INSPIRE Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe
D2.8.II.4 Data Specification on Geology – Technical Guidelines
Title |
D2.8.II.4 Data Specification on Geology – Technical Guidelines |
Creator |
Temporary MIWP 2021-2024 sub-group 2.3.1 |
Date of publication |
2024-07-31 |
Subject |
INSPIRE Data Specification for the spatial data theme Geology |
Publisher |
INSPIRE Maintenance and Implementation Group (MIG) |
Type |
Text |
Description |
This document describes the INSPIRE Data Specification for the spatial data theme Geology |
Format |
AsciiDoc |
Licence |
|
Rights |
Public |
Identifier |
|
Changelog |
https://github.com/INSPIRE-MIF/technical-guidelines/releases/tag/v2024.2 |
Language |
en |
Relation |
Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) |
Foreword
How to read the document?
This document describes the "INSPIRE data specification on Geology – Technical Guidelines" version 3.0 as developed by the Thematic Working Group (TWG) Geology using both natural and a conceptual schema language.
The data specification is based on a common template[1] used for all data specifications, which has been harmonised using the experience from the development of the Annex I, II and III data specifications.
This document provides guidelines for the implementation of the provisions laid down in the Implementing Rule for spatial data sets and services of the INSPIRE Directive. It also includes additional requirements and recommendations that, although not included in the Implementing Rule, are relevant to guarantee or to increase data interoperability.
Two executive summaries provide a quick overview of the INSPIRE data specification process in general, and the content of the data specification on Geology in particular. We highly recommend that managers, decision makers, and all those new to the INSPIRE process and/or information modelling should read these executive summaries first.
The UML diagrams (in Chapter 5) offer a rapid way to see the main elements of the specifications and their relationships. The definition of the spatial object types, attributes, and relationships are included in the Feature Catalogue (also in Chapter 5). People having thematic expertise but not familiar with UML can fully understand the content of the data model focusing on the Feature Catalogue. Users might also find the Feature Catalogue especially useful to check if it contains the data necessary for the applications that they run. The technical details are expected to be of prime interest to those organisations that are responsible for implementing INSPIRE within the field of Geology, but also to other stakeholders and users of the spatial data infrastructure.
The technical provisions and the underlying concepts are often illustrated by examples. Smaller examples are within the text of the specification, while longer explanatory examples and descriptions of selected use cases are attached in the annexes.
In order to distinguish the INSPIRE spatial data themes from the spatial object types, the INSPIRE spatial data themes are written in italics.
The document will be publicly available as a 'non-paper'. It does not represent an official position of the European Commission, and as such cannot be invoked in the context of legal procedures. |
Legal Notice
Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication.
Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services – General Executive Summary
The challenges regarding the lack of availability, quality, organisation, accessibility, and sharing of spatial information are common to a large number of policies and activities and are experienced across the various levels of public authority in Europe. In order to solve these problems it is necessary to take measures of coordination between the users and providers of spatial information. The Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council adopted on 14 March 2007 aims at establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) for environmental policies, or policies and activities that have an impact on the environment.
INSPIRE is based on the infrastructures for spatial information that are created and maintained by the Member States. To support the establishment of a European infrastructure, Implementing Rules addressing the following components of the infrastructure have been specified: metadata, interoperability of spatial data sets (as described in Annexes I, II, III of the Directive) and spatial data services, network services, data and service sharing, and monitoring and reporting procedures.
INSPIRE does not require collection of new data. However, after the period specified in the Directive[2] Member States have to make their data available according to the Implementing Rules.
Interoperability in INSPIRE means the possibility to combine spatial data and services from different sources across the European Community in a consistent way without involving specific efforts of humans or machines. It is important to note that "interoperability" is understood as providing access to spatial data sets through network services, typically via Internet. Interoperability may be achieved by either changing (harmonising) and storing existing data sets or transforming them via services for publication in the INSPIRE infrastructure. It is expected that users will spend less time and efforts on understanding and integrating data when they build their applications based on data delivered in accordance with INSPIRE.
In order to benefit from the endeavours of international standardisation bodies and organisations established under international law their standards and technical means have been utilised and referenced, whenever possible.
To facilitate the implementation of INSPIRE, it is important that all stakeholders have the opportunity to participate in specification and development. For this reason, the Commission has put in place a consensus building process involving data users, and providers together with representatives of industry, research and government. These stakeholders, organised through Spatial Data Interest Communities (SDIC) and Legally Mandated Organisations (LMO)[3], have provided reference materials, participated in the user requirement and technical[4] surveys, proposed experts for the Data Specification Drafting Team[5], the Thematic Working Groups[6] and other ad-hoc cross-thematic technical groups and participated in the public stakeholder consultations on draft versions of the data specifications. These consultations covered expert reviews as well as feasibility and fitness-for-purpose testing of the data specifications[7].
This open and participatory approach was successfully used during the development of the data specifications on Annex I, II and III data themes as well as during the preparation of the Implementing Rule on Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services[8] for Annex I spatial data themes and of its amendment regarding the themes of Annex II and III.
The development framework elaborated by the Data Specification Drafting Team aims at keeping the data specifications of the different themes coherent. It summarises the methodology to be used for the development of the data specifications, providing a coherent set of requirements and recommendations to achieve interoperability. The pillars of the framework are the following technical documents[9]:
-
The Definition of Annex Themes and Scope describes in greater detail the spatial data themes defined in the Directive, and thus provides a sound starting point for the thematic aspects of the data specification development.
-
The Generic Conceptual Model defines the elements necessary for interoperability and data harmonisation including cross-theme issues. It specifies requirements and recommendations with regard to data specification elements of common use, like the spatial and temporal schema, unique identifier management, object referencing, some common code lists, etc. Those requirements of the Generic Conceptual Model that are directly implementable are included in the Implementing Rule on Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services.
-
The Methodology for the Development of Data Specifications defines a repeatable methodology. It describes how to arrive from user requirements to a data specification through a number of steps including use-case development, initial specification development and analysis of analogies and gaps for further specification refinement.
-
The Guidelines for the Encoding of Spatial Data defines how geographic information can be encoded to enable transfer processes between the systems of the data providers in the Member States. Even though it does not specify a mandatory encoding rule it sets GML (ISO 19136) as the default encoding for INSPIRE.
-
The Guidelines for the use of Observations & Measurements and Sensor Web Enablement-related standards in INSPIRE Annex II and III data specification development provides guidelines on how the "Observations and Measurements" standard (ISO 19156) is to be used within INSPIRE.
-
The Common data models are a set of documents that specify data models that are referenced by a number of different data specifications. These documents include generic data models for networks, coverages and activity complexes.
The structure of the data specifications is based on the "ISO 19131 Geographic information - Data product specifications" standard. They include the technical documentation of the application schema, the spatial object types with their properties, and other specifics of the spatial data themes using natural language as well as a formal conceptual schema language[10].
A consolidated model repository, feature concept dictionary, and glossary are being maintained to support the consistent specification development and potential further reuse of specification elements. The consolidated model consists of the harmonised models of the relevant standards from the ISO 19100 series, the INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model, and the application schemas[11] developed for each spatial data theme. The multilingual INSPIRE Feature Concept Dictionary contains the definition and description of the INSPIRE themes together with the definition of the spatial object types present in the specification. The INSPIRE Glossary defines all the terms (beyond the spatial object types) necessary for understanding the INSPIRE documentation including the terminology of other components (metadata, network services, data sharing, and monitoring).
By listing a number of requirements and making the necessary recommendations, the data specifications enable full system interoperability across the Member States, within the scope of the application areas targeted by the Directive. The data specifications (in their version 3.0) are published as technical guidelines and provide the basis for the content of the Implementing Rule on Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services[12]. The content of the Implementing Rule is extracted from the data specifications, considering short- and medium-term feasibility as well as cost-benefit considerations. The requirements included in the Implementing Rule are legally binding for the Member States according to the timeline specified in the INSPIRE Directive.
In addition to providing a basis for the interoperability of spatial data in INSPIRE, the data specification development framework and the thematic data specifications can be reused in other environments at local, regional, national and global level contributing to improvements in the coherence and interoperability of data in spatial data infrastructures.
Geology – Executive Summary
In the INSPIRE context Geology could be seen as a "reference data theme" as it provides information for several themes of Annex III: Mineral resources, Natural Risk Zones, Soil, Energy resources, and it has a specific relationship with one of the most important natural resources, water, through groundwater bodies contained in aquifers. Geomorphology describes the Earth’s present-day surface, and the processes creating its geometry.
The use of geological data
Geological data are used in various domains requiring knowledge of the surface and underground geological environment: detecting geo-hazards; ensuring the safe disposal of wastes, nuclear wastes, carbon capture and storage; ensuring the safe construction of buildings; providing information for environmental planning; providing information for natural resources exploration; vulnerability of the underground to contamination; providing indicators for climatic change; providing construction material and minerals. For groundwater and aquifers uses are: water supply (water abstraction); groundwater resources (water availability); providing base flow for rivers, wetlands; protecting ecosystems dependent on groundwater; groundwater quality and quantity assessment; transboundary groundwater management.
How geoscientists could provide this useful information?
Geological information provides basic knowledge about the physical properties and composition of the geologic materials (rocks and sediments) outcropping at the land’s surface and forming the underground, and about their structure and their age. It also provides knowledge about aquifers, i.e. subsurface units of rocks or sediments of sufficient porosity and permeability to allow either a significant flow of groundwater or the abstraction of significant quantities of groundwater. Knowledge about landforms is also provided.
The main product delivered by geologists for the users is a geological map which is the result of an interpretation of the observations and measurements made on rocks and sediments, on and under the surface. Because the rocks forming the subsurface are visible or accessible only on very small parts of the surface, the outcrops, geologists have to interpret these observations and measurements to group rocks in geologic units, and to connect other information observed locally to identify the general geological structure.
Boreholes are another important source of information for interpreting the subsurface geology. These can provide a stratigraphic and lithological log, analogous to a vertical geological map, and can also be used to gather samples and make measurements of various properties at depth.
All this information is interpreted to make geological maps. The landforms (geomorphologic features) are often indicated on general geological maps, and are detailed on specific, applied geomorphological maps.
Hydrogeological information
Hydrogeology describes the flow, occurrence, and behavior of water in the underground environment. It is a science located between hydrology and geology, and both have a strong influence on the understanding of groundwater flow and solute transport. Hydrological processes are responsible, for example, for the characterization and understanding of water supply derived from recharge of aquifers. On the other hand the physical properties and composition of the geologic materials (rocks and sediments) create the main environment for groundwater flow and storage. Rocks and sediments also influence groundwater quality in terms of their chemical composition.
The INSPIRE groundwater model describes two basic elements: the rock system (including aquifers, dependent on the geological condition) and the groundwater system (including groundwater bodies), completed by hydrogeological objects (such as water wells). See annex C for a detailed description of this domain.
Geophysical information
Since geophysics provides valuable information on the physical properties of rocks (like density, porosity, magnetic susceptibility, etc.), regardless of their organization as geologic units, geophysics is part of the INSPIRE Geological data specifications. Geophysical boundaries may or may not coincide with geological boundaries, depending on the changes of physical properties within and outside the geological units. Geophysics provides extra - quite often the only - information on the organization of the units in the subsurface. These results are processed by geophysicists in order to deliver the 1D, 2D, 3D or even 4D spatial distribution of the property. The spatial property distributions are then interpreted by geologists to build geological models of the subsurface, for instance to detect hydrocarbon bearing structures or zones of mineral resources.
Which geological data to provide through INSPIRE?
Based on the analysis of the potential types of users and identification of use cases the TWG developed a core data model. It is based on the complex GeoSciML data model, developed by the international geosciences community, in particular Geological Survey Organisations (http://www.geosciml.org/).
The core data model contains the main types of GeologicFeatures (GeologicUnits, GeologicStructures, and GeomorphologicFeatures). The geometry of these features is described in MappedFeatures and can be included in geological maps and profiles in the form of points, lines and polygons. The data model also enables a description of the lithological/stratigraphical characteristics of borehole logs, thematic maps, geophysical surveys and measurements, and features related to hydrogeology (aquifers and groundwater bodies).
Basic geological knowledge and applied maps
As mentioned above, Geology is used by other thematic domains which are interested only in specific properties of the underground (to prevent landslides, to insure safe disposal of wastes etc). Geological surveys provide the basic knowledge about the Earth, but this basic information must then be processed by experts to transform it into the specific maps (named applied maps) required by thematic users. As very often the needs of thematic users concern a local area, the basic knowledge must be supplemented by new data related to specific properties (for example the porosity of the local rocks is needed in an assessment of a landslide).
The INSPIRE Geology model provides elements to build applied maps but does not describe these applied features.
Acknowledgements
Many individuals and organisations have contributed to the development of these Guidelines.
The Thematic Working Group Geology and Mineral Resources (TWG-GE-MR) included:
Jean-Jacques Serrano (TWG Facilitator), John Laxton (TWG Editor), Kristine Ash, Xavier Berástegui Batalla, Stefan Bergman, Daniel Cassard, Bjørn Follestad, Andrew Hughes, Uffe Larsen, Tomasz Nałęcz, Simon Pen, László Sőrés, Jouni Vuollo, Robert Tomas (European Commission Contact Point).
Also contributed:
Invited external experts for hydrogeology: Bernhard Wagner, Janusz Michalak,
Invited external expert for geoscience interoperability: Francois Robida.
For the final version of the document: Chris Schubert
Other contributors to the INSPIRE data specifications are the Drafting Team Data Specifications, the JRC Data Specifications Team and the INSPIRE stakeholders - Spatial Data Interested Communities (SDICs) and Legally Mandated Organisations (LMOs).
Contact information
Maria Vanda Nunes de Lima & Michael Lutz
European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC)
Institute for Environment and Sustainability
Unit H06: Digital Earth and Reference Data
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/pageid/2
Table of Contents
- 1. Scope
- 2. Overview
- 3. Specification scopes
- 4. Identification information
- 5. Data content and structure
- 6. Reference systems, units of measure and grids
- 7. Data quality
- 8. Dataset-level metadata
- 9. Delivery
- 10. Data Capture
- 11. Portrayal
- 11.1. Layers to be provided by INSPIRE view services
- 11.2. Styles required to be supported by INSPIRE view services
- 11.3. Styles recommended to be supported by INSPIRE view services
- 11.3.1. Styles for the layer GE.GeologicUnit - Lithology
- 11.3.2. Styles for the layer GE.GeologicUnit – Age of Rocks (olderNamedAge)
- 11.3.3. Styles for the layer GE.GeologicFault
- 11.3.4. Styles for the layer GE.GeologicFold
- 11.3.5. Styles for the layer GE.GeomorphologicFeature – Natural Geomorphologic Feature
- 11.3.6. Styles for the layer GE.GeomorphologicFeature – Anthropogenic Geomorphologic Feature
- 11.3.7. Styles for the layer GE.Borehole - Purpose of Boreholes
- 11.3.8. Styles for the layer GE.Aquifer – Aquifer Type
- 11.3.9. Styles for the layer GE.Aquifer – Media Type
- 11.3.10. Styles for the layer GE.Aquiclude – ConstitutionOfAquiclude
- 11.3.11. Styles for the layer GE.Aquitard – ConstitutionOfAquitard
- 11.3.12. Styles for the layer GE.AquiferSystem – ConstitutionOfAquifer System
- 11.3.13. Styles for the layer GE.GroundWaterBody– Groundwater Body
- 11.3.14. Styles for the layer GE.ActiveWell– Type of Active Well
- 11.3.15. Styles for the layer group GE.GeophStation - (TypeOfGeophStation)
- 11.3.16. Styles for the layer group GE.GeophProfile - (TypeOfGeophProfile)
- 11.3.17. Styles for the layer group GE.Campaign - (TypeOfSurvey)
- 11.3.18. Styles for the layer group GE. GeophSwath - (TypeOfGeophSwath)
- Bibliography
- Annex A: Abstract Test Suite - (normative)
- A.1. Application Schema Conformance Class
- A.2. Reference Systems Conformance Class
- A.3. Data Consistency Conformance Class
- A.4. Metadata IR Conformance Class
- A.5. Information Accessibility Conformance Class
- A.6. Data Delivery Conformance Class
- A.7. Portrayal Conformance Class
- A.8. Technical Guidelines Conformance Class
- A.8.1. Multiplicity test
- A.8.2. CRS http URI test
- A.8.3. Metadata encoding schema validation test
- A.8.4. Metadata occurrence test
- A.8.5. Metadata consistency test
- A.8.6. Encoding schema validation test
- A.8.7. Coverage multipart representation test
- A.8.8. Coverage domain consistency test
- A.8.9. Style test
- Annex B: Use case - (informative)
- B.1. UC01: Providing geological data to detect geo-hazards
- B.2. UC02: Providing geological data to ensure safe disposal of waste
- B.3. UC03: Providing geological data to detect ground instability in a flat area
- B.4. UC04: Looking for deep fractured zones in the basement (Geothermal exploration)
- B.5. UC05: Checking background radiation level changes
- B.6. UC06: Providing data to undertake water balance to ensure compliance with the WFD
- B.7. UC07: Groundwater reporting for WFD
- B.8. UC08: Providing hydrogeological data to define significant pressure
- B.9. UC09: Providing data to assess Corrosivity to Underground Assets
- B.10. UC10: Providing data to plan tunneling operations safely and effectively
- Annex C: Code list values - (normative)
- Annex D: Data model extensions - (informative)
- Annex E: Aquifers and Groundwater bodies - (informative)
1. Scope
This document specifies a harmonised data specification for the spatial data theme Geology as defined in Annex II of the INSPIRE Directive.
This data specification provides the basis for the drafting of Implementing Rules according to Article 7 (1) of the INSPIRE Directive [Directive 2007/2/EC]. The entire data specification is published as implementation guidelines accompanying these Implementing Rules.
2. Overview
2.1. Name
INSPIRE data specification for the theme Geology.
2.2. Informal description
Definition:
Geology characterised according to composition and structure. Includes bedrock, aquifers and geomorphology [Directive 2007/2/EC].
Description
From the definition, we detail each word. Geology is the study of the past and present aspects of the Earth, including its history and life on Earth.
The composition of an earth material describes what it consists of (its components), both the weight percentage of elements or molecules (chemical composition), and the species and number of particles, e.g. minerals (mineralogical composition), clasts and fossils.
The structure of an earth material describes the physical arrangements of its components. A geologic structure is a configuration of matter in the Earth based on describable inhomogeneity, pattern, or fracture in an earth material.
The composition and structure of earth materials
-
are reflected by their physical properties (e.g. density, porosity, and mechanical, magnetic, electrical, seismic and hydraulic properties)
-
influence geological processes (genesis, fracturing, alteration)
-
control the properties of aquifers
-
control the morphology of the landscape
-
control their use as a natural resources
-
determine their behavior during natural and industrial processes
The bedrock is a general term for the rock, usually solid, that underlies soil or other unconsolidated, superficial material.
Aquifer is a wet underground layer of water-bearing permeable rock or unconsolidated materials (gravel, sand, silt, or clay) from which groundwater can be usefully extracted using a water well.
Groundwater is all water which is below the surface of the ground in the saturation zone and in direct contact with the ground or subsoil. This zone is commonly referred to as an aquifer.
Groundwater body is a distinct volume of groundwater within an aquifer. Generally the groundwater body is not exactly correlated with the main (deeper) groundwater aquifers because it was based on the surface water basins. This means that an aquifer is not always equivalent to a groundwater body (GWB) (the methodology differs in different member states).
Geomorphology provides basic knowledge about the present shape of the sub-aerial and submerged parts of the Earth surface and its dynamics (genesis and involved processes).
The analysis of reference material and examples of use, briefly described in the Executive Summary, shows the wide range of uses with various sets of rock properties required for different uses: a geologist in charge of mineral prospecting, or mining waste protection, does not request the same information about rocks as an engineer dealing with natural hazards who is more interested in underground stability.
This data specification defines three application schemas: Geology, Hydrogeology, and Geophysics to provide the basic geological, hydrogeological and geophysical knowledge on an area, with agreed sets of attributes. To demonstrate the extensibility and also to cover more specific geological and geophysical requirements two extension application schemas for Geology and Geophysics where defined (see Annex D).
The Geological data model contains:
-
Geologic Features with Geologic Events, Geologic Units, Geologic Structures, and Geomorphologic Features. The geometry of these features is described in Mapped Features, and is included in geological maps and profiles in the form of points, lines and polygons. Mapped Features and Boreholes can be bundled in Collections,
-
Thematic Class for reclassifying GeologicFeatures as some thematic class for thematic maps,
-
The lithology of rock units,
-
The processes of Geologic Events and their environments and ages
-
The types of Shear Displacement Structures and Folds
-
Borehole details, such as location and purpose.
The Geophysics data model provides essential information on the physical properties of geological structures. The data model includes:
-
High rank geophysical stations that are part of international and national observation networks
-
Important types of geophysical measurements that are most often requested or provided by stakeholders
-
Measurements that have basic role in improving geological knowledge, especially in environmental and engineering context.
-
Measurement campaigns that include any number of measurements and allow data providers to deliver metadata in a collective manner.
The Hydrogeological data model contains:
-
The Aquifer System comprising HydrogeologicUnits, Aquifers, Aquitards, Aquicludes and the AquiferSystem,
-
The Groundwater System comprising GroundWaterBody, and its relationships to the Aquifer System, Hydrogeology Objects, and WFD_GroundWaterBody
-
Hydrogeology Objects, both natural and man-made, including Wells
Extensibility of the INSPIRE geology models:
-
For geology: the possibility of using GeoSciML v 3.2 for a wide range of geoscientific information is discussed in the Annex D,
-
For geophysics: guidance and examples are included to demonstrate the usage of the Observations & Measurements schema in delivering measurement and processing results.
Definition:
Geology characterised according to composition and structure. Includes bedrock, aquifers and geomorphology [Directive 2007/2/EC].
Description:
In the INSPIRE context the Geology data theme can be seen as a "reference data theme" as it provides information for several other INSPIRE data themes e.g. Mineral resources; Area Management, Restriction and Regulation Zones; Natural Risk Zones; Soil; Energy resources. In Geology there is a specific relationship with one of the most important natural resources, water, through groundwater bodies contained in aquifers. The theme also covers geomorphology that describes the Earth’s present-day surface, and the location of the geophysical campaigns and measurements that provide valuable information on the physical properties of rocks (like density, porosity, magnetic susceptibility, etc.) regardless of their organization as geologic units.
The INSPIRE Geology Theme is split into the following sub-themes:
-
Geology: provides basic knowledge about the physical properties and composition of geologic materials (rocks and sediments), their structure and their age as depicted in geological maps, as well as landforms (geomorphological features). The model also covers boreholes - another important source of information for interpreting the subsurface geology.
-
Hydrogeology: describes the flow, occurrence, and behaviour of water in the subsurface environment. The two basic elements are the rock system (including aquifers) and the groundwater system (including groundwater bodies). Man-made or natural hydrogeological objects/features (such as groundwater wells and natural springs) are also included.
-
Geophysics: focuses on the availability and location of key geophysical features. It includes metadata on high rank gravity, magnetic and seismological stations that are part of international and national observation networks as well as metadata on 2D and 3D seismic measurements that are most often requested by third party users. It also provides collective metadata on gravity, magnetic and airborne geophysical campaigns that cover large areas and provide basic geological information for scientific research and more detailed applied studies e.g. exploring earth resources (hydrocarbons, mineral deposits, ground water, geothermal energy…).
Entry in the INSPIRE registry: http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/theme/ge/
2.3. Normative References
[Directive 2007/2/EC] Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE)
[ISO 19105] EN ISO 19105:2000, Geographic information — Conformance and testing
[ISO 19105] EN ISO 19105:2000, Geographic information — Conformance and testing
[ISO 19107] EN ISO 19107:2005, Geographic Information – Spatial Schema
[ISO 19108] EN ISO 19108:2005, Geographic Information – Temporal Schema
[ISO 19108-c] ISO 19108:2002/Cor 1:2006, Geographic Information – Temporal Schema, Technical Corrigendum 1
[ISO 19111] EN ISO 19111:2007 Geographic information - Spatial referencing by coordinates (ISO 19111:2007)
[ISO 19113] EN ISO 19113:2005, Geographic Information – Quality principles
[ISO 19115] EN ISO 19115:2005, Geographic information – Metadata (ISO 19115:2003)
[ISO 19118] EN ISO 19118:2006, Geographic information – Encoding (ISO 19118:2005)
[ISO 19123] EN ISO 19123:2007, Geographic Information – Schema for coverage geometry and functions
[ISO 19125-1] EN ISO 19125-1:2004, Geographic Information – Simple feature access – Part 1: Common architecture
[ISO 19135] EN ISO 19135:2007 Geographic information – Procedures for item registration (ISO 19135:2005)
[ISO 19138] ISO/TS 19138:2006, Geographic Information – Data quality measures
[ISO 19139] ISO/TS 19139:2007, Geographic information – Metadata – XML schema implementation
[ISO 19157] ISO/DIS 19157, Geographic information – Data quality
[OGC 06-103r4] Implementation Specification for Geographic Information - Simple feature access – Part 1: Common Architecture v1.2.1
NOTE This is an updated version of "EN ISO 19125-1:2004, Geographic information – Simple feature access – Part 1: Common architecture".
[Regulation 1205/2008/EC] Regulation 1205/2008/EC implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards metadata
[Regulation 976/2009/EC] Commission Regulation (EC) No 976/2009 of 19 October 2009 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the Network Services
[Regulation 1089/2010/EC] Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services
[Regulation 2000/60/EC] DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy
[Regulation 2006/118/EC] DIRECTIVE 2006/118/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration
2.4. Terms and definitions
General terms and definitions helpful for understanding the INSPIRE data specification documents are defined in the INSPIRE Glossary[13].
Specifically, for the theme Geology, the following terms are defined:
(1) GeologicFeature
The abstract GeologicFeature class represents a conceptual feature that is hypothesized to exist coherently in the world. This corresponds with a "legend item" from a traditional geologic map * while the bounding coordinates of a Geologic Feature may be described, its shape is not. The implemented Geologic Feature instance acts as the "description package"
(2) MappedFeature
A spatial representation of a GeologicFeature. A MappedFeature is part of a geological interpretation.
It provides a link between a notional feature (description package) and one spatial representation of it, or part of it (exposures, surface traces and intercepts, etc) which forms the specific bounded occurrence, such as an outcrop or map polygon.
(3) Geologic Unit
A volume of rock with distinct characteristics. Includes both formal units (i.e. formally adopted and named in an official lexicon) and informal units (i.e. named but not promoted to the lexicon) and unnamed units (i.e. recognisable and described and delineable in the field but not otherwise formalised). Spatial properties are only available through association with a MappedFeature.
(4) Geologic Structure
Geologic Structure, in the INSPIRE context, considers shear displacement structures (including faults) and folds. A shear displacement structure is defined as a brittle to ductile style structure along which displacement has occurred. A fold is defined as one or more systematically curved layers, surfaces, or lines in a rock body.
(5) Hydrogeologic Unit
A Hydrogeologic Unit is a volume of rock that by virtue of its porosity or permeability has a distinct influence on the storage or movement of groundwater.
(6) Aquifer
A wet underground layer of water-bearing permeable rock or unconsolidated materials (gravel, sand, silt, or clay) from which groundwater can be usefully extracted using a water well.
(7) Groundwater Body
A distinct volume of groundwater within an aquifer or system of aquifers, which is hydraulically isolated from nearby groundwater bodies.
(8) Geophysical Station
Geophysical measurement spatially referenced to a single point location.
(9) Geophysical Profile
Geophysical measurement spatially referenced to a curve.
(10) Geophysical Swath
Geophysical measurement spatially referenced to a surface.
(11) Campaign
Geophysical activity extending over a limited time range and limited area for producing similar geophysical measurements, processing results or models.
2.5. Symbols and abbreviations
AM |
Area management/restriction/regulation zones and reporting units |
AP |
Assessment Point |
ATS |
Abstract Test Suite |
EC |
European Commission |
EEA |
European Environmental Agency |
EF |
Environmental Monitoring Facilities |
ETRS89 |
European Terrestrial Reference System 1989 |
ETRS89-LAEA |
Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area |
EVRS |
European Vertical Reference System |
FOI |
Feature of interest |
GCM |
General Conceptual Model |
GDE |
Groundwater dependent ecosystems |
GE |
Geology |
GeoSciML |
GeoScience Markup Language |
GIS |
Geographical Information System |
GML |
Geography Markup Language |
GSHP |
Ground Source Heat Pumps |
GWB |
Groundwater bodies |
GWD |
Groundwater Directive |
GWML |
GroundWater Markup Language |
HY |
Hydrography |
ICS |
International Commission on Stratigraphy |
IR |
Implementing Rule |
ISDSS |
Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services |
ISO |
International Organization for Standardization |
ITRS |
International Terrestrial Reference System |
IUGS |
International Union of Geological Sciences |
LAT |
Lowest Astronomical Tide |
LMO |
Legally Mandated Organisation |
LU |
Land Use |
RBD |
River Basin District |
RBMP |
River Basin Management Plan |
SDIC |
Spatial Data Interest Community |
SO |
Soil |
SR |
Sea Region |
SRS |
Spatial Reference System |
SWE |
Sensor Web Enablement |
TG |
Technical Guidance |
UML |
Unified Modeling Language |
UTC |
Coordinated Universal Time |
WFD |
Water Framework Directive |
WISE |
Water Information System of Europe |
XML |
EXtensible Markup Language |
2.6. How the Technical Guidelines map to the Implementing Rules
The schematic diagram in Figure 1 gives an overview of the relationships between the INSPIRE legal acts (the INSPIRE Directive and Implementing Rules) and the INSPIRE Technical Guidelines. The INSPIRE Directive and Implementing Rules include legally binding requirements that describe, usually on an abstract level, what Member States must implement.
In contrast, the Technical Guidelines define how Member States might implement the requirements included in the INSPIRE Implementing Rules. As such, they may include non-binding technical requirements that must be satisfied if a Member State data provider chooses to conform to the Technical Guidelines. Implementing these Technical Guidelines will maximise the interoperability of INSPIRE spatial data sets.
Figure 1 - Relationship between INSPIRE Implementing Rules and Technical Guidelines
2.6.1. Requirements
The purpose of these Technical Guidelines (Data specifications on Geology) is to provide practical guidance for implementation that is guided by, and satisfies, the (legally binding) requirements included for the spatial data theme Geology in the Regulation (Implementing Rules) on interoperability of spatial data sets and services. These requirements are highlighted in this document as follows:
📕
|
IR Requirement This style is used for requirements contained in the Implementing Rules on interoperability of spatial data sets and services (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010). |
For each of these IR requirements, these Technical Guidelines contain additional explanations and examples.
NOTE The Abstract Test Suite (ATS) in Annex A contains conformance tests that directly check conformance with these IR requirements.
Furthermore, these Technical Guidelines may propose a specific technical implementation for satisfying an IR requirement. In such cases, these Technical Guidelines may contain additional technical requirements that need to be met in order to be conformant with the corresponding IR requirement when using this proposed implementation. These technical requirements are highlighted as follows:
📒
|
TG Requirement X This style is used for requirements for a specific technical solution proposed in these Technical Guidelines for an IR requirement. |
NOTE 1 Conformance of a data set with the TG requirement(s) included in the ATS implies conformance with the corresponding IR requirement(s).
NOTE 2 In addition to the requirements included in the Implementing Rules on interoperability of spatial data sets and services, the INSPIRE Directive includes further legally binding obligations that put additional requirements on data providers. For example, Art. 10(2) requires that Member States shall, where appropriate, decide by mutual consent on the depiction and position of geographical features whose location spans the frontier between two or more Member States. General guidance for how to meet these obligations is provided in the INSPIRE framework documents.
2.6.2. Recommendations
In addition to IR and TG requirements, these Technical Guidelines may also include a number of recommendations for facilitating implementation or for further and coherent development of an interoperable infrastructure.
📘
|
Recommendation X Recommendations are shown using this style. |
NOTE The implementation of recommendations is not mandatory. Compliance with these Technical Guidelines or the legal obligation does not depend on the fulfilment of the recommendations.
2.6.3. Conformance
Annex A includes the abstract test suite for checking conformance with the requirements included in these Technical Guidelines and the corresponding parts of the Implementing Rules (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010).
3. Specification scopes
This data specification does not distinguish different specification scopes, but just considers one general scope.
NOTE For more information on specification scopes, see [ISO 19131:2007], clause 8 and Annex D.
4. Identification information
These Technical Guidelines are identified by the following URI:
NOTE ISO 19131 suggests further identification information to be included in this section, e.g. the title, abstract or spatial representation type. The proposed items are already described in the document metadata, executive summary, overview description (section 2) and descriptions of the application schemas (section 5). In order to avoid redundancy, they are not repeated here.
5. Data content and structure
5.1. Application schemas – Overview
5.1.1. Application schemas included in the IRs
Articles 3, 4 and 5 of the Implementing Rules lay down the requirements for the content and structure of the data sets related to the INSPIRE Annex themes.
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
The types to be used for the exchange and classification of spatial objects from data sets related to the spatial data theme Geology are defined in the following application schemas (see sections 5.3, 5.4, 5.5):
-
Geology application schema
-
Hydrogeology application schema
-
Geophysics application schema
All 3 application schemas provide basic geological, hydrogeological and geophysical knowledge on an area, with an agreed set of attributes.
The application schemas specify requirements on the properties of each spatial object including its multiplicity, domain of valid values, constraints, etc.
NOTE The application schemas presented in this section contain some additional information that is not included in the Implementing Rules, in particular multiplicities of attributes and association roles.
📒
|
TG Requirement 1 Spatial object types and data types shall comply with the multiplicities defined for the attributes and association roles in this section. |
An application schema may include references (e.g. in attributes or inheritance relationships) to common types or types defined in other spatial data themes. These types can be found in a sub-section called "Imported Types" at the end of each application schema section. The common types referred to from application schemas included in the IRs are addressed in Article 3.
📕
|
IR Requirement Types that are common to several of the themes listed in Annexes I, II and III to Directive 2007/2/EC shall conform to the definitions and constraints and include the attributes and association roles set out in Annex I. |
NOTE Since the IRs contain the types for all INSPIRE spatial data themes in one document, Article 3 does not explicitly refer to types defined in other spatial data themes, but only to types defined in external data models.
Common types are described in detail in the Generic Conceptual Model [DS-D2.7], in the relevant international standards (e.g. of the ISO 19100 series) or in the documents on the common INSPIRE models [DS-D2.10.x]. For detailed descriptions of types defined in other spatial data themes, see the corresponding Data Specification TG document [DS-D2.8.x].
5.1.2. Additional recommended application schemas
In addition to the application schemas listed above, the following additional application schema have been defined for the theme Geology (see Annex D):
-
Geophysics extension application schema to share e.g. geophysical observation results in a harmonised way using ISO 19156 (O&M) Standard.
These additional application schemas are not included in the IRs. They typically address requirements from specific (groups of) use cases and/or may be used to provide additional information. They are included in this specification in order to improve interoperability also for these additional aspects and to illustrate the extensibility of the application schemas included in the IRs.
📘
|
Recomendation 1 Additional and/or use case-specific information related to the theme Geology should be made available using the spatial object types and data types specified in the following application schema: - Geophysics extension These spatial object types and data types should comply with the definitions and constraints and include the attributes and association roles defined in the Annex D. The code lists used in attributes or association roles of spatial object types or data types should comply with the definitions and include the values defined in the Annex D. |
5.2. Basic notions
This section explains some of the basic notions used in the INSPIRE application schemas. These explanations are based on the GCM [DS-D2.5].
5.2.1. Notation
5.2.1.1. Unified Modeling Language (UML)
The application schemas included in this section are specified in UML, version 2.1. The spatial object types, their properties and associated types are shown in UML class diagrams.
NOTE For an overview of the UML notation, see Annex D in [ISO 19103].
The use of a common conceptual schema language (i.e. UML) allows for an automated processing of application schemas and the encoding, querying and updating of data based on the application schema – across different themes and different levels of detail.
The following important rules related to class inheritance and abstract classes are included in the IRs.
📕
|
IR Requirement (…)
|
The use of UML conforms to ISO 19109 8.3 and ISO/TS 19103 with the exception that UML 2.1 instead of ISO/IEC 19501 is being used. The use of UML also conforms to ISO 19136 E.2.1.1.1-E.2.1.1.4.
NOTE ISO/TS 19103 and ISO 19109 specify a profile of UML to be used in conjunction with the ISO 19100 series. This includes in particular a list of stereotypes and basic types to be used in application schemas. ISO 19136 specifies a more restricted UML profile that allows for a direct encoding in XML Schema for data transfer purposes.
To model constraints on the spatial object types and their properties, in particular to express data/data set consistency rules, OCL (Object Constraint Language) is used as described in ISO/TS 19103, whenever possible. In addition, all constraints are described in the feature catalogue in English, too.
NOTE Since "void" is not a concept supported by OCL, OCL constraints cannot include expressions to test whether a value is a void value. Such constraints may only be expressed in natural language.
5.2.1.2. Stereotypes
In the application schemas in this section several stereotypes are used that have been defined as part of a UML profile for use in INSPIRE [DS-D2.5]. These are explained in Table 1 below.
Table 1 – Stereotypes (adapted from [DS-D2.5])
Stereotype | Model element | Description |
---|---|---|
applicationSchema |
Package |
An INSPIRE application schema according to ISO 19109 and the Generic Conceptual Model. |
leaf |
Package |
A package that is not an application schema and contains no packages. |
featureType |
Class |
A spatial object type. |
type |
Class |
A type that is not directly instantiable, but is used as an abstract collection of operation, attribute and relation signatures. This stereotype should usually not be used in INSPIRE application schemas as these are on a different conceptual level than classifiers with this stereotype. |
dataType |
Class |
A structured data type without identity. |
union |
Class |
A structured data type without identity where exactly one of the properties of the type is present in any instance. |
codeList |
Class |
A code list. |
import |
Dependency |
The model elements of the supplier package are imported. |
voidable |
Attribute, association role |
A voidable attribute or association role (see section 5.2.2). |
lifeCycleInfo |
Attribute, association role |
If in an application schema a property is considered to be part of the life-cycle information of a spatial object type, the property shall receive this stereotype. |
version |
Association role |
If in an application schema an association role ends at a spatial object type, this stereotype denotes that the value of the property is meant to be a specific version of the spatial object, not the spatial object in general. |
5.2.2. Voidable characteristics
The «voidable» stereotype is used to characterise those properties of a spatial object that may not be present in some spatial data sets, even though they may be present or applicable in the real world. This does not mean that it is optional to provide a value for those properties.
For all properties defined for a spatial object, a value has to be provided – either the corresponding value (if available in the data set maintained by the data provider) or the value of void. A void value shall imply that no corresponding value is contained in the source spatial data set maintained by the data provider or no corresponding value can be derived from existing values at reasonable costs.
📘
|
Recomendation 2 The reason for a void value should be provided where possible using a listed value from the VoidReasonValue code list to indicate the reason for the missing value. |
The VoidReasonValue type is a code list, which includes the following pre-defined values:
-
Unpopulated: The property is not part of the dataset maintained by the data provider. However, the characteristic may exist in the real world. For example when the "elevation of the water body above the sea level" has not been included in a dataset containing lake spatial objects, then the reason for a void value of this property would be 'Unpopulated'. The property receives this value for all spatial objects in the spatial data set.
-
Unknown: The correct value for the specific spatial object is not known to, and not computable by the data provider. However, a correct value may exist. For example when the "elevation of the water body above the sea level" of a certain lake has not been measured, then the reason for a void value of this property would be 'Unknown'. This value is applied only to those spatial objects where the property in question is not known.
-
Withheld: The characteristic may exist, but is confidential and not divulged by the data provider.
NOTE It is possible that additional reasons will be identified in the future, in particular to support reasons / special values in coverage ranges.
The «voidable» stereotype does not give any information on whether or not a characteristic exists in the real world. This is expressed using the multiplicity:
-
If a characteristic may or may not exist in the real world, its minimum cardinality shall be defined as 0. For example, if an Address may or may not have a house number, the multiplicity of the corresponding property shall be 0..1.
-
If at least one value for a certain characteristic exists in the real world, the minimum cardinality shall be defined as 1. For example, if an Administrative Unit always has at least one name, the multiplicity of the corresponding property shall be 1..*.
In both cases, the «voidable» stereotype can be applied. In cases where the minimum multiplicity is 0, the absence of a value indicates that it is known that no value exists, whereas a value of void indicates that it is not known whether a value exists or not.
EXAMPLE If an address does not have a house number, the corresponding Address object should not have any value for the «voidable» attribute house number. If the house number is simply not known or not populated in the data set, the Address object should receive a value of void (with the corresponding void reason) for the house number attribute.
5.2.3. Code lists
Code lists are modelled as classes in the application schemas. Their values, however, are managed outside of the application schema.
5.2.3.1. Code list types
The IRs distinguish the following types of code lists.
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
The type of code list is represented in the UML model through the tagged value extensibility, which can take the following values:
-
none, representing code lists whose allowed values comprise only the values specified in the IRs (type a);
-
narrower, representing code lists whose allowed values comprise the values specified in the IRs and narrower values defined by data providers (type b);
-
open, representing code lists whose allowed values comprise the values specified in the IRs and additional values at any level defined by data providers (type c); and
-
any, representing code lists, for which the IRs do not specify any allowed values, i.e. whose allowed values comprise any values defined by data providers (type d).
📘
|
Recomendation 3 Additional values defined by data providers should not replace or redefine any value already specified in the IRs. |
NOTE This data specification may specify recommended values for some of the code lists of type (b), (c) and (d) (see section 5.2.4.3). These recommended values are specified in a dedicated Annex.
In addition, code lists can be hierarchical, as explained in Article 6(5) of the IRs.
📕
|
IR Requirement (…)
|
The type of code list and whether it is hierarchical or not is also indicated in the feature catalogues.
5.2.3.2. Obligations on data providers
📕
|
IR Requirement (….)
|
Article 6(6) obliges data providers to use only values that are allowed according to the specification of the code list. The "allowed values according to the specification of the code list" are the values explicitly defined in the IRs plus (in the case of code lists of type (b), (c) and (d)) additional values defined by data providers.
For attributes whose type is a code list of type (b), (c) or (d) data providers may use additional values that are not defined in the IRs. Article 6(6) requires that such additional values and their definition be made available in a register. This enables users of the data to look up the meaning of the additional values used in a data set, and also facilitates the re-use of additional values by other data providers (potentially across Member States).
NOTE Guidelines for setting up registers for additional values and how to register additional values in these registers is still an open discussion point between Member States and the Commission.
5.2.3.3. Recommended code list values
For code lists of type (b), (c) and (d), this data specification may propose additional values as a recommendation (in a dedicated Annex). These values will be included in the INSPIRE code list register. This will facilitate and encourage the usage of the recommended values by data providers since the obligation to make additional values defined by data providers available in a register (see section 5.2.4.2) is already met.
📘
|
Recomendation 4 Where these Technical Guidelines recommend values for a code list in addition to those specified in the IRs, these values should be used. |
NOTE For some code lists of type (d), no values may be specified in these Technical Guidelines. In these cases, any additional value defined by data providers may be used.
5.2.3.4. Governance
The following two types of code lists are distinguished in INSPIRE:
-
Code lists that are governed by INSPIRE (INSPIRE-governed code lists). These code lists will be managed centrally in the INSPIRE code list register. Change requests to these code lists (e.g. to add, deprecate or supersede values) are processed and decided upon using the INSPIRE code list register’s maintenance workflows.
INSPIRE-governed code lists will be made available in the INSPIRE code list register at http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/<CodeListName>. They will be available in SKOS/RDF, XML and HTML. The maintenance will follow the procedures defined in ISO 19135. This means that the only allowed changes to a code list are the addition, deprecation or supersession of values, i.e. no value will ever be deleted, but only receive different statuses (valid, deprecated, superseded). Identifiers for values of INSPIRE-governed code lists are constructed using the pattern http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/<CodeListName>/<value>.
-
Code lists that are governed by an organisation outside of INSPIRE (externally governed code lists). These code lists are managed by an organisation outside of INSPIRE, e.g. the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) or the World Health Organization (WHO). Change requests to these code lists follow the maintenance workflows defined by the maintaining organisations. Note that in some cases, no such workflows may be formally defined.
Since the updates of externally governed code lists is outside the control of INSPIRE, the IRs and these Technical Guidelines reference a specific version for such code lists.
The tables describing externally governed code lists in this section contain the following columns:
-
The Governance column describes the external organisation that is responsible for maintaining the code list.
-
The Source column specifies a citation for the authoritative source for the values of the code list. For code lists, whose values are mandated in the IRs, this citation should include the version of the code list used in INSPIRE. The version can be specified using a version number or the publication date. For code list values recommended in these Technical Guidelines, the citation may refer to the "latest available version".
-
In some cases, for INSPIRE only a subset of an externally governed code list is relevant. The subset is specified using the Subset column.
-
The Availability column specifies from where (e.g. URL) the values of the externally governed code list are available, and in which formats. Formats can include machine-readable (e.g. SKOS/RDF, XML) or human-readable (e.g. HTML, PDF) ones.
Code list values are encoded using http URIs and labels. Rules for generating these URIs and labels are specified in a separate table.
-
📘
|
Recomendation 5 The http URIs and labels used for encoding code list values should be taken from the INSPIRE code list registry for INSPIRE-governed code lists and generated according to the relevant rules specified for externally governed code lists. |
NOTE Where practicable, the INSPIRE code list register could also provide http URIs and labels for externally governed code lists.
5.2.3.5. Vocabulary
For each code list, a tagged value called "vocabulary" is specified to define a URI identifying the values of the code list. For INSPIRE-governed code lists and externally governed code lists that do not have a persistent identifier, the URI is constructed following the pattern http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/<UpperCamelCaseName>.
If the value is missing or empty, this indicates an empty code list. If no sub-classes are defined for this empty code list, this means that any code list may be used that meets the given definition.
An empty code list may also be used as a super-class for a number of specific code lists whose values may be used to specify the attribute value. If the sub-classes specified in the model represent all valid extensions to the empty code list, the subtyping relationship is qualified with the standard UML constraint "\{complete,disjoint}".
5.2.4. Identifier management
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
NOTE 1 An external object identifier is a unique object identifier which is published by the responsible body, which may be used by external applications to reference the spatial object. [DS-D2.5]
NOTE 2 Article 9(1) is implemented in each application schema by including the attribute inspireId of type Identifier.
NOTE 3 Article 9(2) is ensured if the namespace and localId attributes of the Identifier remains the same for different versions of a spatial object; the version attribute can of course change.
5.2.5. Geometry representation
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
NOTE 1 The specification restricts the spatial schema to 0-, 1-, 2-, and 2.5-dimensional geometries where all curve interpolations are linear and surface interpolations are performed by triangles.
NOTE 2 The topological relations of two spatial objects based on their specific geometry and topology properties can in principle be investigated by invoking the operations of the types defined in ISO 19107 (or the methods specified in EN ISO 19125-1).
5.2.6. Temporality representation
The application schema(s) use(s) the derived attributes "beginLifespanVersion" and "endLifespanVersion" to record the lifespan of a spatial object.
The attributes "beginLifespanVersion" specifies the date and time at which this version of the spatial object was inserted or changed in the spatial data set. The attribute "endLifespanVersion" specifies the date and time at which this version of the spatial object was superseded or retired in the spatial data set.
NOTE 1 The attributes specify the beginning of the lifespan of the version in the spatial data set itself, which is different from the temporal characteristics of the real-world phenomenon described by the spatial object. This lifespan information, if available, supports mainly two requirements: First, knowledge about the spatial data set content at a specific time; second, knowledge about changes to a data set in a specific time frame. The lifespan information should be as detailed as in the data set (i.e., if the lifespan information in the data set includes seconds, the seconds should be represented in data published in INSPIRE) and include time zone information.
NOTE 2 Changes to the attribute "endLifespanVersion" does not trigger a change in the attribute "beginLifespanVersion".
📕
|
IR Requirement (…)
|
NOTE The requirement expressed in the IR Requirement above will be included as constraints in the UML data models of all themes.
📘
|
Recomendation 6 If life-cycle information is not maintained as part of the spatial data set, all spatial objects belonging to this data set should provide a void value with a reason of "unpopulated". |
5.2.6.1. Validity of the real-world phenomena
The application schema(s) use(s) the attributes "validFrom" and "validTo" to record the validity of the real-world phenomenon represented by a spatial object.
The attributes "validFrom" specifies the date and time at which the real-world phenomenon became valid in the real world. The attribute "validTo" specifies the date and time at which the real-world phenomenon is no longer valid in the real world.
Specific application schemas may give examples what "being valid" means for a specific real-world phenomenon represented by a spatial object.
📕
|
IR Requirement (…)
|
NOTE The requirement expressed in the IR Requirement above will be included as constraints in the UML data models of all themes.
5.2.7. Coverages
Coverage functions are used to describe characteristics of real-world phenomena that vary over space and/or time. Typical examples are temperature, elevation, precipitation, imagery. A coverage contains a set of such values, each associated with one of the elements in a spatial, temporal or spatio-temporal domain. Typical spatial domains are point sets (e.g. sensor locations), curve sets (e.g. isolines), grids (e.g. orthoimages, elevation models), etc.
In INSPIRE application schemas, coverage functions are defined as properties of spatial object types where the type of the property value is a realisation of one of the types specified in ISO 19123.
To improve alignment with coverage standards on the implementation level (e.g. ISO 19136 and the OGC Web Coverage Service) and to improve the cross-theme harmonisation on the use of coverages in INSPIRE, an application schema for coverage types is included in the Generic Conceptual Model in 9.9.4. This application schema contains the following coverage types:
-
RectifiedGridCoverage: coverage whose domain consists of a rectified grid – a grid for which there is an affine transformation between the grid coordinates and the coordinates of a coordinate reference system (see Figure 2, left).
-
ReferenceableGridCoverage: coverage whose domain consists of a referenceable grid – a grid associated with a transformation that can be used to convert grid coordinate values to values of coordinates referenced to a coordinate reference system (see Figure 2, right).
In addition, some themes make reference to the types TimeValuePair and Timeseries defined in Taylor, Peter (ed.), OGC® WaterML 2.0: Part 1 – Timeseries, v2.0.0, Open Geospatial Consortium, 2012. These provide a representation of the time instant/value pairs, i.e. time series (see Figure 3).
Where possible, only these coverage types (or a subtype thereof) are used in INSPIRE application schemas.
(Source: ISO 19136:2007)
image::./media/image6.png[image,width=309,height=209, align=center]
(Source: GML 3.3.0)
Figure 2 – Examples of a rectified grid (left) and a referenceable grid (right)
Figure 3 – Example of a time series
5.3. Application schema Geology
5.3.1. Description
5.3.1.1. Narrative description and UML Overview
Figure 4 – UML class diagram: Overview of the Geology application schema
Figure 4 shows only the spatial object types and their relationships. It does not include data types and code-lists. The properties are not visible but are shown in the following figures, which describe the main parts of the Geology data model.
Figure 5 – UML class diagram: GeologicFeature, MappedFeature, GeologicEvent, ThematicClass
MappedFeature and GeologicFeature are central classes (spatial object types) in the model.
A MappedFeature provides a spatial representation of a GeologicFeature. The specification association from MappedFeature to GeologicFeature allows only one Geologic Feature to be represented by any Mapped Feature.
As well as 'standard' geological maps the model allows the description of thematic maps using the themeClass association to ThematicClass. A thematic map in this context can be considered as a reclassification of the GeologicUnit in terms of some thematic property, for example reclassifying Geologic Units in terms of their susceptibility to compaction or their potential as a source of aggregate. A theme should have a name and be constrained by a codelist of class values for that theme but as each theme will have different classes, and it is likely different classification systems will have been used by different data providers, it is not possible to mandate any particular codelist of theme class values in the specification.
The abstract GeologicFeature class represents a conceptual geological feature that is hypothesized to exist coherently in the world, and includes as sub-types the main information classes in the model. The implemented Geologic Feature instance acts as the "description package". There are three sub-types of GeologicFeature in the data model: GeologicUnit, GeologicStructure and GeomorphologicFeature.
A GeologicEvent is defined as an identifiable event during which one or more geological processes act to modify geological entities. Geological age is modelled using GeologicEvent – the age of some geological event occurring. A GeologicEvent should have a specified geologic age and process, and may have a specified environment.
The geologicHistory association from GeologicFeature to GeologicEvent describes a sequence of one or more Geologic Events which together describe the age or geologic history of the GeologicFeature. Commonly GeologicFeatures will have a geologicHistory comprising only one GeologicEvent, which represents the formation of the GeologicFeature.
Figure 6 – UML class diagram: GeologicCollection
A GeologicCollection is a named or identifiable group of geological or geophysical objects. Geologic objects are commonly grouped into collections such as geological maps, thematic maps, groups of geophysical measurements or models of the same type etc, which are familiar to many user communities. The GeologicCollection class allows the delivery of a package of objects that go to make up one of these familiar collections.
Figure 7 – UML class diagram: GeologicUnit
GeologicUnit represents a body of material in the Earth whose complete and precise extent is inferred to exist. Spatial properties are only available through association with a MappedFeature.
The composition association from GeologicUnit to CompositionPart allows the lithological description of the Geologic Unit. The composition of a Geologic Unit can be made up of several Composition Parts, for example where there are lithologically distinct components interbedded.
Figure 8 – UML class diagram: GeologicStructure
Geologic Structure is defined as a configuration of matter in the Earth based on describable inhomogeneity, pattern, or fracture in an Earth Material. The identity of a Geologic Structure is independent of the material that is the substrate for the structure.
The two types of GeologicStructure in the data model are ShearDisplacementStructure and Fold.
-
ShearDisplacementStructure includes all brittle to ductile style structures along which displacement has occurred, from a simple, single 'planar' brittle (fault) or ductile surface to a fault system comprised of tens of strands of both brittle and ductile nature.
-
Fold describes one or more systematically curved layers, surfaces, or lines in a rock body. A fold denotes a structure formed by the deformation of a Geologic Feature to form a structure that may be described by the translation of an abstract line (the fold axis) along some curvilinear path (the fold profile).
Figure 9 – UML class diagram: GeomorphologicFeature
The abstract GeomorphologicFeature class is a point, linear or areal landform or landscape. It is a natural or an anthropogenic surface feature and may be erosional, depositional or both. GeomorphologicFeature has two subtypes: NaturalGeomorphologicFeature and AnthropogenicGeomorphologicFeature.
-
NaturalGeomorphologicFeature is a geomorphologic feature produced by natural dynamics.
-
AnthropogenicGeomorphologicFeature is a man-made geomorphologic feature on the earth’s surface (including those in shallow water), having a characteristic shape and range in composition, composed of unconsolidated earthy, organic materials, artificial materials, or rock, that is the direct result of human manipulation or activities. It can be either constructional (e.g., artificial levee) or destructional (quarry), or both.
Figure 10 – UML class diagram: Borehole
Borehole is a generalized class for any narrow shaft drilled in the ground, at any angle. The logElement association to MappedInterval allows the description of a borehole log as a collection of MappedIntervals, each off which can be specified by a GeologicUnit and have a geologicHistory (age). This allows the description of lithological or stratigraphical borehole logs. A MappedInterval is a special kind of Mapped Feature whose shape is a 1-D interval and which uses the spatial reference system (SRS) of the containing borehole.
A MappedInterval is therefore an interpretation of the observations (lithological, geophysical etc) made in the original log, and it is only such interpreted borehole logs which are in scope of the data specification. These interpretations can be in terms of lithostratigraphic units described in a stratigraphic lexicon and shown on a geological map, but they can be in terms of other types of unit such as a recognisable lithological unit correlated between boreholes. The data specification does not cover the original observations upon which the interpretation was made, but these can be delivered using the GeoSciML and the ISO 19156 Observations & Measurements standard.
5.3.1.2. Consistency between spatial data sets
The observation location is specified by its coordinates.
5.3.1.3. Modelling of object references
MappedFeature can be seen as a container for geometry whereas GeologicFeature is a container for properties. This enables a single 'real world' GeologicFeature to have multiple 'map' representations, for example at different scales or resolutions of map or as an element in a 3D model
5.3.2. Feature catalogue
Feature catalogue metadata
Application Schema |
INSPIRE Application Schema Geology |
Version number |
3.0 |
Types defined in the feature catalogue
Type | Package | Stereotypes |
---|---|---|
AnthropogenicGeomorphologicFeature |
Geology |
«featureType» |
AnthropogenicGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
Borehole |
Geology |
«featureType» |
BoreholePurposeValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
CollectionTypeValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
CompositionPart |
Geology |
«dataType» |
CompositionPartRoleValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
EventEnvironmentValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
EventProcessValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
FaultTypeValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
Fold |
Geology |
«featureType» |
FoldProfileTypeValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
GeochronologicEraValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
GeologicCollection |
Geology |
«featureType» |
GeologicEvent |
Geology |
«featureType» |
GeologicFeature |
Geology |
«featureType» |
GeologicStructure |
Geology |
«featureType» |
GeologicUnit |
Geology |
«featureType» |
GeologicUnitTypeValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
GeomorphologicActivityValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
GeomorphologicFeature |
Geology |
«featureType» |
LithologyValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
MappedFeature |
Geology |
«featureType» |
MappedInterval |
Geology |
«featureType» |
MappingFrameValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
NaturalGeomorphologicFeature |
Geology |
«featureType» |
NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
ShearDisplacementStructure |
Geology |
«featureType» |
ThematicClass |
Geology |
«dataType» |
ThematicClassValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
ThematicClassificationValue |
Geology |
«codeList» |
5.3.2.1. Spatial object types
5.3.2.1.1. AnthropogenicGeomorphologicFeature
AnthropogenicGeomorphologicFeature | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: anthropogenicGeomorphologicFeatureType
|
5.3.2.1.2. Borehole
Borehole | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: inspireId
|
||||||||||
Attribute: downholeGeometry
|
||||||||||
Attribute: boreholeLength
|
||||||||||
Attribute: elevation
|
||||||||||
Attribute: location
|
||||||||||
Attribute: purpose
|
||||||||||
Association role: logElement
|
5.3.2.1.3. Fold
Fold | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: profileType
|
5.3.2.1.4. GeologicCollection
GeologicCollection | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: inspireId
|
||||||||||
Attribute: name
|
||||||||||
Attribute: collectionType
|
||||||||||
Attribute: reference
|
||||||||||
Attribute: beginLifespanVersion
|
||||||||||
Attribute: endLifespanVersion
|
||||||||||
Association role: geophObjectSet
|
||||||||||
Association role: geophObjectMember
|
||||||||||
Association role: boreholeMember
|
||||||||||
Association role: mapMember
|
5.3.2.1.5. GeologicEvent
GeologicEvent | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: name
|
||||||||||
Attribute: eventEnvironment
|
||||||||||
Attribute: eventProcess
|
||||||||||
Attribute: olderNamedAge
|
||||||||||
Attribute: youngerNamedAge
|
5.3.2.1.6. GeologicFeature
GeologicFeature (abstract) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: inspireId
|
||||||||||
Attribute: name
|
||||||||||
Association role: themeClass
|
||||||||||
Association role: geologicHistory
|
5.3.2.1.7. GeologicStructure
GeologicStructure (abstract) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.1.8. GeologicUnit
GeologicUnit | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: geologicUnitType
|
||||||||
Association role: composition
|
5.3.2.1.9. GeomorphologicFeature
GeomorphologicFeature (abstract) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.1.10. MappedFeature
MappedFeature | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: shape
|
||||||||
Attribute: mappingFrame
|
||||||||
Association role: specification
|
5.3.2.1.11. MappedInterval
MappedInterval | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.1.12. NaturalGeomorphologicFeature
NaturalGeomorphologicFeature | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: naturalGeomorphologicFeatureType
|
||||||||
Attribute: activity
|
5.3.2.1.13. ShearDisplacementStructure
ShearDisplacementStructure | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: faultType
|
5.3.2.2. Data types
5.3.2.2.1. CompositionPart
CompositionPart | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: material
|
||||||||
Attribute: proportion
|
||||||||
Attribute: role
|
5.3.2.2.2. ThematicClass
ThematicClass | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: themeClassification
|
||||||||
Attribute: themeClass
|
5.3.2.3. Code lists
5.3.2.3.1. AnthropogenicGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue
AnthropogenicGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.2. BoreholePurposeValue
BoreholePurposeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.3. CollectionTypeValue
CollectionTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.4. CompositionPartRoleValue
CompositionPartRoleValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.5. EventEnvironmentValue
EventEnvironmentValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.6. EventProcessValue
EventProcessValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.7. FaultTypeValue
FaultTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.8. FoldProfileTypeValue
FoldProfileTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.9. GeochronologicEraValue
GeochronologicEraValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.10. GeologicUnitTypeValue
GeologicUnitTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.11. GeomorphologicActivityValue
GeomorphologicActivityValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.12. LithologyValue
LithologyValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.13. MappingFrameValue
MappingFrameValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.14. NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue
NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.15. ThematicClassificationValue
ThematicClassificationValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.3.16. ThematicClassValue
ThematicClassValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4. Imported types (informative)
This section lists definitions for feature types, data types and code lists that are defined in other application schemas. The section is purely informative and should help the reader understand the feature catalogue presented in the previous sections. For the normative documentation of these types, see the given references.
5.3.2.4.1. CharacterString
CharacterString | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.2. DateTime
DateTime | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.3. DirectPosition
DirectPosition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.4. DocumentCitation
DocumentCitation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.5. GM_Curve
GM_Curve | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.6. GM_Object
GM_Object (abstract) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.7. GM_Point
GM_Point | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.8. GeophObject
GeophObject (abstract) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.9. GeophObjectSet
GeophObjectSet | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.10. Identifier
Identifier | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.11. Quantity
Quantity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.2.4.12. QuantityRange
QuantityRange | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.3.3. Externally governed code lists
The externally governed code lists included in this application schema are specified in the tables in this section and in Annex C.
5.3.3.1. Governance and authoritative source
Code list | Governance | Authoritative Source(incl. version*[14] and relevant subset, where applicable) |
---|---|---|
GeochronologicEraValue |
International Commission on Stratigraphy of the International Union of Geological Sciences |
Cohen, K.M., Finney, S. & Gibbard, P.L., International Chronostratigraphic Chart, August 2012, International Commission on Stratigraphy of the International Union of Geological Sciences, 2012 |
5.3.3.2. Availability
Code list | Availability | Format |
---|---|---|
GeochronologicEraValue |
PDF or JPG |
NOTE This externally managed code list and its values extended for Pre-Cambrian rocks and Quaternary units are presented in the Annex C of this document.
5.4. Application schema Hydrogeology
5.4.1. Description
5.4.1.1. Narrative description and UML Overview
Figure 11 – UML class diagram: Overview of the Hydrogeology application schema
The INSPIRE Hydrogeological data model identifies two basic elements: the 'rock' system or aquifer system (invariable in time) containing hydrogeological units, classified as aquifers, aquitards and aquicludes and the 'groundwater' system with groundwater bodies (variable in time). Hydrogeological objects (man-made and natural objects such as groundwater wells and springs) interact with these domains of the 'rock' system and the 'groundwater' system. The 'rock' system and the 'groundwater' system and the interaction between them create a hydrogeological system. The principal aim of the core model is to capture the main classes of these systems and to provide the logical links between them. The 'groundwater' system is created by groundwater flow in aquifers of the 'rock' system, which have the right porosity and permeability to conduct groundwater. The 'groundwater' system has distinct groundwater flow properties and a distinct pressure regime and is confined by permeability, groundwater surface or other barriers in the subsurface.
The model provides the classes of the 'rock' system and the 'groundwater' system and the links between them and also the interaction of these systems with man-made facilities and natural features. Like the INSPIRE Geological model the Hydrogeological model represents a more static approach aimed at providing mainly information depicted onhydrogeological maps at a regional or national scale (1 : 50.000 or smaller).
NOTE 1 For provision of detailed measurements on the quality and chemical composition of groundwater and time series measurements of groundwater level within groundwater wells the use of the WaterML 2.0 specification is recommended.
The Hydrogeology - 'Rock' system
Figure 12 – UML class diagram: HydrogeologicalUnit, AquiferSystem, Aquifer, Aquitard, Aquiclude
The 'Rock' system has 1 main class, HydrogeologicalUnit, with a number of important subclasses. HydrogeologicalUnit is a part of the lithosphere with distinctive parameters for water storage and conduction, and is a specialisation of GeologicUnit.
There are four important subclasses of HydrogeologicalUnit: Aquifer, Aquitard, Aquiclude and AquiferSystem. An Aquifer is a wet underground layer of water-bearing permeable rock or unconsolidated materials (gravel, sand, silt, or clay) from which groundwater can be usefully extracted by a groundwater well.
An Aquitard is a saturated, but poorly permeable bed that impedes groundwater movement and does not yield water freely to wells, but which may transmit appreciable water to or from adjacent aquifers and, where sufficiently thick, may constitute an important groundwater storage unit.
An Aquiclude is a HydrogeologicalUnit that due to its low permeability can act as a barrier to groundwater flow and as such often confines aquifers or aquifer systems.
An AquiferSystem is a collection of Aquifers and/or Aquitards which together constitute the environment of groundwater - "communicating vessels" that are filled or can be filled with groundwater i.e. a GroundWaterBody.
An AquiferSystem may contain one or more Aquifers, Aquitards and Aquicludes .
The hydrogeology – "Groundwater system"
Figure 13 – UML class diagram: GroundWaterBody, AquiferSystem, ActiveWell, WFDGroundWaterBody - from the application schema Water Framework Directive of Area management/restriction/regulation zones and reporting units INSPIRE theme
The hydrogeological system is formed by the interaction of the groundwater system and the rock system.
The main class of the the groundwater system is GroundWaterBody.
A GroundWaterBody is a distinct volume of groundwater within an aquifer or system of aquifers, which is hydraulically isolated from nearby groundwater bodies. The piezometricState property of a GroundWaterBody, which specifies the piezometric state of the groundwater body water table, is modelled in a separate class PiezometricState.
WFDGroundWaterBody is a distinct volume of groundwater within a groundwater flow system, which is used as a reporting or management unit within the Water Framework Directive (WFD). This class is a special type of ManagementOrRegulationZone class, which is imported from the application schema Water Framework Directive of Area management/restriction/regulation zones and reporting units INSPIRE theme. The relationship to the GroundWaterBody is modeled through the association relatedGroundWaterBody (i.e. every WFDGroundWaterBody is linked to 1 or many natural GroundWaterBodies).
GroundWaterBody interacts with the 'rock' system through an association with AquiferSystem.
Hydrogeological objects
Figure 14 – UML class diagram: HydrogeologicalObject, HydrogeologicalObjectNatural, HydrogeologicalObjectManMade, ActiveWell, GroundWaterBody, Borehole (from Geology), EnvironmentalMonitoringFacilities (from EF Theme)
HydrogeologicalObject is an abstract class for man-made or natural objects where interaction occurs with the hydrogeological system. HydrogeologicalObject has two subclasses HydrogeologicalObjectManMade and HydrogeologicalObjectNatural
HydrogeologicalObjectManMade is an abstract class for a manmade facility, where interaction occurs with the hydrogeological system.
An ActiveWell is the only type of HydrogeologicalObjectManMade defined in this application schema. It is an excavation or opening into the ground where the intended use is for location, acquisition, development, or artificial recharge of ground water. The association from ActiveWell to Borehole allows the ActiveWell to be associated with a particular Borehole. Where there is an associated Borehole the geometry should be taken from Borehole rather than from HydrogeologicalObject.
ActiveWell has a bidirectional associations to a GroundWaterBody to describe the interaction between these wells and a groundwater body.
HydrogeologicalObjectNatural is the type of HydrogeologicalObject for natural objects where interaction (inflow or outflow) occurs with the hydrogeological system.
Like ActiveWell, HydrogeologicalObjectNatural has bidirectional associations to a GroundWaterBody to describe the interaction between a type of natural hydrogeological object and a groundwater body.
5.4.1.2. Consistency between spatial data sets
The observation location is specified by its coordinates.
5.4.1.3. Modelling of object references
MappedFeature can be seen as a container for geometry whereas GeologicUnit (and thus HydrogeologicalUnit) is a container for properties. This enables a single 'real world' GeologicUnit to have multiple 'map' representations, for example at different scales or resolutions of map or as an element in a 3D model.
A GroundWaterBody may be monitored by an EnvironmentalMonitoringFacility comprising one or more ActiveWells acting as groundwater observation wells.
Based on the different assumptions established in Member States the delineation of a WFDGroundWaterBody, used for reporting under the Water Framework Directive, boundary can differ from the natural GroundWaterBody extent.The WFDGroundWaterBody is associated with one or more natural groundwater bodies.
5.4.2. Feature catalogue
Feature catalogue metadata
Application Schema |
INSPIRE Application Schema Hydrogeology |
Version number |
3.0 |
Types defined in the feature catalogue
Type | Package | Stereotypes |
---|---|---|
ActiveWell |
Hydrogeology |
«featureType» |
ActiveWellTypeValue |
Hydrogeology |
«codeList» |
Aquiclude |
Hydrogeology |
«featureType» |
Aquifer |
Hydrogeology |
«featureType» |
AquiferMediaTypeValue |
Hydrogeology |
«codeList» |
AquiferSystem |
Hydrogeology |
«featureType» |
AquiferTypeValue |
Hydrogeology |
«codeList» |
Aquitard |
Hydrogeology |
«featureType» |
ConditionOfGroundwaterValue |
Hydrogeology |
«codeList» |
GroundWaterBody |
Hydrogeology |
«featureType» |
HydroGeochemicalRockTypeValue |
Hydrogeology |
«codeList» |
HydrogeologicalObject |
Hydrogeology |
«featureType» |
HydrogeologicalObjectManMade |
Hydrogeology |
«featureType» |
HydrogeologicalObjectNatural |
Hydrogeology |
«featureType» |
HydrogeologicalSurface |
Hydrogeology |
«union» |
HydrogeologicalUnit |
Hydrogeology |
«featureType» |
NaturalObjectTypeValue |
Hydrogeology |
«codeList» |
PiezometricState |
Hydrogeology |
«dataType» |
QuantityValue |
Hydrogeology |
«union» |
StatusCodeTypeValue |
Hydrogeology |
«codeList» |
WaterPersistenceValue |
Hydrogeology |
«codeList» |
WaterSalinityValue |
Hydrogeology |
«codeList» |
5.4.2.1. Spatial object types
5.4.2.1.1. ActiveWell
ActiveWell | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: activityType
|
||||||||||||
Association role: environmentalMonitoringFacility
|
||||||||||||
Association role: borehole
|
||||||||||||
Association role: groundWaterBody
|
5.4.2.1.2. Aquiclude
Aquiclude | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.1.3. Aquifer
Aquifer | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: aquiferType
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: mediaType
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: isExploited
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: isMainInSystem
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: vulnerabilityToPollution
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: permeabilityCoefficient
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: storativityCoefficient
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: hydroGeochemicalRockType
|
||||||||||||
Association role: aquitard
|
||||||||||||
Association role: hydrogeologicalObject
|
||||||||||||
Association role: aquiferSystem
|
5.4.2.1.4. AquiferSystem
AquiferSystem | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: isLayered
|
||||||||||||
Association role: aquitard
|
||||||||||||
Association role: aquiclude
|
||||||||||||
Association role: aquifer
|
5.4.2.1.5. Aquitard
Aquitard | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: approximatePermeabilityCoefficient
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: approximateStorativityCoefficient
|
||||||||||||
Association role: aquiferSystem
|
||||||||||||
Association role: aquifer
|
5.4.2.1.6. GroundWaterBody
GroundWaterBody | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: inspireId
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: approximateHorizontalExtend
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: conditionOfGroundWaterBody
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: mineralization
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: piezometricState
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: beginLifespanVersion
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: endLifespanVersion
|
||||||||||||
Association role: activeWell
|
||||||||||||
Association role: aquiferSystem
|
||||||||||||
Association role: observationWell
|
||||||||||||
Association role: hydrogeologicalObjectNatural
|
5.4.2.1.7. HydrogeologicalObject
HydrogeologicalObject (abstract) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: inspireId
|
||||||||||
Attribute: geometry
|
||||||||||
Attribute: name
|
||||||||||
Attribute: description
|
||||||||||
Attribute: beginLifespanVersion
|
||||||||||
Attribute: endLifespanVersion
|
||||||||||
Association role: aquifer
|
5.4.2.1.8. HydrogeologicalObjectManMade
HydrogeologicalObjectManMade (abstract) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: validFrom
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: validTo
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: statusCode
|
5.4.2.1.9. HydrogeologicalObjectNatural
HydrogeologicalObjectNatural | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: naturalObjectType
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: waterPersistence
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: approximateQuantityOfFlow
|
||||||||||||
Association role: groundWaterBody
|
5.4.2.1.10. HydrogeologicalUnit
HydrogeologicalUnit (abstract) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: description
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: approximateDepth
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: approximateThickness
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: beginLifespanVersion
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: endLifespanVersion
|
||||||||||||
Association role: geologicStructure
|
5.4.2.2. Data types
5.4.2.2.1. HydrogeologicalSurface
HydrogeologicalSurface | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: surfaceRectifiedGrid
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: surfaceReferencableGrid
|
||||||||||||
Attribute: surfacePointCollection
|
5.4.2.2.2. PiezometricState
PiezometricState | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: observationTime
|
||||||||||
Attribute: piezometricSurface
|
5.4.2.2.3. QuantityValue
QuantityValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: singleQuantity
|
||||||||
Attribute: quantityInterval
|
5.4.2.3. Code lists
5.4.2.3.1. ActiveWellTypeValue
ActiveWellTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.3.2. AquiferMediaTypeValue
AquiferMediaTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.3.3. AquiferTypeValue
AquiferTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.3.4. ConditionOfGroundwaterValue
ConditionOfGroundwaterValue | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.3.5. HydroGeochemicalRockTypeValue
HydroGeochemicalRockTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.3.6. NaturalObjectTypeValue
NaturalObjectTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.3.7. StatusCodeTypeValue
StatusCodeTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.3.8. WaterPersistenceValue
WaterPersistenceValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.3.9. WaterSalinityValue
WaterSalinityValue | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4. Imported types (informative)
This section lists definitions for feature types, data types and code lists that are defined in other application schemas. The section is purely informative and should help the reader understand the feature catalogue presented in the previous sections. For the normative documentation of these types, see the given references.
5.4.2.4.1. Boolean
Boolean | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.2. Borehole
Borehole | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.3. DateTime
DateTime | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.4. EnvironmentalMonitoringFacility
EnvironmentalMonitoringFacility | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.5. GM_Primitive
GM_Primitive (abstract) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.6. GM_Surface
GM_Surface | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.7. GeologicStructure
GeologicStructure (abstract) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.8. GeologicUnit
GeologicUnit | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.9. Identifier
Identifier | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.10. PT_FreeText
PT_FreeText | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.11. PointObservationCollection
PointObservationCollection | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.12. Quantity
Quantity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.13. QuantityRange
QuantityRange | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.14. RectifiedGridCoverage
RectifiedGridCoverage | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.2.4.15. ReferenceableGridCoverage
ReferenceableGridCoverage | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.4.3. Externally governed code lists
The Hydrogeology application schema does not contain externally governed code lists.
5.5. Application schema Geophysics
5.5.1. Description
5.5.1.1. Narrative description and UML overview
Figure 15 – UML class diagram: Overview of the Geophysics application schema
The Geophysical data model is designed to fulfill identified common requirements mainly related to spatial locations and essential metadata of geophysical measurements. The extended model (see Annex D) is to demonstrate the extensibility of the core model to address some more specific geophysical information and delivery of observation results.
Fundamental classes that are defined in this model are related to the well-known geophysical concepts measurement and survey:
-
GeophMeasurement is a generic spatial object type that models the field observation procedure with its location, spatial characteristics and related metadata. The related projectedGeometry is necessary when measurement setup is 3 dimensional, to define a 2D geometry for displaying purposes
-
Campaign is used to document geophysical surveys as measurement campaigns
Both are derived from SF_SpatialSamplingFeature that is a fundamental element of the ISO 19156 Observations and Measurements standard (O&M). Geophysical entities are always used for spatial sampling either by means of data acquisition (measurements) or data processing (models), therefore these are considered as sampling features. To encode the geophysical results of data acquisition and modeling procedures the O&M standard has to be used. At the minimum, in the Geophysics application schema, the sampling geometry (shape) shall always be provided. Recommendations and coding examples about the use of O&M, are provided in the .
Geophysics - Campaign
Figure 16 – UML class diagram: GeophObjectSet, Campaign
GeophObjectSet is a generic spatial object type, subclass of SF_SamplingFeature that models geophysical entity collections like campaigns, or projects.
Note: In many cases it is useful to link observation results to collections, rather than to individual geophysical objects (e.g. a gravity map can be associated with a gravity survey and not with a single station). For encoding the O&M standard has to be used. As a minimum the sampling geometry shall always be provided. Recommendations for the use of O&M, and coding examples are provided in the guidelines (please reference D2.9 document).
Campaign is subtype of GeophObjectSet. Geophysical activity is usually organized into campaigns and projects. In the core model Campaign is a collective class to document such measuring activities. In the extension model (see Annex D) another GeophObjectSet subtype, Project is also available.
Geophysics - Measurement
Figure 17 – UML class diagram: GeophObject, GeophMeasurment, GeophStation, GeophProfile, GeophSwath
GeophObject is a generic spatial object type that models single geophysical entities. It has two subtypes: GeophMeasurement and GeophModel. The later is only available in the Geopysics extension application schema (see Annex D).
GeophMeasurement is a generic spatial object type that models the field observation procedure with its location, spatial characteristics and related metadata. In contrast to Geophysical models geophysical measurements collect data outside or on the boundary of the observed spatial domain. In many cases observed data carries the characteristics of the internal organization of the observed domain as a function of some non spatial dimension (time, frequency, electrode distance etc.). It is a matter of processing to transform measured data so that the results overlap with the internal area of the observed domain. The observed property of a measurement is usually a geophysical property that can not be directly interpreted as a property of the observed domain.
In this model GeophMeasurement has three subtypes: GeophStation, GeophProfile, and GeophSwath.
GeophStations are measurements spatially referenced to a point. They are used to collect data at a single location. The source – sensor setup may be elongated or two dimensional, but the observed data is either zero dimensional or a function of a non spatial parameter, for example time, frequency or electrode spacing. Processed results can be one dimensional (eg. a sounding curve) but it does not change the fact that the original sampling feature geometry is still a point. The type of GeophStation is restricted to gravity and magnetic base stations, seismological stations, vertical electric soundings and magnetotelluric soundings.
Note: Exclusion of ordinary (non base) gravity and magnetic survey stations prevents data providers from the obligation of reporting millions of ordinary stations. These should be reported in a collective manner by using the Campaign class.
Constraint: shape must be point geometry. It is equivalent to the center or reference point of the measurement.
GeophProfiles are measurements spatially referenced to a curve. They are used to collect data along a curve or a series of points that can either be on the surface or in the 3D space. Observed data is a curve coverage. Range data may contain non dimensional parameters, for example time, frequency. Processed results can be two dimensional (eg. a depth section) but it does not change the fact that the original sampling feature geometry is still a curve. The type of GeophProfile is restricted to seismicLine, and boreholeLogging.
Constraint: shape must be curve geometry. It is equivalent to the reference curve of the measurement.
GeophSwath is a geophysical measurement spatially referenced to a surface. Range data may contain non dimensional parameters, for example time, frequency. Processed results are two or three dimensional. Type of GeophSwath is restricted to 3DSeismics.
Constraint: shape must be surface geometry. It is equivalent to the reference surface of the measurement.
5.5.1.2. Consistency between spatial data sets
5.5.1.3. Identifier management
All geophysical spatial object types shall be identified by an inspireId of type Identifier. It is composed of a local identification code, a namespace that identifies the naming authority, and an optional version number. Features derived from GeophMeasurement usually don’t get updated, and for this reason version number is not required. Features derived from GeophModel may have several versions as a result of reprocessing. Therefore, version number may be required.
5.5.1.4. Modelling of object references
Using geophysical features object referencing is often required. (eg. largerWork, relatedMeasurement, relatedModel) For internal referencing the Identifier class of the General Concept Model is used. For external referencing the usage of MD_Identifier embedded in citation records is recommended.
5.5.2. Feature catalogue
Feature catalogue metadata
Application Schema |
INSPIRE Application Schema Geophysics |
Version number |
3.0 |
Types defined in the feature catalogue
Type | Package | Stereotypes |
---|---|---|
Campaign |
Geophysics |
«featureType» |
CampaignTypeValue |
Geophysics |
«codeList» |
GeophMeasurement |
Geophysics |
«featureType» |
GeophObject |
Geophysics |
«featureType» |
GeophObjectSet |
Geophysics |
«featureType» |
GeophProfile |
Geophysics |
«featureType» |
GeophStation |
Geophysics |
«featureType» |
GeophSwath |
Geophysics |
«featureType» |
NetworkNameValue |
Geophysics |
«codeList» |
PlatformTypeValue |
Geophysics |
«codeList» |
ProfileTypeValue |
Geophysics |
«codeList» |
StationRankValue |
Geophysics |
«codeList» |
StationTypeValue |
Geophysics |
«codeList» |
SurveyTypeValue |
Geophysics |
«codeList» |
SwathTypeValue |
Geophysics |
«codeList» |
5.5.2.1. Spatial object types
5.5.2.1.1. Campaign
Campaign | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: campaignType
|
||||||||||
Attribute: surveyType
|
||||||||||
Attribute: client
|
||||||||||
Attribute: contractor
|
||||||||||
Constraint: shape must be GM_Surface
|
5.5.2.1.2. GeophMeasurement
GeophMeasurement (abstract) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: relatedModel
|
||||||||||
Attribute: platformType
|
||||||||||
Attribute: relatedNetwork
|
5.5.2.1.3. GeophObject
GeophObject (abstract) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: inspireId
|
||||||||||
Attribute: citation
|
||||||||||
Attribute: projectedGeometry
|
||||||||||
Attribute: verticalExtent
|
||||||||||
Attribute: distributionInfo
|
||||||||||
Attribute: largerWork
|
||||||||||
Constraint: projectedGeometry must be GM_Point, GM_Curve or GM_Surface
|
5.5.2.1.4. GeophObjectSet
GeophObjectSet | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: inspireId
|
||||||||||
Attribute: citation
|
||||||||||
Attribute: verticalExtent
|
||||||||||
Attribute: distributionInfo
|
||||||||||
Attribute: projectedGeometry
|
||||||||||
Attribute: largerWork
|
||||||||||
Constraint: projectedGeometry must be GM_Point, GM_Curve or GM_Surface
|
5.5.2.1.5. GeophProfile
GeophProfile | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: profileType
|
||||||||
Constraint: shape must be GM_Curve
|
5.5.2.1.6. GeophSwath
GeophSwath | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: swathType
|
||||||||
Constraint: shape must be GM_Surface
|
5.5.2.1.7. GeophStation
GeophStation | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: stationType
|
||||||||||
Attribute: stationRank
|
||||||||||
Constraint: shape must be GM_Point
|
5.5.2.2. Code lists
5.5.2.2.1. CampaignTypeValue
CampaignTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.2.2. NetworkNameValue
NetworkNameValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.2.3. PlatformTypeValue
PlatformTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.2.4. ProfileTypeValue
ProfileTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.2.5. StationRankValue
StationRankValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.2.6. StationTypeValue
StationTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.2.7. SurveyTypeValue
SurveyTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.2.8. SwathTypeValue
SwathTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.3. Imported types (informative)
This section lists definitions for feature types, data types and code lists that are defined in other application schemas. The section is purely informative and should help the reader understand the feature catalogue presented in the previous sections. For the normative documentation of these types, see the given references.
5.5.2.3.1. DocumentCitation
DocumentCitation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.3.2. EX_VerticalExtent
EX_VerticalExtent | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.3.3. GM_Object
GM_Object (abstract) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.3.4. Identifier
Identifier | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.3.5. MD_Distributor
MD_Distributor | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.3.6. RelatedParty
RelatedParty | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.2.3.7. SF_SpatialSamplingFeature
SF_SpatialSamplingFeature (abstract) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
5.5.3. Externally governed code lists
The Geophysics application schema does not contain externally governed code lists.
6. Reference systems, units of measure and grids
6.1. Default reference systems, units of measure and grid
The reference systems, units of measure and geographic grid systems included in this sub-section are the defaults to be used for all INSPIRE data sets, unless theme-specific exceptions and/or additional requirements are defined in section 6.2.
6.1.1. Coordinate reference systems
6.1.1.1. Datum
📕
|
IR Requirement For the three-dimensional and two-dimensional coordinate reference systems and the horizontal component of compound coordinate reference systems used for making spatial data sets available, the datum shall be the datum of the European Terrestrial Reference System 1989 (ETRS89) in areas within its geographical scope, or the datum of the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) or other geodetic coordinate reference systems compliant with ITRS in areas that are outside the geographical scope of ETRS89. Compliant with the ITRS means that the system definition is based on the definition of the ITRS and there is a well documented relationship between both systems, according to EN ISO 19111. |
6.1.1.2. Coordinate reference systems
📕
|
IR Requirement Spatial data sets shall be made available using at least one of the coordinate reference systems specified in sections 1.3.1, 1.3.2 and 1.3.3, unless one of the conditions specified in section 1.3.4 holds. 1.3.1. Three-dimensional Coordinate Reference Systems
1.3.2. Two-dimensional Coordinate Reference Systems
1.3.3. Compound Coordinate Reference Systems
1.3.4. Other Coordinate Reference Systems Exceptions, where other coordinate reference systems than those listed in 1.3.1, 1.3.2 or 1.3.3 may be used, are:
The geodetic codes and parameters needed to describe these other coordinate reference systems and to allow conversion and transformation operations shall be documented and an identifier shall be created in a coordinate systems register established and operated by the Commission, according to EN ISO 19111 and ISO 19127. |
6.1.1.3. Display
📕
|
IR Requirement For the display of spatial data sets with the view network service as specified in Regulation No 976/2009, at least the coordinate reference systems for two-dimensional geodetic coordinates (latitude, longitude) shall be available. |
6.1.1.4. Identifiers for coordinate reference systems
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
These Technical Guidelines propose to use the http URIs provided by the Open Geospatial Consortium as coordinate reference system identifiers (see identifiers for the default CRSs in the INSPIRE coordinate reference systems register). These are based on and redirect to the definition in the EPSG Geodetic Parameter Registry (http://www.epsg-registry.org/).
📒
|
TG Requirement 2 The identifiers listed in the INSPIRE coordinate reference systems register (https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/crs) shall be used for referring to the coordinate reference systems used in a data set. |
NOTE CRS identifiers may be used e.g. in:
-
data encoding,
-
data set and service metadata, and
-
requests to INSPIRE network services.
6.1.2. Temporal reference system
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
NOTE 1 Point 5 of part B of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1205/2008 (the INSPIRE Metadata IRs) states that the default reference system shall be the Gregorian calendar, with dates expressed in accordance with ISO 8601.
NOTE 2 ISO 8601 Data elements and interchange formats – Information interchange – Representation of dates and times is an international standard covering the exchange of date and time-related data. The purpose of this standard is to provide an unambiguous and well-defined method of representing dates and times, so as to avoid misinterpretation of numeric representations of dates and times, particularly when data is transferred between countries with different conventions for writing numeric dates and times. The standard organizes the data so the largest temporal term (the year) appears first in the data string and progresses to the smallest term (the second). It also provides for a standardized method of communicating time-based information across time zones by attaching an offset to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
EXAMPLE 1997 (the year 1997), 1997-07-16 (16th July 1997), 1997-07-16T19:20:3001:00 (16th July 1997, 19h 20' 30'', time zone: UTC1)
6.1.3. Units of measure
📕
|
IR Requirement (…)
|
6.1.4. Grids
📕
|
IR Requirement Either of the grids with fixed and unambiguously defined locations defined in Sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 shall be used as a geo-referencing framework to make gridded data available in INSPIRE, unless one of the following conditions holds:
2.2 Equal Area Grid The grid is based on the ETRS89 Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area (ETRS89-LAEA) coordinate reference system with the centre of the projection at the point 52o N, 10o E and false easting: x0 = 4321000 m, false northing: y0 = 3210000 m. The origin of the grid coincides with the false origin of the ETRS89-LAEA coordinate reference system (x=0, y=0). Grid points of grids based on ETRS89-LAEA shall coincide with grid points of the grid. The grid is hierarchical, with resolutions of 1m, 10m, 100m, 1000m, 10000m and 100000m. The grid orientation is south-north, west-east. The grid is designated as Grid_ETRS89-LAEA. For identification of an individual resolution level the cell size in metres is appended. For the unambiguous referencing and identification of a grid cell, the cell code composed of the size of the cell and the coordinates of the lower left cell corner in ETRS89-LAEA shall be used. The cell size shall be denoted in metres ("m") for cell sizes up to 100m or kilometres ("km") for cell sizes of 1000m and above. Values for northing and easting shall be divided by 10n, where n is the number of trailing zeros in the cell size value. |
6.2. Theme-specific requirements and recommendations
There are no theme-specific requirements or recommendations on reference systems and grids.
7. Data quality
This chapter includes a description of the data quality elements and sub-elements as well as the corresponding data quality measures that should be used to evaluate and document data quality for data sets related to the spatial data theme Geology (section 7.1).
It may also define requirements or recommendations about the targeted data quality results applicable for data sets related to the spatial data theme Geology (sections 7.2).
In particular, the data quality elements, sub-elements and measures specified in section 7.1 should be used for
-
evaluating and documenting data quality properties and constraints of spatial objects, where such properties or constraints are defined as part of the application schema(s) (see section 5);
-
evaluating and documenting data quality metadata elements of spatial data sets (see section 8); and/or
-
specifying requirements or recommendations about the targeted data quality results applicable for data sets related to the spatial data theme Geology (see sections 7.2).
The descriptions of the elements and measures are based on Annex D of ISO/DIS 19157 Geographic information – Data quality.
7.1. Data quality elements
Table 3 lists all data quality elements and sub-elements that are being used in this specification. Data quality information can be evaluated at level of spatial object, spatial object type, dataset or dataset series. The level at which the evaluation is performed is given in the "Evaluation Scope" column.
The measures to be used for each of the listed data quality sub-elements are defined in the following sub-sections.
Table 3 – Data quality elements used in the spatial data theme Geology
Section |
Data quality element |
Data quality sub-element |
Definition |
Evaluation Scope |
7.1.1 |
Logical consistency |
Conceptual consistency |
adherence to rules of the conceptual schema |
spatial object type; spatial object |
7.1.2 |
Logical consistency |
Domain consistency |
adherence of values to the value domains |
spatial object type; spatial object |
📘
|
Recomendation 7 Where it is impossible to express the evaluation of a data quality element in a quantitative way, the evaluation of the element should be expressed with a textual statement as a data quality descriptive result. |
7.1.1. Logical consistency – Conceptual consistency
The Application Schema conformance class of the Abstract Test Suite in Annex I defines a number of tests to evaluate the conceptual consistency (tests A.1.1-A.1.7) of a data set.
📘
|
Recomendation 8 For the tests on conceptual consistency, it is recommended to use the Logical consistency – Conceptual consistency data quality sub-element and the measure Number of items not compliant with the rules of the conceptual schema as specified in the table below. |
Name |
|
Alternative name |
- |
Data quality element |
logical consistency |
Data quality sub-element |
conceptual consistency |
Data quality basic measure |
error count |
Definition |
count of all items in the dataset that are not compliant with the rules of the conceptual schema |
Description |
If the conceptual schema explicitly or implicitly describes rules, these rules shall be followed. Violations against such rules can be, for example, invalid placement of features within a defined tolerance, duplication of features and invalid overlap of features. |
Evaluation scope |
spatial object / spatial object type |
Reporting scope |
data set |
Parameter |
- |
Data quality value type |
integer |
Data quality value structure |
- |
Source reference |
ISO/DIS 19157 Geographic information – Data quality |
Example |
|
Measure identifier |
10 |
7.1.2. Logical consistency – Domain consistency
The Application Schema conformance class of the Abstract Test Suite in Annex I defines a number of tests to evaluate the domain consistency (tests A1.1 - A.1.7) of a data set.
📘
|
Recomendation 9 For the tests on domain consistency, it is recommended to use the Logical consistency – Domain consistency data quality sub-element and the measure Number of items not in conformance with their value domain as specified in the table below. |
Name |
Number of items not in conformance with their value domain |
Alternative name |
- |
Data quality element |
logical consistency |
Data quality sub-element |
domain consistency |
Data quality basic measure |
error count |
Definition |
count of all items in the dataset that are not in conformance with their value domain |
Description |
|
Evaluation scope |
spatial object / spatial object type |
Reporting scope |
data set |
Parameter |
- |
Data quality value type |
integer |
7.2. Minimum data quality requirements
No minimum data quality requirements are defined for the spatial data theme Geology.
8. Dataset-level metadata
This section specifies dataset-level metadata elements, which should be used for documenting metadata for a complete dataset or dataset series.
NOTE Metadata can also be reported for each individual spatial object (spatial object-level metadata). Spatial object-level metadata is fully described in the application schema(s) (section 5).
For some dataset-level metadata elements, in particular those for reporting data quality and maintenance, a more specific scope can be specified. This allows the definition of metadata at sub-dataset level, e.g. separately for each spatial object type (see instructions for the relevant metadata element).
8.1. Metadata elements defined in INSPIRE Metadata Regulation
Table 4 gives an overview of the metadata elements specified in Regulation 1205/2008/EC (implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards metadata).
The table contains the following information:
-
The first column provides a reference to the relevant section in the Metadata Regulation, which contains a more detailed description.
-
The second column specifies the name of the metadata element.
-
The third column specifies the multiplicity.
-
The fourth column specifies the condition, under which the given element becomes mandatory.
Table 4 – Metadata for spatial datasets and spatial dataset series specified in Regulation 1205/2008/EC
Metadata Regulation Section |
Metadata element |
Multiplicity |
Condition |
1.1 |
Resource title |
1 |
|
1.2 |
Resource abstract |
1 |
|
1.3 |
Resource type |
1 |
|
1.4 |
Resource locator |
0..* |
Mandatory if a URL is available to obtain more information on the resource, and/or access related services. |
1.5 |
Unique resource identifier |
1..* |
|
1.7 |
Resource language |
0..* |
Mandatory if the resource includes textual information. |
2.1 |
Topic category |
1..* |
|
3 |
Keyword |
1..* |
|
4.1 |
Geographic bounding box |
1..* |
|
5 |
Temporal reference |
1..* |
|
6.1 |
Lineage |
1 |
|
6.2 |
Spatial resolution |
0..* |
Mandatory for data sets and data set series if an equivalent scale or a resolution distance can be specified. |
7 |
Conformity |
1..* |
|
8.1 |
Conditions for access and use |
1..* |
|
8.2 |
Limitations on public access |
1..* |
|
9 |
Responsible organisation |
1..* |
|
10.1 |
Metadata point of contact |
1..* |
|
10.2 |
Metadata date |
1 |
|
10.3 |
Metadata language |
1 |
Generic guidelines for implementing these elements using ISO 19115 and 19119 are available at https://knowledge-base.inspire.ec.europa.eu/publications/technical-guidance-implementation-inspire-dataset-and-service-metadata-based-isots-191392007_en. The following sections describe additional theme-specific recommendations and requirements for implementing these elements.
8.1.1. Conformity
The Conformity metadata element defined in Regulation 1205/2008/EC requires to report the conformance with the Implementing Rule for interoperability of spatial data sets and services. In addition, it may be used also to document the conformance to another specification.
📘
|
Recomendation 10 Dataset metadata should include a statement on the overall conformance of the dataset with this data specification (i.e. conformance with all requirements). |
📘
|
Recomendation 11 The Conformity metadata element should be used to document conformance with this data specification (as a whole), with a specific conformance class defined in the Abstract Test Suite in Annex A and/or with another specification. |
The Conformity element includes two sub-elements, the Specification (a citation of the Implementing Rule for interoperability of spatial data sets and services or other specification), and the Degree of conformity. The Degree can be Conformant (if the dataset is fully conformant with the cited specification), Not Conformant (if the dataset does not conform to the cited specification) or Not Evaluated (if the conformance has not been evaluated).
📘
|
Recomendation 12 If a dataset is not yet conformant with all requirements of this data specification, it is recommended to include information on the conformance with the individual conformance classes specified in the Abstract Test Suite in Annex A. |
📘
|
Recomendation 13 If a dataset is produced or transformed according to an external specification that includes specific quality assurance procedures, the conformity with this specification should be documented using the Conformity metadata element. |
📘
|
Recomendation 14 If minimum data quality recommendations are defined then the statement on the conformity with these requirements should be included using the Conformity metadata element and referring to the relevant data quality conformance class in the Abstract Test Suite. |
NOTE Currently no minimum data quality requirements are included in the IRs. The recommendation above should be included as a requirement in the IRs if minimum data quality requirements are defined at some point in the future.
📘
|
Recomendation 15 When documenting conformance with this data specification or one of the conformance classes defined in the Abstract Test Suite, the Specification sub-element should be given using the http URI identifier of the conformance class or using a citation including the following elements:
|
EXAMPLE 1: The XML snippets below show how to fill the Specification sub-element for documenting conformance with the whole data specification on Addresses v3.0.1.
<gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
<gmd:specification href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformanceClass/ad/3.0.1/tg" />
<gmd:explanation> (...) </gmd:explanation>
<gmd:pass> (...) </gmd:pass>
</gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
or (using a citation):
<gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
<gmd:specification>
<gmd:CI_Citation>
<gmd:title>
<gco:CharacterString>INSPIRE Data Specification on Geology – Draft Guidelines</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:title>
<gmd:date>
<gmd:date>
<gco:Date>2013-02-04</gco:Date>
</gmd:date>
<gmd:dateType>
<gmd:CI_DateTypeCode codeList="http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/ISO_19139_Schemas/resou
rces/Codelist/ML_gmxCodelists.xml#CI_DateTypeCode" codeListValue="publication">publication</gmd:CI_DateTypeCode>
</gmd:dateType>
</gmd:date>
</gmd:CI_Citation>
</gmd:specification>
<gmd:explanation> (...) </gmd:explanation>
<gmd:pass> (...) </gmd:pass>
</gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
EXAMPLE 2: The XML snippets below show how to fill the Specification sub-element for documenting conformance with the CRS conformance class of the data specification on Addresses v3.0.1.
<gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
<gmd:specification href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformanceClass/ad/3.0.1/crs" />
<gmd:explanation> (...) </gmd:explanation>
<gmd:pass> (...) </gmd:pass>
</gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
or (using a citation):
<gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
<gmd:specification>
<gmd:CI_Citation>
<gmd:title>
<gco:CharacterString>INSPIRE Data Specification on Geology – Draft Guidelines – CRS</gco:CharacterString>
</gmd:title>
<gmd:date>
<gmd:date>
<gco:Date>2013-02-04</gco:Date>
</gmd:date>
<gmd:dateType>
<gmd:CI_DateTypeCode codeList="http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/ISO_19139_Schemas/resou
rces/Codelist/ML_gmxCodelists.xml#CI_DateTypeCode" codeListValue="publication">publication</gmd:CI_DateTypeCode>
</gmd:dateType>
</gmd:date>
</gmd:CI_Citation>
</gmd:specification>
<gmd:explanation> (...) </gmd:explanation>
<gmd:pass> (...) </gmd:pass>
</gmd:DQ_ConformanceResult>
8.1.2. Lineage
📘
|
Recomendation 16 Following the ISO/DIS 19157 Quality principles, if a data provider has a procedure for the quality management of their spatial data sets then the appropriate data quality elements and measures defined in ISO/DIS 19157 should be used to evaluate and report (in the metadata) the results. If not, the Lineage metadata element (defined in Regulation 1205/2008/EC) should be used to describe the overall quality of a spatial data set. |
According to Regulation 1205/2008/EC, lineage "is a statement on process history and/or overall quality of the spatial data set. Where appropriate it may include a statement whether the data set has been validated or quality assured, whether it is the official version (if multiple versions exist), and whether it has legal validity. The value domain of this metadata element is free text".
The Metadata Technical Guidelines based on EN ISO 19115 and EN ISO 19119 specifies that the statement sub-element of LI_Lineage (EN ISO 19115) should be used to implement the lineage metadata element.
📘
|
Recomendation 17 To describe the transformation steps and related source data, it is recommended to use the following sub-elements of LI_Lineage:
|
NOTE 1 In order to improve the interoperability, domain templates and instructions for using these free text elements (descriptive statements) may be specified here and/or in an Annex of this data specification.
TWG Recommendations on the use of the Lineage MD element (based on the results of the OneGeology-Europe project):
To provide the user with valuable information about the quality (thematic, geometric) and usability of geological map data, the metadata should include information about the original data sources (geological and topographic sources, digitizing and mapping processes) for the final digital dataset.
Geological units and structures are the result of an interpretation and their geometry is drawn on a topographic map. The digitizing method and the topographic map used are then very important for the data quality. To create all geological maps of a country needs several decades of work. So the data are very heterogeneous for many reasons, and harmonizing these data is a well-known issue and needs a huge work, but the user would like to know if the thematic and the geometric harmonisation are done or not.
Metadata elements to describe the dataset
-
Digitizing method
-
Internal thematic harmonization
-
Internal geometric harmonization
Metadata elements to describe Geological and Topographic Sources:
-
Title
-
Description
-
Date
-
Mapping method (only for geological source)
-
Temporal extent
-
Scale
-
Reference system
The following paragraphs describe which Lineage metadata elements should be used:
Digitizing method:
ISO Number |
87 |
Name |
description |
Definition |
description of the event, including related parameters or tolerances |
XPath |
dataQualityInfo//lineage// processStep/*/description |
Data type |
CharacterString |
Domain |
Free text |
Example |
Digitized on screen from scanned geological or applied map |
Internal thematic harmonization
ISO Number |
83 |
Name |
statement |
Definition |
general explanation of the data producer’s knowledge about the lineage of a dataset |
XPath |
dataQualityInfo//lineage//statement |
Data type |
CharacterString |
Domain |
Free text |
Example |
thematicHarmonizationDescription=Yes, thematicHarmonizationDescription: unified structured legend |
Internal geometric harmonization
ISO Number |
83 |
Name |
statement |
Definition |
general explanation of the data producer’s knowledge about the lineage of a dataset |
XPath |
dataQualityInfo//lineage//statement |
Data type |
CharacterString |
Domain |
Free text |
Example |
geometricHarmonization= yes; |
Source title:
ISO Number |
360 |
Name |
sourceCitation |
Definition |
recommended reference to be used for the source data |
XPath |
dataQualityInfo//lineage//processStep//source// sourceCitation/*/title |
Data type |
CharacterString |
Domain |
Free text |
Example |
Source description:
ISO Number |
93 |
Name |
description |
Definition |
detailed description of the level of the source data |
XPath |
dataQualityInfo//lineage//processStep//source// description |
Data type |
CharacterString |
Domain |
Free text |
Example |
Source Date:
ISO Number |
362 |
Name |
date |
Definition |
Reference date for the cited resource |
XPath |
dataQualityInfo//lineage//processStep//source// sourceCitation/*/date |
Data type |
Class |
Domain |
Date (B.4.2) |
Example |
Source Mapping method (only for geological source):
ISO Number |
87 |
Name |
description |
Definition |
description of the event, including related parameters or tolerances |
XPath |
dataQualityInfo//lineage// processStep/*/description |
Data type |
CharacterString |
Domain |
Free text |
Example |
Field survey (A predefined code list is available for specifying the source mapping method) |
Source Scale:
ISO Number |
94 |
Name |
scaleDenominator |
Definition |
denominator of the representative fraction on a source map |
XPath |
dataQualityInfo//lineage//processStep//source// scaleDenominator |
Data type |
Class |
Domain |
MD_RepresentativeFraction (B.2.2.4) |
Example |
25000 |
Source Reference system:
ISO Number |
95 |
Name |
sourceReferenceSystem |
Definition |
spatial reference system used by the source data |
XPath |
dataQualityInfo//lineage//processStep//source//referenceSystem |
Data type |
Class |
Domain |
MD_ReferenceSystem (B.2.7) |
Example |
Suggested list of Digitizing methods:
code |
method |
directGIS |
Direct input in GIS software |
directGPS |
Direct input – GPS measurement |
interpolationPoint |
Generated data (interpolation from point data) |
Digitized on digitizing tablet: |
|
digitizedTabletLineMap |
|
digitizedTabletPenciledOriginal |
|
digitizedTabletScribingFolio |
|
digitizedTabletFilm |
|
digitizedTabletPaperCopy |
|
Digitized on screen from scanned geological or applied map: |
|
digitizedScannedMapManual |
|
digitizedScannedMapSemiAutomated |
|
digitizedScannedMapAutomated |
|
Digitized on screen from other digital raster data: |
|
digitizedScannedOtherManual |
|
digitizedScannedOtherSemiAutomated |
|
digitizedScannedOtherAutomated |
|
generalized |
Generalized |
unknown |
Unknown digitizing method |
Suggested list of Mapping methods:
code |
method |
fieldSurvey |
Field survey |
assemblyOfPublishedMaps |
Synthesis of published descriptions/maps |
generalization |
Generalization from larger scale |
Interpretation: |
|
intepretationGeophysical |
|
intepretationAerial |
|
intepretationSatellite |
|
unknown |
Unknown mapping method |
8.1.3. Temporal reference
According to Regulation 1205/2008/EC, at least one of the following temporal reference metadata sub-elements shall be provided: temporal extent, date of publication, date of last revision, date of creation.
📘
|
Recomendation 18 It is recommended that at least the date of the last revision of a spatial data set should be reported using the Date of last revision metadata sub-element. |
8.2. Metadata elements for interoperability
📕
|
IR Requirement The metadata describing a spatial data set shall include the following metadata elements required for interoperability:
|
These Technical Guidelines propose to implement the required metadata elements based on ISO 19115 and ISO/TS 19139.
The following TG requirements need to be met in order to be conformant with the proposed encoding.
📒
|
TG Requirement 3 Metadata instance (XML) documents shall validate without error against the used ISO 19139 XML schema. |
NOTE Section 2.1.2 of the Metadata Technical Guidelines discusses the different ISO 19139 XML schemas that are currently available.
📒
|
TG Requirement 4 Metadata instance (XML) documents shall contain the elements and meet the INSPIRE multiplicity specified in the sections below. |
📒
|
TG Requirement 5 The elements specified below shall be available in the specified ISO/TS 19139 path. |
📘
|
Recomendation 19 The metadata elements for interoperability should be made available together with the metadata elements defined in the Metadata Regulation through an INSPIRE discovery service. |
NOTE While this not explicitly required by any of the INSPIRE Implementing Rules, making all metadata of a data set available together and through one service simplifies implementation and usability.
8.2.1. Coordinate Reference System
Metadata element name | Coordinate Reference System |
---|---|
Definition |
Description of the coordinate reference system used in the dataset. |
ISO 19115 number and name |
13. referenceSystemInfo |
ISO/TS 19139 path |
referenceSystemInfo |
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
mandatory |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
1..* |
Data type(and ISO 19115 no.) |
186. MD_ReferenceSystem |
Domain |
To identify the reference system, the referenceSystemIdentifier (RS_Identifier) shall be provided. NOTE More specific instructions, in particular on pre-defined values for filling the referenceSystemIdentifier attribute should be agreed among Member States during the implementation phase to support interoperability. |
Implementing instructions |
|
Example |
referenceSystemIdentifier: code: ETRS_89 codeSpace: INSPIRE RS registry |
Example XML encoding |
|
Comments |
8.2.2. Temporal Reference System
Metadata element name | Temporal Reference System |
---|---|
Definition |
Description of the temporal reference systems used in the dataset. |
ISO 19115 number and name |
13. referenceSystemInfo |
ISO/TS 19139 path |
referenceSystemInfo |
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
Mandatory, if the spatial data set or one of its feature types contains temporal information that does not refer to the Gregorian Calendar or the Coordinated Universal Time. |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
0..* |
Data type(and ISO 19115 no.) |
186. MD_ReferenceSystem |
Domain |
No specific type is defined in ISO 19115 for temporal reference systems. Thus, the generic MD_ReferenceSystem element and its reference SystemIdentifier (RS_Identifier) property shall be provided. NOTE More specific instructions, in particular on pre-defined values for filling the referenceSystemIdentifier attribute should be agreed among Member States during the implementation phase to support interoperability. |
Implementing instructions |
|
Example |
referenceSystemIdentifier: code: GregorianCalendar codeSpace: INSPIRE RS registry |
Example XML encoding |
|
Comments |
8.2.3. Encoding
Metadata element name | Encoding |
---|---|
Definition |
Description of the computer language construct that specifies the representation of data objects in a record, file, message, storage device or transmission channel |
ISO 19115 number and name |
271. distributionFormat |
ISO/TS 19139 path |
distributionInfo/MD_Distribution/distributionFormat |
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
mandatory |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
1..* |
Data type (and ISO 19115 no.) |
284. MD_Format |
Domain |
See B.2.10.4. The property values (name, version, specification) specified in section 5 shall be used to document the default and alternative encodings. |
Implementing instructions |
|
Example |
name: <Application schema name> GML application schema version: 4.0 specification: D2.8.II.4 Data Specification on Geology – Technical Guidelines |
Example XML encoding |
|
Comments |
8.2.4. Character Encoding
Metadata element name | Character Encoding |
---|---|
Definition |
The character encoding used in the data set. |
ISO 19115 number and name |
|
ISO/TS 19139 path |
|
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
Mandatory, if an encoding is used that is not based on UTF-8. |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
0..* |
Data type (and ISO 19115 no.) |
|
Domain |
|
Implementing instructions |
|
Example |
- |
Example XML encoding |
|
Comments |
8.2.5. Spatial representation type
Metadata element name | Spatial representation type |
---|---|
Definition |
The method used to spatially represent geographic information. |
ISO 19115 number and name |
37. spatialRepresentationType |
ISO/TS 19139 path |
|
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
Mandatory |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
1..* |
Data type (and ISO 19115 no.) |
B.5.26 MD_SpatialRepresentationTypeCode |
Domain |
|
Implementing instructions |
Of the values included in the code list in ISO 19115 (vector, grid, textTable, tin, stereoModel, video), only vector, grid and tin should be used. NOTE Additional code list values may be defined based on feedback from implementation. |
Example |
- |
Example XML encoding |
|
Comments |
8.2.6. Data Quality – Logical Consistency – Topological Consistency
See section 8.3.2 for instructions on how to implement metadata elements for reporting data quality.
8.3. Recommended theme-specific metadata elements
📘
|
Recomendation 20 The metadata describing a spatial data set or a spatial data set series related to the theme Geology should comprise the theme-specific metadata elements specified in Table 5. |
The table contains the following information:
-
The first column provides a reference to a more detailed description.
-
The second column specifies the name of the metadata element.
-
The third column specifies the multiplicity.
Table 5 – Optional theme-specific metadata elements for the theme Geology
Section |
Metadata element |
Multiplicity |
8.3.1 |
Maintenance Information |
0..1 |
8.3.2 |
Logical Consistency – Conceptual Consistency |
0..* |
8.3.2 |
Logical Consistency – Domain Consistency |
0..* |
📘
|
Recomendation 21 For implementing the metadata elements included in this section using ISO 19115, ISO/DIS 19157 and ISO/TS 19139, the instructions included in the relevant sub-sections should be followed. |
8.3.1. Maintenance Information
Metadata element name | Maintenance information |
---|---|
Definition |
Information about the scope and frequency of updating |
ISO 19115 number and name |
30. resourceMaintenance |
ISO/TS 19139 path |
identificationInfo/MD_Identification/resourceMaintenance |
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
optional |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
0..1 |
Data type(and ISO 19115 no.) |
142. MD_MaintenanceInformation |
Domain |
This is a complex type (lines 143-148 from ISO 19115). At least the following elements should be used (the multiplicity according to ISO 19115 is shown in parentheses):
|
Implementing instructions |
|
Example |
|
Example XML encoding |
|
Comments |
8.3.2. Metadata elements for reporting data quality
📘
|
Recomendation 22 For reporting the results of the data quality evaluation, the data quality elements, sub-elements and (for quantitative evaluation) measures defined in chapter 7 should be used. |
📘
|
Recomendation 23 The metadata elements specified in the following sections should be used to report the results of the data quality evaluation. At least the information included in the row "Implementation instructions" should be provided. |
The first section applies to reporting quantitative results (using the element DQ_QuantitativeResult), while the second section applies to reporting non-quantitative results (using the element DQ_DescriptiveResult).
📘
|
Recomendation 24 If a dataset does not pass the tests of the Application schema conformance class (defined in Annex A), the results of each test should be reported using one of the options described in sections 8.3.2.1 and 8.3.2.2. |
NOTE 1 If using non-quantitative description, the results of several tests do not have to be reported separately, but may be combined into one descriptive statement.
NOTE 2 The sections 8.3.2.1 and 8.3.2.2 may need to be updated once the XML schemas for ISO 19157 have been finalised.
The scope for reporting may be different from the scope for evaluating data quality (see section 7). If data quality is reported at the data set or spatial object type level, the results are usually derived or aggregated.
📘
|
Recomendation 25 The scope element (of type DQ_Scope) of the DQ_DataQuality subtype should be used to encode the reporting scope. Only the following values should be used for the level element of DQ_Scope: Series, Dataset, featureType. If the level is featureType the levelDescription/MDScopeDescription/features element (of type Set< GF_FeatureType>) shall be used to list the feature type names. |
NOTE In the level element of DQ_Scope, the value featureType is used to denote spatial object type.
8.3.2.1. Guidelines for reporting quantitative results of the data quality evaluation
Metadata element name | See chapter 7 |
---|---|
Definition |
See chapter 7 |
ISO/DIS 19157 number and name |
3. report |
ISO/TS 19139 path |
dataQualityInfo/*/report |
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
optional |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
0..* |
Data type (and ISO/DIS 19157 no.) |
Corresponding DQ_xxx subelement from ISO/DIS 19157, e.g. 12. DQ_CompletenessCommission |
Domain |
Lines 7-9 from ISO/DIS 19157
|
Implementing instructions |
39. nameOfMeasure NOTE This should be the name as defined in Chapter 7.
NOTE If the reported data quality results are derived or aggregated (i.e. the scope levels for evaluation and reporting are different), the derivation or aggregation should also be specified using this property.
NOTE This should be data or range of dates on which the data quality measure was applied.
NOTE The DQ_Result type should be DQ_QuantitativeResult and the value(s) represent(s) the application of the data quality measure (39.) using the specified evaluation method (42-43.) |
Example |
See Table E.12 — Reporting commission as metadata (ISO/DIS 19157) |
Example XML encoding |
8.3.2.2. Guidelines for reporting descriptive results of the Data Quality evaluation
Metadata element name | See chapter 7 |
---|---|
Definition |
See chapter 7 |
ISO/DIS 19157 number and name |
3. report |
ISO/TS 19139 path |
dataQualityInfo/*/report |
INSPIRE obligation / condition |
optional |
INSPIRE multiplicity |
0..* |
Data type (and ISO/DIS 19157 no.) |
Corresponding DQ_xxx subelement from ISO/DIS 19157, e.g. 12. DQ_CompletenessCommission |
Domain |
Line 9 from ISO/DIS 19157
|
Implementing instructions |
NOTE The DQ_Result type should be DQ_DescriptiveResult and in the statement (68.) the evaluation of the selected DQ sub-element should be expressed in a narrative way. |
Example |
See Table E.15 — Reporting descriptive result as metadata (ISO/DIS 19157) |
Example XML encoding |
9. Delivery
9.1. Updates
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
NOTE In this data specification, no exception is specified, so all updates shall be made available at the latest 6 months after the change was applied in the source data set.
9.2. Delivery medium
According to Article 11(1) of the INSPIRE Directive, Member States shall establish and operate a network of services for INSPIRE spatial data sets and services. The relevant network service types for making spatial data available are:
-
view services making it possible, as a minimum, to display, navigate, zoom in/out, pan, or overlay viewable spatial data sets and to display legend information and any relevant content of metadata;
-
download services, enabling copies of spatial data sets, or parts of such sets, to be downloaded and, where practicable, accessed directly;
-
transformation services, enabling spatial data sets to be transformed with a view to achieving interoperability.
NOTE For the relevant requirements and recommendations for network services, see the relevant Implementing Rules and Technical Guidelines[16].
EXAMPLE 1 Through the Get Spatial Objects function, a download service can either download a pre-defined data set or pre-defined part of a data set (non-direct access download service), or give direct access to the spatial objects contained in the data set, and download selections of spatial objects based upon a query (direct access download service). To execute such a request, some of the following information might be required:
-
the list of spatial object types and/or predefined data sets that are offered by the download service (to be provided through the Get Download Service Metadata operation),
-
and the query capabilities section advertising the types of predicates that may be used to form a query expression (to be provided through the Get Download Service Metadata operation, where applicable),
-
a description of spatial object types offered by a download service instance (to be provided through the Describe Spatial Object Types operation).
EXAMPLE 2 Through the Transform function, a transformation service carries out data content transformations from native data forms to the INSPIRE-compliant form and vice versa. If this operation is directly called by an application to transform source data (e.g. obtained through a download service) that is not yet conformant with this data specification, the following parameters are required:
Input data (mandatory). The data set to be transformed.
-
Source model (mandatory, if cannot be determined from the input data). The model in which the input data is provided.
-
Target model (mandatory). The model in which the results are expected.
-
Model mapping (mandatory, unless a default exists). Detailed description of how the transformation is to be carried out.
9.3. Encodings
The IRs contain the following two requirements for the encoding to be used to make data available.
📕
|
IR Requirement 1. Every encoding rule used to encode spatial data shall conform to EN ISO 19118. In particular, it shall specify schema conversion rules for all spatial object types and all attributes and association roles and the output data structure used. 2. Every encoding rule used to encode spatial data shall be made available. 2a. Every encoding rule used to encode spatial data shall also specify whether and how to represent attributes and association roles for which a corresponding value exists but is not contained in the spatial data sets maintained by a Member State, or cannot be derived from existing values at reasonable costs. |
NOTE ISO 19118:2011 specifies the requirements for defining encoding rules used for interchange of geographic data within the set of International Standards known as the "ISO 19100 series". An encoding rule allows geographic information defined by application schemas and standardized schemas to be coded into a system-independent data structure suitable for transport and storage. The encoding rule specifies the types of data being coded and the syntax, structure and coding schemes used in the resulting data structure. Specifically, ISO 19118:2011 includes
-
requirements for creating encoding rules based on UML schemas,
-
requirements for creating encoding services, and
-
requirements for XML-based encoding rules for neutral interchange of data.
While the IRs do not oblige the usage of a specific encoding, these Technical Guidelines propose to make data related to the spatial data theme Geology available at least in the default encoding(s) specified in section 0. In this section, a number of TG requirements are listed that need to be met in order to be conformant with the default encoding(s).
The proposed default encoding(s) meet the requirements in Article 7 of the IRs, i.e. they are conformant with ISO 19118 and (since they are included in this specification) publicly available.
9.3.1. Default Encoding(s)
9.3.1.1. Specific requirements for GML encoding
This data specification proposes the use of GML as the default encoding, as recommended in sections 7.2 and 7.3 of [DS-D2.7]. GML is an XML encoding in compliance with ISO 19118, as required in Article 7(1). For details, see [ISO 19136], and in particular Annex E (UML-to-GML application schema encoding rules).
The following TG requirements need to be met in order to be conformant with GML encodings.
📒
|
TG Requirement 6 Data instance (XML) documents shall validate without error against the provided XML schema. |
NOTE 1 Not all constraints defined in the application schemas can be mapped to XML. Therefore, the following requirement is necessary.
NOTE 2 The obligation to use only the allowed code list values specified for attributes and most of the constraints defined in the application schemas cannot be mapped to the XML sch. They can therefore not be enforced through schema validation. It may be possible to express some of these constraints using other schema or rule languages (e.g. Schematron), in order to enable automatic validation.
9.3.1.2. Default encoding(s) for application schema Geology
Name: GeoSciML
Version: 4.1, GML, version 3.2.1,
Specification: http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/geosciml
Schemas: http://schemas.opengis.net/gsml/4.1
Character set: UTF-8
GeoSciML v 4.1 is the community developed exchange format for providing detailed geoscientific information and has now reached maturity as a global OGC standard (http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/geosciml). It also served as the basis for the more simplified INSPIRE Geology core data model and the GeoSciML 4.1 Basic and Borehole schemas fulfill the INSPIRE requirements whilst allowing full access to the extended rich content possibilities of GeoSciML including the GeoSciML-Lite Simple Feature SF0 WFS and INSPIRE compliant View (WMS) services. The detailed guidelines, entitled “GeoSciML 4.1 Encoding Cookbook for OneGeology and INSPIRE” document how to use GeoSciML Basic and Borehole for INSPIRE andis available at http://www.onegeology.org/docs/technical/GeoSciML_Cookbook_1.3.pdf
9.3.1.3. Default encoding(s) for application schema Hydrogeology
Name: Hydrogeology GML Application Schema
Version: 4.0,
Specification: D2.8.II.4 Data Specification on Geology – Technical Guidelines
Character set: UTF-8
The xml schema document is available on the INSPIRE website https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/schemas/ge_hg/4.0/HydrogeologyCore.xsd
9.3.1.4. Default encoding(s) for application schema Geophysics
Name: Geology GML Application Schema
Version: 4.0,
Specification: D2.8.II.4 Data Specification on Geology – Technical Guidelines
Character set: UTF-8
The xml schema document is available on the INSPIRE website https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/schemas/ge_gp/4.0/GeophysicsCore.xsd
9.3.2. Recommended Encoding(s)
📘
|
Recomendation 26 It is recommended that also the encodings specified in this section be provided for the relevant application schemas. |
9.3.2.1. The use of inspire.ec.europa.eu/schemas/ge-core/4.0/GeologyCore.xsd encoding
Name: Geology GML Application Schema
Version: 4.0,
Specification: D2.8.II.4 Data Specification on Geology – Technical Guidelines Character set: UTF-8
The xml schema document is available on the INSPIRE website
https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/schemas/ge-core/4.0/GeologyCore.xsd
9.4. Options for delivering coverage data
For coverages, different encodings may be used for the domain and the range of the coverage. There are several options for packaging the domain and range encoding when delivering coverage data through a download service, as discussed below[17].].
Multipart representation
For performance reasons, binary file formats are usually preferred to text-based formats such as XML for storing large amounts of coverage data. However, they cannot directly constitute an alternative to pure GML, since their own data structure might often not support all the ISO 19123 elements used to describe coverages in the conceptual model.
The OGC standard GML Application Schema for coverages [OGC 09-146r2] offers a format encoding which combines these two approaches. The first part consists of a GML document representing all coverage components except the range set, which is contained in the second part in some other encoding format such as 'well known' binary formats'. Some information in the second part may be redundant with the GML content of the first part. In this case, consistency must be necessarily ensured, for example by defining a GML mapping of the additional encoding format.
The advantage of this multipart representation is that coverage constituents are not handled individually but as a whole. This is not really the case with GML which also allows the encoding of the value side of the coverage in external binary files, but via references to remote locations.
📒
|
TG Requirement 7 Coverage data encoded as multipart messages shall comply with the multipart representation conformance class defined in GML Application Schema for Coverages [OGC 09-146r2]. |
NOTE The GML Application Schema for Coverages establishes a one-to-one relationship between coverages and multipart document instances.
Reference to an external file
The range set can be encoded within the XML structure as an external binary file using the gml:File element. This has the benefit of efficiently storing the range set data within an external file that is of a well-known format type, for example TIFF or GeoTIFF. This method of encoding is of most use for the storage of large files.
Encoding the range inline
This option encodes the range set data within the XML inline. This is encoded as a DataBlock element. This encoding provides much greater visibility for the range set values, however, this comes at the cost of reduced efficiency. This method of encoding would therefore only be suitable for small datasets.
Encoding the domain inside a JPEG 2000 file
This option consists in packaging all the components of one or several coverages, including the domain expressed in GML, in a single JPEG 2000 file. It is based on the OGC standard GML in JPEG 2000 for Geographic Imagery [OGC 05-047r2], also known as GMLJP2, which specifies how to use GML within the XML boxes of JPEG 2000 files.
📒
|
TG Requirement 8 Coverage data encoded in standalone JPEG 2000 files shall comply with the OGC standard GML in JPEG 2000 for Geographic Imagery [OGC 05-047r2]. |
TG Requirement 8 implies that all the encoding rules presented in GMLJP2 shall be strictly followed for including GML within JPEG 2000 data files correctly. For the sake of harmonization, the encoding rules adopted for the multipart message encoding should also apply to the GMLJP2 encoding.
The encoding of coverage components in GMLJP2 within a JPEG 2000 file should conform to the rules specified in the Guidelines for the encoding of spatial data [DS-D2.7].
10. Data Capture
There is no specific guidance required with respect to data capture.
11. Portrayal
This clause defines the rules for layers and styles to be used for portrayal of the spatial object types defined for this theme. Portrayal is regulated in Article 14 of the IRs.
📕
|
IR Requirement
|
In section , the types of layers are defined that are to be used for the portrayal of the spatial object types defined in this specification. A view service may offer several layers of the same type, one for each dataset that it offers data on a specific topic.
NOTE The layer specification in the IRs only contains the name, a human readable title and the (subset(s) of) spatial object type(s), that constitute(s) the content of the layer. In addition, these Technical Guidelines suggest keywords for describing the layer.
📘
|
Recomendation 27 It is recommended to use the keywords specified in section in the Layers Metadata parameters of the INSPIRE View service (see Annex III, Part A, section 2.2.4 in Commission Regulation (EC) No 976/2009). |
Section 0 specifies one style for each of these layers. It is proposed that INSPIRE view services support this style as the default style required by Article 14(1b).
📒
|
TG Requirement 9 For each layer specified in this section, the styles defined in section 0 shall be available. |
NOTE The default style should be used for portrayal by the view network service if no user-defined style is specified in a portrayal request for a specific layer.
In section 11.3, further styles can be specified that represent examples of styles typically used in a thematic domain. It is recommended that also these styles should be supported by INSPIRE view services, where applicable.
📘
|
Recomendation 28 In addition, it is recommended that, where applicable, INSPIRE view services also support the styles defined in section 11.3. |
Where XML fragments are used in the following sections, the following namespace prefixes apply:
-
sld="http://www.opengis.net/sld" (WMS/SLD 1.1)
-
se="http://www.opengis.net/se" (SE 1.1)
-
ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc" (FE 1.1)
11.1. Layers to be provided by INSPIRE view services
Layer Name | Layer Title | Spatial object type(s) | Keywords |
---|---|---|---|
GE.GeologicUnit |
Geologic Units |
MappedFeature (spatial objects whose specification property is of type GeologicUnit) |
Geology, Lithology, Age, Geologic unit |
<human readable name> Example: Shrinking and swelling clays |
MappedFeature (spatial objects whose specification property is of type GeologicFeature and which are classified (using the themeClass property) according to the same thematic classification) (themeClassification : ThematicClassificationValue) |
Geology, Thematic map |
|
GE.GeologicFault |
Geologic Faults |
MappedFeature (spatial objects whose specification property is of type ShearDisplacementStructure) |
Geology, Geologic Structure, Fault |
GE.GeologicFold |
Geologic Folds |
MappedFeature (spatial objects whose specification property is of type Fold) |
Geology, Geologic Structure, Fold |
GE.GeomorphologicFeature |
Geomorphologic Features |
MappedFeature (spatial objects whose specification property is of type GeomorphologicFeature ) |
Geomorphology, Land surface, Landform |
GE.Borehole |
Boreholes |
Borehole |
Borehole, Shaft |
GE.Aquifer |
Aquifers |
MappedFeature (spatial objects whose specification property is of type Aquifer ) |
Aquifer, Groundwater, Permeable, Hydrogeology |
GE.Aquiclude |
Aquicludes |
MappedFeature (spatial objects whose specification property is of type Aquiclude) |
Impermeable, Aquiclude, Hydrogeology |
GE.Aquitard |
Aquitards |
MappedFeature (spatial objects whose specification property is of type Aquitard) |
Poorly permeable, Saturated, Aquitard, Hydrogeology |
GE.AquiferSystems |
Aquifer Systems |
MappedFeature (spatial objects whose specification property is of type AquiferSystem) |
Aquifer, Aquitard, Hydrogeology |
GE.Groundwaterbody |
Groundwater Bodies |
Groundwaterbody |
Groundwater, Aquifer, Hydrogeology |
GE.ActiveWell |
Active Wells |
ActiveWell |
Groundwater, Well, Aquifer, Hydrogeology |
<human readable name> Example: Gravity Stations |
GeophStation (stationType : StationTypeValue) |
Geophysics, Measurement, Point, Station |
|
<human readable name> Example: Seismic Lines |
GeophProfile (profilType : ProfileTypeValue) |
Geophysics, Measurement, Curve, Profile |
|
<human readable name> Example: Ground Gravity Surveys |
Campaign (surveyType : SurveyTypeValue) |
Geophysics, Measurement, Campaign, Survey |
|
<human readable name> Example: 3D Seismics |
GeophSwath (swathType: SwathTypeValue) |
Geophysics, Measurement, Surface, Swath |
NOTE The table above contains several layers for the spatial object type(s), which can be further classified using a code list-valued attribute. Such sets of layers are specified as described in Article 14(3) of the IRs.
📕
|
IR Requirement (…)
|
11.1.1. Layers organisation
Community wide practice has identified that the IR required layer name "GE.GeologicUnit" and layer title "Geologic Units" above does not describe logically the view of this dataset that normal users expect and require – which is very often a view of the dataset classified by .Lithology and/or by .Age. or for layers of the same type but at a different scale A practical solution has been implemented widely and become a community convention whereby the WMS service that provides these views expresses the GE.GeologicUnit layer name as a GROUP layer name with the user expected view layers under that group, expressed in the WMS GetCapabilities response and therefore callable by a user/software client.
This has been found to work with all commonly used WMS software which is configured such that:
[SERVICE / ROOT LAYER NAME]
→ [ROOT LAYER TITLE]
- - + - - + [GROUP LAYER NAME ~ follows data specification naming requirement]
→→ [GROUP LAYER TITLE ~ follows data specification naming requirement]
- - + - - + - - + [LAYER NAME ~ layer of the data specification TYPE BUT following community convention]
…
For example:
- - + BGS_EN_Bedrock_and_Surface_Geology
→ BGS OGE bedrock and surface geology
- - + - - + GE.GeologicFault
→→ Geologic Faults
ABSTRACT: MappedFeature (spatial objects whose specification property is of type ShearDisplacementStructure)
- - + - - + - - + GE.GeologicFault.BGS.EN.1M.Surface
- - + - - + - - + GE.GeologicFault.BGS.EN.1M.Bedrock
- - + - - + GE.GeologicUnit
→→ Geologic Units
ABSTRACT: MappedFeature (spatial objects whose specification property is of type GeologicUnit)
- - + - - + - - + GE.GeologicUnit.BGS.EN.1M.Surface.Lithology
- - + - - + - - + GE.GeologicUnit.BGS.EN.1M.Surface.Age
- - + - - + - - + GE.GeologicUnit.BGS.EN.1M.Bedrock.Lithology
- - + - - + - - + GE.GeologicUnit.BGS.EN.1M.Bedrock.Age
The community concluded that this approach follows the IR at the service group layer whilst providing what real users want.
The Land Cover theme has identified exactly the same requirements including using these layer names to express the scale of the data viewable in the layer allowing different scales for the same data type to be expressed in a single service which the generic IR for all view services also wants to be available.
11.2. Styles required to be supported by INSPIRE view services
None
11.3. Styles recommended to be supported by INSPIRE view services
The way rock units are portrayed on maps is an important factor in facilitating the understanding of geological data and can be used to highlight, for example, the different lithologies or ages. For the user it is important to be able to recognise patterns and schemes, so that relevant information can be drawn from the spatial data base immediately.
A portrayal scheme for lithology, age and faults was developed for OneGeology-Europe with special attention paid to the particularities of the different European countries.
11.3.1. Styles for the layer GE.GeologicUnit - Lithology
Style Name |
GE.GeologicUnit.Lithology |
Style Title |
Geologic Units - Lithology |
Style Abstract |
The colours and RGB codes for lithology, developed for the OneGeology-Europe project, with the addition of styles for anthropogenic consolidated and unconsolidated material, loss of core, cavity and soil, undifferentiated material are includedin the colour tables below. |
Symbology |
See the colour tables below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
11.3.2. Styles for the layer GE.GeologicUnit – Age of Rocks (olderNamedAge)
Style Name |
GE.GeologicUnit.AgeOfRocks |
Style Title |
Geologic Units – Age of rocks |
Style Abstract |
The colours and RGB codes according to the Geological Time Scale 2008, International Commission of Stratigraphy, with the addition of 27 newly defined colours for the proposed new European Proterozoic Epochs (by the OneGeology-Europe project). Please note, the defining age for the unit is the older age. |
Symbology |
See the colour tables below. |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
11.3.3. Styles for the layer GE.GeologicFault
Style Name |
GE.GeologicFault. |
Style Title |
Type of Geologic Fault |
Style Abstract |
The lines (MappedFeatures) of Geologic Structures - faults are portrayed by their type. A proposal was created for the OneGeology_Europe project. |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
Value (FaultTypeValue) | Draw annotation | Colour (RGB) | Symbol [lw = line width in pixel] |
---|---|---|---|
fault |
0, 0, 0 |
||
strikeSlipFault |
0, 0, 0 |
||
dextralStrikeSlipFault |
0, 0, 0 |
||
sinistralStrikeSlipFault |
0, 0, 0 |
||
wrenchFault |
0, 0, 0 |
||
reverseFault |
Symbols in the upthrown block. (For cartographers: The line should be drawn so that the upthrown block is to the right in the drawing direction.) |
0, 0, 0 |
|
thrustFault |
Symbols in the upthrown block. (For cartographers: The line should be drawn so that the upthrown block is to the right in the drawing direction.) |
0, 0, 0 |
|
highAngleReverse |
Symbols in the upthrown block. (For cartographers: The line should be drawn so that the upthrown block is to the right in the drawing direction.) |
0, 0, 0 |
|
normalFault |
0, 0, 0 |
||
lowAngleNormalFault |
Symbols in the downthrown block. (For cartographers: The line should be drawn so that the downthrown block is to the right in the drawing direction |
0, 0, 0 |
|
detachmentFault |
Symbols in the downthrown block. (For cartographers: The line should be drawn so that the downthrown block is to the right in the drawing direction |
0, 0, 0 |
|
highAngleNormalFault |
Symbols in the downthrown block. (For cartographers: The line should be drawn so that the downthrown block is to the right in the drawing direction |
0, 0, 0 |
|
highAngleFault |
0, 0, 0 |
||
lowAngleFault |
|||
horizontalFault |
|||
obliqueSlipFault |
|||
leftNormalFault |
|||
rightNormalFault |
|||
leftReverseFault |
|||
rightReverseFault |
|||
scissorFault |
255,51,51 |
||
extractionFault |
128,230,77 |
||
mixedExtractionFault |
128,230,77 |
||
pureExtractionFault |
128,230,77 |
11.3.4. Styles for the layer GE.GeologicFold
Style Name |
GE.GeologicFold |
Style Title |
Type of Geologic Fold |
Style Abstract |
The lines (MappedFeatures) of Geological structures - Folds are portrayed by their type. |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
Value (FoldProfileTypeValue) | Colour (RGB) | Line width | Symbol |
---|---|---|---|
anticline |
230, 0, 51 |
1 px |
|
antiform |
230, 0, 51 |
1 px |
|
syncline |
230, 0, 51 |
1 px |
|
synform |
230, 0, 51 |
1 px |
11.3.5. Styles for the layer GE.GeomorphologicFeature – Natural Geomorphologic Feature
Style Name | GE.GeomorphologicFeature.Natural |
---|---|
Style Title |
Type of Natural Geomorphologic Features |
Style Abstract |
Proposal for the portrayal style for types of natural geomorphologic features based on color codes: Some rules consider color codes associated to the landform genesis or geomorphologic environments (References 1 and 2). In other cases (Reference 3) the color code is not directly related to any specific geomorphologic environment. |
Symbology |
See the colour tables below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
Depending on the information resolution, the landforms are represented using polygons, lines or points. |
Feature | Values (NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue) | POINT (P) LINE (L) POLYGON (POL) | COLOUR (RGB) | EXAMPLE | EXAMPLE NAME | REFERENCE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
drainagePattern |
L |
0,255,255 |
Stream course |
3 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
constructionalFeature |
P,L,POL |
Same colour as the volcanic, hydrothermal, slopeGravitational, nivalPeriglacialPermafrost, glacial, eolian, marineLittoralCoastalWetland, karstChemicalWeathering, alluvialFluvial, lacustrine or impact NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue to which is related (symbol ad-hoc) |
|||
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
destructionalFeature |
P,L,POL |
Same colour as the volcanic, hydrothermal, slopeGravitational, nivalPeriglacialPermafrost, glacial, eolian, marineLittoralCoastalWetland, karstChemicalWeathering, alluvialFluvial, lacustrine or impact NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue to which is related (symbol ad-hoc) |
|||
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
degradationFeature |
P,L,POL |
Same colour as the volcanic, hydrothermal, slopeGravitational, nivalPeriglacialPermafrost, glacial, eolian, marineLittoralCoastalWetland, karstChemicalWeathering, alluvialFluvial, lacustrine or impact NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue to which is related (symbol ad-hoc) |
|||
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
relicFeature |
P,L,POL |
Same colour as the volcanic, hydrothermal, slopeGravitational, nivalPeriglacialPermafrost, glacial, eolian, marineLittoralCoastalWetland, karstChemicalWeathering, alluvialFluvial, lacustrine or impact NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue to which is related (symbol ad-hoc) |
|||
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
exhumedFeature |
P,L,POL |
Same colour as the volcanic, hydrothermal, slopeGravitational, nivalPeriglacialPermafrost, glacial, eolian, marineLittoralCoastalWetland, karstChemicalWeathering, alluvialFluvial,l acustrine or impact NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue to which is related (symbol ad-hoc) |
|||
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
buriedFeature |
P,L,POL |
Same colour as the volcanic, hydrothermal, slopeGravitational, nivalPeriglacialPermafrost, glacial, eolian, marineLittoralCoastalWetland, karstChemicalWeathering, alluvialFluvial, lacustrine or impact NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue to which is related (symbol ad-hoc) |
|||
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
pediment |
POL |
168,74,10 |
Pediment |
1 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
erosionalFeature |
P,L,POL |
Same colour as the volcanic, hydrothermal, slopeGravitational, nivalPeriglacialPermafrost, glacial, eolian, marineLittoralCoastalWetland, karstChemicalWeathering, alluvialFluvial, lacustrine or impact NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue to which is related (symbol ad-hoc) |
|||
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
hill |
POL |
200,200,200 |
Hill |
— |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
interfluve |
POL |
235,230,230 |
Interfluve |
— |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
crest |
L |
0,0,0 |
Crest |
1 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
headSlope |
POL |
160,160,160 |
Head slope |
— |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature` |
sideSlope |
POL |
215,215,215 |
Side slope |
— |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
noseSlope |
POL |
240,230,255 |
Nose slope |
— |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
freeFace |
POL |
227,227,227 |
Outcrop (i.e. "carbonate rocks") |
4 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
baseSlope |
POL |
250,220,140 |
Base slope |
— |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
mountain |
POL |
227,227,245 |
Mountains (i.e."Alpine chain") |
4 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
mountaintop |
POL |
254,254,254 |
Mountain top |
— |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
mountainslope |
POL |
225,220,200 |
Mountain slope |
— |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
mountainflank |
POL |
220,225,205 |
Mountain flank |
— |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
mountainbase |
POL |
245,210,170 |
Mountain base |
— |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
depression |
POL |
220,235,210 |
Depression |
1 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
plain |
POL |
235,235,200 |
Plain |
— |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
tectonicStructural |
P,L, POL |
0,0,0 |
Hogback |
1 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
volcanic |
P,L,POL |
209,43,255 |
Lava field |
4 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
hydrothermal |
P,L,POL |
225,65,110 |
Geyser |
1 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
erosionSurface |
POL |
168,74,10 |
Erosion surface |
4 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
slopeGravitational |
P,L,POL |
245,210,170 |
Scree slope |
1 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
nivalPeriglacialPermafrost |
P,L,POL |
235,150,180 |
Rock glacier |
2 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
glacial |
P,L, POL |
220,150,225 |
Till plain |
4 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
eolian |
P,L, POL |
240,240,70 |
Dune field |
4 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
marineLittoralCoastalWetland |
P,L, POL |
160,255,235 |
Delta plain complex |
4 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
karstChemicalWeathering |
P, L, POL |
240,160,185 |
Karst landscape |
4 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
alluvialFluvial |
P,L, POL |
160,215,170 |
Alluvial plain |
— |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
lacustrine |
P,L, POL |
220,250,250 |
Playa |
4 |
|
naturalGeomorphologicFeature |
impact |
P,L,POL |
150,120,100 |
Impact crater |
— |
11.3.6. Styles for the layer GE.GeomorphologicFeature – Anthropogenic Geomorphologic Feature
Style Name | GE.GeomorphologicFeature.Anthropogenic |
---|---|
Style Title |
Type of Anthropogenic Geomorphologic Features |
Style Abstract |
Proposal for the portrayal style for types of anthropogenic geomorphologic features based on Color codes: Some rules consider color codes associated to the landform genesis or geomorphologic environments (References 1 and 2). In other cases (Reference 3) the color code is not directly related to any specific geomorphologic environment. |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
Depending on the information resolution, the landforms are represented using polygons, lines or points. |
Feature | Values (AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeatureTypeValue) | POINT(P), LINE(L), POLYGON (POL) | COLOUR (RGB) | EXAMPLE |
---|---|---|---|---|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
artificialCollapsedDepression |
P,L,POL |
170,165,45 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
artificialDrainage |
L |
90,220,225 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
artificialLevee |
L,POL |
80,60,30 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
dredgedChannel |
L |
40,100,125 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
dump |
P,POL |
200,175,100 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
fill |
P,POL |
250,210,80 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
impactCraterAnthropogenic |
P,POL |
210,20,5 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
landfillSite |
P,POL |
255,190,0 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
levelledLand |
POL |
230,200,150 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
openpitMine |
P,POL |
145,110,45 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
pit |
P,POL |
105,100,30 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
quarry |
P,POL |
230,227,162 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
reclaimedLand |
POL |
250,225,250 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
reservoirLake |
POL |
90,220,225 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
spoilBank |
P,POL |
215,105,45 |
|
AnthropogenicGeomorpohologicFeature |
subsidenceAreaAnthropogenic |
POL |
200,200,70 |
REFERENCES for both types of Geomorphological features
-
Mapa geomorfológico de España a escala 1:50.000: Guía para su elaboración / Instituto Geológico y Minero de España. Área de Cartografía Geológica; Martín-Serrano, Á., Salazar, Á., Nozal, F., Suárez, Á. Madrid: Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, 2004.
-
Université de Lausanne. Faculté des Géosciences et de l’Environnement. Institut de Géographie. http://www.unil.ch/igul/page19238.html (April 2011)
-
Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.
11.3.7. Styles for the layer GE.Borehole - Purpose of Boreholes
Style Name | GE.Borehole |
---|---|
Style Title |
Boreholes – Purpose type |
Style Abstract |
The Point Symbology to portrayal different boreholes based on their purpose (BoreholePurposeValue code list) using the 'ASCII Windings Font'. |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
Value (BoreholePurposeValue) | Portrayal | Portrayal Code |
---|---|---|
aquaculture |
|
170-w2 |
contingencyWaterSupply |
|
165-w2 |
dewatering |
|
163-w2 230-w2 |
disposal |
|
85-w2 |
drinkingWaterSupply |
|
163-w2 174-w2 |
emergencyWaterSupply |
|
163-w2 237-w2 |
environmentalMonitoring |
|
155-w2 |
explorationExploitationNonmetallicMineralDeposits |
|
209-w2 |
explorationExploitationRawMaterial |
|
171-w |
explorationNaturalUndergroundStorage |
|
193-w2 |
explorationExploitationEnergyResources |
|
191-w2 |
flowingShot |
|
163-w2 |
geochemicalSurvey |
|
178-w |
geologicalSurvey |
|
202-w2 |
geophysicalSurvey |
|
226-w2 |
geotechnicalSurvey |
|
179w |
geothermalEnergy |
|
236-w2 |
groundwaterLevelMonitoring |
|
162-w2 178-w |
heatStorage |
|
114-w3 + 226-w2 |
hydrogeologicalSurvey |
|
162-w2 |
industrialWaterSupply |
|
163-w2 236-w2 |
irrigation |
|
163-w2 231-w2 |
mineralExplorationExtraction |
|
185-w2 |
mitigation |
|
156-w2 |
multidisciplinaryScientificResearch |
|
114-w3 + 443-w2 |
pedologicalSurvey |
|
195-w2 |
pollutionMonitoring |
|
88-w2 |
recharge |
|
167-w2 |
remediation |
|
152-w2 |
Shallow methane production |
|
176-w2 |
shotHole |
|
224-w2 |
thermalCleaning |
|
56-w2 |
waterQualityMonitoring |
|
181w |
hydrocarbonAppraisal |
175-w2 |
|
hydrocarbonExploration |
|
179-w2 |
hydrocarbonProduction |
|
178-w2 |
waterSupply |
|
163-w2 |
Fonts: w = Wingdings w2 = Windings2 |
Style Name | GE.Borehole |
---|---|
Style Title |
Borehole Depth Type |
Style Abstract |
The colour ramp is to differentiate based on BoreholeLength measure of a borehole depth. |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
11.3.8. Styles for the layer GE.Aquifer – Aquifer Type
Style Name |
GE.Aquifer.Type |
Style Title |
Type of Aquifers |
Style Abstract |
The polygons (MappedFeatures) of Types of Aquifers based on the Aquif*erTypeValue* code list. |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
Value (AquiferTypeValue) | Colour (RGB) | Line width | Symbol |
---|---|---|---|
confinedSubArtesian |
132, 0, 168 |
1,5 px |
|
confinedArtesian |
132, 0, 168 |
1,5 px |
|
unconfined |
132, 0, 168 |
1,5 px |
11.3.9. Styles for the layer GE.Aquifer – Media Type
Style Name |
GE.Aquifer.MediaType |
Style Title |
Type of Aquifer Media |
Style Abstract |
The polygons (MappedFeatures) of Types of Aquifers based on the media type (AquiferMediaTypeValue code list). |
Symbology |
See the colour tables below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
Color (CMYK and RGB) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AquiferMediaTypeValue |
C |
M |
Y |
K |
R |
G |
B |
Symbol |
||
fractured |
0 |
32 |
30 |
0 |
255 |
173 |
178 |
|||
porous |
45 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
140 |
255 |
255 |
|||
karstic |
89 |
0 |
161 |
122 |
204 |
224 |
188 |
|||
compound |
0 |
173 |
50 |
0 |
255 |
211 |
127 |
|||
karsticAndFractured |
25 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
191 |
191 |
255 |
|||
porousAndFractured |
40 |
0 |
40 |
0 |
155 |
255 |
153 |
|||
11.3.10. Styles for the layer GE.Aquiclude – ConstitutionOfAquiclude
Style Name | GE. Aquiclude.ConstitutionOfAquiclude |
---|---|
Style Title |
Aquiclude – Constitution of Aquiclude |
Style Abstract |
The polygons (MappedFeatures) of spatial objects whose specification property is of type Aquiclude |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
Color (CMYK and RGB) |
||||||||||
Aquiclude |
C |
M |
Y |
K |
R |
G |
B |
Symbol |
||
unconsolidated |
7 |
17 |
40 |
0 |
237 |
212 |
153 |
|||
consolidated (rock) |
15 |
30 |
45 |
0 |
217 |
178 |
140 |
11.3.11. Styles for the layer GE.Aquitard – ConstitutionOfAquitard
Style Name | GE.Aquitard. ConstitutionOfAquitard |
---|---|
Style Title |
Aquiclude – Constitution of Aquiclude |
Style Abstract |
The polygons (MappedFeatures) of spatial objects whose specification property is of type Aquitard |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
Color (CMYK and RGB) |
||||||||||
C |
M |
Y |
K |
R |
G |
B |
Symbol |
|||
Aquitard |
38 |
20 |
0 |
114 |
140 |
180 |
226 |
11.3.12. Styles for the layer GE.AquiferSystem – ConstitutionOfAquifer System
Style Name | GE.AquiferSystem. ConstitutionOfAquiferSystem |
---|---|
Style Title |
AquiferSystem – Constitution of AquiferSystem |
Style Abstract |
The polygons (MappedFeatures) of spatial objects whose specification property is of type AquiferSystem |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
Color (CMYK and RGB) |
||||||||||
C |
M |
Y |
K |
R |
G |
B |
Symbol |
|||
AquiferSystem |
38 |
20 |
0 |
114 |
190 |
215 |
240 |
11.3.13. Styles for the layer GE.GroundWaterBody– Groundwater Body
Style Name | GE.GroundWaterBody |
---|---|
Style Title |
Groundwater Body |
Style Abstract |
Normally represented by contour lines of (piezometric) head |
Symbology |
default |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
Color (CMYK and RGB) |
||||||||||
C |
M |
Y |
K |
R |
G |
B |
Line |
|||
Groundwater Body |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11.3.14. Styles for the layer GE.ActiveWell– Type of Active Well
Style Name | GE.ActiveWell |
---|---|
Style Title |
Type of Active Wells |
Style Abstract |
Style for Active Wells based on the activity type (ActiveWellTypeValue) |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
None |
Value (ActiveWellTypeValue) | Portrayal | Portrayal Code |
---|---|---|
exploitation |
|
165-w2 |
recharge |
|
167-w2 |
dewatering |
|
163-w2 230-w2 |
disposal |
|
85-w2 |
waterExploratory |
|
162-w2 |
thermal |
|
236-w2 |
11.3.15. Styles for the layer group GE.GeophStation - (TypeOfGeophStation)
Style Name | GE.TypeOfGeophStation:GE.gravityStation |
---|---|
Style Title |
TypeOfGeophStation - Gravity Stations |
Style Abstract |
The symbols of GeophStation are portrayed by type (stationType) and size of symbol by rank (stationRank). Note: One layer shall be made available for each code list value, for example: GE.gravityStation, GE.magneticStation, GE.seismologicalStation, etc.. |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
Value (StationTypeValue) |
Value (StationRankValue) |
Geometry |
Stroke RGB |
Fill RGB |
Symbol |
Size |
gravity station |
Observatory |
point |
|
#FF6600 |
square |
14 |
gravity station |
1stOrderBase |
point |
|
#FF6600 |
circle |
14 |
gravity station |
2ndOrderBase |
point |
|
#FF6600 |
circle |
12 |
magnetic station |
Observatory |
point |
|
#00CCFF |
square |
14 |
magnetic station |
secularStation |
point |
|
#00CCFF |
triangle |
14 |
magnetic station |
1stOrderBase |
point |
|
#00CCFF |
circle |
14 |
magnetic station |
2ndOrderBase |
point |
|
#00CCFF |
circle |
12 |
seismologicalStation |
Observatory |
point |
|
#993366 |
square |
14 |
seismologicalStation |
1stOrderBase |
point |
|
#993366 |
circle |
14 |
seismologicalStation |
2ndOrderBase |
point |
|
#993366 |
circle |
12 |
magnetotelluricsounding |
- |
point |
|
#FFFF00 |
circle |
10 |
verticalElectricSounding |
- |
point |
|
#C0C0C0 |
circle |
10 |
11.3.16. Styles for the layer group GE.GeophProfile - (TypeOfGeophProfile)
Style Name | GE.TypeOf GeophProfile:GE.seismicLine |
---|---|
Style Title |
TypeOf GeophProfile - Seismic Lines |
Style Abstract |
The symbols of GeophProfile are portrayed by type (ProfileType). Note: One layer shall be made available for each code list value, for example: GE.boreholeLogging, GE.seismicLine, GE.multielectrodeDCProfile, etc. |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
<min scale> - <max scale> |
Value (ProfileTypeValue) |
Geometry |
stroke RGB |
fll RGB |
symbol |
size |
boreholeLogging |
point |
|
#00FF00 |
circle |
12 |
seismicLine |
linestring |
#FF0000 |
|
|
|
multielectrodeDCProfile |
linestring |
#C0C0C0 |
|
|
|
conePenetrationTest |
point |
|
#CCFFCC |
circle |
10 |
flightLine |
linestring |
#3366FF |
|
|
|
verticalSeismicProfile |
linestring |
#FFCC99 |
|
|
|
georadarProfile |
linestring |
#99CC00 |
|
|
11.3.17. Styles for the layer group GE.Campaign - (TypeOfSurvey)
Style Name | GE.TypeOfSurvey:GE.groundGravitySurvey |
---|---|
Style Title |
TypeOfSurvey - Ground Gravity Survey |
Style Abstract |
The symbols of Campaign are portrayed by type (surveyType). Note: One layer shall be made available for each code list value, for example: GE.groundGravitySurvey, GE.groundMagneticSurvey, GE.airborneGeophysicalSurvey, etc. |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
Value (SurveyTypeValue) |
Geometry |
stroke RGB |
fll RGB |
symbol |
size |
groundGravitySurvey |
polygon |
#FF6600 |
|
|
|
groundMagneticSurvey |
polygon |
#00CCFF |
|
|
|
airborneGeophysicalSurvey |
polygon |
#3366FF |
|
|
|
seismologicalSurvey |
polygon |
#993366 |
|
|
|
3DResistivitySurvey |
polygon |
#C0C0C0 |
|
|
|
2D seismic survey |
polygon |
#FF0000 |
|
|
|
3D seismic survey |
polygon |
#FF0000 |
|
|
|
borehole logging survey |
polygon |
#00FF00 |
|
|
|
VES survey |
polygon |
#C0C0C0 |
|
|
|
2D resistivity survey |
polygon |
#C0C0C0 |
|
|
|
TDEM survey |
polygon |
#FF00FF |
|
|
|
FDEM Survey |
polygon |
#FF99CC |
|
|
|
MT survey |
polygon |
#FFFF00 |
|
|
|
georadar survey |
polygon |
#99CC00 |
|
|
|
CPT survey |
polygon |
#CCFFCC |
|
|
|
VSP survey |
polygon |
#FFCC99 |
|
|
|
sonar survey |
polygon |
#000000 |
|
|
|
11.3.18. Styles for the layer group GE. GeophSwath - (TypeOfGeophSwath)
Style Name | GE.TypeOfGeophSwath: GE.3DSeismics |
---|---|
Style Title |
TypeOfGeophSwath - 3D Seismics |
Style Abstract |
The symbols of GeophSwath are portrayed by type (SwathType). |
Symbology |
See the colour table below |
Minimum & maximum scales |
<min scale> - <max scale> |
Value (SwathTypeValue) |
Geometry |
stroke RGB |
fll RGB |
symbol |
size |
radarInterferometry |
polygon |
#000000 |
#99CC00 |
|
|
sonar |
polygon |
#000000 |
#FFFFFF |
|
|
3D Seismics |
polygon |
#000000 |
#FF0000 |
|
|
Bibliography
[DS-D2.3] INSPIRE DS-D2.3, Definition of Annex Themes and Scope, v3.0, https://knowledge-base.inspire.ec.europa.eu/publications/definition-annex-themes-and-scope-d-23-version-30_en
[DS-D2.5] INSPIRE DS-D2.5, Generic Conceptual Model, v3.4rc2, https://knowledge-base.inspire.ec.europa.eu/publications/inspire-generic-conceptual-model_en
[DS-D2.6] INSPIRE DS-D2.6, Methodology for the development of data specifications, v3.0, https://knowledge-base.inspire.ec.europa.eu/publications/methodology-development-data-specifications-baseline-version-d-26-version-30_en
[DS-D2.7] INSPIRE DS-D2.7, Guidelines for the encoding of spatial data, v3.3rc2, https://knowledge-base.inspire.ec.europa.eu/publications/guidelines-encoding-spatial-data_en
[ISO 19101] EN ISO 19101:2005 Geographic information – Reference model (ISO 19101:2002)
[ISO 19103] ISO/TS 19103:2005, Geographic information – Conceptual schema language
[ISO 19107] EN ISO 19107:2005, Geographic information – Spatial schema (ISO 19107:2003)
[ISO 19108] EN ISO 19108:2005 Geographic information - Temporal schema (ISO 19108:2002)
[ISO 19111] EN ISO 19111:2007 Geographic information - Spatial referencing by coordinates (ISO 19111:2007)
[ISO 19115] EN ISO 19115:2005, Geographic information – Metadata (ISO 19115:2003)
[ISO 19118] EN ISO 19118:2006, Geographic information – Encoding (ISO 19118:2005)
[ISO 19135] EN ISO 19135:2007 Geographic information – Procedures for item registration (ISO 19135:2005)
[ISO 19139] ISO/TS 19139:2007, Geographic information – Metadata – XML schema implementation
[ISO 19157] ISO/DIS 19157, Geographic information – Data quality
[OGC 06-103r3] Implementation Specification for Geographic Information - Simple feature access – Part 1: Common Architecture v1.2.0
Annex A: Abstract Test Suite - (normative)
Disclaimer
While this Annex refers to the Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services, it does not replace the legal act or any part of it.
The objective of the Abstract Test Suite (ATS) included in this Annex is to help the conformance testing process. It includes a set of tests to be applied on a data set to evaluate whether it fulfils the requirements included in this data specification and the corresponding parts of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010 (implementing rule as regards interoperability of spatial datasets and services, further referred to as ISDSS Regulation). This is to help data providers in declaring the conformity of a data set to the "degree of conformity, with implementing rules adopted under Article 7(1) of Directive 2007/2/EC", which is required to be provided in the data set metadata according to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2008/1205 (the Metadata Regulation).
Part 1 of this ATS includes tests that provide input for assessing conformity with the ISDSS regulation. In order to make visible which requirements are addressed by a specific test, references to the corresponding articles of the legal act are given. The way how the cited requirements apply to ge specification is described under the testing method.
In addition to the requirements included in ISDSS Regulation this Technical guideline contains TG requirements too. TG requirements are technical provisions that need to be fulfilled in order to be conformant with the corresponding IR requirement when the specific technical implementation proposed in this document is used. Such requirements relate for example to the default encoding described in section 9. Part 2 of the ATS presents tests necessary for assessing the conformity with TG requirements.
NOTE Conformance of a data set with the TG requirement(s) included in this ATS implies conformance with the corresponding IR requirement(s).
The ATS is applicable to the data sets that have been transformed to be made available through INSPIRE download services (i.e. the data returned as a response to the mandatory "Get Spatial Dataset" operation) rather than the original "source" data sets.
The requirements to be tested are grouped in several conformance classes. Each of these classes covers a specific aspect: one conformance class contains tests reflecting the requirements on the application schema, another on the reference systems, etc. Each conformance class is identified by a URI (uniform resource identifier) according to the following pattern:
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ge/<conformance class identifier>
EXAMPLE 1 The URI http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ef/rs identifies the Reference Systems ISDSS conformance class of the Environmental Monitoring Facilities (EF) data theme.
The results of the tests should be published referring to the relevant conformance class (using its URI).
When an INSPIRE data specification contains more than one application schema, the requirements tested in a conformance class may differ depending on the application schema used as a target for the transformation of the data set. This will always be the case for the application schema conformance class. However, also other conformance classes could have different requirements for different application schemas. In such cases, a separate conformance class is defined for each application schema, and they are distinguished by specific URIs according to the following pattern:
http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ge/<conformance class identifier>/
<application schema namespace prefix>
EXAMPLE 2 The URI http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/el/as/el-vec identifies the conformity with the application schema (as) conformance class for the Elevation Vector Elements (el-vec) application schema.
An overview of the conformance classes and the associated tests is given in the table below.
Table 6. Overview of the tests within this Abstract Test Suite.
A.1 Application Schema Conformance Class |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
A.2 Reference Systems Conformance Class |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
A.3 Data Consistency Conformance Class |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
A.4 Metadata IR Conformance Class |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
A.5 Information Accessibility Conformance Class |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
A.6 Data Delivery Conformance Class |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
A.7 Portrayal Conformance Class |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
A.8 Technical Guidelines Conformance Class |
|||||||||
|
In order to be conformant to a conformance class, a data set has to pass all tests defined for that conformance class.
In order to be conformant with the ISDSS regulation the inspected data set needs to be conformant to all conformance classes in Part 1. The conformance class for overall conformity with the ISDSS regulation is identified by the URI http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/ir/ge/.
In order to be conformant with the Technical Guidelines, the dataset under inspection needs to be conformant to all conformance classes included both in Part 1 and 2. Chapter 8 describes in detail how to publish the result of testing regarding overall conformity and conformity with the conformance classes as metadata. The conformance class for overall conformity with the Technical Guidelines is identified by the URI http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/conformance-class/tg/ge/3.0.
It should be noted that data providers are not obliged to integrate / decompose the original structure of the source data sets when they deliver them for INSPIRE. It means that a conformant dataset can contain less or more spatial object / data types than specified in the ISDSS Regulation.
A dataset that contains less spatial object and/or data types can be regarded conformant when the corresponding types of the source datasets after the necessary transformations fulfil the requirements set out in the ISDSS Regulation.
A dataset that contain more spatial object and/or data types may be regarded as conformant when
-
all the spatial object / data types that have corresponding types in the source dataset after the necessary transformations fulfil the requirements set out in the ISDSS Regulation and
-
all additional elements of the source model (spatial object types, data types, attributes, constraints and code lists together with their values) do not conflict with any rule defined in the interoperability target specifications defined for any theme within INSPIRE.
Open issue 1: Even though the last condition can be derived from Art. 8(4) of the Directive, the ISDSS Regulation does not contain requirements concerning the above issue. Therefore, no specific tests have been included in this abstract suite for testing conformity of extended application schemas. Annex F of the Generic Conceptual Model (D2.5) provides an example how to extend INSPIRE application schemas in a compliant way.
The ATS contains a detailed list of abstract tests. It should be noted that some tests in the Application schema conformance class can be automated by utilising xml schema validation tools. It should be noted that failing such validation test does not necessary reflect non-compliance to the application schema; it may be the results of erroneous encoding.
Each test in this suite follows the same structure:
-
Requirement: citation from the legal texts (ISDSS requirements) or the Technical Guidelines (TG requirements);
-
Purpose: definition of the scope of the test;
-
Reference: link to any material that may be useful during the test;
-
Test method: description of the testing procedure.
According to ISO 19105:2000 all tests in this ATS are basic tests. Therefore, this statement is not repeated each time.
Part 1 - (normative)
Conformity with Commission Regulation No 1089/2010
A.1. Application Schema Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.1.1. Schema element denomination test
a) Purpose: Verification whether each element of the dataset under inspection carries a name specified in the target application schema(s).
b) Reference: Art. 3 and Art.4 of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010
c) Test Method: Examine whether the corresponding elements of the source schema (spatial object types, data types, attributes, association roles and code lists) are mapped to the target schema with the correct designation of mnemonic names.
NOTE Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5.2.
A.1.2. Value type test
a) Purpose: Verification whether all attributes or association roles use the corresponding value types specified in the application schema(s).
b) Reference: Art. 3, Art.4, Art.6(1), Art.6(4), Art.6(5) and Art.9(1)of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
c) Test Method: Examine whether the value type of each provided attribute or association role adheres to the corresponding value type specified in the target specification.
NOTE 1 This test comprises testing the value types of INSPIRE identifiers, the value types of attributes and association roles that should be taken from code lists, and the coverage domains.
NOTE 2 Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5.2.
A.1.3. Value test
a) Purpose: Verify whether all attributes or association roles whose value type is a code list take the values set out therein.
b) Reference: Art.4 (3) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
c) Test Method: When an attribute / association role has a code list as its type, compare the values of each instance with those provided in the application schema. To pass this tests any instance of an attribute / association role
-
shall take only values explicitly specified in the code list when the code list’s extensibility is "none".
-
shall take only a value explicitly specified in the code list or shall take a value that is narrower (i.e. more specific) than those explicitly specified in the application schema when the code list’s extensibility is "narrower".
NOTE 1 This test is not applicable to code lists with extensibility "open" or "any".
NOTE 2 When a data provider only uses code lists with narrower (more specific values) this test can be fully performed based on internal information.
NOTE 3 All code lists defined in this Data specification on Geology are with the extensibility "open" or "any". Before using a new or more detailed term the definitions of all values of a relevant code list should be checked (see Recommendation 4).
A.1.4. Attributes/associations completeness test
a) Purpose: Verification whether each instance of spatial object type and data types include all attributes and association roles as defined in the target application schema.
b) Reference: Art. 3, Art.4(1), Art.4(2), and Art.5(2) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
c) Test Method: Examine whether all attributes and association roles defined for a spatial object type or data type are present for each instance in the dataset.
NOTE 1 Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5.2.
NOTE 2 For all properties defined for a spatial object, a value has to be provided if it exists in or applies to the real world entity – either the corresponding value (if available in the data set maintained by the data provider) or the value of void. If the characteristic described by the attribute or association role does not exist in or apply to the real world entity, the attribute or association role does not need to be present in the data set.
A.1.5. Abstract spatial object test
a) Purpose: Verification whether the dataset does NOT contain abstract spatial object / data types defined in the target application schema(s).
b) Reference: Art.5(3) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010
c) Test Method: Examine that there are NO instances of abstract spatial object / data types in the dataset provided.
NOTE Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5.2.
A.1.6. Constraints test
a) Purpose: Verification whether the instances of spatial object and/or data types provided in the dataset adhere to the constraints specified in the target application schema(s).
b) Reference: Art. 3, Art.4(1), and Art.4(2) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
c) Test Method: Examine all instances of data for the constraints specified for the corresponding spatial object / data type. Each instance shall adhere to all constraints specified in the target application schema(s).
NOTE Further technical information is in the Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5.2.
A.1.7. Geometry representation test
a) Purpose: Verification whether the value domain of spatial properties is restricted as specified in the Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
b) Reference: Art.12(1) of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010
c) Test Method: Check whether all spatial properties only use 0, 1 and 2-dimensional geometric objects that exist in the right 2-, 3- or 4-dimensional coordinate space, and where all curve interpolations respect the rules specified in the reference documents.
NOTE Further technical information is in OGC Simple Feature spatial schema v1.2.1 [06-103r4].
A.2. Reference Systems Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.2.1. Datum test
a) Purpose: Verify whether each instance of a spatial object type is given with reference to one of the (geodetic) datums specified in the target specification.
b) Reference: Annex II Section 1.2 of Commission Regulation No 1089/2010
c) Test Method: Check whether each instance of a spatial object type specified in the application schema(s) in section 5 has been expressed using:
-
the European Terrestrial Reference System 1989 (ETRS89) within its geographical scope; or
-
the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS) for areas beyond the ETRS89 geographical scope; or
-
other geodetic coordinate reference systems compliant with the ITRS. Compliant with the ITRS means that the system definition is based on the definition of ITRS and there is a well-established and described relationship between both systems, according to the EN ISO 19111.
NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.
A.2.2. Coordinate reference system test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the two- and three-dimensional coordinate reference systems are used as defined in section 6.
b) Reference: Section 6 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
c) Test Method: Inspect whether the horizontal and vertical components of coordinates one of the corresponding coordinate reference system has been:
-
Three-dimensional Cartesian coordinates based on a datum specified in 1.2 and using the parameters of the Geodetic Reference System 1980 (GRS80) ellipsoid.
-
Three-dimensional geodetic coordinates (latitude, longitude and ellipsoidal height) based on a datum specified in 1.2 and using the parameters of the GRS80 ellipsoid.
-
Two-dimensional geodetic coordinates (latitude and longitude) based on a datum specified in 1.2 and using the parameters of the GRS80 ellipsoid.
-
Plane coordinates using the ETRS89 Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area coordinate reference system.
-
Plane coordinates using the ETRS89 Lambert Conformal Conic coordinate reference system.
-
Plane coordinates using the ETRS89 Transverse Mercator coordinate reference system.
-
For the vertical component on land, the European Vertical Reference System (EVRS) shall be used to express gravity-related heights within its geographical scope. Other vertical reference systems related to the Earth gravity field shall be used to express gravity-related heights in areas that are outside the geographical scope of EVRS.
-
For the vertical component in marine areas where there is an appreciable tidal range (tidal waters), the Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) shall be used as the reference surface.
-
For the vertical component in marine areas without an appreciable tidal range, in open oceans and effectively in waters that are deeper than 200 meters, the Mean Sea Level (MSL) or a well-defined reference level close to the MSL shall be used as the reference surface."
-
For the vertical component in the free atmosphere, barometric pressure, converted to height using ISO 2533:1975 International Standard Atmosphere, or other linear or parametric reference systems shall be used. Where other parametric reference systems are used, these shall be described in an accessible reference using EN ISO 19111-2:2012.
NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.
A.2.3. Grid test
a) Purpose: Verify that gridded data related are available using the grid compatible with one of the coordinate reference systems defined in Commission Regulation No 1089/2010
b) Reference: Annex II Section 2.1 and 2.2 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
c) Test Method: Check whether the dataset defined as a grid is compatible with one of the coordinate reference.
-
Grid_ETRS89_GRS80 based on two-dimensional geodetic coordinates using the parameters of the GRS80 ellipsoid
-
Grid_ETRS89_GRS80zn based on two-dimensional geodetic coordinates with zoning,
-
Plane coordinates using the Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area projection and the parameters of the GRS80 ellipsoid (ETRS89-LAEA)
-
Plane coordinates using the Lambert Conformal Conic projection and the parameters of the GRS80 ellipsoid (ETRS89-LCC)
-
Plane coordinates using the Transverse Mercator projection and the parameters of the GRS80 ellipsoid (ETRS89-TMzn)
NOTE 1 Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.
NOTE 2 This test applies only to Hydrogeology application schema (GroundWaterBody/HydrogeologicalSurface).
A.2.4. View service coordinate reference system test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the spatial data set is available in the two dimensional geodetic coordinate system for their display with the INSPIRE View Service.
b) Reference: Annex II Section 1.4 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010
c) Test Method: Check that each instance of a spatial object types specified in the application schema(s) in section 5 is available in the two-dimensional geodetic coordinate system
NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.
A.2.5. Temporal reference system test
a) Purpose: Verify whether date and time values are given as specified in Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
b) Reference: Art.11(1) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010
c) Test Method: Check whether:
-
the Gregorian calendar is used as a reference system for date values;
-
the Universal Time Coordinated (UTC) or the local time including the time zone as an offset from UTC are used as a reference system for time values.
NOTE Further technical information is given in Section 6 of this document.
A.2.6. Units of measurements test
a) Purpose: Verify whether all measurements are expressed as specified in Commission Regulation No 1089/2010.
b) Reference: Art.12(2) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010
c) Test Method: Check whether all measurements are expressed in SI units or non-SI units accepted for use with the International System of Units.
NOTE 1 Further technical information is given in ISO 80000-1:2009.
NOTE 2 Degrees, minutes and seconds are non-SI units accepted for use with the International System of Units for expressing measurements of angles.
A.3. Data Consistency Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.3.1. Unique identifier persistency test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the namespace and localId attributes of the external object identifier remain the same for different versions of a spatial object.
b) Reference: Art. 9 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
c) Test Method: Compare the namespace and localId attributes of the external object identifiers in the previous version(s) of the dataset with the namespace and localId attributes of the external object identifiers of current version for the same instances of spatial object / data types; To pass the test, neither the namespace, nor the localId shall be changed during the life-cycle of a spatial object.
NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the database of the data providers.
NOTE 2 When using URI this test includes the verification whether no part of the construct has been changed during the life cycle of the instances of spatial object / data types.
NOTE 3 Further technical information is given in section 14.2 of the INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model.
A.3.2. Version consistency test
a) Purpose: Verify whether different versions of the same spatial object / data type instance belong to the same type.
b) Reference: Art. 9 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
c) Test Method: Compare the types of different versions for each instance of spatial object / data type
NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the database of the data providers.
A.3.3. Life cycle time sequence test
a) Purpose: Verification whether the value of the attribute beginLifespanVersion refers to an earlier moment of time than the value of the attribute endLifespanVersion for every spatial object / object type where this property is specified.
b) Reference: Art.10(3) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
c) Test Method: Compare the value of the attribute beginLifespanVersion with attribute endLifespanVersion. The test is passed when the beginLifespanVersion value is before endLifespanVersion value for each instance of all spatial object/data types for which this attribute has been defined.
NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the database of the data providers.
A.3.4. Validity time sequence test
a) Purpose: Verification whether the value of the attribute validFrom refers to an earlier moment of time than the value of the attribute validTo for every spatial object / object type where this property is specified.
b) Reference: Art.12(3) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
c) Test Method: Compare the value of the attribute validFrom with attribute validTo. The test is passed when the validFrom value is before validTo value for each instance of all spatial object/data types for which this attribute has been defined.
NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the database of the data providers.
A.3.5. Update frequency test
a) Purpose: Verify whether all the updates in the source dataset(s) have been transmitted to the dataset(s) which can be retrieved for the GE data theme using INSPIRE download services.
b) Reference: Art.8 (2) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
c) Test Method: Compare the values of beginning of life cycle information in the source and the target datasets for each instance of corresponding spatial object / object types. The test is passed when the difference between the corresponding values is less than 6 months.
NOTE 1 This test can be performed exclusively on the basis of the information available in the database of the data providers.
A.4. Metadata IR Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.4.1. Metadata for interoperability test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the metadata for interoperability of spatial data sets and services described in 1089/2010 Commission Regulation have been created and published for each dataset related to the GE data theme.
b) Reference: Art.13 of Commission Regulation 1089/2010
c) Test Method: Inspect whether metadata describing the coordinate reference systems, encoding, and spatial representation type have been created and published. If the spatial data set contains temporal information that does not refer to the default temporal reference system, inspect whether metadata describing the temporal reference system have been created and published. If an encoding is used that is not based on UTF-8, inspect whether metadata describing the character encoding have been created.
NOTE Further technical information is given in section 8 of this document.
A.5. Information Accessibility Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.5.1. Code list publication test
a) Purpose: Verify whether all additional values used in the data sets for attributes, for which narrower values or any other value than specified in Commission Regulation 1089/2010 are allowed, are published in a register.
b) Reference: Art.6(3) and Annex III Section 4.2.3 (Geology), 4.3.2 (Geophysics), 4.4.3. (Hydrogeology)
c) Test Method: For each additional value used in the data sets for code list-valued attributes, check whether it is published in a register.
NOTE Further technical information is given in section 5 of this document.
A.5.2. CRS publication test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the identifiers and the parameters of coordinate reference system are published in common registers.
b) Reference: Annex II Section 1.5
c) Test Method: Check whether the identifier and the parameter of the CRS used for the dataset are included in a register. .
NOTE Further technical information is given in section 6 of this document.
A.5.3. CRS identification test
a) Purpose: Verify whether identifiers for other coordinate reference systems than specified in Commission Regulation 1089/2010 have been created and their parameters have been described according to EN ISO 19111 and ISO 19127.
b) Reference: Annex II Section 1.3.4
c) Test Method: Check whether the register with the identifiers of the coordinate reference systems is accessible.
NOTE Further technical information is given in section 6 of this document.
A.5.4. Grid identification test
a) Purpose: Verify whether identifiers for other geographic grid systems than specified in Commission Regulation 1089/2010 have been created and their definitions have been either described with the data or referenced.
b) Reference: Annex II Section 2.1 and 2.2
c) Test Method: Check whether the identifiers for grids have been created. Inspect the dataset and/or the metadata for inclusion of grid definition.
NOTE Further technical information is given in section 6 of this document.
A.6. Data Delivery Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.6.1. Encoding compliance test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the encoding used to deliver the dataset comply with EN ISO 19118.
b) Reference: Art.7 (1) of Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
c) Test Method: Follow the steps of the Abstract Test Suit provided in EN ISO 19118.
NOTE 1 Datasets using the default encoding specified in Section 9 fulfil this requirement.
NOTE 2 Further technical information is given in Section 9 of this document.
A.7. Portrayal Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.7.1. Layer designation test
a) Purpose: verify whether each spatial object type has been assigned to the layer designated according to Commission Regulation 1089/2010.
b) Reference: Art. 14(1), Art14(2) and Annex III Section 4.5.
c) Test Method: Check whether data is made available for the view network service using the specified layers respectively:
Layer Name |
---|
GE.GeologicUnit |
GE.GeologicFault |
GE.GeologicFold |
GE.GeomorphologicFeature |
GE.Borehole |
GE.Aquifer |
GE.Aquiclude |
GE.Aquitard |
GE.AquiferSystems |
GE.Groundwaterbody |
GE.ActiveWell |
GE.Geophysics.3DSeismics |
NOTE Further technical information is given in section 11 of this document.
Part 2 - (informative)
Conformity with the technical guideline (TG) Requirements
A.8. Technical Guidelines Conformance Class
Conformance class:
A.8.1. Multiplicity test
a) Purpose: Verify whether each instance of an attribute or association role specified in the application schema(s) does not include fewer or more occurrences than specified in section 5.
b) Reference: Feature catalogue and UML diagram of the application schema(s) in section 5 of this guideline.
c) Test Method: Examine that the number of occurrences of each attribute and/or association role for each instance of a spatial object type or data type provided in the dataset corresponds to the number of occurrences of the attribute / association role that is specified in the application schema(s) in section 5.
A.8.2. CRS http URI test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the coordinate reference system used to deliver data for INSPIRE network services has been identified by URIs according to the EPSG register.
b) Reference: Section 6 of this technical guideline
c) Test Method: Compare the URI of the dataset with the URIs in the table.
NOTE 1 Passing this test implies the fulfilment of test A6.2
NOTE 2 Further reference please see http://www.epsg.org/geodetic.html
A.8.3. Metadata encoding schema validation test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the metadata follows an XML schema specified in ISO/TS 19139.
b) Reference: Section 8 of this technical guideline, ISO/TS 19139
c) Test Method: Inspect whether provided XML schema is conformant to the encoding specified in ISO 19139 for each metadata instance.
NOTE 1 Section 2.1.2 of the Metadata Technical Guidelines discusses the different ISO 19139 XML schemas that are currently available.
A.8.4. Metadata occurrence test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the occurrence of each metadata element corresponds to those specified in section 8.
b) Reference: Section 8 of this technical guideline
c) Test Method: Examine the number of occurrences for each metadata element. The number of occurrences shall be compared with its occurrence specified in Section 8:
NOTE 1 Section 2.1.2 of the Metadata Technical Guidelines discusses the different ISO 19139 XML schema
A.8.5. Metadata consistency test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the metadata elements follow the path specified in ISO/TS 19139.
b) Reference: Section 8 of this technical guideline, ISO/TS 19139
c) Test Method: Compare the XML schema of each metadata element with the path provide in ISO/TS 19137.
NOTE 1 This test does not apply to the metadata elements that are not included in ISO/TS 19139.
A.8.6. Encoding schema validation test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the provided dataset follows the rules of default encoding specified in section 9 of this document
b) Reference: section 9 of this technical guideline
c) Test Method: Inspect whether provided encoding(s) is conformant to the encoding(s) for the relevant application schema(s) as defined in section 9:
NOTE 1 Applying this test to the default encoding schema described in section 9 facilitates testing conformity with the application schema specified in section 5. In such cases running this test with positive result may replace tests from A1.1 to A1.4 provided in this abstract test suite.
NOTE 2 Using Schematron or other schema validation tool may significantly improve the validation process, because some some complex constraints of the schema cannot be validated using the simple XSD validation process. On the contrary to XSDs Schematron rules are not delivered together with the INSPIRE data specifications. Automating the process of validation (e.g. creation of Schematron rules) is therefore a task and an opportunity for data providers.
A.8.7. Coverage multipart representation test
a) Purpose: Verify whether coverage data encoded as multipart messages comply with the multipart representation conformance class defined in GML Application Schema for Coverages [OGC 09-146r2].
b) Reference: OGC standard GML Application Schema for Coverages [OGC 09-146r2].
c) Test Method: Inspect whether coverage data encoded as multipart messages comply with the multipart representation conformance class defined in GML Application Schema for Coverages [OGC 09-146r2].
NOTE 1 further information is provided in section 9.4 of this technical guideline.
NOTE 2 This test applies only to Hydrogeology application schema (GroundWaterBody/HydrogeologicalSurface).
A.8.8. Coverage domain consistency test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the encoded coverage domain is consistent with the information provided in the GML application schema.
b) Reference: Section 9.4.1.2 of this technical guideline.
c) Test Method: For multipart coverage messages compare the encoded coverage domain with the description of the coverage component in the GML application schema
NOTE 1 This test applies only to those multipart messages, where the coverage range is encoded together with the coverage domain (some binary formats).
NOTE 2 .This test does not apply to multipart messages where the coverage range is embedded without describing the data structure (e.g. text based formats).
A.8.9. Style test
a) Purpose: Verify whether the styles defined in section 11.2 have been made available for each specified layer.
b) Reference: section 11.2.
c) Test Method: Check whether the styles defined in section 11.2 have been made available for each specified layer.
Annex B: Use case - (informative)
This annex describes the use cases related to Geology, Hydrogeology & Geophysics that were used as a basis for the development of this data specification. Geological information is mainly collected or produced to be used by other thematic domains (geo-hazard assessment, ensuring safe disposal of wastes, providing construction material etc.) as described in the document "Examples of use".
The following use cases are described:
UC01: Providing geological data to detect geo-hazards
UC02: Providing geological data to ensure safe disposal of waste
UC03: Providing geological data to detect ground instability in a flat area
UC04: Looking for deep fractured zones in the basement (Geothermal exploration)
UC05: Checking background radiation level changes
UC06: Providing data to undertake water balance to ensure compliance with the WFD
UC07: Groundwater reporting for WFD
UC08: Providing hydrogeological data to define significant pressure
UC09: Providing data to assess Corrosivity to Underground Assets
UC10: Providing data to plan tunneling operations safely and effectively
B.1. UC01: Providing geological data to detect geo-hazards
This use case is related to example of use:
-
GE-02: Detecting geo-hazards.
Overview and involved actors
This use case is a part of a more general use case which provides risk maps in a process that involves many other data than geological data (like meteorological data, elements at risk, …) in the disaster management cycle.
The goal of this use case is therefore to deliver geological data to the engineer responsible for establishing risk maps.
Actors:
-
Geological surveys to provide geological information (Geological Surveys represent the Member States)
-
Engineers responsible for establishing risk maps using the geological information in combination with other data.
Narrative description
The hazard is often defined as the probability of occurrence of a potentially damaging phenomenon within a given area and a given period of time. To define this probability the engineer has to access data describing the physical, chemical, mechanical properties of rocks.
Detailed description
Use case description | |
---|---|
Name |
Providing geological data to detect geo-hazards |
Priority |
High |
Description |
The user selects the relevant geographic area and search for geological data: geological map, borehole data, and geotechnical data. |
Pre-condition |
Geological data are available in line with INSPIRE specifications. A specific vocabulary related to the user requirements is available with a "mapping" between geological terms and user’s terms (done by the data provider?). |
Flow of events – Basic path |
|
Step 1 |
The user selects on a geo-portal the area of interest and search in a metadata catalogue for geological maps with lithological and structural information. |
Step 2 |
The user displays the geological map and accesses detailed information about the geologic units (lithology) and structures (existing faults) |
Step 3 |
The user searches in a metadata catalogue for borehole data with information about geologic unit thickness and depth, water level, physical and chemical properties |
Step 4 |
The user accesses the borehole data to get the values of the properties. |
Step 5 |
The user searches in a metadata catalogue for geotechnical data related to the area (existing measurements), or geotechnical properties related to the lithology in general. |
Step 6 |
The user accesses the geotechnical data to get the values of the properties. |
Flow of events – Alternative path |
|
Post-conditions |
|
Post-condition |
The user has a set of geological data related to the selected area. |
*Data source: INSPIRE-conformant Geology data set provided by Member Sate * |
|
Description |
Geological data from national sources. |
Data provider |
Each Member State |
Geographic scope |
All EU Member States, with appropriate cross border cooperation where necessary |
Thematic scope |
Geology |
Scale, resolution |
Scale relevant to the application (tbd) |
Delivery |
INSPIRE Geology GML Application schema |
Documentation |
INSPIRE Geology Data Specification |
Requirements from the use case
Analyzing the use case, there is a need to provide the following objects and attributes:
Geological units with:
-
their related polygons
-
lithology
Geologic structures (faults) with:
-
their related lines
-
attribute: active or non-active
Borehole data with:
-
geologic unit thickness and depth
-
water level
-
any other properties (physical and chemical) measured
Geotechnical data with:
-
data related to the geologic units (from measurements: porosity, …)
-
or values related to the rock types in general
Relationship with other INSPIRE Themes
This use case has some relationships with the following INSPIRE data themes:
-
Soils: the geotechnical properties are those of the rocks but also of the soil on a "continuous column".
-
Natural Risk Zones: Geology is a provider of information about underground to engineers who has to define the risk zones.
B.2. UC02: Providing geological data to ensure safe disposal of waste
This use case is related to example of use:
-
GE-03: Ensuring the safe disposal of wastes, Nuclear Waste, Carbon Capture and Storage.
Overview and involved actors
This use case is a part of a more general use case which provides geological data in a process that involves many other data than geological data (like population distribution, land use …) in the waste disposal management cycle. It is relevant for the disposal of many different kinds of waste in various geological environments. The goal of the use case is to deliver geological data to the authorities and companies responsible for safe disposal of waste.
Actors:
-
Geological surveys to provide geological data (Geological Surveys represent the Member States)
-
Authorities and companies responsible for safe disposal of waste using the geological data in combination with other data.
Narrative description
"Safe disposal" usually means that the waste is placed in the bedrock or in unconsolidated superficial deposits at some depth (< 2 500 meters) below the surface. Depending on the nature of the waste the actual site of disposal is either in a natural space (e.g. pore space) or in man-made space (e.g. excavation or bore hole). Examples of waste are burned nuclear fuel and carbon dioxide. Geological data is needed to build a 3D-model that is used and refined during all stages of the waste disposal process: site selection, planning, characterization, construction, and follow-up program.
Detailed description
Use case description | Name | Providing geological data to ensure safe disposal of waste | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority |
High |
Description |
The user selects the relevant geographic area and searches for geological data from the surface and underground: geological map, borehole data, groundwater data, geophysical and geochemical data. |
Pre-condition |
Geological data are available in line with INSPIRE specifications. |
Flow of events – Basic path |
|
Step 1 |
The user selects on a geo-portal the area of interest and searches in a metadata catalogue for geological maps with lithological and structural information. |
Step 2 |
The user displays the geological map and accesses detailed information about the geologic units (lithology etc) and structures (existing faults) |
Step 3 |
The user searches in a metadata catalogue for mineral resource data with information about location of known mineral deposits |
Step 4 |
The user displays the mineral resource data and accesses detailed information about the deposits |
Step 5 |
The user searches in a metadata catalogue for geophysical data with information about seismicity and survey data |
Step 6 |
The user displays the geophysical data and accesses detailed information about the geophysical expression of the rocks |
Step 7 |
The user searches in a metadata catalogue for borehole data with information about geologic unit thickness and depth, water level, physical and chemical properties, fracture properties |
Step 8 |
The user accesses the borehole data to get the values of the properties. |
Step 9 |
The user searches in a metadata catalogue for groundwater data with information about groundwater flow and groundwater chemistry |
Step 10 |
The user accesses the groundwater data to get the values of the properties. |
Flow of events – Alternative path |
|||
Post-conditions |
|||
Post-condition |
The user has a set of geological data for 3D-modelling of the selected area. |
*Data source: INSPIRE-conformant Geology data set provided by Member Sate * |
|
Description |
Geological data from national sources. |
Data provider |
Each Member State |
Geographic scope |
All EU Member States, with appropriate cross border cooperation where necessary |
Thematic scope |
Geology |
Scale, resolution |
National to local |
Delivery |
INSPIRE Geology GML Application schema |
Requirements from the use case
Analyzing the use case, there is a need to provide the following objects and attributes:
Geological units with:
-
their related spatial objects
-
lithology, mineralogical composition, chemical composition, age, contact relationships, alteration
Geologic structures (faults) with:
-
their related spatial objects
-
attribute: active or non-active
Mineral resource data
-
location of mineral deposits
Geophysical data
-
seismicity
-
survey data (magnetic, electromagnetic, gravity, elevation)
Borehole data with:
-
location of bore holes
-
geologic unit thickness and depth
-
water level
-
mineralogical and chemical composition of rocks
-
porosity, permeability, temperature, fracture pressure, capillary pressure
-
fracture frequency, fracture fillings
Groundwater data
-
location of wells
-
groundwater flow
-
groundwater chemistry
Relationship with other INSPIRE Themes
This use case some relationships with the following INSPIRE data themes.
-
Environmental monitoring facilities: Aquifer monitoring stations, seismicity networks
-
Protected sites: Groundwater protection
-
Elevation: Digital elevation models
B.3. UC03: Providing geological data to detect ground instability in a flat area
This use case is related to example of use:
-
GE-02: Detecting geo-hazards.
Overview and involved actors
This use case is a very particular case which provides risk maps in a process that involves many other data than geological data (like use of the subsurface data, elements at risk…) in the land and urban management cycle.
The goal of this use case is to deliver geological data to the responsible for land and urban planning. These data should then be merged with other related data, in order to construct a basic framework which allows classifying areas according to its hazard and risk levels. From this, further specific works, at the scale of the project, should be developed.
Actors:
-
Geological surveys to provide geological information, including hazard assessment, if available (Geological Surveys represent the Member States)
-
Mining Authorities to provide information on active and abandoned underground activities
-
Geological Surveys and/or Water Authorities to provide information on groundwater
-
Responsible for establishing risk maps using the geological information in combination with other data.
-
Land and urban planners
Narrative description
Land and urban planning need to know the ground stability for safe infrastructure development.
In flat areas, ground instabilities are mainly related to:
-
The existence of soluble lithologies in the subsurface (i.e. evaporites: gypsum or salt; carbonates…)
-
The existence of sand and gravel deposits, loess, peat, shrinking and swelling clays, and other unconsolidated materials, including artificial landfills.
-
The variations in the water table (natural and induced by artificial activities)
-
The existence of a (melting) permafrost
-
The presence of mining, gas production, subsurface infrastructures and other anthropic underground structures, both active and abandoned
-
The seismic activity
Some surface features, as are dolines, some kind of depressions, or other landforms, can be indications of ground instability.
The three first groups of data (lithologies, unconsolidated deposits and hydrogeological data) and the surface features indicating ground instability (geomorphological elements) are geological data and the rest are related data.
(The hazard is often defined as the probability of occurrence of a potentially damaging phenomenon within a given area and a given period of time. To define this probability the engineer has to access data describing the physical, chemical, mechanical properties of rocks).
Detailed description
Use case description | |
---|---|
Name |
Providing geological data to detect ground stability in a flat area |
Priority |
High |
Description |
The user views the geographic work area and search for geological data (geological map, borehole data, geotechnical data) and other related data (presence of mining, gas production, subsurface infrastructures and other anthropic underground activities, both active and abandoned; presence of permafrost; seismological zoning) |
Pre-condition |
Geological and the other related data are available in line with INSPIRE specifications. A specific vocabulary related to the user requirements is available with a "mapping" between geological terms and user’s terms (done by the data provider). |
Flow of events – Basic path |
|
Step 1 |
The user selects on a geo-portal the area of interest and search in a metadata catalogue for geological maps with lithological, structural and geomorphological information. |
Step 2 |
The user displays the geological map and accesses detailed information about the geologic units (rock type, including unconsolidated natural materials and anthropogenic deposits or landfills), the landforms (indices of collapse structures), hydrogeological (watertable) and tectonic structures (existing faults) |
Step 3 |
The user searches in a metadata catalogue for borehole data with information about geologic unit thickness and depth (including artificial landfills), water level, physical and chemical properties |
Step 4 |
The user accesses the borehole data to get the values of the properties. |
Step 5 |
The user searches in a metadata catalogue for geotechnical data related to the area (existing measurements), or geotechnical properties related to the materials in general. |
Step 6 |
The user accesses the geotechnical data to get the values of the properties. |
Step 7 |
The user downloads all the selected information to his computer and makes a specific map of the work area |
Flow of events – Alternative path |
|
Post-conditions |
|
Post-condition 1 |
The user has a set of geological data related to the selected area (a specific geological map). |
Post-condition 2 |
The same user (or a different user involved in the land and urban management) merges the geological information with the other related data and constructs a map which will be the basis for further specific, on site works, at the scale of the project. |
Data source: INSPIRE-conformant Geology and other related data set provided by Member Sate |
|
Description |
Geological and other related data from national sources. |
Data provider |
Each Member State |
Geographic scope |
All EU Member States, with appropriate cross border cooperation where necessary |
Thematic scope |
Geology |
Scale, resolution |
Scale relevant to the application (tbd) |
Delivery |
INSPIRE Geology GML Application schema |
Documentation |
INSPIRE Geology Data Specification |
Requirements from the use case
Analyzing the use case, there is a need to provide the following objects and attributes:
Geological units, including artificial unconsolidated deposits, with:
-
their related polygons
-
lithology
Geologic structures (contacts (primary = original, and secondary = mechanical: faults) with:
-
their related lines
-
their related indications of dip and dip direction
-
landforms (collapse structures, dolines)
-
attribute: active or non-active
Borehole data with:
-
geologic unit thickness and depth
-
water level
-
any other properties (physical and chemical) measured
Geotechnical data with:
-
data related to the geological units (from measurements: porosity, …)
-
or values related to the rock types in general
Relationship with other INSPIRE Themes
This use case has some relationships with the following INSPIRE data themes:
-
Soils: the geotechnical properties are those of the rocks but also of the soil on a "continuous column".
-
Natural Risk Zones: Geology is a provider of information about underground to engineers who have to define the risk zones.
-
Energy
-
Several aspects from Annex I
B.4. UC04: Looking for deep fractured zones in the basement (Geothermal exploration)
This use case is related to example of use:
-
GE-12: Use of geophysics.
Overview and involved actors
This use case is part of a more general use case of providing access to public geophysical information for users interested in mineral or geothermal exploration.
The goal of this use case is to demonstrate the interoperability between geological, borehole and geophysical data services.
Actors:
-
Geological surveys to provide geological information
-
Geophysicists responsible for establishing
-
Geothermal exploration company (user)
Narrative description
In order to find an optimum location for a geothermal drilling the user is looking for data resources related to deep fractured zones in a specific geological unit. Borehole locations are identified in a GIS search and then a specific borehole is selected. From the list of geological units crossed by the borehole the one related to the carboniferous basement is selected and the related observations are examined. From the observation results a geophysical resistivity cross section is selected. If it is freely available the user can download the online resource, otherwise the distributor is contacted and the data is purchased.
Detailed description
Use case description | |
---|---|
Name |
Looking for deep fractured zones in the basement |
Priority |
High |
Description |
|
Pre-condition |
Geological data are available in line with INSPIRE specifications. |
Flow of events – Basic path |
|
Step 1 |
The user selects „borehole" from the catalogue of available features on the geoportal. |
Step 2 |
Starts a BBOX search for boreholes in the target area |
Step 3 |
Locates a borehole and opens it |
Step 4 |
Identifies a geologicUnit from the list of features of interest and opens it. (basement) |
Step 5 |
Selects a physical property (conductivity) of the geologicalUnit and opens the list of related observations |
Step 6 |
The results of the selected observation is a geophysical model (2D MT conductivity profile showing the resistivity variations of the basement) |
Step 7 |
The user opens the coverage in a 3D viewer |
Flow of events – Alternative path |
|
Step 7 |
The user checks the distribution metadata of the model and finds the link to the data provider |
Step 8 |
Data provider is contacted and the results are purchased |
Post-conditions |
|
Post-condition |
|
Data source: INSPIRE-conformant Geology data set provided by Member Sate |
|
Description |
Geological data from national sources. |
Data provider |
Each Member State |
Geographic scope |
All EU Member States, with appropriate cross border cooperation where necessary |
Thematic scope |
Geology |
Scale, resolution |
Scale relevant to the application (tbd) |
Delivery |
INSPIRE Geology GML Application schema |
Documentation |
INSPIRE Geology Data Specification |
Requirements from the use case
Analyzing the use case, there is a need to provide the following objects and attributes:
Borehole data with:
-
geologic unit thickness and depth
-
water level
-
any other properties (physical and chemical) measured
Geological units crossed by the borehole with:
-
their physical properties (conductivity) and related observations
Geophysical objects:
-
geophysical method type, location, distribution metadata
-
geophysical cross section, online resource, distribution metadata
Relationship with other INSPIRE Themes
This use case has some relationships with the following INSPIRE data themes:
-
Mineral resources – for exploration
-
Energy resources – for the Geothermal potential
B.5. UC05: Checking background radiation level changes
This use case is related to example of use:
-
GE-12: Use of geophysics.
Overview and involved actors
This use case is part of a more general use case of providing access to public geophysical information for users interested in the physical state of environment and the impact of industrial contaminations.
The goal of this use case is to demonstrate the importance of access to geophysical monitoring data in order to locate large areas affected by possible radioactive contamination.
Actors:
-
Environment agency (user)
-
Geophysicists responsible for establishing
Narrative description
After a nuclear power plant accident an environment agency analyses the impact of the possible radioactive contamination and collects information on the changes of background radiation intensity. The INSPIRE geoportal is used to locate airborne geophysical surveys that acquired total gamma radiation data over large areas before and after the accident. The results are compared and the areas showing significant changes are outlined for further inversitation.
Detailed description
Use case description | |
---|---|
Name |
Checking background radiation level changes |
Priority |
High |
Description |
|
Pre-condition |
Geological data are available in line with INSPIRE specifications. |
Flow of events – Basic path |
|
Step 1 |
The user starts a BBOX search for airborne geophysical surveys carried out before the accident in the target area |
Step 2 |
The user locates a survey and checks the measured physical parameters |
Step 3 |
If the list of physical parameters include total gamma radiation the user checks the distribution metadata of the model and finds the link to the data provider |
Step 4 |
The user starts a BBOX search for airborne geophysical surveys carried out after the accident in the target area |
Step 5 |
The user locates a survey and checks the measured physical parameters |
Step 6 |
If the list of physical parameters include total gamma radiation the user checks the distribution metadata of the model and finds the link to the data provider |
Step 7 |
Data provider is contacted and the results are purchased |
Step 8 |
Radiation maps are compared and anomalous areas are selected for further investigation |
Post-conditions |
|
Post-condition |
|
Data source: INSPIRE-conformant Geology data set provided by Member Sate |
|
Description |
Geological data from national sources. |
Data provider |
Each Member State |
Geographic scope |
All EU Member States, with appropriate cross border cooperation where necessary |
Thematic scope |
Geology |
Scale, resolution |
Scale relevant to the application (tbd) |
Delivery |
INSPIRE Geology GML Application schema |
Documentation |
INSPIRE Geology Data Specification |
Requirements from the use case
Analyzing the use case, there is a need to provide the following objects and attributes:
Geophysical Survey:
-
geometry, geophysical method type (airborne geophysics), list of measured physical parameters (total gamma radiation)
-
distribution metadata
Geophysical features
From the use case there is a request for three main types of geophysical features. These are:
-
Geophysical measurement
-
Geophysical model
-
Geophysical survey
Geophysical measurement
Geophysical measurements are artifacts to study the spatial distribution of physical properties within the observed domain, most often underground geologic structures. Usually measured data itself can not be used directly in geological interpretation. It has to be analyzed by experts to create geophysical models. The availability and location of geophysical measurements, especially those collected in hydrocarbon, geothermal exploration or environmental studies are considered as information of public interest in most member states.
Geophysical model
Geophysical models are results of data processing. They represent spatial distribution of physical properties within the observed domain, typically underground geologic structures. Geophysical models can be used directly for geologic interpretation. Results are distributed either in industry standard format or as GML coverage.
Geophysical survey
Geophysical exploration surveys may include large number of measurements over large areas. The individual measurements may not be important for the user, but the existence, type, and availability of their results are essential.
Relationship with other INSPIRE Themes
This use case has some relationships with the following INSPIRE data themes:
-
Human health – for identifying areas with different level of hazard caused by increased background radiation intensity
-
Natural risk zones – to register hazardous areas with increased background radiation intensity
B.6. UC06: Providing data to undertake water balance to ensure compliance with the WFD
This use case is related to example of use:
-
AQ-01: Water supply (water abstraction).
Overview and involved actors
The goal of this use case is therefore to deliver hydrogeological data to professionals responsible for establishing whether groundwater bodies are over or under abstracted according to the WFD. Examples of the professionals include regulators such as the Environment Agency of England and Wales.
Actors:
-
Geological surveys to provide geological information (Geological Surveys represent the Member States)
-
Other hydrometric organizations to provide relevant hydrological data, e.g. rainfall
-
Professionals responsible for ensuring compliance with the WFD, e.g. regulator in each member state.
-
Professionals responsible for establishing water supply system, for local government to support water management decision process as well as individual investors.
-
Water modelers.
Narrative description
The WFD requires that a groundwater body has "good status" in that it is not over abstracted. In order to ensure that a groundwater body is not over abstracted, then a water balance needs to be undertaken. The various inputs and outputs to the system need to be quantified and the balance calculated. Importantly the proportion of abstraction compared to recharge to the aquifer has to be determined. The water balance is created for an Assessment Point (AP) for each sub-catchment.
Detailed description
Use case description | |
---|---|
Name |
Providing data to undertake water balance to ensure compliance with the WFD |
Priority |
High |
Description |
The user selects the relevant geographic area and searches for hydrogeological and hydrological data: abstraction, baseflow, springflow, rainfall, potential evaporation. |
Pre-condition |
Hydrogeological and hydrometric data are available in line with INSPIRE specifications. A specific vocabulary related to the user requirements is available with a "mapping" between hydrogeological terms and user’s terms. |
Flow of events – Basic path |
|
Step 1 |
The user selects on a geo-portal the area of interest and searches in a metadata catalogue for hydrogeological maps and other relevant hydrological data. |
Step 2 |
The user displays the hydrogeological map and accesses detailed information about the groundwater resources location (useful groundwater aquifers) and hydrogeological parameters (potential discharge of the well, drawdown) |
Step 3 |
The user searches in a metadata catalogue for relevant hydrological data. |
Step 4 |
The user accesses the hydrological data to get the values of the properties and combines them with the hydrogeological data to perform a water balance for the required AP. |
Step 5 |
The user uploads the water balance back into a portal to provide information at the AP. |
Flow of events – Alternative path |
|
Post-conditions |
|
Post-condition |
The user has a set of hydrogeological and hydrometric data related to the selected area as well as a water balance for the relevant AP. |
Data source: INSPIRE-conformant Geology data set provided by Member Sate |
|
Description |
Hydrogeological and hydrological data from national sources. |
Data provider |
Each Member State |
Geographic scope |
All EU Member States, with appropriate cross border cooperation where necessary |
Thematic scope |
Geology |
Scale, resolution |
Scale relevant to the application (tbd) |
Delivery |
INSPIRE Geology GML Application schema |
Documentation |
INSPIRE Geology Data Specification |
Requirements from the use case
Analyzing the use case, there is a need to provide the following objects and attributes:
Hydrogeological units with:
-
their related polygons
-
potential discharge
-
water table depth
-
aquifer type
-
rock lithology
Well data in relation to borehole with:
-
geologic unit thickness and depth
-
water level
-
any other properties (physical and chemical) measured
Generally to create water balance two main information are needed:
-
Recharge (rainfall, river infiltration, river vanish point)
-
Discharge – groundwater abstraction (water well, effluent stream, spring or seep)
Vanishing point, spring and seep are objects of interest in Hydrography DS (Annex I)
Relationship with other INSPIRE Themes
This use case has some relationships with the following INSPIRE data themes:
-
Hydrology: HydroPointOfInterest
-
Geology: the geologic property of an aquifer
Groundwater Unit is an object in GWML in relation to Geologic Unit in GeoSciML. Although to describe aquifer the more precise information is expected. The GWML object structure may be use as pointed at figure bellow (pink). Those object allow to define type aquifer water table (confined, unconfined).
B.7. UC07: Groundwater reporting for WFD
This use case is related to example of use:
-
AQ-05: Groundwater quality and quantity assessment.
Overview and involved actors
The implementation of the WFD requires the handling of spatial data both for the preparation of the River Basin Management Plans and for the reporting to the Commission.
Article 15 of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires Member States to provide information to the European Commission concerning the river basin management plans (RBMP). The RBMP covers, among others a general description of the characteristics of the river basin district (RBD) required under Article 5 and Annex II WFD including the mapping of the location and boundaries of groundwater bodies (GWB) (Annex VII, WFD).
Recommendation for the form and scope of spatial information deliver under the WFD and the Groundwater Directive (GWD) were presented in "Updated Guidance on Implementing the Geographical Information System (GIS) Elements of the EU Water policy".
Member States are obliged to deliver necessary data to fulfill Water Information System of Europe (WISE) managed by European Environmental Agency (EEA).
Actors:
-
Geological surveys to provide geological information (Geological Surveys represent the Member States)
-
Member States Environmental Agencies or other bodies responsible for reporting
-
European Environmental Agencies (EEA)
Narrative description
GWBs according to Article 2.12 WFD are defined as "a distinct volume of groundwater within an aquifer or aquifers". Thus GWBs are three-dimensional. For the time being it is not possible to represent WBs three-dimensionally in geographic information systems as there are, in most cases, not enough data available to develop three-dimensional models of GWBs. Thus the representation of the feature will be as two-dimensional polygons.
The spatial data concerning GWB is a basis for general maps produce:
• Map 1: Quantitative status – Identification of bodies that are at "good quantitative status" and those that are at "poor quantitative status";
• Map 2: Achievement/exceedance of standard for nitrates (value in Annex 1 of GWD or set according to paragraph 3 of Annex 1 GWD, and according to status assessment procedure in Article 4 of GWD);
• Map 3: Achievement/exceedance of standard for pesticides (combined total and individual value in Annex 1 of GWD or set according to paragraph 3 of Annex 1 GWD, and according to status assessment procedure in Article 4 of GWD);
• Map 4: Achievement/exceedance of threshold values set by Member States for other pollutants (considering in this category the list of substances as contained in Part B of Annex II of GWD and more generally any other pollutants contributing to the characterisation of groundwater bodies as being 'at risk', and according to status assessment procedure in Article 4 of GWD);
• Map 5: Trends - Identification of: (a) groundwater bodies with environmentally significant and sustained upward trends in pollutant concentrations, and (b) groundwater bodies in which trends have been reversed;
GIS data submitted by Member States will be also used to produce a WISE Reference GIS dataset of groundwater bodies by the EEA or its contracted partners.
GWBs provided by Member States will be merged into one dataset taking into account the description of the submitted GWBs (layered, depth range, aquifer type etc.) to produce a consistent dataset.
Detailed description
Use case description | |
---|---|
Name |
Providing groundwater data to WISE reporting |
Priority |
High |
Description |
The Member States are obliged to deliver Groundwater Bodies and Groundwater monitoring information to European Environment Agency (EEA) for Water Management Plans |
Pre-condition |
Hydrogeological data are available in line with INSPIRE specifications. The Reporting schema provide a framework for water related reporting(Water Framework Directive). Format of reporting sheets is defined in Water Information System for Europe (WISE) hosted by EEA |
Flow of events – Basic path |
|
Step 1 |
The user selects on a geo-portal the area of interest and search in a metadata catalogue for groundwater maps with groundwater bodies. |
Step 2 |
The user displays the groundwater map and accesses detailed information about the groundwater bodies (status) and monitoring stations (quality and quantity) |
Step 3 |
The user searches in a metadata catalogue for groundwater monitoring station data with information about aquifer unit thickness and depth, water level, physical and chemical properties |
Step 4 |
The user accesses the monitoring station data to get the values of the properties. |
Flow of events – Alternative path |
|
The user (EEA) selects on a geo-portal the area of interest and search in a metadata catalogue for groundwater maps with groundwater bodies and monitoring stations |
|
The user (EEA) displays the groundwater map and accesses detailed information about the groundwater bodies (status) and monitoring stations (quality and quantity) |
|
Post-conditions |
|
Post-condition |
The user has a set of groundwater data related to the selected area. |
Data source: INSPIRE-conformant Geology data set provided by Member Sate |
|
Description |
Groundwater data from national sources. |
Data provider |
Each Member State |
Geographic scope |
All EU Member States, with appropriate cross border cooperation where necessary |
Thematic scope |
Geology |
Scale, resolution |
Scale relevant to the application (tbd) |
Delivery |
INSPIRE Geology GML Application schema |
Documentation |
INSPIRE Geology Data Specification |
Requirements from the use case
Analyzing the use case, there is a need to provide the following objects and attributes:
The following data were requested as a minimum to be provided for each GWB (under Reporting sheet GWB1):
• Unique code;
• Name (if available);
• X co-ordinate (Longitude) of the centroid of the GWB;
• Y co-ordinate (Latitude) of the centroid of the GWB; and
• Size (surface area (m2), unique identifier for the horizon where separate overlying bodies
exist and, if possible, volume of aquifer (m3).
This was translated into the reporting schemas as follows:
In addition to the IDs assigned by Member States (MS_CD), unique IDs will be generated at EC level (EU_CD) to uniquely identify groundwater bodies in the WISE Reference GIS dataset. This is necessary to identify and visualise transboundary GWBs. With the IDs assigned by Member States only the Member State part of transboundary GWBs can be identified.
The structure of the WISE code will be defined by the data provider of the reference dataset according to the specifications given in the WISE GIS guidance document, second edition. The data provider will be the EEA or its contracted partner.
The following diagram illustrates a fictive example of MS GWB-IDs and European (WISE) GWBIDs for a transboundary groundwater body.
There is a transboundary GWB between AT and CZ. Both Member States delineate the national parts of the transboundary GWBs and assign IDs (EUGroundwaterBodyCode=ATGK1200087,CZ195). The boundaries of the GWB are harmonised at the country border and the GWBs are marked as transboundary. At EU level it will be identified which Member State parts of transboundary GWBs belong together and unique IDs for the total GWB will be assigned (ECGWB173).
To develop a more consistent picture of groundwater bodies it will be necessary to get information on aquifer types and the 3-dimensional characteristics of GWBs, as they might overlay each other.
GIS data to be reported for each groundwater body are specified in Guidance Document: Guidance for reporting under the Water Framework Directive (see Chapter 13). This data will allow the description and visualisation of GWBs and groups of GWBs. Furthermore the parameter horizon should also be characterised according to the groundwater body layer (e.g. alluvial deposit layer, "main" layer, deep horizon (cenoman), thermal or mineral water).
The definition of the parameter "horizon", which will be used in the sense of the numerical position of groundwater body layer (e.g. 1 for the first horizon from the surface, 2 for the second horizon from the surface, 3 for the third horizon from the surface, 4 for fourth and deeper horizons from the surface).
The following attributes should be reported for each GWB
-
Water body code
-
Water body name
-
Shape/GML file
-
Groundwaters: boundaries of all groundwater bodies or groups of groundwater bodies identified.
-
-
For groundwater bodies or groups of groundwater bodies, if available:
-
Layered (Y/N)
-
Average depth to groundwater body (m)
-
Average thickness of groundwater body (m)
-
Assignment to a depth range where the main part of the GWB is situated in (depth ranges: 0-20m, 20-50 m, 50-200 m, >200m)
-
Directly dependent aquatic ecosysteRBD (Y/N)
-
Directly dependent terrestrial ecosysteRBD (Y/N)
-
Geological formation – aquifer type (according to a predefined typology)
-
Type of vertical orientation of GWB (indicated by category and visualised by symbols)
-
Volume of aquifer (m3) (if possible)
-
-
Relevant point source discharges to groundwater
-
ID of significant point sources where data already available
-
Latitude and longitude of each relevant point source (if possible)
-
Type of point source (see GWPI3)
-
-
Relevant diffuse source pollution to groundwater bodies
-
WB Affected? (Y/N)
-
Type of source (see GWPI4)
-
-
Relevant abstractions from groundwater
-
WB Affected? (Y/N)
-
Latitude and longitude of each abstraction (if possible)
-
Type of abstraction (see GWPI5)
-
-
Relevant artificial recharge of groundwater
-
WB Affected? (Y/N)
-
Type of Regulation/Alteration (see GWPI6)
-
-
Significant saltwater or other intrusion
-
WB Affected? (Y/N)
-
-
Other pressures
-
WB Affected? (Y/N)
-
Type of Pressure (to be specified see GWPI8)
-
-
Impacts
-
Type of impact identified (see GWPI9)
-
-
Protected areas
-
Water body within or overlapping with a protected area (Y/N)
-
Type of protected area (provide a shape file only where information is NOT reported under any other Directive. Where information has been provided under other Directives provide the unique identifier (code) of the appropriate protected area)
-
For WISE reporting it is expected that except the GroundWater bodies the Groundwater monitoring station location will be required for reporting.
Relationship with other INSPIRE Themes
This use case has some relationships with the following INSPIRE data themes:
-
Hydrography (HY): GWB is a subset of Water Body class which is the main element in WFD directive reporting as well as base information for Water Management Plans analyzes (water balance)..
-
Area management/restriction/regulation zones and reporting units (AM): there is a important relation between GWB and water related reporting units
-
Environmental Monitoring Facilities (EF): location and characteristics of Groundwater monitoring facilities will be provided by EF specification, but the link to GW monitoring measurement method and properties is needed in Geology DS
B.8. UC08: Providing hydrogeological data to define significant pressure
This use case is related to example of use:
-
AQ-04: Protecting ecosystems dependent on groundwater
Overview and involved actors
The goal of this use case is therefore to deliver hydrogeological data to professionals responsible for biological diversity
Actors:
-
Geological surveys to provide geological information (Geological Surveys represent the Member States)
-
Professionals responsible for biological diversity.
-
Soil experts
Narrative description
Groundwater dependent ecosystems (GDE) are a diverse and important component of biological diversity. The term GDE takes into account ecosystems that use groundwater as part of survival, and can potentially include wetlands, vegetation, mound springs, river base flows, cave ecosystems, playa lakes and saline discharges, springs, mangroves, river pools, billabongs and hanging swamps. The groundwater dependence of ecosystems will range from complete reliance to those that partially rely on groundwater, such as during droughts. The degree and nature of dependency will influence the extent to which ecosystems are affected by changes to the groundwater system, both in quality and quantity. The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires those terrestrial ecosystems dependent on groundwater be identified and the anthropogenic pressures acting on the ecosystems analysed.
Detailed description
Use case description | |
---|---|
Name |
Managing the positive role aquifers play in supporting ecosystems |
Priority |
High |
Description |
The user selects the relevant geographic area and search for hydrogeological data: hydrogeological map (groundwater table level) and well data (geological profile) to estimate the risks associated with groundwater abstraction pressures on the condition of groundwater dependent ecological features. |
Pre-condition |
Hydrogeological data are available in line with INSPIRE specifications. A specific vocabulary related to the user requirements is available with a "mapping" between hydrogeological terms and user’s terms (done by the data provider?). |
Flow of events – Basic path |
|
Step 1 |
The user selects on a geo-portal the area of interest and search in a metadata catalogue for hydrogeological maps with groundwater bodies information. |
Step 2 |
The user displays the hydrogeological map and accesses detailed information about the groundwater bodies location, useful groundwater aquifers and hydrogeological parameters (potential discharge of the well, regional discharge pressures, drawdown) |
Step 3 |
The user searches in a metadata catalogue for well data with information about geologic unit thickness and depth, water level changes, groundwater quality (physical and chemical properties) |
Step 4 |
The user accesses the well data to get the values of the properties. |
Flow of events – Alternative path |
|
Post-conditions |
|
Post-condition |
The user has a set of hydrogeological data related to the selected area and is able to analyse data to provide information for decision makers. |
Data source: INSPIRE-conformant Geology data set provided by Member Sate |
|
Description |
Hydrogeological data from national sources. |
Data provider |
Each Member State |
Geographic scope |
All EU Member States, with appropriate cross border cooperation where necessary |
Thematic scope |
Geology |
Scale, resolution |
Scale relevant to the application (tbd) |
Delivery |
INSPIRE Geology GML Application schema |
Documentation |
INSPIRE Geology Data Specification |
Requirements from the use case
Analyzing the use case, there is a need to provide the following objects and attributes:
Hydrogeological units with:
-
their related polygons
-
potential discharge
-
water table depth
-
rock lithology
The dependency of ecosystems on groundwater is based on some basic groundwater attributes :
-
flow or flux - the rate and volume of supply of groundwater;
-
level - for unconfined aquifers, the depth below surface of the water table;
-
pressure - for confined aquifers, the potentiometric head of the aquifer and its expression in groundwater discharge areas;
-
quality - the chemical quality of groundwater expressed in terms of pH, salinity and/or other potential constituents, including nutrients and contaminants.
Relationship with other INSPIRE Themes
This use case has some relationships with the following INSPIRE data themes:
-
Bio-geographical Regions, Habitats and Biotopes, Species Distribution (BR, HB, SD): existence of some ecosystems in strong plant and animal communities relations with groundwater system.
-
Geology (GE): the geologic property of an aquifer
-
Soil (SO): changing soil moisture level can cause drought
-
Sea region (SR): saline or other intrusion changing ecosystem condition
-
Land Use (LU)
B.9. UC09: Providing data to assess Corrosivity to Underground Assets
This use case is related to example of use:
-
AQ-07: Groundwater as a hazard
Overview and involved actors
The goal of this use case is therefore to deliver hydrogeological and geochemical data to professionals responsible for operating underground assets such as water pipes and building foundations to establish whether corrosion will occur and degrade the asset sufficient to cause a leakage, etc.
Actors:
-
Geological surveys to provide geological information (Geological Surveys represent the Member States)
-
Other organizations to provide relevant geochemical data, e.g. concentration of sulphates/sulphides.
-
Professionals responsible for assessing risk of corrosivity to underground assets, i.e. pipeline operators, etc.
Narrative description
Underground assets, such as iron pipes, concrete foundations are at risk from corrosion due to chemical attack from solutes found in groundwater and leached from the rock they are in contact with. To provide an understanding of areas where the potential for corrosion is greatest, then the relevant data need to be brought together and an assessment undertaken of the potential for corrosion. By combining hydrogeologcial and geochemical data then the likelihood of corrosion occurring to the underground asset can be quantified and maps produced to inform operators of these assets to be informed.
Detailed description
Use case description | |
---|---|
Name |
Providing data to assess Corrosivity to Underground Assets |
Priority |
Medium |
Description |
The user selects the relevant geographic area and searches for hydrogeological and geochemical data: depth to water table, geochemical information - sulphate/sulphides, pH, moisture content, organic carbon and resistivity. |
Pre-condition |
Hydrogeological and geochemical data are available in line with INSPIRE specifications. A specific vocabulary related to the user requirements is available with a "mapping" between hydrogeological terms and user’s terms. |
Flow of events – Basic path |
|
Step 1 |
The user selects on a geo-portal the area of interest and searches in a metadata catalogue for geological maps and other relevant hydrogeological and geochemical data. |
Step 2 |
The user displays the hydrogeological map and accesses detailed information about the groundwater system (depth to water table and moisture content), rock properties (resistivity) and geochemistry (pH, Organic Carbon and sulphate/sulphide concentration) |
Step 3 |
The user accesses the relevant data to get the values of the properties and combines them to produce potential corrosion maps for each type of asset. |
Step 4 |
The user uploads the gridded data back into a portal to provide information for the operator of the asset. |
Flow of events – Alternative path |
|
Post-conditions |
|
Post-condition |
The user has a set of hydrogeological and geochemical data related to the selected area as well as a map of potential corrosivity.. |
Data source: INSPIRE-conformant Geology data set provided by Member Sate |
|
Description |
Hydrogeological and geochemical data from national sources. |
Data provider |
Each Member State |
Geographic scope |
All EU Member States, with appropriate cross border cooperation where necessary |
Thematic scope |
Geology |
Scale, resolution |
Scale relevant to the application (tbd) |
Delivery |
INSPIRE Geology GML Application schema |
Documentation |
INSPIRE Geology Data Specification |
Requirements from the use case
Analyzing the use case, there is a need to provide the following objects and attributes:
Hydrogeological units with:
-
their related polygons
-
water table depth
-
rock lithology
Unsaturated zone data:
-
moisture content
Geochemical data:
-
pH
-
Sulphate/sulphide concentration
Geophysical data:
-
Resistivity of the rocks
Relationship with other INSPIRE Themes
This use case has some relationships with the following INSPIRE data themes:
-
Soils: moisture content:
-
Geology: the geologic property of an aquifer
To understand corrosivity, it is important to quantify groundwater flow and solute transport, therefore data for groundwater quantity and quality need to be available.
The majority of groundwater measurements are undertaken at a well, therefore the WaterWell feature type needs to be included.
B.10. UC10: Providing data to plan tunneling operations safely and effectively
This use case is related to example of use:
-
AQ-07: Groundwater as a hazard
Overview and involved actors
The goal of this use case is therefore to deliver hydrogeological data to professionals responsible for tunneling operations.
Actors:
-
Geological surveys to provide geological information (Geological Surveys represent the Member States)
-
Other organizations to provide relevant hydrogoelogical data, e.g. groundwater level.
-
Professionals responsible for planning and undertaking tunneling operations.
Narrative description
Tunneling is an activity that required suitable knowledge of the geological and hydrogeological conditions to be undertaken safely and cost effectively. Knowledge of the ground conditions that are likely to be encountered is very important to ensure that the correct tunnel boring techniques are used and that the operations are conducted in a safe a way as possible. Understanding of the saturation of the deposits being tunnelled through is equally important to ensure the safe undertaking of underground working. Therefore, building a 3D understanding of the geology combined with the variation of groundwater heads is important in planning any tunneling operation.
Detailed description
Use case description | |
---|---|
Name |
Providing data to plan tunneling operations safely and effectively |
Priority |
Medium |
Description |
The user selects the relevant geographic area and searches for geological and hydrogeological data. The geological data will be used to construct a 3D model |
Pre-condition |
Geological and hydrogeological data are available in line with INSPIRE specifications. A specific vocabulary related to the user requirements is available with a "mapping" between hydrogeological terms and user’s terms. |
Flow of events – Basic path |
|
Step 1 |
The user selects on a geo-portal the area of interest and searches in a metadata catalogue for geological maps and other relevant hydrogeological data. |
Step 2 |
The user accesses a DTM, borehole data and other relevant data to produce a 3D geological model. |
Step 3 |
The user displays the hydrogeological map and accesses detailed information about the groundwater system (water table and moisture content). |
Step 4 |
The user accesses the relevant data to get the values of the properties and combines them with the 3D geolgocial model to produce the required understanding of rock properties and moisture content to plan the tunneling activities. |
Step 5 |
The user uploads the 3D geological model with groundwater data back into a portal to provide information for the tunneling organisation. |
Flow of events – Alternative path |
|
Post-conditions |
|
Post-condition |
The user has a 3D geological model and a set of hydrogeological data related to the selected area. The can be combined to produce a 4D understanding of groundwater flow. |
Data source: INSPIRE-conformant Geology data set provided by Member Sate |
|
Description |
Hydrogeological and geochemical data from national sources. |
Data provider |
Each Member State |
Geographic scope |
All EU Member States, with appropriate cross border cooperation where necessary |
Thematic scope |
Geology |
Scale, resolution |
Scale relevant to the application (tbd) |
Delivery |
INSPIRE Geology GML Application schema |
Documentation |
INSPIRE Geology Data Specification |
Requirements from the use case
Analyzing the use case, there is a need to provide the following objects and attributes:
Topographic data:
-
DTM
Geological data:
-
borehole logs
-
2D maps
-
previously created cross sections
-
physical and mechanical properties of geological units
-
rock mass classification
Hydrogeological units with:
-
their related polygons
-
water table depth
-
rock lithology
Unsaturated zone data:
-
moisture content
Relationship with other INSPIRE Themes
This use case has some relationships with the following INSPIRE data themes:
-
Soils: moisture content:
-
Elevation: DTM
-
Geology: the geologic property of an aquifer
To understand water movement around any underground structure, it is important to quantify groundwater flow, therefore data for groundwater quantity need to be available.
The majority of groundwater measurements are undertaken at a well, therefore the WaterWell feature type needs to be included.
Annex C: Code list values - (normative)
INSPIRE Application Schema 'Geology'
Code List |
---|
AnthropogenicGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue |
BoreholePurposeValue |
CollectionTypeValue |
CompositionPartRoleValue |
EventEnvironmentValue |
EventProcessValue |
FaultTypeValue |
FoldProfileTypeValue |
GeochronologicEraValue |
GeologicUnitTypeValue |
GeomorphologicActivityValue |
LithologyValue |
MappingFrameValue |
NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue |
AnthropogenicGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue
|
BoreholePurposeValue
|
CollectionTypeValue
|
CompositionPartRoleValue
|
EventEnvironmentValue
|
EventProcessValue
|
FaultTypeValue
|
FoldProfileTypeValue
|
GeochronologicEraValue
|
GeologicUnitTypeValue
|
GeomorphologicActivityValue
|
LithologyValue
|
MappingFrameValue
|
NaturalGeomorphologicFeatureTypeValue
|
INSPIRE Application Schema 'Hydrogeology'
Code List |
---|
ActiveWellTypeValue |
AquiferMediaTypeValue |
AquiferTypeValue |
ConditionOfGroundwaterValue |
HydroGeochemicalRockTypeValue |
NaturalObjectTypeValue |
StatusCodeTypeValue |
WaterPersistenceValue |
WaterSalinityValue |
ActiveWellTypeValue
|
AquiferMediaTypeValue
|
AquiferTypeValue
|
ConditionOfGroundwaterValue
|
HydroGeochemicalRockTypeValue
|
NaturalObjectTypeValue
|
StatusCodeTypeValue
|
WaterPersistenceValue
|
WaterSalinityValue
|
INSPIRE Application Schema 'Geophysics'
Code List |
---|
CampaignTypeValue |
NetworkNameValue |
PlatformTypeValue |
ProfileTypeValue |
StationRankValue |
StationTypeValue |
SurveyTypeValue |
SwathTypeValue |
CampaignTypeValue
|
NetworkNameValue
|
PlatformTypeValue
|
ProfileTypeValue
|
StationRankValue
|
StationTypeValue
|
SurveyTypeValue
|
SwathTypeValue
|
Annex D: Data model extensions - (informative)
D.1. Introduction
The INSPIRE Geology and Geophysics models are both simple and designed to enable harmonised INSPIRE services. However for many use cases a wider range of more detailed geoscientific information might be required.
D.2. Use of GeoSciML
GeoSciML is a model for the exchange of detailed geoscience information which has been developed by the international geosciences community, in particular Geological Survey Organisations (http://www.geosciml.org/) and now approved as a global OGC application schema standard (http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/geosciml). GeoSciML version 3.1 was the starting point in developing the INSPIRE GE model and has heavily influenced its design. However full GeoSciML has much broader scope than is required for INSPIRE so the INSPIRE GE model has been developed through a simplification of the required parts of GeoSciML, while aiming to retain the same overall design pattern and key features. The new OGC GeoSciML 4.1 “Basic” module schema has been designed just to fulfill the INSPIRE requirements allowing access to any desired truly extended schemas from the Extension schemas separate from Basic (as with many other INSPIRE theme extended models). The detailed mapping between both models is described in the document: GeoSciML 4.1 Encoding Cookbook for OneGeology and INSPIRE andis available at http://www.onegeology.org/docs/technical/GeoSciML_Cookbook_1.3.pdf.
D.3. Data model extension for Geophysics
D.3.1. Narrative description and UML overview
The core application schema is limited to successfully serve the complex use cases. When the request for data provisioning exceeds the limits of the Geophysics application schema the extension model can be used. It allows data providers to publish many types of geophysical measurements and results with sufficient detail to fulfil the user requirements documented in the use cases. The most significant difference between the core and extension models is that the extension model introduces additional elements to share observation results in a harmonized way. This is done through the ISO 19156 Observations and Measurements (O&M) standard and specialized observation classes from the INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model. For the sake of simplicity the GeophysicsExtension application schema defines only a few additional observation classes that are specific to geophysical measurements and models. It is mainly left to the data provider to decide how the standard is used. However by providing controlled dictionaries and best practice examples the guidance tries to help in achieving maximum level of interoperability.
Spatial object Type - Project
The extension model provides an additional class to model geophysical Projects. Together with the Campaign class of the core model these two can be used for a more detailed description of the geophysical dataset hierarchy. In practice geophysical surveys are often organised into campaigns and projects. A large exploration project may contain several campaigns. e.g.: A big project is started with an airborne measurement campaign. After identifying the main target area a seismic campaign with several seismic lines is carried out. Meanwhile in certain areas where expensive seismic is not feasible magnetotelluric measurements are completed. Each campaign is carried out by different companies, and produce different maps, reports and datasets. The whole activity is controlled by one responsible party, the principal investigator. To model such complex hierarchies the core Campaign and the extension Project feature types can be used.
Figure 18 – UML class diagram: Project
Campaign is geophysical activity extending over a limited time range and limited area for producing geophysical measurements, processing results or models. Campaigns can be considered as parents of geophysical measurements or models. Children geophysical objects may refer to their parent campaign through the largerWork attribute.
Project is geophysical activity extending over a longer time period and larger area, containing any number of campaigns or subprojects. In the hierarchy of geophysical data sets projects are parents of geophysical campaigns, and usually cover whole exploration programs. Project has one added voidable attributes:
-
principalInvestigator: Key party responsible for conducting research
In many cases it is useful to link observation results to collections, rather than to individual geophysical objects. (e.g. a gravity map can be associated with a gravity survey and not with a single station) Both Campaign and Project are subtypes of SF_SpatialSamplingFeature, so it can be done by using the O&M standard. While it sounds quite natural to link observations to Campaigns, it is not very likely that any kind of observation is going to be linked to a Project. Even in this case at least a shape for bounding geometry shall be provided.
GenericGeophMeasurement
The list of geophysical methods in the GeopysicsCore application schema is very limited. This class was added to GeophysicsExtension as a generic container for geophysical methods that do not fit in the core measurement types (station, profile, swath). This class adds one attribute to the supertype GeophMeasurement
-
measurementType: Value must be one of the items listed in the OtherMeasurementTypeValue codelist. This codellist is expected to be extended in the future.
Figure 19 – UML class diagram: GenericGeophMeasurement
Publishing observation data related to a geophysical measurement is optional in INSPIRE. The GeophObject class has the distributionInfo attribute that holds metadata about data access, ordering procedures, fees etc. When the data provider wants to share observation results in a more interoperable manner the use of SF_SpatialSamplingFeature properties is recommended. Guidance to encode observations is given in chapter A.3.7
Models
In the GeophysicsExtension application schema GeophModel is a geophysical object that is created as a result of data processing or interpretation, representing the distribution of physical or geophysical properties within the observed spatial domain. This definition is broader than the usual concept of model in geophysics that is rather a mathematical construction, a replacement of the reality and it can be used for forward modeling. In INSPIRE under model a geophysical product is meant that can be useful not only for geophysicists, but also for specialists of other domains. It is somewhere at the end of the processing chain. Using O&M terminology the sampledFeature association of a GeophModel always can be connected to one or more GeophMeasurements.
Apart from the ones inherited from GeophObject GeophModel has one voidable attribute:
-
relatedMeasurement: It can be used to identify related GeophMeasurement instances.
Figure 20 – UML class diagram: GeophModel
Just like measurements, geophysical models are also categorized on the basis of sampling geometry. CurveModel is a GeophModel with curve geometry. Calculated property values are referenced to a curve. Typical examples are compositLog, layerModel, seismicTimeSection.
Note 1. A 1D layerModel is represented by the trajectory perpendicular to the layer boundaries. Layer parameters are referenced to the curve section overlapping the corresponding layer. The last section of the curve ends at the depth of penetration.
CurveModel has one attribute:
-
modelType: must be a value from the CurveModelTypeValue codelist.
Constraint: shape must be GM_Curve
SurfaceGridModel is a GeophModel with surface geometry. Calculated property values are referenced to a series of grid points on the surface. Typical examples are seismicDepthSection or 2D resistivity section.
It has one attribute:
-
modelType: must be a value from the SurfaceGridModelTypeValue codelist.
Constraint: shape must be GM_Surface
SolidGridModel is a GeophModel with solid geometry. Calculated property values are referenced to a series of grid points in the solid. Typical examples are seismicVolume or 3D resistivity block.
It has one attribute:
-
modelType: must be a value from the SolidGridModelTypeValue codelist.
Constraint: shape must be GM_Solid
OtherGeophModel is a GeophModel with any geometry not listed above.
Examples: Interpreted resistivity cross section (discrete surface coverage that contains polygon patches with resistivity values assigned to them) or Gravity point source distribution (multipoint coverage).
It has one attribute:
-
modelType: must be a value from the OtherGeophModelTypeValue codelist.
How to decide between Measurement and Model?
In contrast to Geophysical measurements geophysical models represent spatial distribution of physical or geophysical properties within the observed spatial domain. Models are created by processing or interpretation and carry the characteristics of the investigated domain as a function of 1 2 or 3 spatial dimensions. It is a matter of data processing to convert measurement data from non spatial dimensions (time, frequency, electrode distance etc.) into space. As a result of this procedure the number of dimensionality increases by 1.
GeophMeasurement and GeophModel are the initial and final stage of the geophysical processing chain. However, the processing chain can be long and if the result originates from an intermediate step it is not always easy to decide which class it belongs to. Table 1. can help in the classification of a feature type.
GeophMeasurement | GeophModel |
---|---|
Data is spatially referenced outside or on the boundary of the investigated domain |
Data is spatially referenced to the internal part of the investigated domain |
Observed data is a function of some non spatial domain (propagation time, frequency, etc.) to be transformed into space by processing |
Observed data is a function of space (or space and time for monitoring.) |
Observed property is a geophysical property and not directly interpretable as property of the investigated domain. |
Observed property is a property of the investigated domain. |
Result can not be used directly for interpretation |
Result can be directly used for interpretation |
Examples:
-
SeismicLine is GeophMeasurement (field data). Observed property is seismic amplitude as a function of time, It is not the property of the investigated domain and the data is not usable for direct interpretation.
-
SeismicTimeSection is somewhere between measurement and model. It has one spatial and one non spatial domain (propagation time) to be converted into depth, but it carries information on the seismic reflectivity of the investigated domain and in practice it is often used directly for interpretation. So it is classified as a curve model.
-
SeismicDepthSection is clearly a model: a 2D spatial coverage of seismic reflectivity that is directly usable for interpretation.
Observations Result and Procedure
In the O&M schema OM_Observation has four main associations: Phenomenon, Domain, Range, and ProcessUsed (Figure 21). Phenomenon connects to the observedProperty. Domain is the observed spatial domain with the featureOfInterest at the target end. Range means the result that was acquired while examining the target. These two relates to each other like domain and range of GML coverages.
Figure 21 – UML class diagram: Observations overview (GCM)
Results contain observedProperty values characterising the featureOfInterest. ProcessUsed links to a procedure that was used to generate results. Type of result is "Any" since it may represent the value of any feature property. The procedure has the abstract OM_Process type with no properties and serves as a base class for observation processes. Using these concepts any type of observation can be fully described, and it is true for geophysical observations as well.
Geophysics has a rich history of describing observation processes and results, and strong industrial standards for data exchange. Many of the standards were developed long before O&M. However, most geophysical data resources can fit to the O&M concept and plugged into some of the above associations. The GeophysicsExtension application schema does not provide a full scale model for geophysical objects. Instead, providing a few auxiliary classes it helps to use the O&M standard as a frame for geophysical information.
Figure 22 – UML class diagram: Result and Procedure
In the INSPIRE Generic Conceptual Model OM_Process has a specialized subclass: Processes::Process. (Figure 22) It has the role of describing generic procedures that are common in practice and can be referenced from many observations that were made in the same or similar way. It has name, identifier, documentation, responsibleParty to inform the user about the nature of the procedure and the authority that maintains the record. ProcessParameters are names of important parameters that are characteristic to the procedure. A useful set of names is available in the hierarchical GeophProcessParameterNameValue codelist. In geophysical terminology process parameters can be considered as header parameters. An instance of Processes::Process contains only the names and descriptions. It is the parameter property of OM_Observation that holds the values and tell how a generic procedure was applied in a specific case. In order to assure consistency between the processParameters in the procedure and the parameters within OM_Observation, constraints should be applied.
Example: A generic process is 2D seismic data acquisition. Suitable processParameters in this case are sampling rate, sensor spacing, minimum offset, coverage, etc. An observation instance contains the values that give the user an idea about the most important conditions that influenced data production.
Codelist GeophProcessNameValue contains common names that can be used as the name attribute of Processes ::Process.
GeophResult is a container class for geophysical result files. The INSPIRE recommendation for encoding observations is to use specialized observations with proper coverage types from the Generic Conceptual Model, if appropriate. For non coverage observations the Sensor Web Enablement (SWE) schema can be used to encode results. Annex A contains several examples to demonstrate best practices and to help data providers to encode their results. Very often in geophysics data is provided in widely used industry standard format, and XML encoding is not an option. In such cases GeophResult is used to include data resources in GeophysicalObjects. The class has one attribute:
-
geophResource: Any number of geophResource items can be included in GeophResult.
GeophResource has two attributes:
-
resource: Data access is provided as CI_OnlineResource, a URL for online access, and an optional description about the resource.
-
resourceType: Type must be one of the items in the ResourceTypeValue codelist.
O&M data must contains physical and geophysical property names either as references to observed properties or embedded in the result. For such referencing items in the GeophPropertyNameValue codelist are recommended.
D.3.2. The use of O&M in the GeophysicsExtension schema
SF_SpatialSamplingFeature
Both GeophObject and GeophObjectSet are derived from SF_SpatialSamplingFeature. Direct observations do not exist in geophysics, it is always about sampling. Geophysical measurements are artefacts that are created with the only intention to realize sampling. The ultimate feature of interest is a part of the earth. The final outcome is a spatial distribution of some physical property of the observed domain, usually the result of a processing chain. Each processing step can be exactly modelled as a separate sampling feature with its' own observation, procedure, observed property and result. The output of one step is the input of the next one. In other words: the sampling feature of one step becomes the sampled feature of the next one. It means that geophysical models are also sampling features that realize sampling by mathematical procedures. The difficulty of modelling geophysical entities comes from the fact that the processing chain can be very long and the intermediate observations are often hidden or out of interest. Intermediate outputs are bundled with final results. Lots of ambiguities can be explained by this condition. As a compromise in INSPIRE the geophysical processing chain is cut into two parts. The first part is represented by GeophMeasurement, the second by GeophModel. The scope of measurement, model, and the differences are explained in chapter D.2.1. (How to decide between Measurement and Model?)
As a minimum, SF_SamplingFeature requires two properties: shape and sampledFeature. Shape is the geometry of the domain where the sampled values are referenced. SampledFeature can be any feature that is considered as the target of observation. An efficient way of binding geology and geophysics is to refer to one or more geological units. If no specific feature can be named, reference to a generic concept (e.g. http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/2.2/realmGeol.owl#Lithosphere ) can be used. Data provisioning by the GeophysicsCore application schema does not have to go any further in using O&M. An example samplingFeature representing a seismic line
<sams:SF_SpatialSamplingFeature gml:id="sf-1"/>
<sam:sampledFeature xlink:href="http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/2.2/realmGeol.owl#Lithosphere"/>
<sams:shape>
<gml:Curve gml:id="crv-1" srsDimension="2" srsName="EPSG:32700">
<gml:segments>
<gml:LineStringSegment>
<gml:pos>654583 76651</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>665473 76552</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>654563 76653</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>665453 76554</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>654543 76655</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>665433 76556</gml:pos>
</gml:LineStringSegment>
</gml:segments>
</gml:Curve>
</sams:shape>
</sams:SF_SpatialSamplingFeature>
OM_Observation
To be able to serve requirements identified in the use cases further elements provided by the O&M standard has to be used. Measurement details must be documented in one or more relatedObservation elements. Results originating from different processes must be separated in different observations. It is a matter of convention what is included in a process. A list of process types is available in the GeophProcessNameValue codelist. Example processes from the dictionary:
-
2DseismicDataAcquisition
-
2DseismicProcessing
-
airborneDataAcquisition
-
boreholeLogging
-
gravityProcessing
-
inversion
-
magneticObservation
-
timeDomainEMSounding
-
verticalElectricSounding
Associated process parameter names and category values can be found in the GeophProcessParameterNameValue hierarchical codelist. Process parameter names and allowed category values are available as narrower terms of the appropriate elements.
Example: Following the GCM Observation schema definition a process descriptor file for 2DseismicDataAcquisition would look like this:
<ompr:Process gml:id="prc1">
<ompr:documentation xlink:href="http://any.institution/geophProcess/2DseisDAQ.html"/>
<ompr:inspireld>
<base:Identifier>
<base:localId>PRC_2D_SeismicDataAcquisition</base:localId>
<base:namespace>http://any.org/process</base:namespace>
</base:Identifier>
</ompr:inspireld>
<ompr:name>2D_SeismicDataAcquisition</ompr:name>
<ompr:processParameter>
<ompr:ProcessParameter>
<ompr:description>sensor type</ompr:description>
<ompr:name codeSpace="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/2DseisDAQ_Parameter/SEN_TYPE">SEN_TYPE</ompr:name>
</ompr:ProcessParameter>
</ompr:processParameter>
<ompr:processParameter>
<ompr:ProcessParameter>
<ompr:description>sensor spacing</ompr:description>
<ompr:name codeSpace="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/2DseisDAQ_Parameter/SEN_SPACING">SEN_SPACING</ompr:name>
</ompr:ProcessParameter>
</ompr:processParameter>
<ompr:processParameter>
<ompr:ProcessParameter>
<ompr:description>reference to industry standard resource</ompr:description>
<ompr:name codeSpace="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/2DseisDAQ_Parameter/ industryStandardResource">industryStandardResource</ompr:name>
</ompr:ProcessParameter>
</ompr:processParameter>
…
…
…
<ompr:responsibleParty> <gmd:CI_ResponsibleParty> <gmd:organisationName> <gco:CharacterString>any organisation</gco:CharacterString> </gmd:organisationName> <gmd:role> <gmd:CI_RoleCode codeListValue="custodian" codeList=""/> </gmd:role> </gmd:CI_ResponsibleParty> </ompr:responsibleParty> <ompr:type>2D_SeismicDataAcquisition</ompr:type> </ompr:Process>
Any GeophProfile of type 2D seismicLine can refer to this process record in its relatedObservation element. An example OM_Observation instance for such a 2D seismic data acquisition:
<om:OM_Observation gml:id="obs-1">
<om:phenomenonTime>
<gml:TimePeriod gml:id="tp-1">
<gml:beginPosition>2000-01-01T08:00:0.0</gml:beginPosition>
<gml:endPosition>2000-01-04T08:00:0.0</gml:endPosition>
</gml:TimePeriod>
</om:phenomenonTime>
<om:resultTime>
<gml:TimeInstant gml:id="ti-02">
<gml:timePosition>2000-01-01T08:00:0.0</gml:timePosition>
</gml:TimeInstant>
</om:resultTime>
<om:procedure xlink:href="http://anyCompany/processes/2DSeismicDataAcquisition.xml"/>
<om:parameter>
<om:NamedValue>
<om:name xlink:href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/2DseisDAQ/SEN_TYPE"/>
<om:value>
<gml:Category codeSpace="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/2DseisDAQ/SEN_TYPE">geophone</gml:Category>
</om:value>
</om:NamedValue>
</om:parameter>
<om:parameter>
<om:NamedValue>
<om:name xlink:href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/2DseisDAQ/SRC_TYPE"/>
<om:value>
<gml:Category codeSpace="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/2DseisDAQ/SRC_TYPE">vibrator</gml:Category>
</om:value>
</om:NamedValue>
</om:parameter>
<om:parameter>
<om:NamedValue>
<om:name xlink:href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/2DseisDAQ/SEN_SPACING"/>
<om:value>
<gml:Quantity uom="m">5</gml:Quantity>
</om:value>
</om:NamedValue>
</om:parameter>
<om:parameter>
<om:NamedValue>
<om:name xlink:href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/2DseisDAQ/SRC_SPACING"/>
<om:value>
<gml:Quantity uom="m">50</gml:Quantity>
</om:value>
</om:NamedValue>
</om:parameter>
<om:parameter>
<om:NamedValue>
<om:name xlink:href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/2DseisDAQ/NUM_CH"/>
<om:value>
<gml:Quantity uom="m">1024</gml:Quantity>
</om:value>
</om:NamedValue>
</om:parameter>
<om:parameter>
<om:NamedValue>
<om:name xlink:href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/2DseisDAQ/industryStandardResource"/>
<om:value xsi:type="gml:ReferenceType" xlink:href="RSC_asd-123.sps"/>
</om:NamedValue>
</om:parameter>
<om:parameter>
<om:NamedValue>
<om:name xlink:href="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/2DseisDAQ/industryStandardResource"/>
<om:value xsi:type="gml:ReferenceType" xlink:href="RSC_asd-123.ukooa"/>
</om:NamedValue>
</om:parameter>
<om:observedProperty xlink:href="http://geomind.elgi.hu/skos/GeophProperty/seismics/seismicAmplitude"/>
<om:featureOfInterest xlink:href="../../.."/>
<om:result xsi:type="gml:ReferenceType" xlink:href="RSC_asd-123"/>
</om:OM_Observation>
Referencing the generic process by the xlink:href attribute makes the code compact and more readable.
<om:procedure xlink:href=" http://anyCompany/2DSeismicDataAcquisition.xml"/>
The series of <om:parameter> elements follow the definitions in the process descriptor. Category parameter values are taken from the narrower terms in the SKOS dictionary. E.g.: value of SRC_TYPE shall be one of \{vibrator, explosive, hammer, airgun}. Numeric values must be encoded as gml:Quantity elements completed with unit of measurement. For referencing Industry standard resource files the industryStandardResource parameter is used. The value of the parameter is a URL pointing to the resource itself. Seismic process descriptors like SPS and UKOOA files shall be accessed through this parameter. URL can be an entry point to a secure data service maintained by the data provider.
Note: Hierarchical code list dictionaries were constructed from GEOMIND parameter catalogues, and cover only a few of the most important geophysical methods. These dictionaries were set up for demonstration purposes to support encoding of geophysical procedures in INSPIRE documents. A full coverage of all geophysical methods can’t be the task of the INSPIRE data specification. The responsibility to improve the geophysical SKOS dictionaries will be passed to appointed organizations representing the geophysical community.
The OM_Observation instance contains important temporal information about the geophysical object, such as phenomenonTime, and resultTime. PhenomenonTime can be a time instant or a time range and refers to the time of the sampling activity. For a seismic line it is reasonable to use time range documenting the measurement start and measurement end. For a survey station measurement providing a time instant is appropriate. ResultTime rather means the time instant from when result is available.
observedProperty
Observations always focus on some property of the feature of interest. It is either a physical property of the ultimate feature of interest, or a more abstract geophysical property that is measured or simulated by the geophysical process. It can also be a composit property that is a group of properties measured together. The om:observedProperty element is used to include such information in the OM_Observation element. A list of geophysical properties is available at http://geomind.elgi.hu/skos/GeophProperty.xml. The ObservableProperty application schema in the GCM Observation package allows data providers to define complex properties with statistical measures and constraints like "total magnetic field average over 1 minute period derived from 1 second averages". Example:
<omop:ObservableProperty gml:id="op1">
<omop:basePhenomenon codeSpace="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/GeophPropertyNameValue/magneticProperty">MAG_T</omop:basePhenomenon>
<omop:uom uom="nT"/>
<omop:statisticalMeasure>
<omop:StatisticalMeasure gml:id="sm1">
<omop:derivedFrom>
<omop:StatisticalMeasure gml:id="sm2">
<omop:statisticalFunction codeSpace="http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/2.0/mathStatistics.ow">Mean</omop:statisticalFunction>
<omop:aggregationTimePeriod>PT1S</omop:aggregationTimePeriod>
</omop:StatisticalMeasure>
</omop:derivedFrom>
<omop:statisticalFunction codeSpace="http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/2.0/mathStatistics.ow">Mean</omop:statisticalFunction>
<omop:aggregationTimePeriod>PT1M</omop:aggregationTimePeriod>
</omop:StatisticalMeasure>
</omop:statisticalMeasure>
</omop:ObservableProperty>
featureOfInterest
The feature of interest (FOI) of a direct observation is the natural target that is observed (color of an apple – observedProperty is color, FOI is apple). When sampling is carried out the observations' feature of interest is the sampling feature itself. The proximate target of a seismic observation is the seismic line and not the earth. The observed property is the seismic amplitude measured on the geophones that are part of the seismic line. This is expressed by the xlink:href attribute that points back to the SF_SpatialSamplingFeature:
<om:featureOfInterest xlink:href="../../.."/>
Result
There are several ways to include geophysical results in an OM_Observation instance. In the case of coverage observations, or when results are available in XML format, inline encoding or referencing directly from the om:result element is recommended. When results are provided in non XML industry standard format, or more result files are bundled together the GeophResult element shall be used. An example seismic field data result package may look like this (pseudo XML encoding):
GeophResult
geophResource
resource
linkage ”http://any.institution/getItem?id=asd-123.1.1.segy”
description ”SEG-Y field data line-1.1”
resourceType "http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/ResourceTypeValue/seismicResource/SEG-Y "
geophResource
resource
linkage ”http://any.institution/getItem?id=asd-123.1.2.segy”
description ”SEG-Y field data line-1.2”
resourceType " http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/ResourceTypeValue/seismicResource/SEG-Y "
geophResource
resource
linkage ”http://any.institution/getItem?id=asd-123.1.3.segy”
description ”SEG-Y field data line-1.3”
resourceType " http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/ResourceTypeValue/seismicResource/SEG-Y "
Dividing data sets
When larger geophysical data sets extend over concession area boundaries, there may be a request to divide observation results into separate peaces. In such cases the use of SamplingFeatureComplex elements are recommended. Parts can be encoded in individual SF_SpatialSamplingFeature elements, and results are accessed at separate web locations with different distribution options. The main geophysical object contains the shape of the whole complex and the links to the related sampling features.
<sams:SF_SpatialSamplingFeature gml:id="sf-1"/>
<sam:sampledFeature xlink:href="http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/2.2/realmGeol.owl#Lithosphere"/>
<sam:relatedSamplingFeature>
<sam:SamplingFeatureComplex>
<sam:role xlink:href="http://geomind.elgi.hu/skos/role/part.xml"/>
<sam:relatedSamplingFeature xlink:href="part1.xml"/>
</sam:SamplingFeatureComplex>
</sam:relatedSamplingFeature>
<sam:relatedSamplingFeature>
<sam:SamplingFeatureComplex>
<sam:role xlink:href="http://geomind.elgi.hu/skos/role/part.xml"/>
<sam:relatedSamplingFeature xlink:href="part2.xml"/>
</sam:SamplingFeatureComplex>
</sam:relatedSamplingFeature>
<sams:shape>
<gml:Curve gml:id="crv-1" srsDimension="2" srsName="EPSG:32700">
<gml:segments>
<gml:LineStringSegment>
<gml:pos>654583 76651</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>665473 76552</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>654563 76653</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>665453 76554</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>654543 76655</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>665433 76556</gml:pos>
</gml:LineStringSegment>
</gml:segments>
</gml:Curve>
</sams:shape>
</sams:SF_SpatialSamplingFeature>
Using Coverages
In principle any geophysical observation result can be encoded as GML coverage. To achieve a higher level of interoperability the use of coverages is highly recommended in INSPIRE. At the same time GML and other XML based encodings are not very common in geophysics, and there are situations when it is neither practical nor possible. Though, there are several ways to efficiently bind XML and binary data, converting huge seismic data files is still not an option. In cases when data exchange is based on widely accepted international standards, the use of those standards must be supported. On the other hand, out of the hydrocarbon industry the weight of standards is not so high, in fact, the lack standards and the virulence of ad-hoc formats is typical. In such cases following the O&M standard and the coverage model is a good alternative for data exchange.
The recommendation of the INSPIRE Cross Thematic Working Group on Observations & Measurements is to use GCM specialized observations when it is possible [DS-D2.9]. The abundance of geophysical data types and the need of supporting industrial standards make the exclusive usage of coverage observations impossible. To avoid fragmentation of the data model a more generic approach seems to be more appropriate in the geophysical domain. However, in result encoding whenever it is feasible the coverage types recommended in the [DS-D2.9] document should be used. (RectifiedGridCoverage, ReferenceableGridCoverage, MultiPointCoverage, TImeSeries)
The GML coverage model supports all discrete coverage types to encode many geophysical data types (http://www.opengis.net/gmlcov/1.0 name space):
-
MultiPointCoverage
-
MultiCurveCoverage
-
MultiSurfaceCoverage
-
MultiSolidCoverage
It also provides coverage types for gridded geophysical data:
-
RectifiedGridCoverage
-
ReferenceableGridCoverage
The table below gives an overview of how results of different geophysical methods can be encoded in principle by the GML coverage model.
Coverage Type |
Geophysical Feature Type |
Subtype |
gmlcov:MultiPointCoverage |
GeophStation |
gravityStation |
gmlcov:MultiPointCoverage |
GeophStation |
magneticStation |
gmlcov:MultiPointCoverage |
Campaign |
gravityProcessingCampaign |
gmlcov:MultiCurveCoverage |
CurveModel |
layerModel |
gmlcov:MultiCurveCoverage |
CurveModel |
compositLog |
gmlcov:MultiSurfaceCoverage |
DiscreteSurfaceModel |
horizontalCrossSection |
gmlcov:MultiSurfaceCoverage |
DiscreteSurfaceModel |
verticalCrossSection |
gmlcov:MultiSolidCoverage |
DiscreteSolidModel |
bodyReconstruction |
gmlcov:RectifiedGridCoverage |
SurfaceGridModel |
horizontalParameterGrid |
gmlcov:RectifiedGridCoverage |
SolidGridModel |
seismicVolume |
gmlcov:ReferenceableGridCoverage |
SurfaceGridModel |
verticalParameterGrid |
gmlcov:ReferenceableGridCoverage |
GeophProfile |
boreholeLog |
gmlcov:ReferenceableGridCoverage |
GeophProfile |
flightLine |
TimeSeries |
GeophStation |
magneticStation (observatory,secular station) |
TimeSeries |
GeophStation |
seismologicalStation (observatory) |
Encoding GeophStation results
It seems to be reasonable not to use different encoding on the basis of the number of points included in a data set. DomainSet of a MultiPointCoverage is one or more points. In this case a station is considered a multipoint object with one single member. (For single point data CV_DiscretePointCoverage could also be used). The following example shows the encoding of gravity station measurement:
<gmlcov:MultiPointCoverage>
<gml:multiPointDomain>
<gml:MultiPoint gml:id="mp-1" srsDimension="3" srsName="EPSG:23700" axisLabels="x y z" uomLabels="m m m">
<gml:pointMember>
<gml:Point gml:id="p-1">
<gml:pos>654543 76654 123.4</gml:pos>
</gml:Point>
</gml:pointMember>
</gml:MultiPoint>
</gml:multiPointDomain>
<gml:rangeSet>
<gml:DataBlock>
<gml:rangeParameters/>
<gml:tupleList ts=" " cs="\n">751752.0 0.05</gml:tupleList>
</gml:DataBlock>
</gml:rangeSet>
<gmlcov:rangeType>
<swe:DataRecord>
<swe:field name="observedGravity">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/GeophPropertyNameValue/gravimetricProperty/observedGravity">
<swe:uom code="microGal"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
<swe:field name="errorOfClosure">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/GeophPropertyNameValue/gravimetricProperty/errorOfClosure">
<swe:uom code="microGal"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
</swe:DataRecord>
</gmlcov:rangeType>
</gmlcov:MultiPointCoverage>
Encoding processing campaign results
Multipoint coverage can be used to deliver results of point observation collections. The following example shows the results of a gravity processing campaign:
<gmlcov:MultiPointCoverage gml:id="mpc-1">
<gml:multiPointDomain>
<gml:MultiPoint gml:id="mp-1" srsDimension="2" srsName="EPSG:4326">
<gml:pointMember>
<gml:Point gml:id="stn-001">
<gml:pos>654543 76674</gml:pos>
</gml:Point>
</gml:pointMember>
<gml:pointMember>
<gml:Point gml:id="stn-002">
<gml:pos>654553 76634</gml:pos>
</gml:Point>
</gml:pointMember>
<gml:pointMember>
<gml:Point gml:id="stn-003">
<gml:pos>654573 76654</gml:pos>
</gml:Point>
</gml:pointMember>
<gml:pointMember>
<gml:Point gml:id="stn-004">
<gml:pos>654593 76624</gml:pos>
</gml:Point>
</gml:pointMember>
<gml:pointMember>
<gml:Point gml:id="stn-005">
<gml:pos>654533 76614</gml:pos>
</gml:Point>
</gml:pointMember>
</gml:MultiPoint>
</gml:multiPointDomain>
<gml:rangeSet>
<gml:DataBlock>
<gml:rangeParameters/>
<gml:tupleList cs="\n" ts=" ">stn-001 980000 980000 980000 0 0
stn-002 980000 980000 980000 0 0
stn-003 980000 980000 980000 0 0
stn-004 980000 980000 980000 0 0
stn-005 980000 980000 980000 0 0</gml:tupleList>
</gml:DataBlock>
</gml:rangeSet>
<gmlcov:rangeType>
<swe:DataRecord id="drec-1">
<swe:field name="identifier">
<swe:Text>
<swe:identifier/>
</swe:Text>
</swe:field>
<swe:field name="observedGravity">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/GeophPropertyNameValue/gravimetricProperty/observedGravity">
<swe:uom code="microGal"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
<swe:field name="gravityFreeAirAnomaly">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/GeophPropertyNameValue/gravimetricProperty/gravityFreeAirAnomaly">
<swe:uom code="microGal"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
<swe:field name="gravityBouguerAirAnomaly">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/GeophPropertyNameValue/gravimetricProperty/gravityBouguerAnomaly">
<swe:uom code="microGal"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
<swe:field name="innerTopoCorrection">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/gravityProcessParameter/topoCorrection/innerTopoCorrection">
<swe:uom code="microGal"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
<swe:field name="totalTopoCorrection">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/gravityProcessParameter/topoCorrection/totalTopoCorrection">
<swe:uom code="microGal"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
</swe:DataRecord>
</gmlcov:rangeType>
</gmlcov:MultiPointCoverage>
Encoding LayerModels
Layer model is a generic concept for representing a 1D structure. An efficient way of encoding is to use MultiCurveCoverage. Typical use cases are delivering inversion results from VES, TDEM, or MT measurements. Composit logs or borehole data can also be encoded like this. Originally GeoSciML also uses CurveCoverage to describe boreholes. Curve segments of the multi curve domain coincide with the layers. For positions a 3D coordinate system is used. The following example shows a horizontally layered earth with vertical curve segments below the station location. Range data contains resistivity and chargeability values from the inversion of a VES/IP sounding station.
<gmlcov:MultiCurveCoverage gml:id="mcc-1">
<gml:multiCurveDomain>
<gml:MultiCurve gml:id="mc-1" srsDimension="3" srsName="EPSG:23700" axisLabels="x y z" uomLabels="m m m">
<gml:curveMember>
<gml:LineString gml:id="ls-1">
<gml:pos>654543 76654 0</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>654543 76654 -1</gml:pos>
</gml:LineString>
</gml:curveMember>
<gml:curveMember>
<gml:LineString gml:id="ls-2">
<gml:pos>654543 76654 -1</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>654543 76654 -10</gml:pos>
</gml:LineString>
</gml:curveMember>
<gml:curveMember>
<gml:LineString gml:id="ls-3">
<gml:pos>654543 76654 -10</gml:pos>
<gml:pos>654543 76654 -100</gml:pos>
</gml:LineString>
</gml:curveMember>
</gml:MultiCurve>
</gml:multiCurveDomain>
<gml:rangeSet>
<gml:DataBlock>
<gml:rangeParameters/>
<gml:tupleList ts=" " cs="\n">2.1 0.1
2.2 0.2
2.3 0.3</gml:tupleList>
</gml:DataBlock>
</gml:rangeSet>
<gmlcov:rangeType>
<swe:DataRecord>
<swe:field name="resistivity">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/GeophPropertyNameValue/electromagneticProperty/resistivity">
<swe:uom code="ohmm"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
<swe:field name="chargeability">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/GeophPropertyNameValue/electromagneticProperty/chargeability">
<swe:uom code="ohmm"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
</swe:DataRecord>
</gmlcov:rangeType>
</gmlcov:MultiCurveCoverage>
Encoding VerticalParameterGrid
The following example shows a resistivity cross section encoded as ReferenceableGridCoverage. Grid geometry is defined by node locations in a 3D coordinate system. The trace of the sample profile is a straight line in SW-NE direction. Nodes are located on the surface in a vertical plain. According to the rangeType element the coverage contains resistivity values for each node.
NOTE Referenceable grids can be used for nodes with uneven spacing or to project grid data to curved surfaces (e.g.: vertical section along a meandering profile)
<gmlcov:ReferenceableGridCoverage gml:id="rgc-1">
<gml:domainSet>
<gmlrgrid:ReferenceableGridByArray gml:id="rga1" dimension="2" srsDimension="3" axisLabels="x z" uomLabels="m m">
<gml:limits>
<gml:GridEnvelope>
<gml:low>0 0</gml:low>
<gml:high>3 3</gml:high>
</gml:GridEnvelope>
</gml:limits>
<gml:axisLabels>x z</gml:axisLabels>
<gml:posList count="16">654543 76654 0
654543 76654 -1
654543 76654 -2
654543 76654 -3
654553 76664 0
654553 76664 -1
654553 76664 -2
654553 76664 -3
654563 76674 0
654563 76674 -1
654563 76674 -2
654563 76674 -3
654573 76684 0
654573 76684 -1
654573 76684 -2
654543 76684 -3</gml:posList>
<gmlrgrid:sequenceRule>Linear</gmlrgrid:sequenceRule>
</gmlrgrid:ReferenceableGridByArray>
</gml:domainSet>
<gml:rangeSet>
<gml:QuantityList uom="mV">1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0</gml:QuantityList>
</gml:rangeSet>
<gmlcov:rangeType>
<swe:DataRecord id="drec-1">
<swe:field name="resistivity">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/GeophPropertyNameValue/electromagneticProperty/resistivity">
<swe:uom code="mV"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
</swe:DataRecord>
</gmlcov:rangeType>
</gmlcov:ReferenceableGridCoverage>
Encoding HorizonalParameterGrid
The following example shows a Bouguer anomaly map encoded as RectifiedGridCoverage. Grid geometry is defined by the origin and two offset vectors in a 2D coordinate system. Grid spacing is 10 m in both directions. According to the rangeType element the coverage contains Bouguer anomaly values for each node.
<gmlcov:RectifiedGridCoverage gml:id="rgc-1">
<gml:rectifiedGridDomain>
<gml:RectifiedGrid gml:id="rg-1" dimension="2" axisLabels="x y" srsDimension="2" uomLabels="m m" srsName="EPSG:23700">
<gml:limits>
<gml:GridEnvelope>
<gml:low>0 0</gml:low>
<gml:high>3 3</gml:high>
</gml:GridEnvelope>
</gml:limits>
<gml:axisLabels>x y</gml:axisLabels>
<gml:origin>
<gml:Point gml:id="p-1">
<gml:pos>654543 76654</gml:pos>
</gml:Point>
</gml:origin>
<gml:offsetVector>10 0</gml:offsetVector>
<gml:offsetVector>0 10</gml:offsetVector>
</gml:RectifiedGrid>
</gml:rectifiedGridDomain>
<gml:rangeSet>
<gml:QuantityList uom="ohmm">1 2 3 4 2 3 4 5 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 7</gml:QuantityList>
</gml:rangeSet>
<gmlcov:rangeType>
<swe:DataRecord>
<swe:field name=" gravityBouguerAnomaly ">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/GeophPropertyNameValue/gravimetricProperty/gravityBouguerAnomaly">
<swe:uom code="ohmm"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
</swe:DataRecord>
</gmlcov:rangeType>
</gmlcov:RectifiedGridCoverage>
In practice grid coverages may contain large amount of data. XML text encoding in such cases is not practical. The [DS-D2.9] document contains recommendations on "out-of band result encoding" explaining how to include optimized binary files in the rangeSet element.
Encoding GeophStation Data as SensorML
Intermediate results like measurement data often contain non spatial coordinates (frequency, pressure, electrode distance etc.) as domain set. In such cases coverage encoding is not applicable, instead SensorML can be used. The following example illustrates the encoding of Vertical Electric Sounding data as SensorML System:
<sml:System>
<gml:description>VES Sounding Data</gml:description>
<gml:name>VES_test-0001</gml:name>
<sml:identification>
<sml:IdentifierList>
<sml:identifier>
<sml:Term>
<sml:codeSpace xlink:href="http://mfgi.hu"/>
<sml:value>VES_test-0001</sml:value>
</sml:Term>
</sml:identifier>
</sml:IdentifierList>
</sml:identification>
<sml:parameters>
<sml:ParameterList>
<sml:parameter name="ARR_TYPE">
<swe:Category definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/VES_Parameter/ARR_TYPE">
<swe:value>schlumberger</swe:value>
</swe:Category>
</sml:parameter>
<sml:parameter name="AZM">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/VES_Parameter/AZM">
<swe:uom code="deg"/>
<swe:value>45.0</swe:value>
</swe:Quantity>
</sml:parameter>
</sml:ParameterList>
</sml:parameters>
<sml:components>
<sml:ComponentList>
<sml:component name="VES_test-0001.1">
<sml:Component>
<gml:description>AB-Ro series with 0.5m MN</gml:description>
<sml:outputs>
<sml:OutputList>
<sml:output name="AB-RO_0.5">
<swe:DataArray>
<swe:elementCount>
<swe:Count>
<swe:value>5</swe:value>
</swe:Count>
</swe:elementCount>
<swe:elementType name="ABMN-AppRes record">
<swe:DataRecord>
<swe:field name="AB">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/VES_Parameter/AB_DIST">
<swe:uom code="m"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
<swe:field name="MN">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/VES_Parameter/MN_DIST">
<swe:uom code="m"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
<swe:field name="APP_RES">
<swe:Quantity definition="http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/GeophProcessParameterNameValue/VES_Parameter/APP_RES">
<swe:uom code="ohmm"/>
</swe:Quantity>
</swe:field>
</swe:DataRecord>
</swe:elementType>
<swe:encoding>
<swe:TextBlock decimalSeparator="." blockSeparator="\n" tokenSeparator=","/>
</swe:encoding>
<swe:values>
3.2,0.5,123.4
6.4,0.5,122.3
8.0,0.5,121.1
12.8,0.5,120,.0
16.0,0.5,119.8
</swe:values>
</swe:DataArray>
</sml:output>
</sml:OutputList>
</sml:outputs>
</sml:Component>
</sml:component>
</sml:ComponentList>
</sml:components>
</sml:System>
NOTE In principle gml allows the definition of non spatial coordinate systems and so with proper CRS referencing frequency, pressure or instrumental time axis can also be used in coverages for encoding "location". This would also solve the problem of handling seismic time sections (SamplingCurve) and depth sections (SamplingSurface) in a different way that may seem weird for seismic experts. However, until such definitions are not available using SensorML is considered to be best practice.
D.3.3. Feature catalogue
Feature catalogue metadata
Application Schema |
INSPIRE Application Schema GeophysicsExtension |
Version number |
3.0 |
Types defined in the feature catalogue
Type | Package | Stereotypes |
---|---|---|
CurveModel |
GeophysicsExtension |
«featureType» |
CurveModelTypeValue |
GeophysicsExtension |
«codeList» |
GeophModel |
GeophysicsExtension |
«featureType» |
GeophProcessNameValue |
GeophysicsExtension |
«codeList» |
GeophProcessParameterNameValue |
GeophysicsExtension |
«codeList» |
GeophPropertyNameValue |
GeophysicsExtension |
«codeList» |
GeophResource |
GeophysicsExtension |
«dataType» |
GeophResult |
GeophysicsExtension |
«dataType» |
OtherGeophMeasurement |
GeophysicsExtension |
«featureType» |
OtherGeophModel |
GeophysicsExtension |
«featureType» |
OtherGeophModelTypeValue |
GeophysicsExtension |
«codeList» |
OtherMeasurementTypeValue |
GeophysicsExtension |
«codeList» |
Project |
GeophysicsExtension |
«featureType» |
ResourceTypeValue |
GeophysicsExtension |
«codeList» |
SolidGridModel |
GeophysicsExtension |
«featureType» |
SolidGridModelTypeValue |
GeophysicsExtension |
«codeList» |
SurfaceGridModel |
GeophysicsExtension |
«featureType» |
SurfaceGridModelTypeValue |
GeophysicsExtension |
«codeList» |
D.3.3.1. Spatial object types
D.3.3.1.1. CurveModel
CurveModel | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: modelType
|
||||||||
Constraint: shape must be GM_Curve
|
D.3.3.1.2. GeophModel
GeophModel | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: relatedMeasurement
|
D.3.3.1.3. OtherGeophMeasurement
OtherGeophMeasurement | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: measurementType
|
||||||||
Constraint: shape must be conformant with the spatial sampling geometry
|
D.3.3.1.4. OtherGeophModel
OtherGeophModel | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: modelType
|
D.3.3.1.5. Project
Project | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: principalInvestigator
|
D.3.3.1.6. SolidGridModel
SolidGridModel | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: modelType
|
||||||||
Constraint: shape must be GM_Solid
|
D.3.3.1.7. SurfaceGridModel
SurfaceGridModel | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: modelType
|
||||||||
Constraint: shape must be GM_Surface
|
D.3.3.2. Data types
D.3.3.2.1. GeophResource
GeophResource | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||
Attribute: resource
|
||||||||||
Attribute: resourceType
|
D.3.3.2.2. GeophResult
GeophResult | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Attribute: geophResource
|
D.3.3.3. Code lists
D.3.3.3.1. CurveModelTypeValue
CurveModelTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.3.2. GeophProcessNameValue
GeophProcessNameValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.3.3. GeophProcessParameterNameValue
GeophProcessParameterNameValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.3.4. GeophPropertyNameValue
GeophPropertyNameValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.3.5. OtherGeophModelTypeValue
OtherGeophModelTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.3.6. OtherMeasurementTypeValue
OtherMeasurementTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.3.7. ResourceTypeValue
ResourceTypeValue | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.3.8. SolidGridModelTypeValue
SolidGridModelTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.3.9. SurfaceGridModelTypeValue
SurfaceGridModelTypeValue | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.4. Imported types (informative)
This section lists definitions for feature types, data types and code lists that are defined in other application schemas. The section is purely informative and should help the reader understand the feature catalogue presented in the previous sections. For the normative documentation of these types, see the given references.
D.3.3.4.1. CI_OnlineResource
CI_OnlineResource | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.4.2. CI_ResponsibleParty
CI_ResponsibleParty | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.4.3. GeophMeasurement
GeophMeasurement (abstract) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.4.4. GeophObject
GeophObject (abstract) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.4.5. GeophObjectSet
GeophObjectSet | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.3.4.6. Identifier
Identifier | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
D.3.4. GeophysicsExtension - Code Lists
INSPIRE Application Schema 'GeophysicsExtension'
Code List |
---|
CurveModelTypeValue |
GeophProcessNameValue |
GeophProcessParameterNameValue |
GeophPropertyNameValue |
OtherGeophModelTypeValue |
OtherMeasurementTypeValue |
ResourceTypeValue |
SolidGridModelTypeValue |
SurfaceGridModelTypeValue |
CurveModelTypeValue
|
compositLog
|
||||
layerModel
|
||||
seismicTimeSection
|
GeophProcessNameValue
|
VES
|
||||
TDEMSounding
|
||||
boreholeLogging
|
||||
MT_Sounding
|
||||
MT_Processing
|
||||
MT_Preprocessing
|
||||
2D_MT_Inversion
|
||||
3D_MT_Inversion
|
||||
2DseismicDataAcquisition
|
||||
3DseismicDataAcquisition
|
||||
airborneDataAcquisition
|
||||
2DseismicProcessing
|
||||
staticCorrection
|
||||
velocityAnalysis
|
||||
timeStacking
|
||||
timeMigration
|
||||
depthMigration
|
||||
depthConversion
|
||||
3DseismicProcessing
|
||||
inversion
|
||||
gravityObservation
|
||||
gravityProcessing
|
||||
normalCorrection
|
||||
heightCorrection
|
||||
topoCorrection
|
||||
bouguerCorrection
|
||||
magneticObservation
|
||||
magneticFieldMonitoring
|
||||
earthquakeObservation
|
||||
ambientNoiseObservation
|
||||
magneticProcessing
|
||||
normalCorrection
|
GeophProcessParameterNameValue
|
VES_Parameter
|
||||||||
VES_ARR_TYPE
|
||||||||
schlumberger
|
||||||||
wenner
|
||||||||
AB_MIN
|
||||||||
AB_MAX
|
||||||||
AZM
|
||||||||
AB_DIST
|
||||||||
MN_DIST
|
||||||||
TDEM_ProcessParameter
|
||||||||
TDEM_ARR_TYPE
|
||||||||
CIL
|
||||||||
singleLoop
|
||||||||
offset
|
||||||||
AZM
|
||||||||
LOOP_SZ_MIN
|
||||||||
LOOP_SZ_MAX
|
||||||||
TX_CURR
|
||||||||
TM_OFFS
|
||||||||
TOFF_TM
|
||||||||
TON_TM
|
||||||||
RX_DELAY
|
||||||||
BASE_FREQ
|
||||||||
LOOP_SZ_X
|
||||||||
LOOP_SZ_Y
|
||||||||
NUM_OF_TURNS
|
||||||||
CURR_WAVE_FORM
|
||||||||
rectangularBipolar
|
||||||||
rectangularBipolar
|
||||||||
RX_COIL_AREA
|
||||||||
boreholeLoggingParameter
|
||||||||
WELL_ID
|
||||||||
WELL_BTM
|
||||||||
DPTH_MIN
|
||||||||
DPTH_MAX
|
||||||||
LOG_TYPE
|
||||||||
industryStandardResource
|
||||||||
WTR_LEV
|
||||||||
DREF
|
||||||||
STRT
|
||||||||
STOP
|
||||||||
STEP
|
||||||||
X
|
||||||||
Y
|
||||||||
LATI
|
||||||||
LONG
|
||||||||
RUN_DEPTH
|
||||||||
NMAT_DEPTH
|
||||||||
DMAT_DEPTH
|
||||||||
SMAT_DEPTH
|
||||||||
DIST
|
||||||||
HRS
|
||||||||
TBR
|
||||||||
I_RF
|
||||||||
I_DC
|
||||||||
I_KO
|
||||||||
I_ONS
|
||||||||
I_OEW
|
||||||||
CLSR
|
||||||||
TIEMD
|
||||||||
TIETVD
|
||||||||
TIEDEV
|
||||||||
TSTT
|
||||||||
TSTB
|
||||||||
ISIP
|
||||||||
FSIP
|
||||||||
RATE
|
||||||||
RUN
|
||||||||
RUNS
|
||||||||
TSTN
|
||||||||
BS
|
||||||||
WRAP
|
||||||||
NULL
|
||||||||
COMP
|
||||||||
WELL
|
||||||||
FLD
|
||||||||
LOC
|
||||||||
STAT
|
||||||||
PROV
|
||||||||
CTRY
|
||||||||
CNTY
|
||||||||
UWI
|
||||||||
LIC
|
||||||||
SRVC
|
||||||||
DATE
|
||||||||
GDAT
|
||||||||
HZCS
|
||||||||
C_SRS
|
||||||||
C_TY
|
||||||||
C_DATE
|
||||||||
C_FM
|
||||||||
C_AC
|
||||||||
C_AD
|
||||||||
CDES
|
||||||||
RIG
|
||||||||
CONTR
|
||||||||
I_DT
|
||||||||
I_CO
|
||||||||
I_AT
|
||||||||
I_GD
|
||||||||
I_CP
|
||||||||
I_CS
|
||||||||
TOPN
|
||||||||
TOPSRC
|
||||||||
TOPDR
|
||||||||
DDES
|
||||||||
BLOWD
|
||||||||
TESTT
|
||||||||
LMF
|
||||||||
API
|
||||||||
APD
|
||||||||
EREF
|
||||||||
PDAT
|
||||||||
RUN_DATE
|
||||||||
MT_Parameter
|
||||||||
AZM
|
||||||||
FREQ_MIN
|
||||||||
FREQ_MAX
|
||||||||
MT_MEAS_TYPE
|
||||||||
LMT
|
||||||||
BBMT
|
||||||||
AMT
|
||||||||
RMT
|
||||||||
industryStandardResource
|
||||||||
2DseismicDAQ_Parameter
|
||||||||
SRC_TYPE
|
||||||||
vibrator
|
||||||||
explosive
|
||||||||
hammer
|
||||||||
airgun
|
||||||||
SEN_TYPE
|
||||||||
geophone
|
||||||||
hydrophone
|
||||||||
seismograph
|
||||||||
SEN_SPACING
|
||||||||
SRC_SPACING
|
||||||||
NUM_CH
|
||||||||
CVRG
|
||||||||
SAMP_RATE
|
||||||||
TM_OFFS_MIN
|
||||||||
TM_OFFS_MAX
|
||||||||
NRST_OFFS
|
||||||||
SEIS_METHOD
|
||||||||
refraction
|
||||||||
reflection
|
||||||||
SEIS_WAVE_TYPE
|
||||||||
P
|
||||||||
S
|
||||||||
industryStandardResource
|
||||||||
airborneDAQ_Parameter
|
||||||||
PAR_TYPE
|
||||||||
AVG_SPACING
|
||||||||
LINE_DIST
|
||||||||
TIELINE_DIST
|
||||||||
FLGT_HGT
|
||||||||
NAV_MODE
|
||||||||
visual
|
||||||||
microfix
|
||||||||
video
|
||||||||
DGPS
|
||||||||
FLGT_SPD
|
||||||||
2DseismicProcParameter
|
||||||||
CDP_SPACING
|
||||||||
CDP_FRST
|
||||||||
CDP_LST
|
||||||||
CORR_STATIC
|
||||||||
shallowRefraction
|
||||||||
acousticLog
|
||||||||
automatic
|
||||||||
industryStandardResource
|
||||||||
inversionProcParameter
|
||||||||
MOD_DIM
|
||||||||
INV_METHOD
|
||||||||
leastSquares
|
||||||||
marquardt
|
||||||||
simulatedAnnealing
|
||||||||
geneticAlgorithm
|
||||||||
INV_TYPE
|
||||||||
single
|
||||||||
joint
|
||||||||
gravityProcessParameter
|
||||||||
errorOfClosure
|
||||||||
gravityDatum
|
||||||||
IGSN71
|
||||||||
Potsdam
|
||||||||
MGH50
|
||||||||
MGH2000
|
||||||||
normalCorrectionFormula
|
||||||||
somigliana
|
||||||||
cassinis
|
||||||||
helmert
|
||||||||
heiskanen
|
||||||||
heightCorrectionFormula
|
||||||||
firstOrderFormula
|
||||||||
SecondOrderFormula
|
||||||||
bouguerCorrectionFormula
|
||||||||
bouguerPlate
|
||||||||
sphericalCap
|
||||||||
bouguerCorrectionDensity
|
||||||||
topoCorrectionDensity
|
||||||||
topoCorrection
|
||||||||
innerTopoCorrection
|
||||||||
totalTopoCorrection
|
||||||||
magneticProcessParameter
|
||||||||
IGRF_SYS
|
||||||||
SAMP_RATE
|
||||||||
MAG_RESOL
|
||||||||
GAUSS_FILT_WDTH
|
||||||||
GAUSS_FILT_SIGMA
|
||||||||
HIGH_CUT_FREQ
|
GeophPropertyNameValue
|
VES_Property
|
||||||
APP_RES
|
||||||
APP_CHRG
|
||||||
CURR
|
||||||
VOLTAGE
|
||||||
TDEM_Property
|
||||||
APP_RES_LT
|
||||||
APP_RES_ET
|
||||||
APP_RES
|
||||||
VOLTAGE
|
||||||
DHDT
|
||||||
DHXDT
|
||||||
DHYDT
|
||||||
DHZDT
|
||||||
boreholeLoggingProperty
|
||||||
MATR
|
||||||
C_TP
|
||||||
C_BS
|
||||||
C_RC
|
||||||
C_DI
|
||||||
CORT
|
||||||
CORB
|
||||||
DDEP
|
||||||
ROP
|
||||||
WOB
|
||||||
RPM
|
||||||
TQ
|
||||||
PUMP
|
||||||
TSPM
|
||||||
GPM
|
||||||
ECD
|
||||||
MD
|
||||||
TVD
|
||||||
AZIM
|
||||||
DEVI
|
||||||
RB
|
||||||
NSDR
|
||||||
EWDR
|
||||||
TOPT
|
||||||
TOPB
|
||||||
DEPT
|
||||||
DPHI
|
||||||
GR
|
||||||
PEF
|
||||||
RHOB
|
||||||
NEUT
|
||||||
DEN
|
||||||
SPOR
|
||||||
PERM
|
||||||
CPOR
|
||||||
OIL
|
||||||
SWTR
|
||||||
OILVOL
|
||||||
WTR
|
||||||
MDEN
|
||||||
DTMA
|
||||||
seismicProperty
|
||||||
seismicReflectivity
|
||||||
seismicVelocity
|
||||||
Vp
|
||||||
Vs
|
||||||
seismicAmplitude
|
||||||
gravimetricProperty
|
||||||
density
|
||||||
gravityBouguerAnomaly
|
||||||
gravityFreeAirAnomaly
|
||||||
observedGravity
|
||||||
magneticProperty
|
||||||
IGRF
|
||||||
magneticFieldVector
|
||||||
MAG_X
|
||||||
MAG_Y
|
||||||
MAG_Z
|
||||||
MAG_T
|
||||||
MAG_H
|
||||||
MAG_INCL
|
||||||
MAG_DECL
|
||||||
magneticFieldAnomaly
|
||||||
MAG_DT
|
||||||
MAG_DZ
|
||||||
MAG_DH
|
||||||
electromagneticProperty
|
||||||
conductivity
|
||||||
resistivity
|
||||||
chargeability
|
||||||
radiometricProperty
|
||||||
totalGammaRadiation
|
||||||
RAD_TC
|
||||||
RAD_EQ_TH
|
||||||
RAD_EQ_U
|
||||||
RAD_K
|
||||||
RAD_TH
|
||||||
RAD_U
|
||||||
RAD_DR
|
||||||
RAD_TR
|
||||||
RAD_CS137
|
||||||
seismologicProperty
|
||||||
seismologyMagnitude
|
||||||
seismologyfocalDistribution
|
||||||
MT_Property
|
||||||
MT_Ex
|
||||||
MT_Ey
|
||||||
MT_Hx
|
||||||
MT_Hy
|
||||||
MT_Hz
|
||||||
MT_impedanceTensor
|
||||||
MT_RE_Zxx
|
||||||
MT_IM_Zxx
|
||||||
MT_RE_Zxy
|
||||||
MT_IM_Zxy
|
||||||
MT_RE_Zyx
|
||||||
MT_IM_Zyx
|
||||||
MT_RE_Zyy
|
||||||
MT_IM_Zyy
|
||||||
MT_RE_Tx
|
||||||
MT_IM_Tx
|
||||||
MT_RE_Ty
|
||||||
MT_IM_Ty
|
||||||
MT_resistivity
|
||||||
MT_ROxx
|
||||||
MT_ROxy
|
||||||
MT_ROyx
|
||||||
MT_ROyy
|
||||||
MT_phase
|
||||||
MT_PHxx
|
||||||
MT_PHxy
|
||||||
MT_PHyx
|
||||||
MT_PHyy
|
OtherGeophModelTypeValue
|
spotModel
|
||||||
earthquakeFocalPoint
|
||||||
persistantScatterer
|
||||||
discreteSurfaceModel
|
||||||
horizontalCrossSection
|
||||||
verticalCrossSection
|
||||||
discreteSolidModel
|
||||||
geophysicalBodyReconstruction
|
OtherMeasurementTypeValue
|
3DMultielectrodeDC
|
ResourceTypeValue
|
boreholeLoggingResource
|
||||
coverage
|
||||
EDI
|
||||
IAGA2002
|
||||
IMFV1.22
|
||||
INTERMAGNETResource
|
||||
LAS
|
||||
magneticResource
|
||||
magnetotelluricResource
|
||||
OGC_Resource
|
||||
SEG-D
|
||||
SEG-Y
|
||||
seismicResource
|
||||
SensorML
|
||||
SPS
|
||||
SWE
|
||||
UKOOA
|
||||
WITSML
|
SolidGridModelTypeValue
|
parameterBlock
|
||||
seismicVolume
|
SurfaceGridModelTypeValue
|
horizontalParameterGrid
|
||||
seismicDepthSection
|
||||
seismicHorizon
|
||||
verticalParameterGrid
|
Annex E: Aquifers and Groundwater bodies - (informative)
E.1. Aquifers and Groundwater bodies
E.1.1. Introduction
Water has always been the basis for human existence. World water use in the past century grew twice as fast as world population. Groundwater has been described as "our Hidden Asset" and although this is a truism groundwater makes up about twenty percent of the world’s fresh water supply. As far as "clean", drinking water resources are concerned it is much more. Groundwater is one of the most important components of water cycle in environment (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 Summary of groundwater processes.
The European Union has recognized the need for a consistent framework for legislation on water management. According to the Water Framework Directive (WFD) introduced in 2000 water is not a commercial product like any other but, rather, a heritage which must be protected, defended and treated as such.
Hydrogeology describes the flow, condition of occurrence and behaviour of water in the underground environment. It is a science located between hydrology and geology, whilst it is necessary to have an understanding of both disciplines. Hydrological processes are responsible for the quantity of water supply e.g. as a result of aquifer recharge. On the other hand, the physical properties and composition of the geologic materials (rocks and sediments) create the main environment for groundwater flow and storage and rocks and sediments also influence groundwater quality as a result of their chemical composition.
Groundwater can be both a resource and a problem depending on what activity is being undertaken. A positive benefit is abstraction for drinking water supply, whereas groundwater flooding causes significant problems to properties and transport infrastructure. Hydrogeology has a direct influence on the environment; groundwater abstraction not only provides water for human consumption but also can cause changes in water flow direction and in some cases may have a dramatic impact on surface water bodies. Overexploitation in an area where groundwater dependent ecosystems are located may change the water table level or the chemical composition of water which may lead to irreversible changes in the ecosystems.
In terms of INSPIRE, the groundwater domain has many connections and dependencies on other human activities described in other themes (Area Management, Soil, Environmental Facilities, Energy Resources, Hydrography, Protected Sites, Utility and Governmental Services). Contamination introduced to groundwater systems takes years to decades to be cleaned out. Prediction is a problem but slow rates of flushing and low rates of degradation are significant issues.
This document intends to introduce groundwater issues to the members of the INSPIRE Geology and Mineral Resources TWG.
E.1.2. Background to groundwater processes
One suitable source of background information for groundwater issues is the UK’s groundwater forum website – www.groundwateruk.org. The section "Groundwater in Depth", see www.groundwateruk.org/Groundwater-in-depth.aspx, has some excellent articles on some of the issues introduced below.
Hydrogeology is a large and complex subject involving the appreciation of many aspects of groundwater, including flow, solute and heat transport, and multi-phase flow. The discipline also includes the study of the unique ecology that inhabits the sub-surface water environment. However, for the purposes of this document, a short summary of the most important aspect of groundwater is required.
Traditionally sub-surface flow of water has been defined as occurring in aquifers, which consist of permeable rocks through which water can flow. These aquifers can be separated by aquitards which are less permeable, or are not as good at passing water through them. In the extreme low permeability case, aquicludes are defined as geological strata which impede the flow of water. However, in the last decade, this definition has been seen as too simplistic and the concept of a groundwater system has been developed. This concept allows the study of the sub-surface water environment in a holistic way which better reflects the hydrological cycle.
Typically the approach to understanding a groundwater system is to determine the inflows, outflows and the movement of water through the system (see Fig. 2). For example the WHO defines a groundwater system as "a discrete, closed three-dimensional system containing flow paths from the point at which recharging water enters an aquifer to the topographically lower point at which it leaves the aquifer (WHO 2006)". Inflows to and outflows from the system can be effected by both natural and anthropogenic factors.
Fig. 2 Example groundwater system showing inflows and outflows and time of travel of water through the system. (GWMate briefing note no. 2: Characterization of Groundwater Systems).
Inflow: The majority of recharge occurs through the soil zone, especially in temperate countries, such as those in Europe. Recharge is defined as the amount of water leaving the soil zone that can eventually reach the groundwater table. Other ways water can be emplaced in the groundwater system include artificial recharge by injecting water into the aquifer via boreholes or surface ponds.
Outflow: There are a number of natural ways that water can leave a groundwater system. These include baseflow to rivers, springflow and outflow to the sea. The most obvious man made outflow to any groundwater system is pumped abstraction from a borehole.
The interaction between rivers and groundwater is complex; rivers can provide both inflow and outflow to the system (Fig. 3) and this can change with time depending on the relationship of the river stage and groundwater head locally. When the groundwater head is below the river stage then water can flow from the river to the aquifer beneath the river. When the flow in the river reduces and thus the stage, then the flow direction can be reversed and the groundwater system can provide an input to the river (Fig. 3). The contribution of groundwater to a river is normally termed "baseflow".
Fig. 3 Different types of river-aquifer interaction (GWMate briefing note no. 2: Characterization of Groundwater Systems).
There are a number of different ways that groundwater can move through the sub-surface (Fig. 4): flow through porous media, flow through fractured aquifers and karstic flow. Flow through porous media is characterised by water moving through the gaps between the rock particles, often in unconsolidated deposits. Where water movement exploits cracks or fissures in the rock to move then this is termed fracture flow. In the extreme case large connected conduit or even "cave" systems can be developed and water movement through this system is termed karstic flow.
Fig. 4 Different types of flow regimes in groundwater systems (www.goodquarry.com).
Groundwater systems can be exploited for a number of uses: supply, including water for drinking, heat reservoir, repository for waste (solid and liquid), a store for excess water during the winter, to name but a few. Groundwater systems are used by humans in many ways and an understanding of the complex interaction between the natural system and the effects of human intervention needs to be developed, normally called conceptualisation.
Conceptualisation: collect data, develop an understanding of the groundwater system and formalise this understanding into a conceptual model, quantify processes including water balance and then create a model of the system. Attention needs to be given to the question that is under consideration.
E.1.3. Description of issues
Traditionally the study of groundwater has been categorised as examining either water quantity or quality; the former examining the amount of groundwater flow and the latter examining the solutes dissolved in groundwater. However, the occurrence and use groundwater is much wider than this. For example as part of climate change mitigation, groundwater systems have been recognised as heat stores for ground source heat pumps and saline aquifers for the disposal of supercritical CO2.
Groundwater flow
Groundwater flow is important for supporting abstractions for water supply for domestic (i.e. people in their homes) as well as industrial purposes. It is also important to support river flows for ecological purposes, amenity value (people to enjoy their surroundings), etc. Groundwater dependent ecosystems, as the name suggests, are also supported by sub-surface flows. These include wetlands, which can be small areas fed by seeps to large nationally significant bodies.
Pollution
Aquifers are vulnerable to polluting activities. These include "catastrophic" events such as accidental spills, i.e. a road tanker crash, to diffuse pollution from agricultural activities. European countries have a long history of industrial activities and groundwater has been polluted from these processes. Understanding the vulnerability of groundwater systems to pollution from current activities and clean-up of aquifers from past activities is equally important. Polluted groundwater can contribute to pollution in rivers, lakes and the seas as well as causing hazards for activities such as mining, etc.
Natural attenuation
Reliance on natural attenuation processes (within the context of a carefully controlled and monitored site cleanup approach) to achieve site-specific remediation objectives within a time frame that is reasonable compared to that offered by other more active methods. The 'natural attenuation processes' that are at work in such a remediation approach include a variety of physical, chemical, or biological processes that, under favourable conditions, act without human intervention to reduce the mass, toxicity, mobility, volume, or concentration of contaminants in soil or groundwater. These in-situ processes include biodegradation; dispersion; dilution; sorption; volatilization; radioactive decay; and chemical or biological stabilization, transformation, or destruction of contaminants.
Saline aquifers
Saline aquifers occur in a range of settings. Aquifers in close proximity to estuaries and the sea are often saline. Deep aquifers with old or "connate" waters are also often highly saline. Basins of internal drainage, where evaporation is the only outflow are highly saline. Saline intrusion is a problem where abstraction occurs in aquifers close to saline water bodies. Careful management has to be undertaken to avoid despoiling the systems permanently. However, deep saline aquifers are being considered for disposal of supercritical CO2. Finally highly saline aquifers that are the result of evaporative processes often contain economically important minerals and are exploited commercially.
Geotechnical considerations
The interaction of groundwater with the built environment is extremely important. As the water content or pore pressure of the ground changes so does its geotechnical properties. For example, rising groundwater in cities causes problems with deep foundations and tunnels. An understanding of water movement in the sub-surface is, therefore, important to ensure safe construction of buildings. Dewatering of aquifers for temporary works is also important to allow sub-water table working in construction works.
Groundwater monitoring
Groundwater, in view of its prevalence and quality is a very important source of supply for the population with drinking water. Because of its economic importance and the widespread risks to water quality caused by pollution discharged to the ground, it requires special protection. This protection is achieved, inter alia, by using amonitoring network for both qualitative and quantitative aspects of groundwater status.
Geohazards
As well as being a resource, groundwater can cause problems either by appearing at the surface or by entering sub-surface structures. Groundwater flooding is one such problem. Under extreme recharge events, the water table can rise to the surface and result in flooding. Groundwater flooding differs from surface water flooding in that it is often long-lasting, typically of the order of weeks to months and can affect areas not identified in traditional flood risk mapping. Unlike surface water floods, it is not possible to control this phenomenon easily by flood defences.
Other geohazards that are related to groundwater include:
-
landslides
-
swell-shrink clays
-
subsidence
All of these geohazards need an assessment of water movement in the sub-surface to understand how they occur and what influence human activity and climate change will have on them.
Heat
Heat flows both into and out of aquifers are increasingly being recognised as a way of reducing reliance on fossil fuels. Groundwater systems and aquifers are being developed to be used as a temporary store for heat. Systems may be based on pumping groundwater into and out of an aquifer using boreholes, such as Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHP), or heat exchange in trenches or boreholes for Ground Coupled Heat Pumps (GCHP). Groundwater can also be used to exploit hotter rocks close to the surface by pumping cold water down or abstracting hot water. These systems can be used to heat, cool and power systems in buildings. Where very elevated groundwater temperatures are found, electricity generation is possible.
Mineral resources
Exploitation of mineral resources requires the control of water where it isn’t wanted and supply of water where it is in short supply. So-called "wet working" of mines requires removal of water where it enters the mine. However mining requires water to operate its processes so in some areas, where water is scare, then groundwater can be used for supply purposes. Groundwater can be rich in minerals and the economic extraction of minerals from groundwaters is possible for high value minerals such as Lithium. As well as this mineral waters can be thought of groundwater as an economic resource, with the dissolved solids giving the water its taste, e.g. bottled waters.
E.1.4. Approach to data models
Fig. 5 Example of an aquifer system
The Aquifer System is dependent of rock properties such as permeability and porosity for water flow and storage. Generally the two main components are Aquifers (e.g. sand and gravel) where water flow is may easily occur and Aquitards, which are poorly permeable formations (e.g. clay) that do not yield water freely to a well or a spring. However, an aquitard may transmit appreciable water to or from adjacent aquifers.
Fig. 6 Example of a groundwater flow system
The aquifer system provides a framework for the groundwater flow system and encompasses it. The nature of the groundwater flow system depends partly on the aquifer system but also on factors such as the geometry of the water table (or confined potentiometric surface) and the location of discharge points such as rivers, springs and wells. Groundwater bodies are discrete bodies of groundwater lying within a groundwater flow system'.
The basic idea of the INSPIRE model for groundwater is to identify two basic elements: the Aquifer System (dependent on the geological conditions) and the Groundwater Flow System. Both components taken together create the Hydrogeological System.
Fig. 7 Example of an hydrogeological system
The mutual relationships between those components create and build the condition for groundwater flow. The main assessment of model is base on the hydrodynamic processes (groundwater flow).
E.1.5. Relevant EU legislation
There is a significant amount of EU legislation that impacts on groundwater systems and their management. The following provides a list of the relevant EU legislation. The most important piece of legislation in terms of shaping how groundwater systems are conceptualised and managed is the water framework Directive. This legislation has encapsulated the changes in approach to the study of groundwater flow described above.
Bathing Water Directive 76/160/EEC
Birds Directive 79/409/EEC
Drinking Water Directive 98/83/EEC
Major Accidents (Seveso) Directive 96/82/EC
Environment Impact Assessment 85/337/EEC
Sewage Sludge Directive 86/278/EEC
Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive 91/271/EEC
Plant Protection Products Directive 91/414/EEC
Nitrates Directive 91/676/EEC
Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC
Integrated Pollution Prevention Control 96/61/EEC
Nitrates Directive
Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive
Plant Protection Products Directive - Directive 91/414/EEC, OJ L230 of 19.08.1991
Biocides Directive - Directive 98/8/EC, OJ L123 of 24.04.1998
Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) Directive - Directive 96/61/EEC, OJ L257 of 10.10.1996
Landfill Directive - Directive 99/31/EC, OJ L182 of 16.07.1999
Waste Framework Directive - Directive 2006/12/EC, OJ L102 of 11.04.2006
Construction Product Directive - Directive 89/106/EC, OJ L40 of 11.02.1989
Floods Directive 2007/60/EC
Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)
Groundwater Directive (2006/118/EC)
Groundwater Directive (80/ 68/EEC)