuous coverages, a subtype of the CoverageByDomainAndRange class shall be used whose domain is restricted to measurement values based on ISO/TS 19103:2005. |
5.3.2. Feature catalogue
Feature catalogue metadata
Application Schema |
INSPIRE Application Schema HumanHealth |
Version number |
5.0 |
Types defined in the feature catalogue
Type | Package | Stereotypes |
---|---|---|
Age |
HumanHealth |
«union» |
AgeRangeType |
HumanHealth |
«dataType» |
AirQualityComponentTypeValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
BathingWaterQualityComponentTypeValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
Biomarker |
HumanHealth |
«featureType» |
BiomarkerStatisticalParameterType |
HumanHealth |
«dataType» |
BiomarkerThematicMetadata |
HumanHealth |
«dataType» |
BiomarkerType |
HumanHealth |
«dataType» |
CODValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
ChemicalValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
ComponentTypeValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
Disease |
HumanHealth |
«featureType» |
DiseaseMeasure |
HumanHealth |
«dataType» |
DiseaseMeasureTypeValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
EnvHealthDeterminantConcentrationMeasure |
HumanHealth |
«featureType» |
EnvHealthDeterminantMeasure |
HumanHealth |
«featureType» |
EnvHealthDeterminantNoiseMeasure |
HumanHealth |
«featureType» |
EnvHealthDeterminantStatisticalData |
HumanHealth |
«featureType» |
EnvHealthDeterminantTypeValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
GeneralHealthStatistics |
HumanHealth |
«featureType» |
GeneralHealthTypeValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
GroundWaterQualityComponentTypeValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
HealthServicesStatistic |
HumanHealth |
«featureType» |
HealthServicesTypeValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
HealthStatisticalData |
HumanHealth |
«featureType» |
ICDValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
LakeWaterQuality |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
MatrixValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
MeasureCategoryTypeValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
MediaTypeValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
NoiseSourceTypeValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
ReferencePeriodType |
HumanHealth |
«dataType» |
RiverWaterQualityComponentTypeValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
StatisticalAggregationMethodValue |
HumanHealth |
«codeList» |
5.3.2.1. Spatial object types
5.3.2.1.1. Disease
Disease | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: ageRange
|
||||||||||
Attribute: diseaseMeasure
|
||||||||||
Attribute: gender
|
||||||||||
Attribute: referencePeriod
|
||||||||||
Attribute: pathology
|
||||||||||
Attribute: COD
|
||||||||||
Constraint: CODusability
|
||||||||||
Constraint: pathologiOrCODnotempty
|
5.3.2.1.2. EnvHealthDeterminantConcentrationMeasure
EnvHealthDeterminantConcentrationMeasure | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: component
|
||||||||
Attribute: media
|
5.3.2.1.3. EnvHealthDeterminantMeasure
EnvHealthDeterminantMeasure | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: location
|
||||||||||
Attribute: type
|
||||||||||
Attribute: measureTime
|
||||||||||
Attribute: beginLifespanVersion
|
||||||||||
Attribute: endLifespanVersion
|
||||||||||
Attribute: validFrom
|
||||||||||
Attribute: validTo
|
||||||||||
Attribute: measure
|
||||||||||
Attribute: category
|
||||||||||
Constraint: measureOrCategory
|
5.3.2.1.4. EnvHealthDeterminantNoiseMeasure
EnvHealthDeterminantNoiseMeasure | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: source
|
5.3.2.1.5. EnvHealthDeterminantStatisticalData
EnvHealthDeterminantStatisticalData | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: statisticalMethod
|
||||||||
Attribute: type
|
||||||||
Association role: measure
|
5.3.2.1.6. HealthStatisticalData
HealthStatisticalData (abstract) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Association role: aggregationUnit
|
5.3.2.1.7. Biomarker
Biomarker | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: biomarkerName
|
||||||||
Attribute: biomarkerStatisticalParameter
|
||||||||
Attribute: referencePeriod
|
||||||||
Attribute: ageRange
|
||||||||
Attribute: gender
|
||||||||
Association role: refersTo
|
5.3.2.1.8. HealthServicesStatistic
HealthServicesStatistic | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: healthServiceType
|
||||||||
Attribute: healthServiceValue
|
||||||||
Attribute: referencePeriod
|
5.3.2.1.9. GeneralHealthStatistics
GeneralHealthStatistics | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: ageRange
|
||||||||||
Attribute: gender
|
||||||||||
Attribute: generalHealthName
|
||||||||||
Attribute: generalHealthValue
|
||||||||||
Attribute: referencePeriod
|
5.3.2.2. Data types
5.3.2.2.1. Age
Age | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: month
|
||||||||
Attribute: week
|
||||||||
Attribute: year
|
5.3.2.2.2. AgeRangeType
AgeRangeType | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: startAge
|
||||||||
Attribute: range
|
5.3.2.2.3. BiomarkerStatisticalParameterType
BiomarkerStatisticalParameterType | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: geometricMean
|
||||||||
Attribute: CI95ofGM
|
||||||||
Attribute: P50
|
||||||||
Attribute: P90
|
||||||||
Attribute: P95
|
||||||||
Attribute: CI95ofP95
|
||||||||
Attribute: maximum
|
||||||||
Attribute: numberOfPartecipants
|
||||||||
Attribute: pinLOD
|
||||||||
Attribute: LOQ
|
||||||||
Constraint: CI95ofGMandGeometricMeanTogether
|
5.3.2.2.4. BiomarkerThematicMetadata
BiomarkerThematicMetadata | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: studyType
|
||||||||
Attribute: areaType
|
||||||||
Attribute: specificSubPopulation
|
||||||||
Attribute: meanAge
|
||||||||
Association role: describedBy
|
5.3.2.2.5. BiomarkerType
BiomarkerType | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: chemical
|
||||||||
Attribute: matrix
|
5.3.2.2.6. DiseaseMeasure
DiseaseMeasure | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: diseaseMeasureType
|
||||||||
Attribute: value
|
5.3.2.2.7. ReferencePeriodType
ReferencePeriodType | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: startDate
|
||||||||
Attribute: endDate
|
5.3.2.3. Code lists
5.3.2.3.1. AirQualityComponentTypeValue
AirQualityComponentTypeValue | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.2. BathingWaterQualityComponentTypeValue
BathingWaterQualityComponentTypeValue | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.3. ChemicalValue
ChemicalValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.4. ComponentTypeValue
ComponentTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.5. DiseaseMeasureTypeValue
DiseaseMeasureTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.6. EnvHealthDeterminantTypeValue
EnvHealthDeterminantTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.7. GroundWaterQualityComponentTypeValue
GroundWaterQualityComponentTypeValue | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.8. HealthServicesTypeValue
HealthServicesTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.9. LakeWaterQuality
LakeWaterQuality | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.10. MatrixValue
MatrixValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.11. MeasureCategoryTypeValue
MeasureCategoryTypeValue | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.12. MediaTypeValue
MediaTypeValue | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.13. NoiseSourceTypeValue
NoiseSourceTypeValue | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.14. RiverWaterQualityComponentTypeValue
RiverWaterQualityComponentTypeValue | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.15. StatisticalAggregationMethodValue
StatisticalAggregationMethodValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.16. ICDValue
ICDValue | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.17. CODValue
CODValue | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.18. GeneralHealthTypeValue
GeneralHealthTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4. Imported types (informative)
This section lists definitions for feature types, data types and code lists that are defined in other application schemas. The section is purely informative and should help the reader understand the feature catalogue presented in the previous sections. For the normative documentation of these types, see the given references.
5.3.2.4.1. Date
Date | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.2. DateTime
DateTime | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.3. GM_Object
GM_Object (abstract) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.4. GenderValue
GenderValue | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.5. Integer
Integer | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.6. Measure
Measure | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.7. PT_FreeText
PT_FreeText | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.8. Real
Real | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.9. StatisticalUnit
StatisticalUnit (abstract) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.10. TM_Period
TM_Period | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.11. UnitOfMeasure
UnitOfMeasure (abstract) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.3. Externally governed code lists
The externally governed code lists included in this application schema are specified in the tables in this section.
5.3.3.1. Governance, availability and constraints
Code list | Governance | Version | Availability | Formats | Subset |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICDValue |
World Health Organization |
Latest available version |
HTML |
|
|
CODValue |
Eurostat |
Latest available version |
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nomenclatures/index.cfm? TargetUrl=LST_NOM_DTL&StrNom=COD_1998&StrLanguageCode=EN |
HTML, CSV, XML |
5.3.3.2. Rules for code list values
Code list | Identifiers | Identifier examples | Labels |
---|---|---|---|
ICDValue |
Append the upper-case alphanumeric code in the "Code" column of Annex A6 to the URI prefix http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/ICDValue/ |
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/ICDValue/A00 for Cholera |
The name after the code in the ICD10online website; e.g Cholera |
CODValue |
Append the two numeric code in the "Code" column of Annex A6 to the URI prefix http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/CODValue/ |
The name after the code in the COD website; e.g Alcohol abuse |
5.4. Application schema Safety
5.4.1. Description
5.4.1.1. Narrative description
Safety is described in the application schema Safety. The structure of Safety is represented by two diagrams: Event core and Event extension.
The first diagram describes the characteristics of an Event (see chapter 2.2) and the spatial types that must be used to represent the location of the Event: a geometry, an administrative units (see AU Data Specification) or a geographical name (see GN data Specification).
The second diagram describes the subtypes of an event and their specific characteristics.
Figure 15: UML class diagram: Overview of the Safety application schema
Figure 15: UML class diagram: Overview of the Safety application schemashows the structure of the Safety application schema and the imported application schemas: GN, AU and Basic Types package from ISO 19103:2005 Schema Language.
5.4.1.2. UML Overview
5.4.1.2.1. Event core Diagram
An Event (see Figure 16: UML class: Event core diagram) is characterized by an inspire identifier, a duration, a citation and the reference to the location where the event happened. An event could be also classified as intentional (if it has been made on purpose) and as a major event (more than 4 fatalities or more than 10 injured or more than 2 million euro damage). The location of the event should be represented by a geometry, a geographical name or, for confidentiality reasons, by the involved administrative unit.
An event can be the result of the aggregation of two or more events close in time and location.
📘
|
Recomendation 10 Any unintentional or intentional event harming or damaging humans, property or the environment shall be modeled using the Event featuretype. |
📘
|
Recomendation 11 Specify the reference source ensuring the reliability of information for the event. |
Figure 16: UML class: Event core diagram
Additional information can be associated to an event as well as the damage caused in terms of affected people or estimated cost for society.
5.4.1.2.2. Event extension Diagram
The four subtypes of an event are shown in Figure 17.
📘
|
Recomendation 12 Building use should be provided if the event occurs inside a building. |
Figure 17: UML class: Event extension diagram
The reference to the links or nodes of a transport network that are involved in a traffic related event (for instance a car accident in a road or a crossing) should be described following the mechanism proposed in the GCM (e.g. speed limit see Figure 16 of GCM).
In this case, instead of defining a new feature type, like in Figure 18, the reference to the elements that are affected by a traffic event are represented through an association between the event and a network reference (Figure 17).
Figure 18: Network reference (from INSPIRE generic conceptual model)
📘
|
Recomendation 13 The links of a transport network that are involved in an traffic related event should be represented following the mechanism described in the GCM to make reference to a network element. |
5.4.2. Feature catalogue
Feature catalogue metadata
Application Schema |
INSPIRE Application Schema Safety |
Version number |
3.0 |
Types defined in the feature catalogue
Type | Package | Stereotypes |
---|---|---|
BuildingUseValue |
Safety |
«codeList» |
ConsequenceTypeValue |
Safety |
«codeList» |
Event |
Safety |
«featureType» |
EventConsequence |
Safety |
«dataType» |
EventInformation |
Safety |
«dataType» |
FireOrExplosionLocalityType |
Safety |
«dataType» |
FireOrExplosionRelatedEvent |
Safety |
«featureType» |
FireOrExplosionTypeValue |
Safety |
«codeList» |
HazardousMaterialRelatedEvent |
Safety |
«featureType» |
HazardousMaterialTypeValue |
Safety |
«codeList» |
LocationUnitType |
Safety |
«union» |
NaturalHazardRelatedEvent |
Safety |
«featureType» |
TrafficRelatedEvent |
Safety |
«featureType» |
TrafficTypeValue |
Safety |
«codeList» |
Spatial object types
5.4.2.1. Event
Event | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: inspireId
|
||||||||||
Attribute: isIntentional
|
||||||||||
Attribute: isMajor
|
||||||||||
Attribute: startTime
|
||||||||||
Attribute: endTime
|
||||||||||
Attribute: causeOfEvent
|
||||||||||
Attribute: eventDescription
|
||||||||||
Attribute: sourceReference
|
||||||||||
Attribute: locationUnit
|
||||||||||
Attribute: beginLifespanVersion
|
||||||||||
Attribute: endLifespanVersion
|
||||||||||
Association role: consequence
|
||||||||||
Association role: aggregation
|
||||||||||
Association role: additionalInformation
|
NaturalHazardRelatedEvent
NaturalHazardRelatedEvent | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: naturalHazardType
|
5.4.2.2. FireOrExplosionRelatedEvent
FireOrExplosionRelatedEvent | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: fireOrExplosionType
|
||||||||
Attribute: fireOrExplosionLocality
|
5.4.2.3. HazardousMaterialRelatedEvent
HazardousMaterialRelatedEvent | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: hazardousMaterialType
|
5.4.2.4. TrafficRelatedEvent
TrafficRelatedEvent | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: trafficType
|
||||||||||
Attribute: trafficRelatedEventInformation
|
5.4.2.5. Data types
5.4.2.6. LocationUnitType
LocationUnitType | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: geometry
|
||||||||
Attribute: geographicalName
|
||||||||
Attribute: administrativeUnit
|
5.4.2.7. EventConsequence
EventConsequence | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: value
|
||||||||
Attribute: consequenceType
|
5.4.2.8. EventInformation
EventInformation | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: title
|
||||||||||
Attribute: preventionAndPreparedness
|
||||||||||
Attribute: lessonsLearned
|
||||||||||
Attribute: eventSequences
|
||||||||||
Attribute: environmentalDamage
|
5.4.2.9. FireOrExplosionLocalityType
FireOrExplosionLocalityType | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: inBuilding
|
||||||||
Attribute: buildingUse
|
5.4.2.10. Code lists
5.4.2.11. ConsequenceTypeValue
ConsequenceTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.12. BuildingUseValue
BuildingUseValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.13. FireOrExplosionTypeValue
FireOrExplosionTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.14. HazardousMaterialTypeValue
HazardousMaterialTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.15. TrafficTypeValue
TrafficTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.16. Imported types (informative)
This section lists definitions for feature types, data types and code lists that are defined in other application schemas. The section is purely informative and should help the reader understand the feature catalogue presented in the previous sections. For the normative documentation of these types, see the given references.
5.4.2.16.1. AdministrativeUnit
AdministrativeUnit | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.16.2. Boolean
Boolean | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.16.3. CI_Citation
CI_Citation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.16.4. DateTime
DateTime | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.16.5. GM_Object
GM_Object (abstract) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.16.6. GeographicalName
GeographicalName | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.16.7. Identifier
Identifier | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.17. NaturalHazardCategoryValue
NaturalHazardCategoryValue | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.18. PT_FreeText
PT_FreeText | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.19. Real
Real | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
6. Reference systems, units of measure and grids
6.1. Default reference systems, units of measure and grid
The reference systems, units of measure and geographic grid systems included in this sub-section are the defaults to be used for all INSPIRE data sets, unless theme-specific exceptions and/or additional requirements are defined in section 6.2.
6.1.1. Coordinate reference systems
6.1.1.1. Datum
📕
|
IR Requirement For the three-dimensional and two-dimensional coordinate reference systems and the horizontal component of compound coordinate reference systems used for making spatial data sets available, the datum shall be the datum of the European Terrestrial Reference System 1989 (ETRS89) in areas within its geographical scope, or the datum of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) or other geodetic coordinate reference systems compliant with ITRS in areas that are outside the geographical scope of ETRS89. Compliant with the ITRS means that the system definition is based on the definition of the ITRS and there is a well documented relationship between both systems, according to EN ISO 19111. |
6.1.1.2. Coordinate reference systems
📕
|
IR Requirement Spatial data sets shall be made available using at least one of the coordinate reference systems specified in sections 1.3.1, 1.3.2 and 1.3.3, unless one of the conditions specified in section 1.3.4 holds. 1.3.1. Three-dimensional Coordinate Reference Systems
1.3.2. Two-dimensional Coordinate Reference Systems
1.3.3. Compound Coordinate Reference Systems
1.3.4. Other Coordinate Reference Systems Exceptions, where other coordinate reference systems than those listed in 1.3.1, 1.3.2 or 1.3.3 may be used, are:
The geodetic codes and parameters needed to describe these other coordinate reference systems and to allow conversion and transformation operations shall be documented and an identifier shall be created in a coordinate systems register established and operated by the Commission, according to EN ISO 19111 and ISO 19127. |
6.1.1.3. Display
📕
|
IR Requirement For the display of spatial data sets with the view network service as specified in Regulation No 976/2009, at least the coordinate reference systems for two-dimensional geodetic coordinates (latitude, longitude) shall be available. |
6.1.1.4. Identifiers for coordinate reference systems
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
These Technical Guidelines propose to use the http URIs provided by the Open Geospatial Consortium as coordinate reference system identifiers (see identifiers for the default CRSs in the INSPIRE coordinate reference systems register). These are based on and redirect to the definition in the EPSG Geodetic Parameter Registry (http://www.epsg-registry.org/).
📒
|
TG Requirement 2 The identifiers listed in the INSPIRE coordinate reference systems register (https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/crs) shall be used for referring to the coordinate reference systems used in a data set. |
NOTE CRS identifiers may be used e.g. in:
-
data encoding,
-
data set and service metadata, and
-
requests to INSPIRE network services.
6.1.2. Temporal reference system
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
NOTE 1 Point 5 of part B of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1205/2008 (the INSPIRE Metadata IRs) states that the default reference system shall be the Gregorian calendar, with dates expressed in accordance with ISO 8601.
NOTE 2 ISO 8601 Data elements and interchange formats – Information interchange – Representation of dates and times is an international standard covering the exchange of date and time-related data. The purpose of this standard is to provide an unambiguous and well-defined method of representing dates and times, so as to avoid misinterpretation of numeric representations of dates and times, particularly when data is transferred between countries with different conventions for writing numeric dates and times. The standard organizes the data so the largest temporal term (the year) appears first in the data string and progresses to the smallest term (the second). It also provides for a standardized method of communicating time-based information across time zones by attaching an offset to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
EXAMPLE 1997 (the year 1997), 1997-07-16 (16th July 1997), 1997-07-16T19:20:3001:00 (16th July 1997, 19h 20' 30'', time zone: UTC1)
6.1.3. Units of measure
📕
|
IR Requirement (…)
|
6.1.4. Grids
📕
|
IR Requirement Either of the grids with fixed and unambiguously defined locations defined in Sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 shall be used as a geo-referencing framework to make gridded data available in INSPIRE, unless one of the following conditions holds:
2.2 Equal Area Grid The grid is based on the ETRS89 Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area (ETRS89-LAEA) coordinate reference system with the centre of the projection at the point 52o N, 10o E and false easting: x0 = 4321000 m, false northing: y0 = 3210000 m. The origin of the grid coincides with the false origin of the ETRS89-LAEA coordinate reference system (x=0, y=0). Grid points of grids based on ETRS89-LAEA shall coincide with grid points of the grid. The grid is hierarchical, with resolutions of 1m, 10m, 100m, 1000m, 10000m and 100000m. The grid orientation is south-north, west-east. The grid is designated as Grid_ETRS89-LAEA. For identification of an individual resolution level the cell size in metres is appended. For the unambiguous referencing and identification of a grid cell, the cell code composed of the size of the cell and the coordinates of the lower left cell corner in ETRS89-LAEA shall be used. The cell size shall be denoted in metres ("m") for cell sizes up to 100m or kilometres ("km") for cell sizes of 1000m and above. Values for northing and easting shall be divided by 10n, where n is the number of trailing zeros in the cell size value. |
6.2. Theme-specific requirements and recommendations
There are no theme-specific requirements or recommendations on reference systems and grids.
7. Data quality
This chapter includes a description of the data quality elements and sub-elements as well as the corresponding data quality measures that should be used to evaluate and document data quality for data sets related to the spatial data theme Human Health and Safety (section 7.1).
It may also define requirements or recommendations about the targeted data quality results applicable for data sets related to the spatial data theme Human Health and Safety (sections 7.2 and 7.3).
In particular, the data quality elements, sub-elements and measures specified in section 7.1 should be used for
-
evaluating and documenting data quality properties and constraints of spatial objects, where such properties or constraints are defined as part of the application schema(s) (see section 5);
-
evaluating and documenting data quality metadata elements of spatial data sets (see section 8); and/or
-
specifying requirements or recommendations about the targeted data quality results applicable for data sets related to the spatial data theme Human Health and Safety (see sections 7.2 and 7.3).
The descriptions of the elements and measures are based on Annex D of ISO/DIS 19157 Geographic information – Data quality.
7.1. Data quality elements
Table 3 lists all data quality elements and sub-elements that are being used in this specification. Data quality information can be evaluated at level of spatial object, spatial object type, dataset or dataset series. The level at which the evaluation is performed is given in the "Evaluation Scope" column.
The measures to be used for each of the listed data quality sub-elements are defined in the following sub-sections.
Table 3 – Data quality elements used in the spatial data theme Human Health and Safety
Section |
Data quality element |
Data quality sub-element |
Definition |
Evaluation Scope |
7.1.1 |
Positional accuracy |
Absolute or external accuracy |
closeness of reported coordinate values to values accepted as or being true |
Dataset |
7.1.2 |
Thematic accuracy |
Quantitative attribute accuracy |
accuracy of quantitative attributes |
Dataset |
7.1.3 |
Temporal quality |
Temporal validity |
validity of data specified by the scope with respect to time |
Dataset |
📘
|
Recomendation 14 Where it is impossible to express the evaluation of a data quality element in a quantitative way, the evaluation of the element should be expressed with a textual statement as a data quality descriptive result. |
7.1.1. Positional accuracy – Absolute or external accuracy
📘
|
Recomendation 15 Absolute or external accuracy should be evaluated and documented using positional accuracy measure as specified in the tables below. |
Name |
<Name of the measure, from ISO/DIS 19157> |
Alternative name |
- |
Data quality element |
Positional accuracy |
Data quality sub-element |
Absolute or external accuracy |
Data quality basic measure |
Not applicable |
Definition |
Mean value of the positional uncertainties for a set of positions where the positional uncertainties are defined as the distance between a measured position and what is considered as the corresponding true position |
Description |
For a number of points (N), the measured positions are given as xmi, ymi and zmi coordinates depending on the dimension in which the position of the point is measured. A corresponding set of coordinates, xti, yti and zti, are considered to represent the true positions. The errors are calculated as: The mean positional uncertainties of the horizontal absolute or External positions are then calculated as: A criterion for the establishing of correspondence should also bestated (e.g. allowing for correspondence to the closest position, correspondence on vertices or along lines). The criterion/criteria for finding the corresponding points shall be reported with the data quality evaluation result. This data quality measure is different from the standard deviation. |
Evaluation scope |
data set |
Reporting scope |
data set |
Parameter |
|
Data quality value type |
|
Data quality value structure |
Single value |
Source reference |
ISO/DIS 19157 Geographic information – Data quality |
Example |
|
Measure identifier |
28 |
7.1.2. Thematic accuracy – Quantitative attribute accuracy
📘
|
Recomendation 16 Quantitative attribute accuracy should be evaluated and documented using error count measure as specified in the tables below. |
Name |
<Name of the measure, from ISO/DIS 19157> |
Alternative name |
- |
Data quality element |
Thematic accuracy |
Data quality sub-element |
Quantitative attribute accuracy |
Data quality basic measure |
Error count |
Definition |
Number of incorrect attribute values |
Description |
- |
Evaluation scope |
data set |
Reporting scope |
data set |
Parameter |
None. |
Data quality value type |
Percentage |
Data quality value structure |
Single value |
Source reference |
ISO/DIS 19157 Geographic information – Data quality |
Example |
- |
Measure identifier |
67 |
7.1.3. Temporal quality – Temporal validity
📘
|
Recomendation 17 Temporal validity should be evaluated and documented using error count measure as specified in the tables below. |
Name |
<Name of the measure, from ISO/DIS 19157> |
Alternative name |
- |
Data quality element |
Temporal quality |
Data quality sub-element |
Temporal validity |
Data quality basic measure |
Error count |
Definition |
Number of items not in conformance with their value domain |
Description |
- |
Evaluation scope |
data set |
Reporting scope |
data set |
Parameter |
None. |
Data quality value type |
Percentage |
Data quality value structure |
Single value |
Source reference |
ISO/DIS 19157 Geographic information – Data quality |
Example |
- |
Measure identifier |
17 |
7.2. Minimum data quality requirements
No minimum data quality requirements are defined for the spatial data theme Human Health and Safety.
7.3. Recommendation on data quality
No minimum data quality recommendations are defined.
8. Dataset-level metadata
This section specifies dataset-level metadata elements, which should be used for documenting metadata for a complete dataset or dataset series.
NOTE Metadata can also be reported for each individual spatial object (spatial object-level metadata). Spatial object-level metadata is fully described in the application schema(s) (section 5).
For some dataset-level metadata elements, in particular those for reporting data quality and maintenance, a more specific scope can be specified. This allows the definition of metadata at sub-dataset level, e.g. separately for each spatial object type (see instructions for the relevant metadata element).
8.1. Metadata elements defined in INSPIRE Metadata Regulation
Table 4 gives an overview of the metadata elements specified in Regulation 1205/2008/EC (implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards metadata).
The table contains the following information:
-
The first column provides a reference to the relevant section in the Metadata Regulation, which contains a more detailed description.
-
The second column specifies the name of the metadata element.
-
The third column specifies the multiplicity.
-
The fourth column specifies the condition, under which the given element becomes mandatory.
Table 4 – Metadata for spatial datasets and spatial dataset series specified in Regulation 1205/2008/EC
Metadata Regulation Section |
Metadata element |
Multiplicity |
Condition |
1.1 |
Resource title |
1 |
|
1.2 |
Resource abstract |
1 |
|
1.3 |
Resource type |
1 |
|
1.4 |
Resource locator |
0..* |
Mandatory if a URL is available to obtain more information on the resource, and/or access related services. |
1.5 |
Unique resource identifier |
1..* |
|
1.7 |
Resource language |
0..* |
Mandatory if the resource includes textual information. |
2.1 |
Topic category |
1..* |
|
3 |
Keyword |
1..* |
|
4.1 |
Geographic bounding box |
1..* |
|
5 |
Temporal reference |
1..* |
|
6.1 |
Lineage |
1 |
|
6.2 |
Spatial resolution |
0..* |
Mandatory for data sets and data set series if an equivalent scale or a resolution distance can be specified. |
7 |
Conformity |
1..* |
|
8.1 |
Conditions for access and use |
1..* |
|
8.2 |
Limitations on public access |
1..* |
|
9 |
Responsible organisation |
1..* |
|
10.1 |
Metadata point of contact |
1..* |
|
10.2 |
Metadata date |
1 |
|
10.3 |
Metadata language |
1 |
Generic guidelines for implementing these elements using ISO 19115 and 19119 are available at https://knowledge-base.inspire.ec.europa.eu/publications/technical-guidance-implementation-inspire-dataset-and-service-metadata-based-isots-191392007_en. The following sections describe additional theme-specific recommendations and requirements for implementing these elements.
8.1.1. Conformity
The Conformity metadata element defined in Regulation 1205/2008/EC requires to report the conformance with the Implementing Rule for interoperability of spatial data sets and services. In addition, it may be used also to document the conformance to another specification.
📘
|
Recomendation 18 Dataset metadata should include a statement on the overall conformance of the dataset with this data specification (i.e. conformance with all requirements). |
📘
|
Recomendation 19 The Conformity metadata element should be used to document conformance with this data specification (as a whole), with a specific conformance class defined in the Abstract Test Suite in Annex A and/or with another specification. |
The Conformity element includes two sub-elements, the Specification (a citation of the Implementing Rule for interoperability of spatial data sets and services or other specification), and the Degree of conformity. The Degree can be Conformant (if the dataset is fully conformant with the cited specification), Not Conformant (if the dataset does not conform to the cited specification) or Not Evaluated (if the conformance has not been evaluated).
📘
|
Recomendation 20 If a dataset is not yet conformant with all requirements of this data specification, it is recommended to include information on the conformance with the individual conformance classes specified in the Abstract Test Suite in Annex A. |
📘
|
Recomendation 21 If a dataset is produced or transformed according to an external specification that includes specific quality assurance procedures, the conformity with this specification should be documented using the Conformity metadata element. |
📘
|
Recomendation 22 If minimum data quality recommendations are defined then the statement on the conformity with these requirements should be included using the Conformity metadata element and referring to the relevant data quality conformance class in the Abstract Test Suite. |
NOTE Currently no minimum data quality requirements are included in the IRs. The recommendation above should be included as a requirement in the IRs if minimum data quality requirements are defined at some point in the future.
📘
|
Recomendation 23 When documenting conformance with this data specification or one of the conformance classes defined in the Abstract Test Suite, the Specification sub-element should be given using the http URI identifier of the conformance class or using a citation including the following elements:
|
EXAMPLE 1: The XML snippets below show how to fill the Specification sub-element for documenting conformance with the whole data specification on Addresses v3.0.1.
<gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
<gmd:specification href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformanceClass/ad/3.0.1/tg" />
<gmd:explanation> (...) </gmd:explanation>
<gmd:pass> (...) </gmd:pass>
</gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
or (using a citation):
<gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
<gmd:specification>
<gmd:CI_Citation>
<gmd:title>
<gco:CharacterString>INSPIRE Data Specification on Human Health and Safety – Technical Guidelines</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:title>
<gmd:date>
<gmd:date>
<gco:Date>2013-04-10</gco:Date>
</gmd:date>
<gmd:dateType>
<gmd:CI_DateTypeCode codeList="http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/ISO_19139_Schemas/resou
rces/Codelist/ML_gmxCodelists.xml#CI_DateTypeCode" codeListValue="publication">publication</gmd:CI_DateTypeCode>
</gmd:dateType>
</gmd:date>
</gmd:CI_Citation>
</gmd:specification>
<gmd:explanation> (...) </gmd:explanation>
<gmd:pass> (...) </gmd:pass>
</gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
EXAMPLE 2: The XML snippets below show how to fill the Specification sub-element for documenting conformance with the CRS conformance class of the data specification on Addresses v3.0.1.
<gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
<gmd:specification href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformanceClass/ad/3.0.1/crs" />
<gmd:explanation> (...) </gmd:explanation>
<gmd:pass> (...) </gmd:pass>
</gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
or (using a citation):
<gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
<gmd:specification>
<gmd:CI_Citation>
<gmd:title>
<gco:CharacterString>INSPIRE Data Specification on Human Health and Safety – Technical Guidelines – CRS</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:title>
<gmd:date>
<gmd:date>
<gco:Date>2013-04-10</gco:Date>
</gmd:date>
<gmd:dateType>
<gmd:CI_DateTypeCode codeList="http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/ISO_19139_Schemas/resou
rces/Codelist/ML_gmxCodelists.xml#CI_DateTypeCode" codeListValue="publication">publication</gmd:CI_DateTypeCode>
</gmd:dateType>
</gmd:date>
</gmd:CI_Citation>
</gmd:specification>
<gmd:explanation> (...) </gmd:explanation>
<gmd:pass> (...) </gmd:pass>
</gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
8.1.2. Lineage
📘
|
Recomendation 24 Following the ISO/DIS 19157 Quality principles, if a data provider has a procedure for the quality management of their spatial data sets then the appropriate data quality elements and measures defined in ISO/DIS 19157 should be used to evaluate and report (in the metadata) the results. If not, the Lineage metadata element (defined in Regulation 1205/2008/EC) should be used to describe the overall quality of a spatial data set. |
According to Regulation 1205/2008/EC, lineage "is a statement on process history and/or overall quality of the spatial data set. Where appropriate it may include a statement whether the data set has been validated or quality assured, whether it is the official version (if multiple versions exist), and whether it has legal validity. The value domain of this metadata element is free text".
The Metadata Technical Guidelines based on EN ISO 19115 and EN ISO 19119 specifies that the statement sub-element of LI_Lineage (EN ISO 19115) should be used to implement the lineage metadata element.
📘
|
Recomendation 25 To describe the transformation steps and related source data, it is recommended to use the following sub-elements of LI_Lineage:
|
NOTE 1 In order to improve the interoperability, domain templates and instructions for using these free text elements (descriptive statements) may be specified here and/or in an Annex of this data specification.
8.1.3. Temporal reference
According to Regulation 1205/2008/EC, at least one of the following temporal reference metadata sub-elements shall be provided: temporal extent, date of publication, date of last revision, date of creation.
📘
|
Recomendation 26 It is recommended that at least the date of the last revision of a spatial data set should be reported using the Date of last revision metadata sub-element. |
8.2. Metadata elements for interoperability
📕
|
IR Requirement The metadata describing a spatial data set shall include the following metadata elements required for interoperability:
|
These Technical Guidelines propose to implement the required metadata elements based on ISO 19115 and ISO/TS 19139.
The following TG requirements need to be met in order to be conformant with the proposed encoding.
📒
|
TG Requirement 3 Metadata instance (XML) documents shall validate without error against the used ISO 19139 XML schema. |
NOTE Section 2.1.2 of the Metadata Technical Guidelines discusses the different ISO 19139 XML schemas that are currently available.
📒
|
TG Requirement 4 Metadata instance (XML) documents shall contain the elements and meet the INSPIRE multiplicity specified in the sections below. |
📒
|
TG Requirement 5 The elements specified below shall be available in the specified ISO/TS 19139 path. |
📘
|
Recomendation 27 The metadata elements for interoperability should be made available together with the metadata elements defined in the Metadata Regulation through an INSPIRE discovery service. |
NOTE While this not explicitly required by any of the INSPIRE Implementing Rules, making all metadata of a data set available together and through one service simplifies implementation and usability.
8.2.1. Coordinate Reference System
Metadata element name | Coordinate Reference System |
---|---|
Definition |
Description of the coordinate reference system used in the dataset. |
ISO 19115 number and name |
|
ISO/TS 19139 path |
referenceSystemInfo |
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
mandatory |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
1..* |
Data type(and ISO 19115 no.) |
|
Domain |
To identify the reference system, the referenceSystemIdentifier (RS_Identifier) shall be provided. NOTE More specific instructions, in particular on pre-defined values for filling the referenceSystemIdentifier attribute should be agreed among Member States during the implementation phase to support interoperability. |
Implementing instructions |
|
Example |
referenceSystemIdentifier: |
Example XML encoding |
|
Comments |
8.2.2. Temporal Reference System
Metadata element name | Temporal Reference System |
---|---|
Definition |
Description of the temporal reference systems used in the dataset. |
ISO 19115 number and name |
|
ISO/TS 19139 path |
referenceSystemInfo |
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
Mandatory, if the spatial data set or one of its feature types contains temporal information that does not refer to the Gregorian Calendar or the Coordinated Universal Time. |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
0..* |
Data type(and ISO 19115 no.) |
|
Domain |
No specific type is defined in ISO 19115 for temporal reference systems. Thus, the generic MD_ReferenceSystem element and its reference SystemIdentifier (RS_Identifier) property shall be provided. NOTE More specific instructions, in particular on pre-defined values for filling the referenceSystemIdentifier attribute should be agreed among Member States during the implementation phase to support interoperability. |
Implementing instructions |
|
Example |
referenceSystemIdentifier: |
Example XML encoding |
|
Comments |
8.2.3. Encoding
Metadata element name | Encoding |
---|---|
Definition |
Description of the computer language construct that specifies the representation of data objects in a record, file, message, storage device or transmission channel |
ISO 19115 number and name |
|
ISO/TS 19139 path |
distributionInfo/MD_Distribution/distributionFormat |
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
mandatory |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
1 |
Data type (and ISO 19115 no.) |
|
Domain |
See B.2.10.4. The property values (name, version, specification) specified in section 5 shall be used to document the default and alternative encodings. |
Implementing instructions |
|
Example |
name: <Application schema name> GML application schema |
Example XML encoding |
|
Comments |
8.2.4. Character Encoding
Metadata element name | Character Encoding |
---|---|
Definition |
The character encoding used in the data set. |
ISO 19115 number and name |
|
ISO/TS 19139 path |
|
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
Mandatory, if an encoding is used that is not based on UTF-8. |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
0..* |
Data type (and ISO 19115 no.) |
|
Domain |
|
Implementing instructions |
|
Example |
- |
Example XML encoding |
|
Comments |
8.2.5. Spatial representation type
Metadata element name | Spatial representation type |
---|---|
Definition |
The method used to spatially represent geographic information. |
ISO 19115 number and name |
|
ISO/TS 19139 path |
|
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
Mandatory |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
1..* |
Data type (and ISO 19115 no.) |
B.5.26 MD_SpatialRepresentationTypeCode |
Domain |
|
Implementing instructions |
Of the values included in the code list in ISO 19115 (vector, grid, textTable, tin, stereoModel, video), only vector, grid and tin should be used. NOTE Additional code list values may be defined based on feedback from implementation. |
Example |
- |
Example XML encoding |
|
Comments |
8.2.6. Data Quality – Logical Consistency – Topological Consistency
See section 8.3.2 for instructions on how to implement metadata elements for reporting data quality.
8.3. Recommended theme-specific metadata elements
📘
|
Recomendation 28 The metadata describing a spatial data set or a spatial data set series related to the theme Human Health and Safety should comprise the theme-specific metadata elements specified in Table 5. |
The table contains the following information:
-
The first column provides a reference to a more detailed description.
-
The second column specifies the name of the metadata element.
-
The third column specifies the multiplicity.
Table 5 – Optional theme-specific metadata elements for the theme Human Health and Safety
Section |
Metadata element |
Multiplicity |
8.3.1 |
Maintenance Information |
0..1 |
8.3.2 |
Logical Consistency – Conceptual Consistency |
0..* |
8.3.2 |
Logical Consistency – Domain Consistency |
0..* |
8.3.2 |
Other DQ element from chapter 7 |
0..1 |
📘
|
Recomendation 29 For implementing the metadata elements included in this section using ISO 19115, ISO/DIS 19157 and ISO/TS 19139, the instructions included in the relevant sub-sections should be followed. |
8.3.1. Maintenance Information
Metadata element name | Maintenance information |
---|---|
Definition |
Information about the scope and frequency of updating |
ISO 19115 number and name |
|
ISO/TS 19139 path |
identificationInfo/MD_Identification/resourceMaintenance |
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
optional |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
0..1 |
Data type(and ISO 19115 no.) |
|
Domain |
This is a complex type (lines 143-148 from ISO 19115). At least the following elements should be used (the multiplicity according to ISO 19115 is shown in parentheses):
|
Implementing instructions |
|
Example |
|
Example XML encoding |
|
Comments |
8.3.2. Metadata elements for reporting data quality
📘
|
Recomendation 30 For reporting the results of the data quality evaluation, the data quality elements, sub-elements and (for quantitative evaluation) measures defined in chapter 7 should be used. |
📘
|
Recomendation 31 The metadata elements specified in the following sections should be used to report the results of the data quality evaluation. At least the information included in the row "Implementation instructions" should be provided. |
The first section applies to reporting quantitative results (using the element DQ_QuantitativeResult), while the second section applies to reporting non-quantitative results (using the element DQ_DescriptiveResult).
📘
|
Recomendation 32 If a dataset does not pass the tests of the Application schema conformance class (defined in Annex A), the results of each test should be reported using one of the options described in sections 8.3.2.1 and 8.3.2.2. |
NOTE 1 If using non-quantitative description, the results of several tests do not have to be reported separately, but may be combined into one descriptive statement.
NOTE 2 The sections 8.3.2.1 and 8.3.2.2 may need to be updated once the XML schemas for ISO 19157 have been finalised.
The scope for reporting may be different from the scope for evaluating data quality (see section 7). If data quality is reported at the data set or spatial object type level, the results are usually derived or aggregated.
📘
|
Recomendation 33 The scope element (of type DQ_Scope) of the DQ_DataQuality subtype should be used to encode the reporting scope. Only the following values should be used for the level element of DQ_Scope: Series, Dataset, featureType. If the level is featureType the levelDescription/MDScopeDescription/features element (of type Set< GF_FeatureType>) shall be used to list the feature type names. |
NOTE In the level element of DQ_Scope, the value featureType is used to denote spatial object type.
8.3.2.1. Guidelines for reporting quantitative results of the data quality evaluation
Metadata element name | See chapter 7 |
---|---|
Definition |
See chapter 7 |
ISO/DIS 19157 number and name |
|
ISO/TS 19139 path |
dataQualityInfo/*/report |
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
optional |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
0..* |
Data type (and ISO/DIS 19157 no.) |
Corresponding DQ_xxx subelement from ISO/DIS 19157, e.g. 12. DQ_CompletenessCommission |
Domain |
Lines 7-9 from ISO/DIS 19157
|
Implementing instructions |
NOTE This should be the name as defined in Chapter 7.
NOTE If the reported data quality results are derived or aggregated (i.e. the scope levels for evaluation and reporting are different), the derivation or aggregation should also be specified using this property.
NOTE This should be data or range of dates on which the data quality measure was applied.
NOTE The DQ_Result type should be DQ_QuantitativeResult and the value(s) represent(s) the application of the data quality measure (39.) using the specified evaluation method (42-43.) |
Example |
See Table E.12 — Reporting commission as metadata (ISO/DIS 19157) |
Example XML encoding |
8.3.2.2. Guidelines for reporting descriptive results of the Data Quality evaluation
Metadata element name | See chapter 7 |
---|---|
Definition |
See chapter 7 |
ISO/DIS 19157 number and name |
|
ISO/TS 19139 path |
dataQualityInfo/*/report |
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
optional |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
0..* |
Data type (and ISO/DIS 19157 no.) |
Corresponding DQ_xxx subelement from ISO/DIS 19157, e.g. 12. DQ_CompletenessCommission |
Domain |
Line 9 from ISO/DIS 19157
|
Implementing instructions |
NOTE The DQ_Result type should be DQ_DescriptiveResult and in the statement (68.) the evaluation of the selected DQ sub-element should be expressed in a narrative way. |
Example |
See Table E.15 — Reporting descriptive result as metadata (ISO/DIS 19157) |
Example XML encoding |
9. Delivery
9.1. Updates
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
NOTE In this data specification, no exception is specified, so all updates shall be made available at the latest 6 months after the change was applied in the source data set.
9.2. Delivery medium
According to Article 11(1) of the INSPIRE Directive, Member States shall establish and operate a network of services for INSPIRE spatial data sets and services. The relevant network service types for making spatial data available are:
-
view services making it possible, as a minimum, to display, navigate, zoom in/out, pan, or overlay viewable spatial data sets and to display legend information and any relevant content of metadata;
-
download services, enabling copies of spatial data sets, or parts of such sets, to be downloaded and, where practicable, accessed directly;
-
transformation services, enabling spatial data sets to be transformed with a view to achieving interoperability.
NOTE For the relevant requirements and recommendations for network services, see the relevant Implementing Rules and Technical Guidelines[15].
EXAMPLE 1 Through the Get Spatial Objects function, a download service can either download a pre-defined data set or pre-defined part of a data set (non-direct access download service), or give direct access to the spatial objects contained in the data set, and download selections of spatial objects based upon a query (direct access download service). To execute such a request, some of the following information might be required:
-
the list of spatial object types and/or predefined data sets that are offered by the download service (to be provided through the Get Download Service Metadata operation),
-
and the query capabilities section advertising the types of predicates that may be used to form a query expression (to be provided through the Get Download Service Metadata operation, where applicable),
-
a description of spatial object types offered by a download service instance (to be provided through the Describe Spatial Object Types operation).
EXAMPLE 2 Through the Transform function, a transformation service carries out data content transformations from native data forms to the INSPIRE-compliant form and vice versa. If this operation is directly called by an application to transform source data (e.g. obtained through a download service) that is not yet conformant with this data specification, the following parameters are required:
Input data (mandatory). The data set to be transformed.
-
Source model (mandatory, if cannot be determined from the input data). The model in which the input data is provided.
-
Target model (mandatory). The model in which the results are expected.
-
Model mapping (mandatory, unless a default exists). Detailed description of how the transformation is to be carried out.
9.3. Encodings
The IRs contain the following two requirements for the encoding to be used to make data available.
📕
|
IR Requirement 1. Every encoding rule used to encode spatial data shall conform to EN ISO 19118. In particular, it shall specify schema conversion rules for all spatial object types and all attributes and association roles and the output data structure used. 2. Every encoding rule used to encode spatial data shall be made available. 2a. Every encoding rule used to encode spatial data shall also specify whether and how to represent attributes and association roles for which a corresponding value exists but is not contained in the spatial data sets maintained by a Member State, or cannot be derived from existing values at reasonable costs. |
NOTE ISO 19118:2011 specifies the requirements for defining encoding rules used for interchange of geographic data within the set of International Standards known as the "ISO 19100 series". An encoding rule allows geographic information defined by application schemas and standardized schemas to be coded into a system-independent data structure suitable for transport and storage. The encoding rule specifies the types of data being coded and the syntax, structure and coding schemes used in the resulting data structure. Specifically, ISO 19118:2011 includes
-
requirements for creating encoding rules based on UML schemas,
-
requirements for creating encoding services, and
-
requirements for XML-based encoding rules for neutral interchange of data.
While the IRs do not oblige the usage of a specific encoding, these Technical Guidelines propose to make data related to the spatial data theme Human Health and Safety available at least in the default encoding(s) specified in section 0. In this section, a number of TG requirements are listed that need to be met in order to be conformant with the default encoding(s).
The proposed default encoding(s) meet the requirements in Article 7 of the IRs, i.e. they are conformant with ISO 19118 and (since they are included in this specification) publicly available.
9.3.1. Default Encoding(s)
9.3.1.1. Specific requirements for GML encoding
This data specification proposes the use of GML as the default encoding, as recommended in sections 7.2 and 7.3 of [DS-D2.7]. GML is an XML encoding in compliance with ISO 19118, as required in Article 7(1). For details, see [ISO 19136], and in particular Annex E (UML-to-GML application schema encoding rules).
The following TG requirements need to be met in order to be conformant with GML encodings.
📒
|
TG Requirement 6 Data instance (XML) documents shall validate without error against the provided XML schema. |
NOTE 1 Not all constraints defined in the application schemas can be mapped to XML. Therefore, the following requirement is necessary.
NOTE 2 The obligation to use only the allowed code list values specified for attributes and most of the constraints defined in the application schemas cannot be mapped to the XML sch. They can therefore not be enforced through schema validation. It may be possible to express some of these constraints using other schema or rule languages (e.g. Schematron), in order to enable automatic validation.
9.3.1.2. Default encoding(s) for application schema HumanHealth
Name: HumanHealth GML Application Schema
Version: 5.0
Specification: D2.8.III.5 Data Specification on Human Health and Safety – Technical Guidelines
Character set: UTF-8
The xml schema document is available on INSPIRE website https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/schemas/hh/5.0/HumanHealth.xsd
Name: Safety GML Application Schema
Version: 3.0rc3
Specification: D2.8.III.5 Data Specification on Human Health and Safety – Technical Guidelines
Character set: UTF-8
The xml schema document is available on INSPIRE website https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/draft-schemas/hh-sa/3.0rc3/HumanHealthSafety.xsd
10. Data Capture
There is no specific guidance required with respect to data capture.
11. Portrayal
This clause defines the rules for layers and styles to be used for portrayal of the spatial object types defined for this theme. Portrayal is regulated in Article 14 of the IRs.
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
In section 11.1, the types of layers are defined that are to be used for the portrayal of the spatial object types defined in this specification. A view service may offer several layers of the same type, one for each dataset that it offers data on a specific topic.
NOTE The layer specification in the IRs only contains the name, a human readable title and the (subset(s) of) spatial object type(s), that constitute(s) the content of the layer. In addition, this TG documents suggests keywords for describing the layer.
📘
|
Recomendation 34 It is recommended to use the keywords specified in section 11.1 in the Layers Metadata parameters of the INSPIRE View service (see Annex III, Part A, section 2.2.4 in Commission Regulation (EC) No 976/2009). |
Section 11.2 specifies one style for each of these layers. It is proposed that INSPIRE view services support this style as the default style required by Article 14(1b).
📒
|
TG Requirement 7 For each layer specified in this section, the styles defined in section 11.2 shall be available. |
NOTE The default style should be used for portrayal by the view network service if no user-defined style is specified in a portrayal request for a specific layer.
In section 11.3, further styles can be specified that represent examples of styles typically used in a thematic domain. It is recommended that also these styles should be supported by INSPIRE view services, where applicable.
📘
|
Recomendation 35 In addition, it is recommended that, where applicable, INSPIRE view services also support the styles defined in section 11.3. |
Where XML fragments are used in the following sections, the following namespace prefixes apply:
-
sld="http://www.opengis.net/sld" (WMS/SLD 1.1)
-
se="http://www.opengis.net/se" (SE 1.1)
-
ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc" (FE 1.1)
11.1. Layers to be provided by INSPIRE view services
Layer Name | Layer Title | Spatial object type(s) | Keywords |
---|---|---|---|
HH.HealthStatisticalData |
Health statistical data |
StatisticalUnit |
Human health, statistical data, biomarker, disease, health service, hospital. |
HH.HealthDeterminantMeasure |
Health determinant measure |
EnvHealthDeterminantMeasure |
Human health, measurement |
HH.Event |
Safety event |
Event |
Safety, event, accident, incident. |
NOTE The table above contains several layers for some spatial object type(s), which can be further classified using a code list-valued attribute. Such sets of layers are specified as described in Article 14(3) of the IRs.
📕
|
IR Requirement (…)
|
11.1.1. Layers organisation
None.
11.2. Styles required to be supported by INSPIRE view services
11.2.1. Styles for the layer HH.HealthStatisticalData
Style Name | HH.HealthStatisticalData.Default |
---|---|
Default Style |
yes |
Style Title |
Health statistical data default style |
Style Abstract |
Human health application schema introduces some statistical data related to the theme to be reported on statistical units. For the portrayal of these statistical data on statistical units, typical thematic cartography rules should be followed. It may be relevant to provide a tool for the INSPIRE geoportal for simple online thematic mapping. Such tool already exists on Eurostat website (see figure below). |
Symbology |
- |
Minimum & maximum scales |
See statistical unit scale range. |
Figure 19: Example of online thematic mapping interface for of human health and safety statistical data (Eurostat website)
📘
|
Recomendation 36 Human health and safety statistical data portrayal rules should follow typical rules of thematic mapping. A simple online thematic mapping tool may be relevant to be provided. |
11.2.2. Styles for the layer HH.HealthDeterminantMeasure
Style Name | HH.HealthDeterminantMeasure.Default |
---|---|
Default Style |
yes |
Style Title |
Health determinant measure default style |
Style Abstract |
Outline colour: solid, blue (RGB 0 0 255) Outline width: 3pt |
Symbology |
(Encoding to be checked)
|
Minimum & maximum scales |
Depends on layer density. |
11.2.3. Styles for the layer HH.Event
Style Name | HH.Event.Default |
---|---|
Default Style |
yes |
Style Title |
Event default style |
Style Abstract |
Outline colour: solid, red (RGB 255 0 0) Outline width: 3pt |
Symbology |
(Encoding to be checked)
|
Minimum & maximum scales |
Depends on layer density. |
11.3. Styles recommended to be supported by INSPIRE view services
None.
Bibliography
[DS-D2.3] INSPIRE DS-D2.3, Definition of Annex Themes and Scope, v3.0, https://knowledge-base.inspire.ec.europa.eu/publications/definition-annex-themes-and-scope-d-23-version-30_en
[DS-D2.5] INSPIRE DS-D2.5, Generic Conceptual Model, v3.3, https://knowledge-base.inspire.ec.europa.eu/publications/inspire-generic-conceptual-model_en
[DS-D2.6] INSPIRE DS-D2.6, Methodology for the development of data specifications, v3.0, https://knowledge-base.inspire.ec.europa.eu/publications/methodology-development-data-specifications-baseline-version-d-26-version-30_en
[DS-D2.7] INSPIRE DS-D2.7, Guidelines for the encoding of spatial data, v3.2, https://knowledge-base.inspire.ec.europa.eu/publications/guidelines-encoding-spatial-data_en
[ISO 19101] EN ISO 19101:2005 Geographic information – Reference model (ISO 19101:2002)
[ISO 19103] ISO/TS 19103:2005, Geographic information – Conceptual schema language
[ISO 19107] EN ISO 19107:2005, Geographic information – Spatial schema (ISO 19107:2003)
[ISO 19108] EN ISO 19108:2005 Geographic information - Temporal schema (ISO 19108:2002)
[ISO 19111] EN ISO 19111:2007 Geographic information - Spatial referencing by coordinates (ISO 19111:2007)
[ISO 19115] EN ISO 19115:2005, Geographic information – Metadata (ISO 19115:2003)
[ISO 19118] EN ISO 19118:2006, Geographic information – Encoding (ISO 19118:2005)
[ISO 19135] EN ISO 19135:2007 Geographic information – Procedures for item registration (ISO 19135:2005)
[ISO 19139] ISO/TS 19139:2007, Geographic information – Metadata – XML schema implementation
[ISO 19157] ISO/DIS 19157, Geographic information – Data quality
[OGC 06-103r3] Implementation Specification for Geographic Information - Simple feature access – Part 1: Common Architecture v1.2.0
Annex A: Abstract Test Suite - (normative)
Disclaimer |
The objective of the Abstract Test Suite (ATS) included in this Annex is to help the conformance testing process. It includes a set of tests to be applied on a data set to evaluate whether it fulfils the requirements included in this data specification and the corresponding parts of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010 (implementing rule as regards interoperability of spatial datasets and services, further referred to as ISDSS Regulation). This is to help data providers in declaring the conformity of a data set to the "degree of conformity, with implementing rules adopted under Article 7(1) of Directive 2007/2/EC", which is required to be provided in the data set metadata according to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2008/1205 (the Metadata Regulation).
Part 1 of this ATS includes tests that provide input for assessing conformity with the ISDSS regulation. In order to make visible which requirements are addressed by a specific test, references to the corresponding articles of the legal act are given. The way how the cited requirements apply to hh specification is described under the testing method.
In addition to the requirements included in ISDSS Regulation this Technical guideline contains TG requirements too. TG requirements are technical provisions that need to be fulfilled in order to be conformant with the corresponding IR requirement when the specific technical implementation proposed in this document is used. Such requirements relate for example to the default encoding described in section 9. Part 2 of the ATS presents tests necessary for assessing the conformity with TG requirements.
NOTE Conformance of a data set with the TG requirement(s) included in this ATS implies conformance with the corresponding IR requirement(s).
The ATS is applicable to the data sets that have been transformed to be made available through INSPIRE download services (i.e. the data returned as a response to the mandatory "Get Spatial Dataset" operation) rather than the original "source" data sets.
The requirements to be tested are grouped in several conformance classes. Each of these classes covers a specific aspect: one conformance class contains tests reflecting the requirements on the application schema, another on the reference systems, etc. Each conformance class is identified by a URI (uniform resource identifier) according to the following pattern:
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/hh/<conformance class identifier>
EXAMPLE 1 The URI http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ef/rs identifies the Reference Systems ISDSS conformance class of the Environmental Monitoring Facilities (EF) data theme.
The results of the tests should be published referring to the relevant conformance class (using its URI).
When an INSPIRE data specification contains more than one application schema, the requirements tested in a conformance class may differ depending on the application schema used as a target for the transformation of the data set. This will always be the case for the application schema conformance class. However, also other conformance classes could have different requirements for different application schemas. In such cases, a separate conformance class is defined for each application schema, and they are distinguished by specific URIs according to the following pattern:
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/hh/<conformance class identifier>/
<application schema namespace prefix>
EXAMPLE 2 The URI http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/el/as/el-vec identifies the conformity with the application schema (as) conformance class for the Elevation Vector Elements (el-vec) application schema.
An overview of the conformance classes and the associated tests is given in the table below.
A.1 Application Schema Conformance Class |
|||||||
|
|||||||
A.2 Reference Systems Conformance Class |
|||||||
|
|||||||
A.3 Data Consistency Conformance Class |
|||||||
|
|||||||
A.4 Metadata IR Conformance Class |
|||||||
|
|||||||
A.5 Information Accessibility Conformance Class |
|||||||
|
|||||||
A.6 Data Delivery Conformance Class |
|||||||
|
|||||||
A.7 Portrayal Conformance Class |
|||||||
|
|||||||
A.8 Technical Guideline Conformance Class |
|||||||
|
In order to be conformant to a conformance class, a data set has to pass all tests defined for that conformance class.
In order to be conformant with the ISDSS regulation the inspected data set needs to be conformant to all conformance classes in Part 1. The conformance class for overall conformity with the ISDSS regulation is identified by the URI http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/hh/.
In order to be conformant with the Technical Guidelines, the dataset under inspection needs to be conformant to all conformance classes included both in Part 1 and 2. Chapter 8 describes in detail how to publish the result of testing regarding overall conformity and conformity with the conformance classes as metadata. The conformance class for overall conformity with the Technical Guidelines is identified by the URI http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/tg/hh/3.0.
It should be noted that data providers are not obliged to integrate / decompose the original structure of the source data sets when they deliver them for INSPIRE. It means that a conformant dataset can contain less or more spatial object / data types than specified in the ISDSS Regulation.
A dataset that contains less spatial object and/or data types can be regarded conformant when the corresponding types of the source datasets after the necessary transformations fulfil the requirements set out in the ISDSS Regulation.
A dataset that contain more spatial object and/or data types may be regarded as conformant when
-
all the spatial object / data types that have corresponding types in the source dataset after the necessary transformations fulfil the requirements set out in the ISDSS Regulation and
-
all additional elements of the source model (spatial object types, data types, attributes, constraints and code lists together with their values) do not conflict with any rule defined in the interoperability target specifications defined for any theme within INSPIRE.
Open issue 1: Even though the last condition can be derived from Art. 8(4) of the Directive, the ISDSS Regulation does not contain requirements concerning the above issue. Therefore, no specific tests have been included in this abstract suit for testing conformity of extended application schemas. Annex F of the Generic Conceptual Model (D2.5) provides an example how to extend INSPIRE application schemas in a compliant way.
The ATS contains a detailed list of abstract tests. It should be noted that some tests in the Application schema conformance class can be automated by utilising xml schema validation tools. It should be noted that failing such validation test does not necessary reflect non-compliance to the application schema; it may be the results of erroneous encoding.
Each test in this suit follows the same structure:
-
Requirement: citation from the legal texts (ISDSS requirements) or the Technical Guidelines (TG requirements);
-
Purpose: definition of the scope of the test;
-
Reference: link to any material that may be useful during the test;
-
Test method: description of the testing procedure.
According to ISO 19105:2000 all tests in this ATS are basic tests. Therefore, this statement is not repeated each time.
Part 1 - (normative)
Conformity with Commission Regulation No 1089/2010
A.1. Application Schema Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.1.1. Schema element denomination test
-
Purpose: Verification whether each element of the dataset under inspection carries a name specified in the target application schema(s).
-
Reference: Art. 3 and Art.4 of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010
-
Test Method: Examine whether the corresponding elements of the source schema (spatial object types, data types, attributes, association roles and code lists) are mapped to the target schema with the correct designation of mnemonic names.
NOTE Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5.2.
A.1.2. Value type test
-
Purpose: Verification whether all attributes or association roles use the corresponding value types specified in the application schema(s).
-
Reference: Art. 3, Art.4, Art.6(1), Art.6(4), Art.6(5) and Art.9(1)of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
-
Test Method: Examine whether the value type of each provided attribute or association role adheres to the corresponding value type specified in the target specification.
NOTE 1 This test comprises testing the value types of INSPIRE identifiers, the value types of attributes and association roles that should be taken from code lists, and the coverage domains.
NOTE 2 Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5.2.
A.1.3. Value test
-
Purpose: Verify whether all attributes or association roles whose value type is a code list take the values set out therein.
-
Reference: Art.4 (3) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
-
Test Method: When an attribute / association role has a code list as its type, compare the values of each instance with those provided in the application schema. To pass this tests any instance of an attribute / association role
-
shall take only values explicitly specified in the code list when the code list’s extensibility is "none".
-
shall take only a value explicitly specified in the code list or shall take a value that is narrower (i.e. more specific) than those explicitly specified in the application schema when the code list’s extensibility is "narrower".
-
NOTE 1 This test is not applicable to code lists with extensibility "open" or "any".
NOTE 2 When a data provider only uses code lists with narrower (more specific values) this test can be fully performed based on internal information.
A.1.4. Attributes/associations completeness test
-
Purpose: Verification whether each instance of spatial object type and data types include all attributes and association roles as defined in the target application schema.
-
Reference: Art. 3, Art.4(1), Art.4(2), and Art.5(2) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
-
Test Method: Examine whether all attributes and association roles defined for a spatial object type or data type are present for each instance in the dataset.
NOTE 1 Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5.2.
NOTE 2 For all properties defined for a spatial object, a value has to be provided if it exists in or applies to the real world entity – either the corresponding value (if available in the data set maintained by the data provider) or the value of void. If the characteristic described by the attribute or association role does not exist in or apply to the real world entity, the attribute or association role does not need to be present in the data set.
A.1.5. Abstract spatial object test
-
Purpose: Verification whether the dataset does NOT contain abstract spatial object / data types defined in the target application schema(s).
-
Reference: Art.5(3) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010
-
Test Method: Examine that there are NO instances of abstract spatial object / data types in the dataset provided.
NOTE Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5.2.
A.1.6. Constraints test
-
Purpose: Verification whether the instances of spatial object and/or data types provided in the dataset adhere to the constraints specified in the target application schema(s).
-
Reference: Art. 3, Art.4(1), and Art.4(2) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
-
Test Method: Examine all instances of data for the constraints specified for the corresponding spatial object / data type. Each instance shall adhere to all constraints specified in the target application schema(s).
NOTE Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5.2.
A.1.7. Geometry representation test
-
Purpose: Verification whether the value domain of spatial properties is restricted as specified in the Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
-
Reference: Art.12(1), Annex IV Section 5 of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010
-
Test Method: Check whether all spatial properties only use 0, 1 and 2-dimensional geometric objects that exist in the right 2-, 3- or 4-dimensional coordinate space, and where all curve interpolations respect the rules specified in the reference documents.
NOTE Further technical information is in OGC Simple Feature spatial schema v1.2.1 [06-103r4].
A.2. Reference Systems Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.2.1. Datum test
-
Purpose: Verify whether each instance of a spatial object type is given with reference to one of the (geodetic) datums specified in the target specification.
-
Reference: Annex II Section 1.2 of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010
-
Test Method: Check whether each instance of a spatial object type specified in the application schema(s) in section 5 has been expressed using:
-
the European Terrestrial Reference System 1989 (ETRS89) within its geographical scope; or
-
the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) for areas beyond the ETRS89 geographical scope; or
-
other geodetic coordinate reference systems compliant with the ITRS. Compliant with the ITRS means that the system definition is based on the definition of ITRS and there is a well-established and described relationship between both systems, according to the EN ISO 19111.
-
NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.
A.2.2. Coordinate reference system test
-
Purpose: Verify whether the two- and three-dimensional coordinate reference systems are used as defined in section 6.
-
Reference: Section 6 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
-
Test Method: Inspect whether the horizontal and vertical components of coordinates one of the corresponding coordinate reference system has been:
-
Three-dimensional Cartesian coordinates based on a datum specified in 1.2 and using the parameters of the Geodetic Reference System 1980 (GRS80) ellipsoid.
-
Three-dimensional geodetic coordinates (latitude, longitude and ellipsoidal height) based on a datum specified in 1.2 and using the parameters of the GRS80 ellipsoid.
-
Two-dimensional geodetic coordinates (latitude and longitude) based on a datum specified in 1.2 and using the parameters of the GRS80 ellipsoid.
-
Plane coordinates using the ETRS89 Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area coordinate reference system.
-
Plane coordinates using the ETRS89 Lambert Conformal Conic coordinate reference system.
-
Plane coordinates using the ETRS89 Transverse Mercator coordinate reference system.
-
For the vertical component on land, the European Vertical Reference System (EVRS) shall be used to express gravity-related heights within its geographical scope. Other vertical reference systems related to the Earth gravity field shall be used to express gravity-related heights in areas that are outside the geographical scope of EVRS.
-
For the vertical component in marine areas where there is an appreciable tidal range (tidal waters), the Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) shall be used as the reference surface.
-
For the vertical component in marine areas without an appreciable tidal range, in open oceans and effectively in waters that are deeper than 200 meters, the Mean Sea Level (MSL) or a well-defined reference level close to the MSL shall be used as the reference surface."
-
For the vertical component in the free atmosphere, barometric pressure, converted to height using ISO 2533:1975 International Standard Atmosphere, or other linear or parametric reference systems shall be used. Where other parametric reference systems are used, these shall be described in an accessible reference using EN ISO 19111-2:2012.
-
NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.
A.2.3. View service coordinate reference system test
-
Purpose: Verify whether the spatial data set is available in the two dimensional geodetic coordinate system for their display with the INSPIRE View Service.
-
Reference: Annex II Section 1.4 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010
-
Test Method: Check that each instance of a spatial object types specified in the application schema(s) in section 5 is available in the two-dimensional geodetic coordinate system
NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.
A.2.4. Temporal reference system test
-
Purpose: Verify whether date and time values are given as specified in Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
-
Reference: Art.11(1) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010
-
Test Method: Check whether:
-
the Gregorian calendar is used as a reference system for date values;
-
the Universal Time Coordinated (UTC) or the local time including the time zone as an offset from UTC are used as a reference system for time values.
-
NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.
A.2.5. Units of measurements test
-
Purpose: Verify whether all measurements are expressed as specified in Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
-
Reference: Art.12(2) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010
-
Test Method: Check whether all measurements are expressed in SI units or non-SI units accepted for use with the International System of Units.
NOTE 1 Further technical information is given in ISO 80000-1:2009.
NOTE 2 Degrees, minutes and seconds are non-SI units accepted for use with the International System of Units for expressing measurements of angles.
A.3. Data Consistency Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.3.1. Unique identifier persistency test
-
Purpose: Verify whether the namespace and localId attributes of the external object identifier remain the same for different versions of a spatial object.
-
Reference: Art. 9 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
-
Test Method: Compare the namespace and localId attributes of the external object identifiers in the previous version(s) of the dataset with the namespace and localId attributes of the external object identifiers of current version for the same instances of spatial object / data types; To pass the test, neither the namespace, nor the localId shall be changed during the life-cycle of a spatial object.
NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the database of the data providers.
NOTE 2 When using URI this test includes the verification whether no part of the construct has been changed during the life cycle of the instances of spatial object / data types.
NOTE 3 Further technical information is given in section 14.2 of the INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model.
A.3.2. Version consistency test
-
Purpose: Verify whether different versions of the same spatial object / data type instance belong to the same type.
-
Reference: Art. 9 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
-
Test Method: Compare the types of different versions for each instance of spatial object / data type
NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the database of the data providers.
A.3.3. Life cycle time sequence test
-
Purpose: Verification whether the value of the attribute beginLifespanVersion refers to an earlier moment of time than the value of the attribute endLifespanVersion for every spatial object / object type where this property is specified.
-
Reference: Art.10(3) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
-
Test Method: Compare the value of the attribute beginLifespanVersion with attribute endLifespanVersion. The test is passed when the beginLifespanVersion value is before endLifespanVersion value for each instance of all spatial object/data types for which this attribute has been defined.
NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the database of the data providers.
A.3.4. Validity time sequence test
-
Purpose: Verification whether the value of the attribute validFrom refers to an earlier moment of time than the value of the attribute validTo for every spatial object / object type where this property is specified.
-
Reference: Art.12(3) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
-
Test Method: Compare the value of the attribute validFrom with attribute validTo. The test is passed when the validFrom value is before validTo value for each instance of all spatial object/data types for which this attribute has been defined.
NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the database of the data providers.
A.3.5. Update frequency test
-
Purpose: Verify whether all the updates in the source dataset(s) have been transmitted to the dataset(s) which can be retrieved for the HH data theme using INSPIRE download services.
-
Reference: Art.8 (2) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
-
Test Method: Compare the values of beginning of life cycle information in the source and the target datasets for each instance of corresponding spatial object / object types. The test is passed when the difference between the corresponding values is less than 6 months.
NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the database of the data providers.
A.4. Metadata IR Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.4.1. Metadata for interoperability test
-
Purpose: Verify whether the metadata for interoperability of spatial data sets and services described in 1089/2010 Commission Regulation have been created and published for each dataset related to the HH data theme.
-
Reference: Art.13 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010
-
Test Method: Inspect whether metadata describing the coordinate reference systems, encoding, topological consistency and spatial representation type have been created and published. If the spatial data set contains temporal information that does not refer to the default temporal reference system, inspect whether metadata describing the temporal reference system have been created and published. If an encoding is used that is not based on UTF-8, inspect whether metadata describing the character encoding have been created.
NOTE Further technical information is given in section 8 of this document.
A.5. Information Accessibility Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.5.1. Code list publication test
-
Purpose: Verify whether all additional values used in the data sets for attributes, for which narrower values or any other value than specified in Commission Regulation 1089/2010 are allowed, are published in a register.
-
Reference: Art.6(3) and Annex IV Section 5.
-
Test Method: For each additional value used in the data sets for code list-valued attributes, check whether it is published in a register.
NOTE Further technical information is given in section 5 of this document.
A.5.2. CRS publication test
-
Purpose: Verify whether the identifiers and the parameters of coordinate reference system are published in common registers.
-
Reference: Annex II Section 1.5
-
Test Method: Check whether the identifier and the parameter of the CRS used for the dataset are included in a register. .
NOTE Further technical information is given in section 6 of this document.
A.5.3. CRS identification test
-
Purpose: Verify whether identifiers for other coordinate reference systems than specified in Commission Regulation 1089/2010 have been created and their parameters have been described according to EN ISO 19111 and ISO 19127.
-
Reference: Annex II Section 1.3.4
-
Test Method: Check whether the register with the identifiers of the coordinate reference systems is accessible.
NOTE Further technical information is given in section 6 of this document.
A.6. Data Delivery Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.6.1. Encoding compliance test
-
Purpose: Verify whether the encoding used to deliver the dataset comply with EN ISO 19118.
-
Reference: Art.7 (1) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
-
Test Method: Follow the steps of the Abstract Test Suit provided in EN ISO 19118.
NOTE 1 Datasets using the default encoding specified in Section 9 fulfil this requirement.
NOTE 2 Further technical information is given in Section 9 of this document.
A.7. Portrayal Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.7.1. Layer designation test
-
Purpose: verify whether each spatial object type has been assigned to the layer designated according to Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
-
Reference: Art. 14(1), Art14(2) and Annex IV Section 5.
-
Test Method: Check whether data is made available for the view network service using the specified layers respectively:
-
HH.HealthStatisticalData
-
HH.HealthDeterminantMeasure
-
NOTE Further technical information is given in section 11 of this document.
Part 2 - (informative)
Conformity with the technical guideline (TG) Requirements
A.8. Technical Guideline Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.8.1. Multiplicity test
-
Purpose: Verify whether each instance of an attribute or association role specified in the application schema(s) does not include fewer or more occurrences than specified in section 5.
-
Reference: Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5 of this guideline.
-
Test Method: Examine that the number of occurrences of each attribute and/or association role for each instance of a spatial object type or data type provided in the dataset corresponds to the number of occurrences of the attribute / association role that is specified in the application schema(s) in section 5.
A.8.2. CRS http URI test
-
Purpose: Verify whether the coordinate reference system used to deliver data for INSPIRE network services has been identified by URIs according to the EPSG register.
-
Reference: Section 6 of this technical guideline
-
Test Method: Compare the URI of the dataset with the URIs in the table.
NOTE 1 Passing this test implies the fulfilment of test A6.2
NOTE 2 Further reference please see http://www.epsg.org/geodetic.html
A.8.3. Metadata encoding schema validation test
-
Purpose: Verify whether the metadata follows an XML schema specified in ISO/TS 19139.
-
Reference: Section 8 of this technical guideline, ISO/TS 19139
-
Test Method: Inspect whether provided XML schema is conformant to the encoding specified in ISO 19139 for each metadata instance.
NOTE 1 Section 2.1.2 of the Metadata Technical Guidelines discusses the different ISO 19139 XML schemas that are currently available.
A.8.4. Metadata occurrence test
-
Purpose: Verify whether the occurrence of each metadata element corresponds to those specified in section 8.
-
Reference: Section 8 of this technical guideline
-
Test Method: Examine the number of occurrences for each metadata element. The number of occurrences shall be compared with its occurrence specified in Section 8:
NOTE 1 Section 2.1.2 of the Metadata Technical Guidelines discusses the different ISO 19139 XML schema.
A.8.5. Metadata consistency test
-
Purpose: Verify whether the metadata elements follow the path specified in ISO/TS 19139.
-
Reference: Section 8 of this technical guideline, ISO/TS 19139
-
Test Method: Compare the XML schema of each metadata element with the path provide in ISO/TS 19137.
NOTE 1 This test does not apply to the metadata elements that are not included in ISO/TS 19139.
A.8.6. Encoding schema validation test
-
Purpose: Verify whether the provided dataset follows the rules of default encoding specified in section 9 of this document
-
Reference: section 9 of this technical guideline
-
Test Method: Inspect whether provided encoding(s) is conformant to the encoding(s) for the relevant application schema(s) as defined in section 9:
NOTE 1 Applying this test to the default encoding schema described in section 9 facilitates testing conformity with the application schema specified in section 5. In such cases running this test with positive result may replace tests from A1.1 to A1.4 provided in this abstract test suite.
NOTE 2 Using Schematron or other schema validation tool may significantly improve the validation process, because some some complex constraints of the schema cannot be validated using the simple XSD validation process. On the contrary to XSDs Schematron rules are not delivered together with the INSPIRE data specifications. Automating the process of validation (e.g. creation of Schematron rules) is therefore a task and an opportunity for data providers.
A.8.7. Style test
-
Purpose: Verify whether the styles defined in section 11.2 have been made available for each specified layer.
-
Reference: section 11.2.
-
Test Method: Check whether the styles defined in section 11.2 have been made available for each specified layer.
Annex B: Use cases - (informative)
This annex describes the use cases that were used as a basis for the development of this data specification.
B.1. Human health and soil
In the Human Health and Safety TWG of Inspire directive, the mandate describes clearly that the data model should be developed in order to cope with various exposure elements that may cause adverse health effects. It is true however, that the link between geospatial aspects and health effects is rare, but use of the Inspire infrastructure may provide a unique opportunity to identify possible links between health effects and underlying environmental conditions/exposures that might be related to poor or good health. This kind of information can be crucial to design the appropriate health infrastructures that can cope with severe health problems and also take the necessary counteracting measures in order to mitigate such health effects.
The use case presented in this document describes the exposure of inhabitants to soil contamination. Human exposure to soil can take place through various exposure routes namely inhalation, dermal and ingestion. Inhalation exposure can take place through the respiration of air whose contamination is originating from soil contaminants. Dermal exposure obviously takes place through direct contact with contaminated soil. Ingestion exposure can be divided in two parts, namely direct and indirect. The direct exposure takes place through incidental soil ingestion while the indirect exposure takes place through crop consumption that grows in contaminated soil.
The importance of such a use case would be to provide geospatial distribution of exposure due to soil contamination based on specific scenarios that may include one or more of the previously mentioned exposure routes. This could help to establish potential links with health effects that are recorded in the same areas.
In the following schema, a generic presentation of the total exposure due to soil contamination is given. It is presented in a generic form in the sense that no contaminant has been identified but rather any contaminant could be examined.
Use Case Description | |
---|---|
Name |
Exposure to contaminated soil through dermal, ingestion and inhalation routes |
Primary actor |
Analyst |
Goal |
To assess the potential impact of soil contamination to human health |
System under |
|
Importance |
Medium |
Description |
Exposure assessments due to contaminated soil ingestion, inhalation and dermal contact |
Pre-condition |
Measurements and observations on soil. |
Post-condition |
Adoption of measures to reduce exposure to certain agents |
Flow of Events – Basic Path |
|
Step 1 |
Determine contaminants in soil (mostly through measurements). Data taken from Soil TWG data model |
Step 2 |
Run model to calculate the concentration in air. Data on ingestion rates and dermal contact. (mostly fixed parameters) |
Step 3 |
Retrieve relevant anthropometric data (e.g. body weight) from Population Distribution – Demography TWG |
Step 4 |
Apply universal parameters such as "relative absorption factor" for soil ingestion |
Step 5 |
Use results for creating exposure maps based on soil concentration, air exchange rate (data most probably retrieved from Buildings TWG) |
Flow of Events – Alternative Paths |
|
NONE |
|
Data set: Information on Contaminants |
|
Description |
|
Type |
input |
Data provider |
Soil bureaus |
Geographic scope |
Regional |
Thematic scope |
Exposure assessment based on data provided for soil contamination and subsequent use of models. |
Scale, resolution |
1:10000 |
Delivery |
Online |
Documentation |
|
Data set: Information on Demographic Data |
|
Description |
Exposure parameters |
Type |
input |
Data provider |
Research Institutes, Environmental Agencies, Health Authorities |
Geographic scope |
None |
Thematic scope |
Parameters for applying the necessary models in order to calculate population exposure to soil contamination |
Scale, resolution |
None |
Delivery |
Online |
Documentation |
|
Data set: Population density map |
|
Description |
Demographic data - Population Density maps |
Type |
input |
Data provider |
Country’s statistical office |
Geographic scope |
Regional |
Thematic scope |
Population density |
Scale, resolution |
1:10000 |
Delivery |
DVD, Online |
Documentation |
|
Data set: Exposure Maps |
|
Description |
Maps for population exposure to soil contamination |
Data provider |
Health Authorities, Environmental Agencies |
Type |
output |
Geographic scope |
Regional |
Thematic scope |
Population exposure to contamination of soil |
Scale, resolution |
1:10000 |
Delivery |
online |
Documentation |
B.2. Noise exposure
Policy question
Which European citizens are exposed to noise?
Background
Noise is ubiquitous but its role as a key form of pollution with serious human health consequences is still underestimated. Noise causes or contributes to not only annoyance and sleep disturbance but also heart attacks, learning disabilities and tinnitus.
Use Case Description | |
---|---|
Name |
Exposure of the citizens to noise |
Priority |
High |
Desc ription |
maps of noise exposure |
Legal foundation(s) |
Directive 2002/49/EC |
Pre-condition |
Inventory of assessment and management of environmental noise must be available in the MS – 2002/49/EG |
Flow of Events - Basic Path |
|
Step 1 |
collection of emission data (e.g. traffic data of road, rail and air traffic, road surfaces, traffic speed) |
Step 2 |
collection of structural environment data (e.g. noise barriers, buildings) and digital terrain model |
Step 3 |
collection of the population data |
Step 4 |
calculation of the indicators (e.g. Lden, Lnight) |
Step 5 |
calculation of noise maps (e.g. noise bands of road traffic noise) |
Post-condition |
adoption of measures to reduce exposure to noise |
Actors |
|
End-users |
|
Information provider(s) |
Member states, EUROSTAT |
Information processors(s)/Brokers |
EEA |
Information Source Input |
|
Description |
|
Thematic scope |
Human Health and Safety |
Base datasets |
traffic data and industrial activities |
Data provider |
local and national authorities |
Scale, resolution |
calculation on regional and national level |
Documentation |
|
Information Source Output |
|
Description |
noise maps (annual mean) including indicators |
Thematic scope |
Human Health and Safety |
Base dataset(s) |
noise maps (annual mean) including indicators |
Data provider(s) |
EEA |
Scale, resolution |
Europe |
Documentation |
|
External reference |
Examples:
B.3. Human Health for drinking water
Analyzing the relationship between environment and health has become a major issue for public health as focused in the Environment and Health Action Plan 2004–2010 of the European Commission. Two priority areas have been selected: preventing health risks related to the quality of resources on the one hand and to chemicals on the other; developing environmental health through research, expertise, training and information.
Chronic exposure to pollutants can cause a variety of adverse effects on human health. Human exposures to pollutants released to the ambient environment result from contacts with contaminated air, water, soils, and food. Pollutants may enter the human body through direct ingestion of drinking water. For many polluants, drinking water are the main sources of exposure for the general population. The relevance of the protection of drinking water is directly related to the protection of human- and ecological health.
The use case proposed here combine monitoring network and spatial approach to increase effectiveness of produced maps to stakeholders interested in assuming decisions for safeguarding citizen health. A decision should be made on the need of management, possibilities to counteract excess of pollutant concentration. This is the responsibility for the local authorities in cooperation with drinking water companies.
A spatial database is assembled for a set of variables to characterize environmental and population data. Population exposure is assessing by combining spatial data on water supplies (pmping stations, treatement station, distribution unit), and drinking water habits. Studies integrate georeferenced measured monitoring to produce an estimation of the exposure dose or to build a proximity indicator to contaminant source as a surrogate for exposure. Environmental monitoring networks provide good quality data to characterize exposure pathways. This indicator integrates water, demographic and behavioral georeferenced data to construct population exposure doses and associated risks.
This use case is developed for many applications:
-
map environmental disparities throughout Europe ;
-
identify vulnerable population and determinants of exposure to manage and plan remedial actions in order to reduce environmental pollution by choosing options which minimize health risk ;
-
provide exposure dataset to quantify spatial relationships between risk estimates and disease data in epidemiological study context.
Use Case Description | |
---|---|
Name |
Detection of hotspot exposure area and vulnerable population due to contaminated drinking water consumption |
Priority |
Medium |
Description |
Produce an estimation of the exposure dose due to contaminated drinking water consumption. This use case aims at spatializing an environmental indicator related to human health using risk assessment methods. |
Legal foundation(s) |
EU Directive on the protection of groundwater against pollution and detoriation (2006 118/EC), Water Framework Directive (WFD, Directive 2000/60/EC), Drinking Water Directive (DWD), Council Directive 98/83/EC. |
Pre-condition |
Measurements on water from pumping water stations, treatment stations or distribution unit. Potential extension: Demographical data, health data, inventory of polluted sites and knowledge on the pollution profiles of those sites. |
Flow of Events - Basic Path |
|
Step 1 |
Member states collect and store the harmonised raw data. |
Step 2 |
Assess population exposure. Combine exposure data with demographical data to assess health impact. Locate commune where hotspot exposures to substances present in water are suspected to generate a potential increasing risk to human health. |
Step 3 |
Characterize different types of source : recognise adverse contribution of polluted sites on water quality |
Step 4 |
If drinking water concentrations are found with passing thresholds levels, consider possible countermeasures on the site and/or on the path from the site. |
Post-condition |
Improved and protection of drinking water quality |
Actors |
|
End-users |
|
Information provider(s) |
Municipalities, provinces |
Information processors(s)/Brokers |
Private and public data collection companies, Laboratories, consultancy companies |
Information Source Input |
|
Description |
Drinking water concentrations in distribution unit for each commun |
Thematic scope |
Protection of drinking water provision |
Base datasets |
Drinking water concentrations are derived from national and European monitoring database which describe at a communal scale, water pollutants concentration measured in water supply systems. GIS is used to combine commune location information with the geographical concentration distributions. MS have to report the boundaries of their management zones. MS are allowed to provide either GIS files, or a set of administrative units that form the zones. |
Data provider |
Provinces, municipalities, drinking water companies |
Scale, resolution |
Regional (spatial extension), communal (spatial object) |
Documentation |
Implementation of requirements on Priority substances within the Context of the Water Framework Directive |
External reference |
|
Information Source Output |
|
Description |
Maps of health risks due to contaminated drinking water ingestion Selection of commun and distribution unit generating potential health risks to humans |
Thematic scope |
Protection of drinking water provision |
Base dataset(s) |
|
Data provider(s) |
Provinces, municipalities, drinking water companies |
Scale, resolution |
Regional, communal |
Documentation |
|
E xternal reference |
B.4. Ambient Air Quality and Human Health
B.4.1. Concentration of ambient air pollutants and progress in reducing them
Policy question
What progress is being made in reducing concentrations of air pollutants?
Background
The indicator (EEA: CSI004) of the potential exposure of urban populations to air pollution focuses on sulphur dioxide, particulate matter (PM10), nitrogen oxides and ground-level ozone. Sulphur dioxide (SO2) is directly toxic to humans, its main action being on the respiratory functions. Indirectly, it can affect human health as it is converted to sulphuric acid and sulphate in the form of fine particulate matter. Short-term exposure to nitrogen dioxide may result in airway and lung damage, decline in lung function, and increased responsiveness to allergens following acute exposure. Toxicology studies show that long-term exposure to nitrogen dioxide can induce irreversible changes in lung structure and function. Exposure to high ozone concentration for periods of a few days can have adve rse health effects, in particular inflammatory responses and reduction in lung function. Exposure to moderate ozone concentrations for longer periods may lead to a reduction in lung function in young children. Epidemiological studies have reported statistical significant associations between short-term and especially long-term exposure to increased ambient PM concentrations and increased morbidity and (premature) mortality. PM levels that may be relevant to human health are commonly expressed in terms of PM10 meaning particulate matter (PM with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 µm). Health effect associations for the PM2.5 fraction are even more clearly evident. Although the body of evidence concerning the health effects of PM is increasing rapidly, it is not yet possible to identify a concentration threshold below which health effects are not detectable.
An additional indicator could be the Average Exposure Indicator (AEI). It describes the exposure of the population to fine particles PM2,5. The AEI is determined as a 3-year running annual mean PM2.5 concentration averaged over the selected monitoring stations in agglomerations and larger urban areas, set in urban background locations to best assess the PM2.5 exposure to the general population. The AQ directive (2008/50/EG) lays down an AEI-reduction target until 2020.
List of pollutants: Ozone, Particles PM10 and PM2,5, Nitrogen dioxide, Sulphur dioxide
Use Case Description | |
---|---|
Name |
Exposure of the population to ambient air pollutants – maps and indicators |
Priority |
High |
Description |
Concentration maps of ambient air pollutants and indicators that showing the progress in reducing the concentration of them |
Legal foundation(s) |
AQ Directive 2008/50/EC |
Pre-condition |
|
Flow of Events - Basic Path |
|
Step 1 |
collection of air quality data and station meta data |
Step 2 |
collection of the population data |
Step 3 |
calculation of the indicators |
Step 4 |
calculation of air pollution concentration maps (e.g. annual mean, days in exceedances…), |
Step 5 |
include information of indicators in to the maps (e.g. via zooming) |
Post-condition |
Adoption of measures to reduce exposure to ambient air pollution |
Actors |
|
End-users |
|
Information provider(s) |
Member states, EUROSTAT, ECMWF, EMEP |
Information processors(s)/Brokers |
EEA |
Information Source Input |
|
Description |
|
Thematic scope |
Human Health and Safety, Atmospheric conditions, Environmental Monitoring Facilities |
Base datasets |
measured air pollutants |
Data provider |
Member states, EUROSTAT, ECMWF, EMEP |
Scale, resolution |
Measurement at stations (points) on regional/national level |
Documentation |
|
Information Source Output |
|
Description |
air pollution concentration maps (e.g. annual mean, days in exceedances…) including (e.g. via zoom) indicators |
Thematic scope |
Human Health and Safety |
Base dataset(s) |
air pollution concentration values (e.g. annual mean) |
Data provider(s) |
EEA |
Scale, resolution |
Europe |
Documentation |
|
External reference |
Examples:
Concentration map:
Indicator:
Percentage of urban population resident in areas where pollutant concentrations are higher than selected limit/target values
B.4.2. Ambient air quality assessment
Policy question
To which extent do the MS comply with the EU air quality objectives?
Background
The EU air quality legislation (initially the Framework Directive 96/62/EC and now the air quality directive 2008/50/EC) requires the Member States (MS) to divide their territory into a number of air quality management zones and agglomerations. In these zones and agglomerations, the Member States should annually assess ambient air quality levels against the attainment of air quality objectives for the protection of human health and the environment. Delimitations of zones may differ between different pollutants in order to optimize management of air quality due to differences in sources and abatement strategies. Where levels exceed the limit value margin of tolerance, the Member States have to prepare an air quality plan or programme to ensure compliance with the limit value before the date when the limit value formally enters into force. In addition, information on air quality should be disseminated to the public.
The complete lists of pollutants and air quality objectives are annexed.
Use Case Description | |
---|---|
Name |
Exposure of the population to ambient air pollutants – assessment of air quality in management zones |
Priority |
High |
Description |
Results of annually assessment of air quality shows in which agglomerations or zones air pollution levels exceed the limit/target values and measures to ensure compliance with the limit values are necessary in the MS |
Legal foundation(s) |
AQ Directive 2008/50/EC |
Pre-condition |
|
Flow of Events - Basic Path |
|
Step 1 |
delimitation of zones: For the protection of human health the entire territory must be covered (no gaps allowed; lakes included, seas excluded) by zones |
Step 2 |
collection of the population data MS should (voluntary information) provide population figures for each zone and have to mark a zone if it’s an agglomeration (>250k inhabitants, or <250k inh. but with a given (high) population density, to be decided upon by the MS) or non-agglomeration. |
Step 3 |
Definition of the assessment regime within the zones (5-yearly cycle) |
Step 4 |
preliminary information made available to EC (draft Implementing Rules) All information of steps 1 to 3 has to be transmitted to the EC, including the list of measurement stations. This has to be done before the actual monitoring starts. |
Step 5 |
monitoring starts Measurement of air pollutants |
Step 6 |
validation of the monitored data (yearly basis) MS have to validate their data according to the data quality objectives as set out by the directive. Statistics are to be calculated look at the annexed table (annex 1.B in the IR) |
Step 7 |
reporting The accounting (assessment results) is reported to the EC, together with all the relevant primary data |
Post-condition |
Adoption of measures to reduce exposure to these agents |
Actors |
|
End-users |
|
Information provider(s) |
Member states |
Information processors(s)/Brokers |
EEA |
Information Source Input |
|
Description |
|
Thematic scope |
Human Health and Safety, Area management, Environmental Monitoring Facilities |
Base datasets |
measured air pollutants |
Data provider |
Member states |
Scale, resolution |
Administrative units (LAU, smallest unit: commune) |
Documentation |
|
Information Source Output |
|
Description |
Maps of zones in compliance and not compliance of limit/target values for the protection of health |
Thematic scope |
Human Health and Safety, Area management |
Base dataset(s) |
air quality in a management zone |
Data provider(s) |
EEA |
Scale, resolution |
Europe |
Documentation |
|
External reference |
Examples:
Assessment of air quality in management zones
B.4.3. Near-real-time ozone (air pollutants) concentration
Policy question:
How can I protect my health from ambient air pollutants?
Background
Exposure to high ozone concentration for periods of a few days can have adverse health effects, in particular inflammatory responses and reduction in lung function. It can also trigger asthma attacks. Exposure to moderate ozone concentrations for longer periods may lead to a reduction in lung function in young children. The MS are required to inform the public up-to-date – hourly or at least daily - about the ozone concentration (and about other pollutants, Annex XVI of directive 2008/50/EG) and the exceedances of information and alert threshold.
Information threshold: means a level beyond which there is a risk to human health from brief exposure for particularly sensitive sections of the population and for which immediate and appropriate information is necessary Exceedance of Information threshold: People with asthma or other respiratory diseases should reduce exposure by avoiding prolonged outdoor activities. Everyone should limit prolonged outdoor activities.
Alert threshold: means a level beyond which there is a risk to human health from brief exposure for the population as a whole and at which immediate steps are be taken by the MS Exceedance of alert threshold: People with asthma or other respiratory diseases, children and the elderly are recommended to stay indoors. Everyone should avoid prolonged outdoor activities.
List of pollutants: ozone (in place), PM10 and NO2 (in discussion)
Use Case Description |
|
---|---|
Name |
Exposure of the population to ambient air pollutants – near real time air pollution information |
Priority |
Medium |
Description |
Provide near real time air quality data to the public, maps and graphs, exceedances of information or alert thresholds |
Legal foundation(s) |
Implementing Provisions under Art. 25/26 of the AQ Directive 2008/50/EC |
Pre-condition |
|
Flow of Events - Basic Path |
|
Step 1 |
collection of provisional, primary air quality data in near real time |
Step 2 |
collection of station meta data |
Step 3 |
calculations (8-hourly values, daily mean values) |
Step 4 |
calculation of air pollution concentration maps, graphs etc. |
Post-condition |
recommended precautions to reduce exposure to short time high ambient air pollution levels |
Actors |
|
End-users |
|
Information provider(s) |
Member states |
Information processors(s)/Brokers |
EEA |
Information Source Input |
|
Description |
|
Thematic scope |
Human Health and Safety, Atmospheric conditions, Environmental Monitoring Facilities |
Base datasets |
measured air pollutants |
Data provider |
Member states |
Scale, resolution |
Measurement stations (points) on regional/national level |
Documentation |
|
Information Source Output |
|
Description |
air pollution concentration maps |
Thematic scope |
Human Health and Safety |
Base dataset(s) |
Air pollution concentration values (e.g. daily, 1-hourly) |
Data provider(s) |
EEA |
Scale, resolution |
Europe |
Documentation |
|
External reference |
EEA: Near-real-time-ozone-web. http://www.eea.europa.eu/maps/ozone/welcome |
Example:
B.5. Safety
Policy question
How can a citizen be given the option to receive an assessment of the safety situation for the positioning of a spatial object? In this case, a citizen can be an authority representative an individual person, a politician or an insurance official. The "spatial object" may be a nursery school, a residence, a public service or an industry.
Background
During building construction environmental conditions have always been taken into account. Today, communities are much more complex and that makes it increasingly more difficult to take everything into account to achieve the best community possible. Climate change population increase mean that natural emergencies will have a greater effect on the lives and health of people and on the environment. Therefore, it ought to be easier for citizens to make this type of data that is needed to provide a clear foundation for decision making much more accessible.
Use Case Description |
|
---|---|
Name |
Finding the most suitable location for a nursery school in relation risks and safety. |
Priority |
High |
Description |
Use existing data to provide a clear foundation the risk and safety report or the positioning of the nursery school |
Legal foundation(s) |
Civil Protection Act |
Pre-condition |
Make an inventory of the risk and safety factors that should be taken into consideration For example: natural emergencies Seveso sites , occurrence of hazardous substances and major roads. |
Flow of Events - Basic Path |
|
Step 1 |
Collation of data for: natural emergencies |
Step 2 |
Collation of data for: Seveso sites. |
Step 3 |
Collation of data for: the presence of hazardous substances. |
Step 4 |
Collation of data for: major roads |
Step 5 |
Weigh the input data amounts against each other to achieve a more detailed description of the situation . |
Step 6 |
Conduct an n overlay analysis of the multicriteria type. |
Post-condition |
The foundation for decision making in the form of thematic visualized data, whereby the risk and safety levels are graded from most to least suitable positioning, in accordance with the analysis information provided. |
Actors |
|
End-users |
|
Information provider(s) |
|
Information Source Input |
|
Description |
|
Thematic scope |
Human health and safety |
Base datasets |
Production and industrial sites Transport networks |
Data provider |
|
Scale, resolution |
Calculation on local level. |
Documentation |
|
Information Source Output |
|
Description |
The foundation for decision making in the form of thematic visualized data, whereby the risk and safety levels are graded from most to least suitable positioning, in accordance with the analysis information provided. This information can be visualized digitally with a GIS program or by printed maps; depending on the users. |
Thematic scope |
Human health and safety |
Base dataset(s) |
Data results from the analysis |
Data provider(s) |
Local authorities |
Scale, resolution |
Municipalities |
Documentation |
|
External reference |
Example:
Annex C: Code list values - (normative)
INSPIRE Application Schema 'HumanHealth'
Code List |
---|
DiseaseMeasureTypeValue |
EnvHealthDeterminantTypeValue |
GeneralHealthTypeValue |
HealthServicesTypeValue |
MediaTypeValue |
StatisticalAggregationMethodValue |
DiseaseMeasureTypeValue
|
EnvHealthDeterminantTypeValue
|
GeneralHealthTypeValue
|
HealthServicesTypeValue
|
MediaTypeValue
|
StatisticalAggregationMethodValue
|
INSPIRE Application Schema 'Safety'
Code List |
---|
BuildingUseValue |
ConsequenceTypeValue |
FireOrExplosionTypeValue |
HazardousMaterialTypeValue |
TrafficTypeValue |
BuildingUseValue
|
ConsequenceTypeValue
|
FireOrExplosionTypeValue
|
HazardousMaterialTypeValue
|
TrafficTypeValue
|